Orange Warlord’s lawyers worried the FBI might have seized evidence relevant to other crimes during Mar-a-Lago raid

[Willie Whittaker is a Putin Cock Sucker <NoEmail@void.net>]

Orange Warlord’s lawyers worried the FBI might have seized evidence
relevant to other crimes during Mar-a-Lago raid

Claiming their fat client's Fourth Amendment rights were violated during
the August 8th FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago and just hours before their big
hearing in front of a panel at the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals,
disgraced former President Trump's lawyers filed a motion with shitty
federal Judge Aileen Cannon to try to get her to hand them an
un-redacted copy of the search warrant affidavit.

It's not clear they're even in the right court as it was not Cannon, but
Federal Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart who originally approved the
warrant. The motion itself is the usual Trump victimhood type bullshit,
but by far the best part comes in a footnote on the seventh page:

"A general rummaging through the belongings of President Trump is a
particularly ominous moment in law enforcement history. With DOJ and
some state officials engaging in various efforts to investigate
President Trump, the search smacks of pretextual conduct with hopes of
feeding personal documents to prosecutors or agents who might find use
for them in unrelated pursuits. Authorization to seize 'any other
containers/boxes that are collectively stored or found together with the
aforementioned documents and containers/boxes' is an invitation to
'rummage,' which every court has recognized as barred under the Fourth
Amendment," Trump's lawyers write.

Meaning they think it's unfair that the FBI might have (and probably
did) collect evidence that would be sought by New York Attorney General
Letitia James, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, and
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg in their respective
investigations, not to mention the other federal prosecutors
investigating Trump for trying to overturn the 2020 election. Very sad!