Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Picture of Elizabeth The 2nd

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Serge

unread,
Nov 22, 2000, 8:43:59 AM11/22/00
to

As Australia's Head of State, the Queen's portrait insolently appears on our
currency, a ludicrous situation I grant you, and one which is anathema to an
avowed republican such as myself.

However, be that as it may, when receiving some coins in change recently I
paused to examine the Queen's portrait more closely. One coin was minted in
1998 but she didn't look a day over 30, all the other coins were similarly
afflicted. I immediately checked the notes in my wallet and was aghast to
discover that here to, she didn't look a day over 30. Her portrait was
perfect in every detail, ageless no blemishes or wrinkles, no spots. It was
almost as if time had stood still.

It put me in mind of Wilde's "The Picture of Dorian Gray" but with the
central theme going terribly wrong.

Instead of the portrait becoming hideously grotesque and disgusting over the
years, whilst the subject remained flawless. Here we had the opposite. The
portrait was flawless whilst the subject became hideously grotesque and
disgusting over the years.

An epiphany?

Yes, but it stood out like dogs balls on a hot day!

Serge.


Lilibet

unread,
Nov 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM11/24/00
to
I say, this REALLY is becoming most tedious.
Why do my subjects continue to treat me with such utter contempt?
I'm particularly annoyed with that wretched Colonial scoundrel Serge for
continually posting offensive comments.
His latest post has Mother inconsolable, and my poor dear Husband apoplectic
with rage.
If there were some truth to his assertion:

"Instead of the portrait becoming hideously grotesque and disgusting over
the years, whilst the subject remained flawless. Here we had the opposite.
The portrait was flawless whilst the subject became hideously grotesque and
disgusting over the years."
then he may have had a point, no matter how rude, but it is an obvious
slander.
Every Friday night after Philip's weekly bath he comes to my bedchamber and
tells me how attractive he thinks I am.
I feel I may have to unleash Lord Such onto this insufferable fellow so that
he too will be forced into exile like Karen Horn, Annie Facstaff, Ppill and
the soon to follow Adrienne, the Australian hayseed and Sacha that totally
amoral and unprincipled 'business' woman.

Lilibet

"Serge" <serg...@one.net.au> wrote in message
news:5ePS5.41918$SF5.7...@ozemail.com.au...

Serge

unread,
Nov 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM11/24/00
to

"Lilibet" <lil...@buck.pal.uk> wrote in message
news:1krT5.44632$SF5.7...@ozemail.com.au...

> I say, this REALLY is becoming most tedious.
> Why do my subjects continue to treat me with such utter contempt?
> I'm particularly annoyed with that wretched Colonial scoundrel Serge for
> continually posting offensive comments.
> His latest post has Mother inconsolable, and my poor dear Husband
apoplectic
> with rage.
> If there were some truth to his assertion:
> "Instead of the portrait becoming hideously grotesque and disgusting over
> the years, whilst the subject remained flawless. Here we had the opposite.
> The portrait was flawless whilst the subject became hideously grotesque
and
> disgusting over the years."
> then he may have had a point, no matter how rude, but it is an obvious
> slander.
> Every Friday night after Philip's weekly bath he comes to my bedchamber
and
> tells me how attractive he thinks I am.
> I feel I may have to unleash Lord Such onto this insufferable fellow so
that
> he too will be forced into exile like Karen Horn, Annie Facstaff, Ppill
and
> the soon to follow Adrienne, the Australian hayseed and Sacha that totally
> amoral and unprincipled 'business' woman.
>
> Lilibet


Listen you stupid, dull-witted, senile old cow.
Are you BLIND as well as stupid.
Don't you know that Scream is a good personal friend of mine.
Are you dyslectic, you steaming, disgusting, filthy old toe-rag, why don't
you READ some of his posts. He hates your guts, he's only taking the piss
when he swears his loyalty. He wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.
You make George the 3rd look like a bloody rocket scientist, if you weren't
an accident of birth you'd be mucking out shit houses for a living.

Serge.


Lilibet

unread,
Nov 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM11/24/00
to

"Serge" <serg...@one.net.au> wrote in message
news:2nrT5.44633$SF5.7...@ozemail.com.au...

> Listen you stupid, dull-witted, senile old cow.
> Are you BLIND as well as stupid.
> Don't you know that Scream is a good personal friend of mine.
> Are you dyslectic, you steaming, disgusting, filthy old toe-rag, why don't
> you READ some of his posts. He hates your guts, he's only taking the piss
> when he swears his loyalty. He wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.
> You make George the 3rd look like a bloody rocket scientist, if you
weren't
> an accident of birth you'd be mucking out shit houses for a living.
>
> Serge.


This is an obvious slander against by stalwart and Defender of the Crown,
Lord Such.
I refuse to be drawn in what is an obvious attempt to cause friction between
us.
Lord Such is, and continues to be, my strength, He is the complete gentleman
and a credit to his gender.

You Sir are a bounder and a cad.

Lilibet.

0 new messages