Contact me by private e-mail regarding offensive messages
(including bestiality) sent to the Yahoo Guitar Amplifiers
group, from a spoofed lordvalve2004 yahoo ID, which
originated from your unique IP address.
This message is left here because you have not responded to
my private e-mail and I know that you read this forum.
Contact me at j...@seattle-attorney.com if you wish to say
anything before I complete my contacts with Yahoo and Cox
ISP, after which time I will post more info to this group,
as I'm sure people are now curious about what appears to be
your childish games.
A copy of this was sent to Willie, as he may be interested
to know that you portrayed him as somebody who has sex with
dogs.
Best,
Tom
Pete
--
Now you know why I used the qualifier "practically" --Bender
>Mr. Mulay:
>
>Contact me by private e-mail regarding offensive messages
<SNIP> blah blah blah
Considering your forum was created to counter the off topic posts in
this forum I find you posting this off topic post here rather amusing.
Just deal with this privately with Marc and wait for his repsonse if
any. If he doesn't respond - oh well - why does AGA need to be
involved?
"PING MARC MULAY" indicates that it is a private message for Marc, because
I can't raise him by private e-mail.
In the words of another AGA poster: "No likee, no clickee" ESPECIALLY
when it's so obvious that it's not an amp message!
>In the words of another AGA poster: "No likee, no clickee" ESPECIALLY
>when it's so obvious that it's not an amp message!
Interesting statement :)
No offense intended, BTW.
>> Just deal with this privately with Marc and wait for his repsonse if
>> any. If he doesn't respond - oh well - why does AGA need to be
>> involved?
>
>"PING MARC MULAY" indicates that it is a private message for Marc, because
>I can't raise him by private e-mail.
Well, it's a good thing you didn't post it at aga since it was a
private message!
>
>In the words of another AGA poster: "No likee, no clickee" ESPECIALLY
>when it's so obvious that it's not an amp message!
Yep.
Actually, I doubt that you need to notify Marc before taking any
action anyhow.
You don't even owe him the courtesy actually.
He agreed to the terms of using your forum, but there was an almost
immediate breach in trust. Right? So hang the SOB. Time to be a
moderator, even if it kills your utopia.
Pete
Kabong!~!~!~!
"Jim Anable" <j...@seattle-attorney.com> wrote in message
news:406DF69F...@seattle-attorney.com...
>As much as I don't want anything to do with your forum, I've got to
>say that that's a pretty weak minded thing that Marc did.
>
>Pete
You're kidding right? That's one of the reasons he's been in my killfile for
quite a while. I'd say it's pretty typical and right in line with his
mentality.
Lostpup198
"The human race divides itself politically
into those who want to be controlled,
and those who have no such desire."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
(1907-1988)
Ping indicates that you want him to post in news group, not that it's a private
message. If it were a private message, you wouldn't post it in a news group.
At least, I would hope that you wouldn't ...
>"PING MARC MULAY" indicates that it is a private message for Marc
I'm afraid this is a public forum and anything posted here is up for
grabs.
>In the words of another AGA poster: "No likee, no clickee" ESPECIALLY
>when it's so obvious that it's not an amp message!
In the words of Eric Cartman "What incredible irony".
Peter
email - alerichatbellsouthdotnet
>
>On 2-Apr-2004, PMG <avo...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> As much as I don't want anything to do with your forum, I've got to
>> say that that's a pretty weak minded thing that Marc did.
>
>Who could be surprised? That's pretty much the same kind of entry he made
>to this group. The guy's got NO class whatsoever, let's face it.
>
>~kp
I wasn't surprised at all. I *was* wondering who'd be the one to do
something like that. I can't say I guessed that Marc Mulay would be
the first.
In all actuality, Jim probably needed a dose of what it's like to
actually moderate someone who really *does* need moderating. I'm not
saying that a moderator is needed here at aga, but forums are a
different situation.
Pete
>In the words of Eric Cartman "What incredible irony".
>
>Peter
Cartman tends to have things figured out. To some extent.
He's definitely got a grasp on how to process each situation.
> Can we see that post?
> I for one would like to see it here on AGA.
>
> Kabong!~!~!~!
You'll have to get Marc to post it.
> >From: Jim Anable j...@seattle-attorney.com
>
> >> Just deal with this privately with Marc and wait for his repsonse if
> >> any. If he doesn't respond - oh well - why does AGA need to be
> >> involved?
> >
> >"PING MARC MULAY" indicates that it is a private message for Marc, because
> >I can't raise him by private e-mail.
> >
> >In the words of another AGA poster: "No likee, no clickee" ESPECIALLY
> >when it's so obvious that it's not an amp message!
> >
> >
> >
>
> Ping indicates that you want him to post in news group, not that it's a private
> message. If it were a private message, you wouldn't post it in a news group.
> At least, I would hope that you wouldn't ...
Technically, isn't "ping" when a computer contacts another and wants an immediate
response? When I "ping" somebody, I'm looking for an immediate response,
regardless of forum. But what I was trying to say is that from the subject, you
could easily see that it was a message for Marc, and not amp related.
Oh, believe me. I fully expected somebody to test the system. It works.
Locating his IP was just icing.
> Considering your forum was created to counter the off topic posts in
> this forum I find you posting this off topic post here rather amusing.
>
> Just deal with this privately with Marc and wait for his repsonse if
> any. If he doesn't respond - oh well - why does AGA need to be
> involved?
In the sense of some folks going out of their way to trash this group, and
now a new discussion forum, it is sort of on topic. And it's handy to have
this sort of thing on file the next time somebody claims to be all innocent
of that sort of screwball behavior.
Nope, not surprised in the least, unless it's to be surprised that a couple
of other turd-flingers didn't beat him to it.
>On 2-Apr-2004, Squid <tentac...@noSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Just deal with this privately with Marc and wait for his repsonse if
>> any. If he doesn't respond - oh well - why does AGA need to be
>> involved?
>
>Because AGA is involved with Mark Mullet, of course!
>
>~kp
>
Actually, I think the reverse is true. There is a lot of AGA that has him in
their killfile, and therefore doesn't *want* to be involved with him.
How do you know it was him in the first place?
And since this group is not moderated, what's wrong with
posting the post in question here to let the rest of us
can see if we can recognize the style or content and
determine who wrote it?
AFAIK, you are making this shit up. I have yet to see any
evidence of the post, much less who the author is.
You're an attorney, right? Let's see what you are referring to.
Otherwise if I was in Marc's position I would consider that libel
for you to allege he posted such a thing without evidence.
Kabong!~!~!~!
>
Kabong!~!~!~! >>
Why, you're too busy posting useless crap on this forum to have any time to
read it.
>Funny, I tired to register on the Yahoo forum, looks like someone already has
>the user name RoccaforteAmps.
You need to have Jim kill that account. Unless Jim just set that up
so that so that nobody else would grab it.
If anyone shows up there pretending to be me, it's not me, it's
somebody else.
I did NOT know that! I was thinking of it in the computer sense, "respond to me
right away."
Sorry about that.
> "Jim Anable" <j...@seattle-attorney.com> wrote in message
> news:406E4A75...@seattle-attorney.com...
> > El Kabong wrote:
> >
> > > Can we see that post?
> > > I for one would like to see it here on AGA.
> > >
> > > Kabong!~!~!~!
> >
> > You'll have to get Marc to post it.
>
> How do you know it was him in the first place?
The full header showed the SAME IP address that is associated with
all of his recent messages to AGA. That ALL I am saying.
> On 03 Apr 2004 19:45:34 GMT, roccafo...@aol.com (RoccaforteAmps)
> wrote:
>
> >Funny, I tired to register on the Yahoo forum, looks like someone already has
> >the user name RoccaforteAmps.
>
> You need to have Jim kill that account.
That's beyond my control. If you do a profiles check, you'll see somebody set it
up in 2001. Maybe Doug, and he forgot his password? I've done that before,
myself...
> On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:17:02 -0800, Jim Anable <j...@seattle-attorney.com> wrote:
>
> > The full header showed the SAME IP address that is associated with
> > all of his recent messages to AGA. That ALL I am saying.
>
> The headers are quite revealing [1], there is nothing else to say...
>
> Lupi
> (Purple Ice)
>
> [1] They betray the poster (and lay bare his true character).
Other than to note that Marc has returned, and did not deny it.
So Yahoo forum accounts work in all Yahoo forums then?
That's odd. But I guess you can set up your ezBoard accounts to work
local for just the one forum, or universally with all ezBoard forums.
PMG wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:25:18 -0800, Jim Anable
> <j...@seattle-attorney.com> wrote:
>
> >PMG wrote:
> >
> >> On 03 Apr 2004 19:45:34 GMT, roccafo...@aol.com (RoccaforteAmps)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Funny, I tired to register on the Yahoo forum, looks like someone already has
> >> >the user name RoccaforteAmps.
> >>
> >> You need to have Jim kill that account.
> >
> >That's beyond my control. If you do a profiles check, you'll see somebody set it
> >up in 2001. Maybe Doug, and he forgot his password? I've done that before,
> >myself...
>
> So Yahoo forum accounts work in all Yahoo forums then?
AFAIK, that's how it works.
Stankin' hot, corn-soup spew shot close-range upon yon beardless red face lays melt
waste to the pimple frost. There IS nothing else to---
Oh wait!
SplurgleGUSHhhhhhhhhh....spurt! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh=======
Oh. Toungue that redeye you Loop!
Lupi Zopi wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:17:02 -0800, Jim Anable <j...@seattle-attorney.com> wrote:
>
> > The full header showed the SAME IP address that is associated with
> > all of his recent messages to AGA. That ALL I am saying.
>
I saw that the first time you posted it, I guess Elka Bong was hitting too much
off the bong to pick up on that ...
>On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:25:18 -0800, Jim Anable
><j...@seattle-attorney.com> wrote:
>
>>PMG wrote:
>>
>>> On 03 Apr 2004 19:45:34 GMT, roccafo...@aol.com (RoccaforteAmps)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Funny, I tired to register on the Yahoo forum, looks like someone already
>has
>>> >the user name RoccaforteAmps.
>>>
>>> You need to have Jim kill that account.
>>
>>That's beyond my control. If you do a profiles check, you'll see somebody
>set it
>>up in 2001. Maybe Doug, and he forgot his password? I've done that before,
>>myself...
>
>So Yahoo forum accounts work in all Yahoo forums then?
When you set up a screen name for a forum on Yahoo, you are actually setting up
a screen name that can be used for all of Yahoo groups.
You are hereby dubbed "Mr. Plonk, Esq. P.C." ;-) You have joined the
cause of Lunitard Control.
Of course, mulay is invisible to most in AGA thanks to killfiles....
> On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:17:02 -0800, Jim Anable <j...@seattle-attorney.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The full header showed the SAME IP address that is associated with
> > all of his recent messages to AGA. That ALL I am saying.
>
>
> The headers are quite revealing [1], there is nothing else to say...
>
> Lupi
> (Purple Ice)
>
> [1] They betray the poster (and lay bare his true character).
>
>
Funny you should mention that. ... . ;-)
Fortunately, he's a lawyer, so changing his name to Mike Anable should
be a piece of cake.
http://angelfood.00freehost.com
Marc Mulay <mvm...@cox.net> wrote in message news:<406FA284...@cox.net>...
Hey Jim, It's pretty clear to me what you had in mind. Damn nice of you to
invite his response, explanation, whiney excuse, whatnot. Wasted, but a nice
gesture.
Ron
>On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:25:18 -0800, Jim Anable
><j...@seattle-attorney.com> wrote:
>
>>PMG wrote:
>>
>>> On 03 Apr 2004 19:45:34 GMT, roccafo...@aol.com (RoccaforteAmps)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Funny, I tired to register on the Yahoo forum, looks like someone already has
>>> >the user name RoccaforteAmps.
>>>
>>> You need to have Jim kill that account.
>>
>>That's beyond my control. If you do a profiles check, you'll see somebody set it
>>up in 2001. Maybe Doug, and he forgot his password? I've done that before,
>>myself...
>
>So Yahoo forum accounts work in all Yahoo forums then?
Yep.
Ron
'bout time dat loopy poivert got wat 'is dum azz dahsoive!!!!
Marc is one of the few posters who uses his real name. Whaddaya mean
you can't find him? What kind of lawyer are you anyways??? I've been
in battle with a couple of real porn sites, not this silly boy stuff
you ninnys complain about. These sites use my registered trademark and
are seriously offensive to my customers. Ping away...maybe you'll
connect to St.Petersburg .ru Don't you have something better to do
like chase some ambulances or something???? woof woof
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:26:23 -0800, Jim Anable
<j...@seattle-attorney.com> wrote:
>Mr. Mulay:
>
>Contact me by private e-mail regarding offensive messages
>(including bestiality) sent to the Yahoo Guitar Amplifiers
>group, from a spoofed lordvalve2004 yahoo ID, which
>originated from your unique IP address.
>
>This message is left here because you have not responded to
>my private e-mail and I know that you read this forum.
>
>Contact me at j...@seattle-attorney.com if you wish to say
>anything before I complete my contacts with Yahoo and Cox
>ISP, after which time I will post more info to this group,
>as I'm sure people are now curious about what appears to be
>your childish games.
>
>A copy of this was sent to Willie, as he may be interested
>to know that you portrayed him as somebody who has sex with
>dogs.
Garsh, that was such an enlightening and informative post of yours.
It should be post of the year!
Congradulation, Dudsville Amps.
Kabong!~!~!~!
Bush is a LIAR - Vote his ass OUT!