Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

another "law-abiding" gun goofball rampage

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D.

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 8:16:00 PM1/4/10
to

(CNN) -- A man dressed in black walked into the lobby of a federal
courthouse in Las Vegas, Nevada, pulled a shotgun from underneath his
jacket and opened fire Monday, killing a court security officer and
injuring a deputy U.S. marshal, an FBI spokesman said.
-----------------------------------

...and the gun goofballs tell us if every "law-abiding" person carries
a gun these firearm shootouts will hardly ever occur...

we know better
;-)

edi...@netpath.net

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 11:03:43 PM1/4/10
to
On Jan 4, 8:16 pm, "Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D." <d...@coldine.edu> wrote:
> (CNN) -- A man dressed in black walked into the lobby of a federal
> courthouse in Las Vegas, Nevada, pulled a shotgun from underneath his
> jacket and opened fire Monday, killing a court security officer and
> injuring a deputy U.S. marshal, an FBI spokesman said.

NOTHING in that clip from a news story says what his prior criminal
record was - so quit trying to bullshit the world about how he was
"law-abiding" until then.

http://www.Internet-Gun-Show.com- your source for hard-to-find stuff!

Mr. Albritton

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 12:03:21 AM1/5/10
to


Exactly how were this man's actions "law abiding?"

You really ARE stupid if you think that this guy wasn't breaking the law in
this situation.

James Meyers

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 10:51:27 AM1/5/10
to

"Mr. Albritton" <albri...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hhuh6r$guj$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
May I ask why you respond to this jerk. And also leave the subject line the
way he wants it to be?

Mr. Albritton

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 11:29:42 AM1/5/10
to
>> You really ARE stupid if you think that this guy wasn't breaking the law
>> in this situation.
> May I ask why you respond to this jerk. And also leave the subject line
> the
> way he wants it to be?

1.) To call him out and prove him wrong at his own game.
2.) If I leave the subject line the same, he runs a higher chance of
reading reply and responding to it.... further proving how wrong and
unintelligent he really is.

P.S. If I just stand by and "watch" him spew all of this nonsense, then
people will actually start buying into all of these lies.

How do you think this whole gun control movement got started in the first
place????

Because all of the people who knew that this "speech" was nothing but lies
quietly stood by and said nothing.

Message has been deleted
0 new messages