Open one of the two original pictures. If it's not already in
RGB mode, change it to RGB. Using the move tool, drag
the picture onto the other (blank) windows. It will be in its
own layer.
Do likewise for the second original picture. It, too, will be in
its own layer.
Be sure you have the layers palette open (Window > Show
Layers menu). Select a layer and use the move tool to move
it into an appropriate position. You can superimpose the layer
to get it into just the right position above the other layer so
that they match.
You can make tonal adjustments to one or the other layer so
that the match is improved.
"jjgil" <jj...@mail.flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a5q6dn$bha$1...@diana.bcn.ttd.net...
:->I'd like to join two pictures of a landscape in order to make a panoramic
:->view, but don't know exactly how to do it. Any help will be appreciated :-)
:->
:->
:->
:->
Get Panavue, it will save a lot of time and effort if you intend to do a
lot of work on Panoramic images :o)
http://www.panavue.com/
--
The reply address is not checked. New update: 19 Feb, 2002.
A Land of lost Dreams.
http://www.planetphotoshop.com/jim18.html
Allan
"jjgil" <jj...@mail.flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a5q6dn$bha$1...@diana.bcn.ttd.net...
I can recommend doing a google web search for "PTAssembler", a cool
program that makes the stitching process much easier for an occasional
picture, one where you want to stitch only two or three files. For a great
tutorial google to find "panotools", you'll find a lot of info about stitching
files there. While your out and about searching, search for "Max Lyons "
really nice set of panoramas, Max is also the guy who provides the
PTAssembler program. Panotools functions from within Photoshop
as plug-ins, is a hard to learn, but extremely powerful free package.
Stitching should be in the arsenal of every landscape photographer,
as it opens up a whole new perspective on digital imagery. Shooting
many slices of a scene instead of one super wide angle shot allows you
to control the front to rear perspective. You don't get the background
shoved away, but you still capture the wide view. You also gain the
very high resolving power from creating a picture out of many files.
The viewer can get as close to the picture as they want, a very wide
actually looks better from up close if a normal lens perspective was
used to make the original images. That way the viewer has to turn their
heads to see the entire view and it is more like they were looking at the
real thing. I have a 13 x 30 inch picture made this way from 18 individual
pieces, each shot with a 3.4 megapixel camera. The resulting image is big
and the viewer is allowed to whip out their loupe if they want to check
sharpness. Big disadvantage to this method of shooting, don't try it on
a soccer game. :-)
Bob G
"lhorwinkle" <NOT_NOT_l...@usa.com> wrote in message
news:na3g8.112621$2v1.3...@e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com...
http://www.fh-furtwangen.de/~dersch/
Allan
"jjgil" <jj...@mail.flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a5q6dn$bha$1...@diana.bcn.ttd.net...
"jjgil" <jj...@mail.flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a5q6dn$bha$1...@diana.bcn.ttd.net...
Thanks to all, including to Sgath Faol for the link .
>
>