On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:32:03 -0700 (PDT), Carl Gundel
<
basic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>That sounds cool.
I'm always up for messing around with things, but how did you come by
the amp? Did you buy it, but don't like it? Did someone give it to
you?
-
There's one in the pawn shop around corner, a 2x12 100watter, for $300
and change. Excellent shape. The one before looked like a wet dog
that had semi-dried after flood water had gotten into the cab's
fiberboard and loosened up tolex. Same price. I might have given
them $125 for it to cannibalize up another head and consider the deal
fair ($75 if you want to get really get sweet thing going on me).
Problem, I find or am semi-agreeable with others, is the VK basically
has no glaring design flaws. I've an early 212 - 46l6 100wat model.
The speakers I did find objectionable, although I did not try mounting
them in a closeback halfstack, I have, as others seem find (more)
acceptable;- they will "fart," though, in an open amp as supplied by
Peavey -- only so happens that I'm flush in various better-regarded
Eminence speakers. Praise the Lord.
Not all amps do have adjustable bias - even though Peavey's founder
did style the VK as an affordable "boutique amp," for the masses -
"frontend" user accessible bias adjustments are traditionally reserved
for amp technicians and only provided on but a few amps -exceptions-
certainly not among a $400 pricetag on a VK head, mine initially cost
(I "converted" mine, the 212, into a head, btw, with a slab of wooden
beneath;- particle board VK cabinets are constructed I found too be
altogether irritating, weighty and distracting).
Virtually any amp, practically, then, stands to benefit with the added
expensive of conveying, to an musical amp electronic technician, what
subjective tonal qualities subjectively in biasing tubes, in fact,
entail;- to couple furthermore with a rising price of various suitable
"boutique-branded" tubes, for what such qualified technical care
indeed, conceivably, might exceed over and by an initial cost of
today's tubed-powered alternatives among mass-production, value amps.
Which would include the VK.
Some, as well, manage with the distortion channel as it is, others
prefer driving the clean channel hard for their distortion;- hardly
any, I'm aware of, would forgo the clean channel's reputation and an
integral it brings to the VK's popularity. Bass, I might add, be what
it may on the distortion channel, doesn't apply to the clean. Quite
the opposite I find with a 4x12 closed cab.
One thing, though, about the mods is they're not as complex as, say,
messing with tonestack on a Peavey Windsor - Peavey, or as it was
initially received, touted out for its "Marshall Killer." (Too
"retro" for many, the Windsor, in popular reception, even if among
wider regard, "loud as hell," still, Mesa and other Peavey
design-addressable "metal amps" do garner a fair following among
serious or performing musicians, modern changing styles, et alia.)
Some consequently will say a "modded VK" sounds that - like a modded
VK and not a $2000 Marshall amp.
Gaining overall a better perspective, however, of subtleties - what
precisely is a clean valved amp, (the VK again stands well among
regards), refining an appreciation of possibilities affecting amps and
their tones - there's a hell of lot better amps, than the VK, better
musicians, yet, have risen above by performing their own mods. I'll
bet.
The VK, incidentally has a couple other mods I've noticed - a MESA
distortion mod, as well a sag-characteristic rectifier stage mod (not
a tube rectifier, that you should be so lucky). Mention might as well
include pulling the entire rear "texture" module for forgoing an
ersatz Class-A "travesty," ostensibly, against balances in the power
tranny, strictly to operate in push-pull A/B operation, as of course
the VK fundamentally is designed;- others, however, observe that the
textured design is actually well-implemented for what it's intended to
achieve.
Apart from modifying the bias circuitry for setting my own tubes'
amperage, I've really no burning desire offhand to jump into what
fires a perception about what goes crunch in the night with Ch2's
fuzzbuzz. Then again I suppose I really do like my cleans.
In my mind any rationally sane amp-lover's amp ought, per force, to
have bias adjustment. Why they all haven't is simply because the
world isn't quite so perfect as I would wish.