Where can the rest of us find this "recored" you refer to?
You wanna know what *really set him off against me? It was this exchange
almost three years ago. Sokolich, aka The Ghost, aka a Zillion other
aliases was responding to Mike Rieves (aka Porky and a few others).
> Whatever letter it is to which you are referring, you didn't receive
> from me. Also, "Please do" doesn't constitute a question, you
> pig-headed moron.
(I replied to the above with...)
From the dictionary...
Please - If it is your desire or pleasure; if you please. Used in polite
*requests* (emphasis added)
Request - To express a desire for; ask for
Ghost - see Gary Sokolich
Gary Sokolich - A person of moderate to severe mental retardation having
a mental age of from three to seven years and generally being capable of
some degree of communication and performance of simple tasks under
supervision. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in
use and is now considered offensive.
----
That was when he started in with all that slander and libel nonsense.
He's been going strong ever since, but mostly with Mike, though. I think
at this point he actually *likes* me, believe it or not. BTW, did you
know his MySpace page auto-plays music *and* video?
All this from three years ago? The clown needs a hobby. And a life. Or, a
bullet in the head.
Gentlemen, when someone starts a thread like this, there is no response
which counts as win - it's best just to ignore it and not play his game.
Just my opinion.
-S-
I know, but sometimes I can't resist toying with delusional individuals.
Yeah, I know, me, too, sometimes, but I always try to remember that what
they're after is not to slur someone's reputation; what they're after is
to get attention, and that attention comes in the form of a response,
any response, to their postings. If you respond at all, they win and
they'll be back to do it again. The only hope of getting them to go
away is to ignore them.
-S-
> I think at this point he actually *likes* me, believe it or not.
Think again, asswipe.
> The clown needs a hobby. And a life.
> Or, a bullet in the head.
As do you.
Not so fast, clown. We need to see specific links. You made a claim, you
back it up. You do the leg work.
Why should I? To immoral degenrates like you, it wouldn't matter any way.
Your bias in favor of psychopathic and sociopathic scumbags like Jim Carr
stands out like a pile of dog crap in the middle of a white living room
rug.
.
Now I'm immoral? I'm going to need to know why. No links permitted. Write
it.
Subject: Re: Jim Carr: Admirable Human Being or Contemptible Piece of
Human Waste?
From: "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishbo...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.guitar.bass
"Jim Carr" <newsg...@azwebpages.com> wrote in message
news:uf61j.26785$aN3...@newsfe12.phx...
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>> "utellme" <ute...@cesspool.com> wrote in message
>> news:ae6cf$4744e1e0$44b791e3$22...@news.flashnewsgroups.com...
>>> Check the recored before you insult yourself with your ignorance.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Where can the rest of us find this "recored" you refer to?
>
All this from three years ago? The clown needs a hobby. And a life. Or,
hey Joe why do you continue to feed this idiot? Yes.. I have him
*plonked*. It just interests me when regulars encourage this sort of thing.
It's fun to watch him implode.
Pray tell, what else interests your simple mind?
Almost as much fun as watching immoral degenerates like you flaunt their
lack of character as if it were a badge of honor.
Why do you think I'm immoral? Are you man enough to answer this question
this time?
Well, considering he's still at it after 3 years, the chances of 'him'
actually impoding are almost negligible.
So all feeding him does is continue the boring old cycle - which really
isn't that entertaining.
--- Derek
--
Derek Tearne - de...@url.co.nz
Many Hands - Trans Cultural Music from Aotearoa/New Zealand
http://www.manyhands.co.nz/
I think it's broken....
Try to thump it over the top.
It may not fix it but it always feels good.
Jose
I am certainly open to the possibility that my assessment of you is
incorrect. So, here's the deal. You review the litany of defamatory
lies about me that Jim Carr and Mike Rieves have posted on the internet.
You then tell me whether you admire them or whether you think that they
are a couple of sociopathic pieces of white trash. Then, if you still
need me to answer your question, I will do so.
I need you to answer the question I asked RIGHT NOW. I'm assuming you're
able to spot the question.
> So, here's the deal. You review the litany of defamatory
> lies about me that Jim Carr and Mike Rieves have posted on the internet.
Aw, boo hoo. Someone hurt yer feeling?....poor l'il guy.
> You then tell me whether you admire them or whether you think that they
> are a couple of sociopathic pieces of white trash.
THEY'RE *WHITE???*
Bastards.
Is this the "Statue of Limitations" guy, back for another thumping?
David
Watch out, everyone! He's got a lawyer, and he's not afraid to use it!
The only thing that you need RIGHT NOW is a course in morality and
ethics.
> I'm assuming you're able to spot the question.
The answer to your question is well documented in your posting record,
and I'm assuming that you are not so stupid as to be unable to spot the
answer.
Wow!
Another sociopath proudly emerges in this cesspool.
Why am I not surprised?
> Wow!
> Another sociopath proudly emerges in this cesspool.
> Why am I not surprised?
Because you traded yer capacity for surprise for cynicism.
I don't need to. I nailed it.
I've just come to a shiny new clinical conclusion, just for you:
You need to be killed.
It's uncanny! You *must* be Hugo Chavez!!!
Jose
> I've just come to a shiny new clinical conclusion, just for you:
Congratulations, moron. I trust that the neural overload that occurred
within in your little peanut brain, didn't result in any permanent damage.
> You need to be killed.
As do you.
Furthermore, let me suggest that you put some padding on your spare bedroom
door so that you can deny hearing the authorities knocking after they break
it down and haul your pathetic ass off to jail where it clearly belongs.
Only in the minds of jackasses like you who condone and applaud immoral,
sociopathic behavior.
>> Is this the "Statue of Limitations" guy, back for another thumping?
>
> Watch out, everyone! He's got a lawyer, and he's not afraid to use it!
My lawyer has advised me that hiring Guido to deal with issues like this
would be much more cost efficient than hiring him, and that hiring Guido
would have the added benefit of providing a guaranteed result.
As a lawyer who provides legal advice that is worth no more than what
someone pays you for it, what do you think?
>
> Aw, boo hoo. Someone hurt yer feeling?....poor l'il guy.
Hurt feelings were when Jim Carr's first wife dumped him in favor of
someone with a moral conscience as well as a dick that she can see.
Obviously, that someone isn't you.
Hurt feelings were also when your neighbor's dog jumped your girlfriend
because the dog correctly sensed that she was one of his species in heat.
> "Steve Freides" <st...@fridayscomputer.com> wrote in message
> news:5qlk4uF...@mid.individual.net...
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishbo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:cP51j.20951$ya1...@news02.roc.ny...
>>> "utellme" <ute...@cesspool.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ae6cf$4744e1e0$44b791e3$22...@news.flashnewsgroups.com...
>>>> Check the recored before you insult yourself with your ignorance.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Where can the rest of us find this "recored" you refer to?
>>
>> Gentlemen, when someone starts a thread like this, there is no response
>> which counts as win - it's best just to ignore it and not play his game.
>>
>> Just my opinion.
>
>
> I know, but sometimes I can't resist toying with delusional individuals.
Or resist displaying your obvious ignorance and lack of moral character.
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishbo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:cP51j.20951$ya1...@news02.roc.ny...
>> "utellme" <ute...@cesspool.com> wrote in message
>> news:ae6cf$4744e1e0$44b791e3$22...@news.flashnewsgroups.com...
>>> Check the recored before you insult yourself with your ignorance.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Where can the rest of us find this "recored" you refer to?
>
> Gentlemen, when someone starts a thread like this, there is no response
> which counts as win - it's best just to ignore it and not play his game.
>
> Just my opinion.
> -S-
Assuming that you don't have shit for brains and that you are not totally
devoid of moral character, perhaps you should consider the following.
"All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing." -
-- Edmund Burke
The only thing that you've ever nailed is your dog.
> The only thing that you've ever nailed is your dog.
No, I got it right you just aren't man enough to admit it.
Picture a group of teenagers walking around the neighborhood kicking
fences to make the dogs bark. You're the dog.
Seriously, Jeff (and everyone else), this guy is so utterly convinced of
his own superiority that *any* reaction from you is seen as a success on
his part. He despises everyone. Do you ever feel insulted by someone you
despise and consider your inferior in every possible way (intellectual,
moral, etc.)? In terms of arrogance this guy makes me look like Ghandi
(your choice which one).
He's been at this for over three years now, so it's pretty clear he's
not going to stop. The the thing is he writes far more replies than he
does new topics, so stop replying to him.
If you want to feel like you "got" him understand that *every* time he
starts a new thread, it's because he's failed to get the attention he
wants. If nobody replies, we win. So far we're collectively 0 for 572,
so let's try to win one, eh?
I got no illusions I'm gonna get through to this freak...I was just
having fun baiting the crazy dude.
> I got no illusions I'm gonna get through to this freak...I was just
> having fun baiting the crazy dude.
It's not baiting when you're doing *exactly* what he wants you to do.
I like to think of it as a symbiotic moronic relationship.....
> jeffb wrote:
>> utellme wrote:
>>
>>> The only thing that you've ever nailed is your dog.
>>
>> No, I got it right you just aren't man enough to admit it.
>
> Picture a group of teenagers walking around the neighborhood kicking
> fences to make the dogs bark.
> You're the dog.
Since you are replying, doesn't that make you one of the barking dogs?
> Seriously, Jeff (and everyone else), this guy is so utterly convinced of
> his own superiority that *any* reaction from you is seen as a success on
> his part. He despises everyone.
No. I only despise pathological liars and conscienceless, sociopathic
scumbags like you.
> Do you ever feel insulted by someone you
> despise and consider your inferior in every possible way (intellectual,
> moral, etc.)? In terms of arrogance this guy makes me look like Ghandi
> (your choice which one).
Given the criticism for arrogance that you have received in this newsgroup,
the only thing that I make you look like is pot calling the kettle black.
> He's been at this for over three years now, so it's pretty clear he's
> not going to stop.
You started it and you repeatedly escalated it. So, if you are looking for
someone to blame, take a look in the mirror, asswipe.
> The the thing is he writes far more replies than he
> does new topics, so stop replying to him.
By all means. Do exactly what Jim Carr tells you to do. After all, Jim
Carr knows what's best for all mindless pathetic dupes like you.
> If you want to feel like you "got" him understand that *every* time he
> starts a new thread, it's because he's failed to get the attention he
> wants.
This thread is, of course, a perfect example of the sort of failure to
which you refer.
> If nobody replies, we win. So far we're collectively 0 for 572,
> so let's try to win one, eh?
Transalation: If nobody replies, Jim Carr wins.
Here's a serious warning, Jeff, once this guy latches on to you, you cannot
stop him, he will follow you everywhere you go on Usenet and he will not
stop harrassing you. He isn't your typical troll, and despite how he comes
off here, he is very well educated and in all other things than Usenet
relationships, quite intelligent, and he just might be unbalanced enough to
be dangerous.
>
> "jeffb" <je...@nospam.org> wrote in message
> news:qUO5j.3957$sg.814@pd7urf1no...
>> Jim Carr wrote:
>>> jeffb wrote:
>>>
>>>> I got no illusions I'm gonna get through to this freak...I was just
>>>> having fun baiting the crazy dude.
>>>
>>> It's not baiting when you're doing *exactly* what he wants you to
>>> do.
>>
>> I like to think of it as a symbiotic moronic relationship.....
>
> Here's a serious warning, Jeff, once this guy latches on to you, you
> cannot stop him, he will follow you everywhere you go on Usenet and he
> will not stop harrassing you.
Quite the contrary. Jeff is little more than a naive dupe who has enabled
me to keep this thread going. Other than the Beavis & Butt-Head duo, I have
no interest in Jeff or anyone else in this newsgroup. What is particularly
hillarious to me is that Beavis and Butt-Head now have each other in their
respective killfiles. Consequently, the debate between you and Jim Carr
over which of you is Beavis and which of you is Butt-Head is not likely to
be resolved anytime soon.
> He isn't your typical troll, and despite
> how he comes off here, he is very well educated and in all other
> things than Usenet relationships, quite intelligent, and he just might
> be unbalanced enough to be dangerous.
Given your track record both here and in alt.music.home studio, you are
hardly in a credible position to be calling anyone unbalanced.. Also,
everyone who is skilled in martial arts is dangerous, but only when
attacked.