Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The right to privacy

13 views
Skip to first unread message

Morley

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
I understand that the ridiculous Dual Carriageway or Bus lane or
whatever she calls herself, is under the impression that she has
discovered my identity and has been busily emailing it to people on agr.
Unhappily for her, some people have a sense of honour and a distaste for
this venomous lady dog and have written to warn me and I'd like to
thank them. Obviously, they're aware that if you lie down with a dog you
get up with fleas. They have also told me who they believe to have
passed this information on to her and that person will get the same
treatment I'm warning about now:
If any harm comes to me or my family as a result of this spiteful
creature's behaviour, I will make sure she pays - I and everyone else
have the right to privacy and nobody has the right to take it away from
me. As BZ so amply demonstrates, there are a lot of crazies out there
and I wish to protect myself and my family from them - people like her
endanger and befoul everything they touch.

--
Morley


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

DeadeyeDev

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to


Now I feel hurt!
I haven't gotten any mail from BZ! So if it's any consolation,
your secret's still safe from me, Morley.

Forgive me for seeming to dismiss your concerns, but I think
maybe you're worrying yourself needlessly about the security
thing. Aside from some possible embarrassment owing to your
association with us salt of the earth types, there seems little
to be concerned about.

Presumably, your home already has a security system. Your cars
ought to be locked up at night anyhow. Your children ought to be
attending private/public schools, or safely in university. Based
on views posted on usenet, the bog IRA bomb squad will be after
Phil Exrxes rather than you. What's the problem?

If BZ is out for blood, I'm fairly sure it's Charles Windsor's
blood and not yours.

Relax. Have a drink. Eat a biscie.
-------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------

Got questions? Get answers over the phone at Keen.com.
Up to 100 minutes free!
http://www.keen.com


Morley

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
In article <171f6a02...@usw-ex0106-046.remarq.com>,

DeadeyeDev <deadeyede...@fcmail.com.invalid> wrote:
> Morley <morle...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >I understand that the ridiculous Dual Carriageway or Bus lane or
> >whatever she calls herself, is under the impression that she has
> >discovered my identity and has been busily emailing it to people
> on agr.
<snip>

> >
>
> Now I feel hurt!
> I haven't gotten any mail from BZ! So if it's any consolation,
> your secret's still safe from me, Morley.

Oh that does relieve my mind!! ;-)


>
> Forgive me for seeming to dismiss your concerns, but I think
> maybe you're worrying yourself needlessly about the security
> thing. Aside from some possible embarrassment owing to your
> association with us salt of the earth types, there seems little
> to be concerned about.

Sorry to disappoint you but I quite enjoy some of these salt of the
earth types - a little slumming is so good for one, doncha know! ;-)
Now some eejit is bound to take that seriously.......oh, dear!


>
> Presumably, your home already has a security system. Your cars
> ought to be locked up at night anyhow. Your children ought to be
> attending private/public schools, or safely in university. Based
> on views posted on usenet, the bog IRA bomb squad will be after
> Phil Exrxes rather than you. What's the problem?

We may know who posts to newsgroups, we don't know who lurks on them. I
am concerned for my own security but I'm much more concerned for my
children's. And no, they're not in school or university any more and
even if they were, that's no guarantee of anything! There are people who
have some very extreme views and nobody here knows whether they read
this group or not - I prefer to retain my privacy and, like everyone
else I have the right to do so. Just become some batty old biddy has
decided she doesn't like my views and isn't getting enough attention she
has no right whatsoever to breach that privacy - even if someone else
has done so in the past. When my son succeeded to his grandfather's
title, he received 8 begging letters within 10 days of his grandfather's
death. Althought this was immensely distressing to him at the
time, that's not a threat, of course but it does show that there are
people out there who target prominent people (as they perceive it) in
one way or another.

>
> If BZ is out for blood, I'm fairly sure it's Charles Windsor's
> blood and not yours.
>
> Relax. Have a drink. Eat a biscie.

Hmmm, a glass of the Grouse and an oatcake, do you think? Bit early,
perhaps!

Bus Pass wants to remember that what she does to others can be done to
her. From what I understand there are people who know who she is and
where she is. I've never attempted to breach someone's privacy, however
furious someone has made me and I'm happy to say I'm not enough of a
lowlife to do so.

BZ Lane

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
So It looks as though the Mongrel''s Whelp is confessing to the FIRE
BOMB in my friend's letter box. Therefore the authorities will have her
and her henchmen in custody in no time and all the time we thought it
was the Evil relic peddler!

No one least of all me thinks this rabid bee is actually who she
purports to be.Begging letters indeed.Turns one's stomach with the wild
pomposity of it and the vulgarity.

This Morticia pretending to rank with one of the prominent families of
the United Kingdom is a bored housewife posturing to impress gullible
groveling gits.As many of you have emailed me , you have been on to her
for years.We ALL know what "model" is an euphenism for.
Sounds rather like the Flem has misdirected yet another of her missives.

Many thanks D.E. for setting her straight.
I'm afraid the FIRE BOBM incident is a very serious matter.

I did enjoy your observation re: Action Toy!!

BZ Lane


BZ Lane

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
MB distributed her assumed Identity ,or more properly put, the one she
invented,to hundreds of people via the Use Net Groups.It has nothing to
do with me that she recklessly made a fool of herself by purporting to
be another person!! She goes on Endlessly, Daily that she is a VIP,
Today giving out the location of her digs, which naturally TRUE VIPS
don't for an an instant do!!
Her insatiable lust for attention has landed her in a right old mess
Because she has made threats, right here, and an act of violence has
already taken place, shortly after her reappearance here,
BZ


Leah Sabine-West

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
As one of "BZ's" secretaries I can tell you she will be in the south of
France for a short time
Your thoughtful notes will be answered in due course.

Thank each of you who know it for keeping "BZ's" true identity
secret.Unlike some,she is not fond of touting privilege.

Yours Truly,
Leah Sabine West


Susan Roger

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
Sometimes my server misses threads but what kind of violence are you
speaking of???? Susie


BZ Lane <Biz...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:7490-396...@storefull-287.iap.bryant.webtv.net...

DeadeyeDev

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
Biz...@webtv.net (BZ Lane) wrote:
>MB distributed her assumed Identity ,or more properly put, the
one she
>invented,to hundreds of people via the Use Net Groups.It has
nothing to
>do with me that she recklessly made a fool of herself by
purporting to
>be another person!! She goes on Endlessly, Daily that she is a
VIP,
>Today giving out the location of her digs, which naturally TRUE
VIPS
>don't for an an instant do!!
>Her insatiable lust for attention has landed her in a right old
mess
>Because she has made threats, right here, and an act of violence
has
>already taken place, shortly after her reappearance here,
>BZ
>
Ah, the plot thickens! Please don't keep the details from us.
Was it similar to the 'terrorism' that Greg experienced?
(There's never been a ruckus here to match his hysterics after he
got that rodent-type gift in the mail!)
Tell us, has the Uni-Ratter struck again?
-Dev
-------------------------------------------

DeadeyeDev

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
Oh, for fuck's sake! That's what all this fuss is about? A
match in a mailbox?! ha-a-a, ha-a-a-a!

Every kid in the Free World plays that trick on the old cranks in
his neighborhood. I suggest you simply try to be friendlier to
the tykes, and stop hurling refuse or invectives at them when
they come to collect for the Boy Scouts.

Terry

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
I know you're worried about this, but I honestly think you're worrying
unnecessarily. There are plenty of goof balls out there, but I think if they
wanted to target an aristo they'd pick on a current one, look them up in
Burkes Peerage and then camp outside their house delaring undying love or
hatred.

Relax, it's not as if you advocate anything hateful.

TH

PS Welcome back to the middle classes...the classier class!

>I understand that the ridiculous Dual Carriageway or Bus lane or
>whatever she calls herself, is under the impression that she has
>discovered my identity and has been busily emailing it to people on agr.

>Unhappily for her, some people have a sense of honour and a distaste for
>this venomous lady dog and have written to warn me and I'd like to
>thank them. Obviously, they're aware that if you lie down with a dog you
>get up with fleas. They have also told me who they believe to have
>passed this information on to her and that person will get the same
>treatment I'm warning about now:
>If any harm comes to me or my family as a result of this spiteful
>creature's behaviour, I will make sure she pays - I and everyone else
>have the right to privacy and nobody has the right to take it away from
>me. As BZ so amply demonstrates, there are a lot of crazies out there
>and I wish to protect myself and my family from them - people like her
>endanger and befoul everything they touch.
>

Morley

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
In article <7490-396...@storefull-287.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,

Biz...@webtv.net (BZ Lane) wrote:
> MB distributed her assumed Identity ,or more properly put, the one she
> invented,to hundreds of people via the Use Net Groups.It has nothing
to
> do with me that she recklessly made a fool of herself by purporting to
> be another person!! She goes on Endlessly, Daily that she is a VIP,
> Today giving out the location of her digs, which naturally TRUE VIPS
> don't for an an instant do!!
> Her insatiable lust for attention has landed her in a right old mess
> Because she has made threats, right here, and an act of violence has
> already taken place, shortly after her reappearance here,
> BZ
>
>
You can believe what you like, ducky but why bother emailing people with
what you think is my identity, if you don't believe it? You're not too
bright, are you? And BTW you need to brush up your English if you're
going to keep writing as THE English authority - nobody under the age of
75 has used the term 'digs' in England for simply years! And digs
were rented accommodation not one's own house. And I don't claim to be
a VIP, true or otherwise. Oh, dear, don't you ever get tired of being
so just plain *wrong* all the time? And if you can tell me how I,
living in UK, can commit an act of violence in US I'd love to hear about
it. What are you on, for heaven's sake? And tell your 'secretary' Leah
I can't WAIT to hear more from her. Maybe you could get her to teach
you how to turn off the upper case key on your machine - then you
wouldn't make such an ass of yourself when you 'write' to agr. Send us
a pc from France. Au revoir!

Morley

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
In article <8knd8h$2l9$1...@supernews.com>,

"Terry" <ter...@bucksnet.co.uk> wrote:
> I know you're worried about this, but I honestly think you're worrying
> unnecessarily. There are plenty of goof balls out there, but I think
if they
> wanted to target an aristo they'd pick on a current one, look them up
in
> Burkes Peerage and then camp outside their house delaring undying love
or
> hatred.

But Terry, dear that's exactly why I'm worried about my children!! They
fall precisely into that category.


>
> Relax, it's not as if you advocate anything hateful.

Stick around - this could change! ;-) No, I don't, but for some people
just being titled or disagreeing with them is enough. I really don't
want to make too much of this but it is worrying and it is also
absolutely beyond the pale that someone so incredibly *stupid* should do
this out of sheer spite just because I don't share her views one hundred
per cent!


>
> TH
>
> PS Welcome back to the middle classes...the classier class!

And it didn't hurt a bit! ;-))
Actually, I never left it - you can take the girl out of
the..........etc. etc.
<snip>

Copper Queen

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
Morley wrote:
>
> In article <171f6a02...@usw-ex0106-046.remarq.com>,
> DeadeyeDev <deadeyede...@fcmail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > Morley <morle...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > >I understand that the ridiculous Dual Carriageway or Bus lane or
> > >whatever she calls herself, is under the impression that she has
> > >discovered my identity and has been busily emailing it to people
> > on agr.
> <snip>
> > >
> >
> > Now I feel hurt!
> > I haven't gotten any mail from BZ! So if it's any consolation,
> > your secret's still safe from me, Morley.
>
> Oh that does relieve my mind!! ;-)
> >
> > Forgive me for seeming to dismiss your concerns, but I think
> > maybe you're worrying yourself needlessly about the security
> > thing. Aside from some possible embarrassment owing to your
> > association with us salt of the earth types, there seems little
> > to be concerned about.
>
> Sorry to disappoint you but I quite enjoy some of these salt of the
> earth types - a little slumming is so good for one, doncha know! ;-)
> Now some eejit is bound to take that seriously.......oh, dear!

Hey, Morley, you've been slumming with me for years and I'm trailer
trash. That's somewhere far below 'salt of the earth'! Of course, owing
the farm the trailes sits on does elevate my position a little bit! ;o)

> >
> > Presumably, your home already has a security system. Your cars
> > ought to be locked up at night anyhow. Your children ought to be
> > attending private/public schools, or safely in university. Based
> > on views posted on usenet, the bog IRA bomb squad will be after
> > Phil Exrxes rather than you. What's the problem?
>
> We may know who posts to newsgroups, we don't know who lurks on them. I
> am concerned for my own security but I'm much more concerned for my
> children's. And no, they're not in school or university any more and
> even if they were, that's no guarantee of anything! There are people who
> have some very extreme views and nobody here knows whether they read
> this group or not - I prefer to retain my privacy and, like everyone
> else I have the right to do so. Just become some batty old biddy has
> decided she doesn't like my views and isn't getting enough attention she
> has no right whatsoever to breach that privacy - even if someone else
> has done so in the past. When my son succeeded to his grandfather's
> title, he received 8 begging letters within 10 days of his grandfather's
> death. Althought this was immensely distressing to him at the
> time, that's not a threat, of course but it does show that there are
> people out there who target prominent people (as they perceive it) in
> one way or another.
>

Gee! I wish I had thought of that! I could have bought a bigger farm and
critters to go on it! That's me! A day late and dollar short! ;o)


> >
> > If BZ is out for blood, I'm fairly sure it's Charles Windsor's
> > blood and not yours.
> >
> > Relax. Have a drink. Eat a biscie.
>
> Hmmm, a glass of the Grouse and an oatcake, do you think? Bit early,
> perhaps!
>
> Bus Pass wants to remember that what she does to others can be done to
> her. From what I understand there are people who know who she is and
> where she is. I've never attempted to breach someone's privacy, however
> furious someone has made me and I'm happy to say I'm not enough of a
> lowlife to do so.
>
> --
> Morley
>
>

Hey, look there! 'Lowlife'! I taught you a new word! ;o)

cq

jabberwocky

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
Morley, you seem to invite conflict. This is not the first time I have seen
you get "paranoid" about your children. I am sure your children are grown up
and have fled from home, yet quite capable of looking after themselves.To be
honest, you flatter yourself in thinking that you are so important, that
someone should want to go chasing after you! Why do you feel they are
threatened?
Quite honestly I think you are attention seeking as is your antagonist. You
know it takes two to fight. If you come into a public forum like this NG you
have to accept that if you want to be controversial in the way you address
your public, then you open yourself up to whoever wants to shoot you down.
Its no good complaining. Fire is fed by flames.If you dont like the
heat.....you know what comes next. You seem to have some sort of vested
interest in trying to win some sort of ego war. For myself, I admit that I
enjoy a good flame, but you should not take it so seriously!

Morley <morle...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8knfsh$k9v$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...

brit

unread,
Jul 14, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/14/00
to
Welcome Morley, another of bz victims....whatever she says..shes the crazy,
believe me, I and about 20 other people in the Royal circles on the Net can
attest to that wholeheartedly..Alway s the same mo..disagree with her,and
she never forgets it..and goes out of her way to try to make your life a
misery (I said TRY..being the operative word......Little does she know that
she is a laughing stock...both on and off the Net..A sad pathetic excuse for
a human being...
So welcome morley, you're in very good company with us!!

brit

Morley

unread,
Jul 15, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/15/00
to
In article <1OPb5.4196$q5.1...@news.inreach.com>,

"brit" <link...@INREACH.COM> wrote:
> Welcome Morley, another of bz victims....whatever she says..shes the
crazy,
> believe me, I and about 20 other people in the Royal circles on the
Net can
> attest to that wholeheartedly..Alway s the same mo..disagree with
her,and
> she never forgets it..and goes out of her way to try to make your life
a
> misery (I said TRY..being the operative word......Little does she know
that
> she is a laughing stock...both on and off the Net..A sad pathetic
excuse for
> a human being...
> So welcome morley, you're in very good company with us!!
>
> brit
>
<snip>

Thanks, brit. I rather thought that BZ wasn't exactly Miss Popular but
I'm still slightly staggered at the energy she must put into hounding
people from the word 'go' if they don't agree with her every syllable!
I'm told that many have her killfiled which seems an excellent solution!

RCLOVELY

unread,
Jul 15, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/15/00
to
> slumming with me for years and I'm trailer
>trash. That's somewhere far below 'salt of the earth'! Of course, owing
>the farm the trailes sits on does elevate my position a little bit! ;o)

As long as you own the land, it dosen't matter what you live in. Consider
yourself landed gentry!

RC

Copper Queen

unread,
Jul 15, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/15/00
to

Oh, I do, my dear! I sit and survey my forest and pastures like a true
Queen. Now all I need are some serfs to cut the fescue! It's so hard to
find a good serf anymore! Maybe I'll get a cow or two or three. ;o)

cq

His Jadedness

unread,
Jul 15, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/15/00
to
>Thanks, brit. I rather thought that BZ wasn't exactly Miss Popular but
>I'm still slightly staggered at the energy she must put into hounding
>people from the word 'go' if they don't agree with her every syllable!
>I'm told that many have her killfiled which seems an excellent solution!

As someone would say - " Spot on!"


His Jadedness, Andy; http://members.aol.com/agh3rd/index.htm
Nec petita nec cupita approbatio tua

His Jadedness

unread,
Jul 16, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/16/00
to
>Oh, I do, my dear! I sit and survey my forest and pastures like a true
>Queen. Now all I need are some serfs to cut the fescue! It's so hard to
>find a good serf anymore! Maybe I'll get a cow or two or three. ;o)
>
>cq

Hey CQ... You have to feed your serfs. right? I know of one- all he asks is for
1 room, electricity and a phone line (and he'll pay for the line!), 3 meals a
day, and he'll do farm work.. within reason. He's mainly looking for peace and
quite to write in - a royal genealogy/biographical series no less! Interested??

Susan Cohen

unread,
Jul 16, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/16/00
to

Susan Roger wrote:

> Sometimes my server misses threads but what kind of violence are you
> speaking of???? Susie

Heck, I'm still trying to figure out when Morley gave
any such hints, and who really thinks anyone will
believe that Morley's a phony???

Susan

>
>
> BZ Lane <Biz...@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:7490-396...@storefull-287.iap.bryant.webtv.net...

Susan Roger

unread,
Jul 16, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/16/00
to

Susan Cohen <fla...@hers.com> wrote in message
news:3971D49A...@hers.com...

>
>
> Susan Roger wrote:
>
> > Sometimes my server misses threads but what kind of violence are you
> > speaking of???? Susie
>
> Heck, I'm still trying to figure out when Morley gave
> any such hints, and who really thinks anyone will
> believe that Morley's a phony???
>
> Susan
> ****************************
I have no idea what is going on, but I think with this particular thread,
ignorance is bliss...Susie

alex...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jul 16, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/16/00
to
In article <96361145...@talita.eclipse.net.uk>,

"jabberwocky" <sa1...@eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
> Morley, you seem to invite conflict. This is not the first time I
have seen
> you get "paranoid" about your children. I am sure your children are
grown up
> and have fled from home, yet quite capable of looking after
themselves.
______________________________________________________________

You have it right in the first sentence, but you need to substitute
"invite" with "provoke". She wonders aloud in another post how she was
the one behind the mailbox attack on BZ since she's on another
continent, but then makes much the same inference against others by
bringing up the phoney-as-her-title issue of her children in another
post. Simple. She has her friend brit drive over two hours probably
and perform said act of arson (a federal offense in the U.S.,
btw),there's no end to brit's malice and the only reason that one's
identity hasn't been outed by BZ is probably exactly because BZ is
physically terrified of this petty criminal. Of course, none of
Morley's feigned distress makes sense anyway since she claims initially
that BZ has it all wrong as far as her identity. On the other hand, if
BZ had it right and as she points out, it was dropped by Morley herself
previously in some context.
__________________________________________________________________

To be
> honest, you flatter yourself in thinking that you are so important,
that
> someone should want to go chasing after you! Why do you feel they are
> threatened?
> Quite honestly I think you are attention seeking as is your
antagonist. You
> know it takes two to fight. If you come into a public forum like this
NG you
> have to accept that if you want to be controversial in the way you
address
> your public, then you open yourself up to whoever wants to shoot you
down.
> Its no good complaining. Fire is fed by flames.If you dont like the
> heat.....you know what comes next. You seem to have some sort of
vested
> interest in trying to win some sort of ego war.

___________________________________________________________________

Exactly, and why would anyone married into the aristocracy have such an
insecure ego...if she truly were ever married into the aristocracy that
is, and isn't just some frustrated housewife let loose on a keyboard in
Bexley Heath or Surbiton...Not that anyone (except those predisposed to
slaver after her every word) care about who or what she might be, the
whole issue of identity and status is one of her own creation and that
has come back to haunt her. Along with her own allusions to her
purported background, she also conversely casts aspersions on other's
identities whenever their points of view don't coincide with hers,
hardly surprising then that as you say her own fire comes back to burn
her.

alex d.SS


For myself, I admit that I
> enjoy a good flame, but you should not take it so seriously!
>

Copper Queen

unread,
Jul 16, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/16/00
to

Darlin! Does this serf like fried green tomatoes? ;o) I don't believe in
serfs working in the hot sun, so he'd only need to work in the early
morning and in the evening. That's only about 7 hours a day, at the
moment. When there's a tornado watch, he can seek shelter in the house.

Interested? ;o)

cq

Copper Queen

unread,
Jul 16, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/16/00
to
Susan Cohen wrote:
>
> Susan Roger wrote:
>
> > Sometimes my server misses threads but what kind of violence are you
> > speaking of???? Susie
>
> Heck, I'm still trying to figure out when Morley gave
> any such hints, and who really thinks anyone will
> believe that Morley's a phony???
>
> Susan

Morley's a phoney what?!

cq

Susan Cohen

unread,
Jul 16, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/16/00
to

Copper Queen wrote:

Oh, gosh - you mean it's worse than I thought?

Susan

Copper Queen

unread,
Jul 16, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/16/00
to

Seems to be! Do you have the antidote? I really need some if you have
enough to share.

cq

Morley

unread,
Jul 17, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/17/00
to
In article <8kt646$du7$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,

alex...@my-deja.com wrote:
> In article <96361145...@talita.eclipse.net.uk>,
> "jabberwocky" <sa1...@eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
> > Morley, you seem to invite conflict. This is not the first time I
> have seen
> > you get "paranoid" about your children. I am sure your children are
> grown up
> > and have fled from home, yet quite capable of looking after
> themselves.
> ______________________________________________________________
>
> You have it right in the first sentence, but you need to substitute
> "invite" with "provoke". She wonders aloud in another post how she
was
> the one behind the mailbox attack on BZ since she's on another
> continent, but then makes much the same inference against others by
> bringing up the phoney-as-her-title issue of her children in another
> post. Simple. She has her friend brit drive over two hours probably
> and perform said act of arson (a federal offense in the U.S.,
> btw)<snip>

Alex, I'll put up with a certain amount from you because I'm not quite
sure that you're an entirely well person. In fact, I'm fairly sure of
that, judging by the above incoherence. But I would remind you that the
law of libel holds good for the Internet, too - witness the recent case
involving Demon and one of their clients. I have no idea what BZ is
talking about but I suggest you pass the same message on to
her/yourself. Disagreeing with me on newsgroup matters is one thing -
libel is another and you have just committed a libel. Watch it and be
thankful I warned you first - I won't again and you can tell BZ/yourself
that, too.

alex...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jul 17, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/17/00
to
In article <8kv2ap$mo1$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Why don't you take your paranoid delusional threats to the doctor at
the Tavi dearie? BZ is your problem of your own maiing...I don't know
BZ from anyone else here, although your camp follower brit does..and
that's a fact, so check it. The laws of libel are something you
yourself should watch out for, as you commit them frequently. Along
with malicious slander.

alex d.SS

Leah Sabine-West

unread,
Jul 17, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/17/00
to
The victim of the mailbox attack wasn't "BZ" but she was known to her.
She has homes on both sides of the Atlantic.

<96361145...@talita.eclipse.net.uk>, "jabberwocky"
<sa1...@eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
Morley, you seem to invite conflict. This is not the first time I have

seen you get "paranoid" CUT
______________________________________________

You have it right in the first sentence, but you need to substitute
"invite" with "provoke". She wonders aloud in another post how she was
the one behind the mailbox attack on BZ since she's on another
continent, but then makes much the same inference against others by
bringing up the phoney-as-her-title issue of her children in another
post. Simple. She has her friend brit drive over two hours probably and

perform said act of arson (a federal offense in the U.S., btw),there's


no end to brit's malice and the only reason that one's identity hasn't
been outed by BZ is probably exactly because BZ is physically terrified
of this petty criminal. Of course, none of Morley's feigned distress
makes sense anyway since she claims initially that BZ has it all wrong
as far as her identity. On the other hand, if BZ had it right and as she
points out, it was dropped by Morley herself previously in some context.
______________________________________________

To be
honest, you flatter yourself in thinking that you are so important, that
someone should want to go chasing after you! Why do you feel they are
threatened?
Quite honestly I think you are attention seeking as is your
antagonist. You
know it takes two to fight. If you come into a public forum like this NG
you have to accept that if you want to be controversial in the way you
address your public, then you open yourself up to whoever wants to shoot
you down. Its no good complaining. Fire is fed by flames.If you dont
like the heat.....you know what comes next. You seem to have some sort
of vested interest in trying to win some sort of ego war.
______________________________________________

His Jadedness

unread,
Jul 17, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/17/00
to
>Darlin! Does this serf like fried green tomatoes? ;o) I don't believe in
>serfs working in the hot sun, so he'd only need to work in the early
>morning and in the evening. That's only about 7 hours a day, at the
>moment. When there's a tornado watch, he can seek shelter in the house.
>
>Interested? ;o)
>
>cq

He eats tomatoes fried, sliced, diced, stewed, off the vine, etc. and has a
weakness for white beans and hot water cornbread,

err... define "early morning" and "evening" ;)

I'm sure that upon further communication that he'll be *very* interested!

Copper Queen

unread,
Jul 17, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/17/00
to
His Jadedness wrote:
>
> >Darlin! Does this serf like fried green tomatoes? ;o) I don't believe in
> >serfs working in the hot sun, so he'd only need to work in the early
> >morning and in the evening. That's only about 7 hours a day, at the
> >moment. When there's a tornado watch, he can seek shelter in the house.
> >
> >Interested? ;o)
> >
> >cq
>
> He eats tomatoes fried, sliced, diced, stewed, off the vine, etc. and has a
> weakness for white beans and hot water cornbread,
>
> err... define "early morning" and "evening" ;)
>
> I'm sure that upon further communication that he'll be *very* interested!
>
>
Early morning and evening are the cool of the day. Day means the sun is
shining in the sky, no stars are blinking and winking and nod.

cq

brit

unread,
Jul 18, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/18/00
to
In article <20000715135557...@ng-cu1.aol.com>,

agh...@aol.comorgnet (His Jadedness) wrote:
> >Thanks, brit. I rather thought that BZ wasn't exactly Miss Popular
but
> >I'm still slightly staggered at the energy she must put into hounding
> >people from the word 'go' if they don't agree with her every
syllable!
> >I'm told that many have her killfiled which seems an excellent
solution!
>
> As someone would say - " Spot on!"
>
> His Jadedness, Andy; http://members.aol.com/agh3rd/index.htm
> Nec petita nec cupita approbatio tua
>

Absolutement!!!! Kilfile was made for the bz/alex of this world....

PS..bz has been sited in the Salvation Army, and in Walmart over the
weekend...and I DON"T mean the Parisian stores!!!!

brit

--
After eating an entire bull, a mountain lion felt
so good he started roaring. He kept it up until a
hunter came along and shot him...
The moral: When you're full of bull, keep your mouth shut.

Nick

unread,
Jul 18, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/18/00
to
alex...@my-deja.com wrote:


>Exactly, and why would anyone married into the aristocracy have
such an
>insecure ego...if she truly were ever married into the
aristocracy that
>is, and isn't just some frustrated housewife let loose on a
keyboard in
>Bexley Heath or Surbiton...Not that anyone (except those
predisposed to
>slaver after her every word) care about who or what she might
be, the
>whole issue of identity and status is one of her own creation
and that
>has come back to haunt her. Along with her own allusions to her
>purported background, she also conversely casts aspersions on
other's
>identities whenever their points of view don't coincide with
hers,
>hardly surprising then that as you say her own fire comes back
to burn
>her.

OK Alex - since you don't believe Morley's credentials.....I
don't believe you are British, and, as you are egging on Morley
to prove her statement, I challenge you to prove you are what you
say you are. I think you are a mentally deficient resident of
Romania who was found in one of those dreadful orphanages a few
years ago. You are an illegal immigrant to Britain and currently
live in a caravan (house trailer to us Norte Americanos) in
Phil's back yard. You worship BZ because BZ worships St.
Diana. You once saw a vision of Diana speaking to a group of
children gathered round a landmine, while you were serving chips
at a stall in the Cromwell Road. Amazingly, Diana was speaking
Romanian and you have made it your life's work to find out what
she was saying. Recently, you looked up the word "sycophant" in
the dictionary and now delight in using your new English word
whenever you find someone who doesn't worship the saint. You are
saving your chip profits to buy diana's old apartment in Chelsea.

Am I close?

Nick

brit

unread,
Jul 18, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/18/00
to

***************************

Thats as good as any other bio he/she gives....

brit


His Jadedness

unread,
Jul 19, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/19/00
to
>Early morning and evening are the cool of the day. Day means the sun is
>shining in the sky, no stars are blinking and winking and nod.
>
>cq

Ahh.. so from sunrise to sunrise + 4 hrs and from sunset - 4 hrs to sunset
would be about right? or dusk- 4 hrs?

Ever thought of doing a bed and breakfast farm? <g>

alex...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jul 19, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/19/00
to
In article <1504a248...@usw-ex0101-005.remarq.com>,
Nick <choules...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
__________________________________________________________________

Read what I wrote, dimwit. Morley and Morley alone has made status and
national background an issue in attacking other posters who disagree
with her. "You don't believe because I don't believe"?? How ludicrous
you are. No one has to account to the likes of you for anything,
Burbidge, but by the way I didn't trade in my British passport as you
probably did when you slunk off to Canada. And too bad Phil didn't put
the boot in once and for all and publish your name and address in full,
you certainly have it coming.

[snipped for inane drivel by someone who majored in the English
language at a U.K. uni]

> Am I close?
>
> Nick
>
_________________________________________________________________

Not as close as your head is up your arse as usual, Burbidge. Cheers,

alex d.SS

Copper Queen

unread,
Jul 19, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/19/00
to
His Jadedness wrote:
>
> >Early morning and evening are the cool of the day. Day means the sun is
> >shining in the sky, no stars are blinking and winking and nod.
> >
> >cq
>
> Ahh.. so from sunrise to sunrise + 4 hrs and from sunset - 4 hrs to sunset
> would be about right? or dusk- 4 hrs?
>
> Ever thought of doing a bed and breakfast farm? <g>
>

Oh, I know how that works. I get up at 4 AM cook all kinds of food, the
tourists eat it and then leave. I get to do the dishes and make the beds
and clean the bathrooms. Then I do the same thing tomorrow! FERGIT THAT!
It's easier to just do that every day for myself!

I don't need to do the work! I need a serf!

cq

Nick

unread,
Jul 19, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/19/00
to

Well, you wrote "if she truly were ever married into the


aristocracy that is, and isn't just some frustrated housewife let

loose on a keyboard in Bexley Heath or Surbiton....". So you were
questioning Morley's credentials....so I questioned yours. See
how that works, pissant?

> Morley and Morley alone has made
status and
>national background an issue in attacking other posters who
disagree
>with her.

No. She has made status and background a factor in establishing
knowledge.

>"You don't believe because I don't believe"?? How
ludicrous
>you are. No one has to account to the likes of you for
anything,

Quite true....

>Burbidge,

My name is Choules. I would post my birth certificate to prove it
but you would dismiss that as sycophancy to the Registry office.

>but by the way I didn't trade in my British passport
as you
>probably did

Wrong, pissant. I have both a British and a Canadian passport.

>when you slunk off to Canada.

Wrong again. There was no slinking. I was quite open about it.

>And too bad Phil
didn't put
>the boot in once and for all and publish your name and address
in full,
>you certainly have it coming.

Well, he has posted what he believes is my name and address, but
the data he posted was almost entirely in error. The bit he got
right was that I live in Oakville, but I have never made any
secret of that.I wouldn't put too much trust in data posted by a
troll, Alex.

>[snipped for inane drivel by someone who majored in the English
>language at a U.K. uni]

Do you mean the writer of the drivel was the language major? or
the person who snipped it? Really, for an allegedly educated
person your grammar leaves a lot to be desired.

Martha Tassi

unread,
Jul 20, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/20/00
to

>
> >
> > > Sometimes my server misses threads but what kind of violence are you
> > > speaking of???? Susie
> >
> > Heck, I'm still trying to figure out when Morley gave
> > any such hints, and who really thinks anyone will
> > believe that Morley's a phony???
> >
> > Susan
>
> Morley's a phoney what?!
>
> cq

===
"Phoney baloney"?

-Martha
===


Copper Queen

unread,
Jul 20, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/20/00
to


Wellll! I've known her to carry a thread on for several days just on
puns, but I can't recall any genuine baloney. I was able to trade puns
with her for awhile, but she was still going strong when I dropped out
of the thread!

cq

Martha Tassi

unread,
Jul 20, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/20/00
to

Copper Queen wrote:

=====
"Silly Salame"?

-Martha
======


Copper Queen

unread,
Jul 20, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/20/00
to

Is that Salome or Salami? ;o)

cq

Copper Queen

unread,
Jul 20, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/20/00
to
Sacha wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 16:42:15 GMT, Martha Tassi <mta...@home.com>
> Why, thank you. Silly Sausage is a very affectionate English-ism!
> ;-)
> --
> Sacha


Like 'my little cabbage' is to the French? ;o)

cq

Susan Cohen

unread,
Jul 20, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/20/00
to

Copper Queen wrote:

> Martha Tassi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Heck, I'm still trying to figure out when Morley gave
> > > > any such hints, and who really thinks anyone will
> > > > believe that Morley's a phony???
> > > >
> > > > Susan
> > >
> > > Morley's a phoney what?!
> > >
> > > cq
> >
> > ===
> > "Phoney baloney"?
> >
> > -Martha
> > ===
>
> Wellll! I've known her to carry a thread on for several days just on
> puns, but I can't recall any genuine baloney. I was able to trade puns
> with her for awhile, but she was still going strong when I dropped out
> of the thread!
>
> cq

Do they even make baloney in England?

Susan

BZ Lane

unread,
Jul 20, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/20/00
to
Morley's a phoney what?!
cq
===
"Phoney baloney"?
-Martha
===
Bratwurst, more like.OR as we say in England the Worst brat between a
"bun." TIC
A Banger Clanger too!
BZ


BZ Lane

unread,
Jul 20, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/20/00
to
fauixbrit posted here that one of her *spies* saw MY sister in two
locations last week! She has admitted to TRUE invasion of privacy.Then
she and the corroded Copper and Bow Wow Morley pretended to discuss MY
Sister's occupation , AS IF they KNEW IT! Those sickmaking juvenile
bullies don't grasp the criminal practices they are indulging in. The
Archives are under scrutiny as many of you well know.
BZ who finds it a hoot that privacy breakers bawl over their own!


alex...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jul 21, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/21/00
to
In article <13124ef1...@usw-ex0101-005.remarq.com>,
_________________________________________________________________

You can twist it as you please, since you're just her little lapdog
bURBIDGE, I know how she has tried to throw her background around.
Along with everyone else on this board outside The Toadying Triumvirate.


>
> >"You don't believe because I don't believe"?? How
> ludicrous
> >you are. No one has to account to the likes of you for
> anything,
>
> Quite true....
>

_______________________________________________________________

Then why bother making such a ridiculous post. Read again (if you are
literate, and don't just cast aspersions on other's nationality and/or
literacy, what I wrote originally:

Not that anyone (except those predisposed to
> >> >slaver after her every word) care about who or what she might
> >> be, the whole issue of identity and status is one of her own
creation and that has come back to haunt her. Along with her own
allusions to her purported background, she also conversely casts
aspersions on other's identities whenever their points of view don't
coincide with hers, hardly surprising then that as you say her own fire
comes back to burn her.

Now, do you need to have that explained in five different languages?
Sorry, I don't know Romanian but there are some thieving types round
here who probably do...
_____________________________________________________________________


> >Burbidge,
>
> My name is Choules. I would post my birth certificate to prove it
> but you would dismiss that as sycophancy to the Registry office.

_____________________________________________________________________

Who cares what your name is, however since I've seen it posted by
someone I _do_ believe, it's Burbidge.
_____________________________________________________________________


>
> >but by the way I didn't trade in my British passport
> as you
> >probably did
>
> Wrong, pissant. I have both a British and a Canadian passport.

____________________________________________________________________

Oh, playing both sides of the street with the nationality as well are
we?? Read your Mistress Morley's original contention, you might see
she is trying to make a case for privacy, supposedly the name of this
thread. She is right too--although she applies it selectively and on
occasion only to defend herself and play the victim. Nonetheless,
there is such a thing as privacy and that is why heretofore I for one
have _never_ mentioned nationality as a "challenge". Even looney
housewives in Bexley Heath are British usually, after all. I was
questioning other assertions she kept trumpeting. The right to privacy
is something you lot do _not_ respect, evidenced by your post to me. I
could care less if you have five passports (probably do, handy for
illicit goings-on I'm sure).
______________________________________________________________________


>
> >when you slunk off to Canada.
>
> Wrong again. There was no slinking. I was quite open about it.
>
> >And too bad Phil
> didn't put
> >the boot in once and for all and publish your name and address
> in full,
> >you certainly have it coming.
>
> Well, he has posted what he believes is my name and address, but
> the data he posted was almost entirely in error. The bit he got
> right was that I live in Oakville, but I have never made any
> secret of that.I wouldn't put too much trust in data posted by a
> troll, Alex.

____________________________________________________________________

Oh then I won't put too much trust in the data posted on northlincs by
your other sweetheart Andy-Pandy, the trollette.
___________________________________________________________________

> >[snipped for inane drivel by someone who majored in the English
> >language at a U.K. uni]
>
> Do you mean the writer of the drivel was the language major? or
> the person who snipped it? Really, for an allegedly educated
> person your grammar leaves a lot to be desired.
>
> Nick

> _________________________________________________________________

I wouldn't think you are even so much as an allegedly educated person,
Burbidge. Your only major was...you guessed it, ladies and gentlemen!
SYCOPHANCY, first-class. Oh, along with minoring in harrassing sick
women to death.

truebrit

unread,
Jul 21, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/21/00
to
t>>

>> >but by the way I didn't trade in my British passport
>> as you
>> >probably did
>>
>> Wrong, pissant. I have both a British and a Canadian passport.
>____________________________________________________________________


Since when has Canada recognised dual nationality?
Mrs H


Nick

unread,
Jul 21, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/21/00
to
alex...@my-deja.com wrote:

>You can twist it as you please, since you're just her little
lapdog
>bURBIDGE, I know how she has tried to throw her background
around.

and

>Along with everyone else on this board outside The Toadying
Triumvirate.

>Who cares what your name is, however since I've seen it posted
by
>someone I _do_ believe, it's Burbidge.

and then he went to say this:

>The right to privacy
>is something you lot do _not_ respect, evidenced by your post
to me.


Earth to Alex. Do read your stuff before posting. Obviously by
posting what you believe to be private information you don't
respect privacy either, pissant.

>________________________________________________________________


_____
>>
>> >but by the way I didn't trade in my British passport
>> as you
>> >probably did
>>
>> Wrong, pissant. I have both a British and a Canadian passport.
>________________________________________________________________
____
>
>Oh, playing both sides of the street with the nationality as
well are
>we??

I have earned both nationalities and I shall damned well use
both passports, thank you very much.

> Read your Mistress Morley's original contention, you might see
>she is trying to make a case for privacy, supposedly the name
of this
>thread. She is right too--although she applies it selectively
and on
>occasion only to defend herself and play the victim.
Nonetheless,
>there is such a thing as privacy and that is why heretofore I
for one
>have _never_ mentioned nationality as a "challenge". Even
looney
>housewives in Bexley Heath are British usually, after all. I
was

>questioning other assertions she kept trumpeting. I


>could care less if you have five passports (probably do, handy
for
>illicit goings-on I'm sure).

If you don't care how many passports I have, why suggest I
am "playing both sides of the street"??

>________________________________________________________________


______
>>
>> >when you slunk off to Canada.

My name is Choules. And no-one here, including me, harassed any
sick woman to death. Proof please. Or are you just trying to
upset the sick woman's family yet AGAIN (you know, the woman you
claim never to mention but always manage to do so?

Nick Choules.

alex...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jul 22, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/22/00
to
In article <02f69bad...@usw-ex0105-034.remarq.com>,

Nick <choules...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
> alex...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> >You can twist it as you please, since you're just her little
> lapdog
> >bURBIDGE, I know how she has tried to throw her background
> around.
>
> and

>
> >Along with everyone else on this board outside The Toadying
> Triumvirate.
> >Who cares what your name is, however since I've seen it posted
> by
> >someone I _do_ believe, it's Burbidge.
>
> and then he went to say this:
>
> >The right to privacy
> >is something you lot do _not_ respect, evidenced by your post
> to me.
>
> Earth to Alex. Do read your stuff before posting. Obviously by
> posting what you believe to be private information you don't
> respect privacy either, pissant.
>
___________________________________________________________________

Too bad for you that you let slip, Pisspot, because now the cat's out
the door on that one and there's no holds barred is there? The
principle of privacy was (a) violated by you lot in the first place,
repeatedly so, and (b) you've denied that Burbidge is your name, so why
would Mr. Liar mind a false name being used? Oh wait, it's Choules,
but you and I know full well you would never use your real surname on
this ng...or you might just be silly enough to imagine that you've
protected your i.d. sufficiently to never have it hunted down
successfully? Believe me, even if Phil got it wrong, the technology
and the means are there to deal with you should the need arise.

> >________________________________________________________________


> _____
> >>
> >> >but by the way I didn't trade in my British passport
> >> as you
> >> >probably did
> >>
> >> Wrong, pissant. I have both a British and a Canadian passport.
> >________________________________________________________________
> ____
> >
> >Oh, playing both sides of the street with the nationality as
> well are
> >we??
>

> I have earned both nationalities and I shall damned well use
> both passports, thank you very much.
>

> > Read your Mistress Morley's original contention, you might see
> >she is trying to make a case for privacy, supposedly the name
> of this
> >thread. She is right too--although she applies it selectively
> and on
> >occasion only to defend herself and play the victim.
> Nonetheless,
> >there is such a thing as privacy and that is why heretofore I
> for one
> >have _never_ mentioned nationality as a "challenge". Even
> looney
> >housewives in Bexley Heath are British usually, after all. I
> was

> >questioning other assertions she kept trumpeting. I


> >could care less if you have five passports (probably do, handy
> for
> >illicit goings-on I'm sure).
>

> If you don't care how many passports I have, why suggest I

> am "playing both sides of the street"??

I don't care because I'm not law enforcement. They on the other hand
might very well be interested in some of your and friends on this
boards' goings-on on both sides of the Atlantic.
>
> >________________________________________________________________


> ______
> >>
> >> >when you slunk off to Canada.

> My name is Choules. And no-one here, including me, harassed any
> sick woman to death. Proof please. Or are you just trying to
> upset the sick woman's family yet AGAIN (you know, the woman you
> claim never to mention but always manage to do so?
>
> Nick Choules.
>

________________________________________________________________

If you care about your privacy, again, why would you post your "real"
name and then protest about a fake one being used? Like most else you
write, it is either stupid or your silly attempt to get yourself out of
a situation of your own making. And as to the sick woman's family that
you falsely claim to have never harassed to death, there's no point in
being a coward and hiding behind the skirts of your victim's family
purportedly "monitoring" (right) this ng and every last post on it
(right), because I intend to bring up your and the clique's past dirty
deeds as it suits me to.

gall...@istar.ca

unread,
Jul 22, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/22/00
to
In article <y7Vd5.4$Co1.2...@dca1-nnrp1.news.digex.net>,
"truebrit" <true...@utahisp.com> wrote:
> t>>

> >> >but by the way I didn't trade in my British passport
> >> as you
> >> >probably did
> >>
> >> Wrong, pissant. I have both a British and a Canadian passport.
> >____________________________________________________________________
>
> Since when has Canada recognised dual nationality?

Canadian law has permitted dual nationality since
February 1977.

Stephen Gallagher

Nick

unread,
Jul 22, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/22/00
to
gall...@istar.ca wrote:
>In article <y7Vd5.4$Co1.2...@dca1-nnrp1.news.digex.net>,
> "truebrit" <true...@utahisp.com> wrote:
>> t>>
>> >> >but by the way I didn't trade in my British passport
>> >> as you
>> >> >probably did
>> >>
>> >> Wrong, pissant. I have both a British and a Canadian
passport.
>>
>________________________________________________________________
____
>>
>> Since when has Canada recognised dual nationality?
>
>Canadian law has permitted dual nationality since
>February 1977.

Actually, for years before that in respect of Commonwealth
citizenships. I became a Canadian citizen in 1972 but retained my
UK citizenship as well.

nick

Susan Cohen

unread,
Jul 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/23/00
to

Nick wrote:

> And no-one here, including me, harassed any
> sick woman to death. Proof please.

Don't hold your breath. I didn't hold mine.

> Or are you just trying to
> upset the sick woman's family yet AGAIN (you know, the woman you
> claim never to mention but always manage to do so?

It's the problem with truth that he claims anyone who denies
his lies has.

Susan


alex...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jul 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/23/00
to
In article <397AAA2E...@hers.com>,

fla...@his.com wrote:
>
>
> Nick wrote:
>
> > And no-one here, including me, harassed any
> > sick woman to death. Proof please.
>
> Don't hold your breath. I didn't hold mine.
________________________________________________________________

It's you two who owe an explanation to your victim's family, not I or
anyone else. I won't hold my breath waiting for your reprobate
attitude to change however.
________________________________________________________________


>
> > Or are you just trying to
> > upset the sick woman's family yet AGAIN (you know, the woman you
> > claim never to mention but always manage to do so?
>
> It's the problem with truth that he claims anyone who denies
> his lies has.
>
> Susan

> _______________________________________________________________

Fishwife Cohen imagines she can play a game with me whereby she pokes
her long, oily nose into threads to make her lying, malevolent retorts
on posts where she has me "kilfilled". Well, Cohen, we can always
escalate the game a bit further and take a page from the much-denied-
but-well-documents incident with your victim Patricia...you too can be
stalked down, your (real) name and address and familial details posted.
Just like your friends hereabouts have done to others. Do hope one of
them around here forwards that little warning to you...before it's too
late.

Nick

unread,
Jul 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/23/00
to
alex...@my-deja.com wrote:
>In article <397AAA2E...@hers.com>,

>Fishwife Cohen imagines she can play a game with me whereby she
pokes
>her long, oily nose into threads to make her lying, malevolent
retorts
>on posts where she has me "kilfilled". Well, Cohen, we can
always
>escalate the game a bit further and take a page from the
much-denied-
>but-well-documents incident with your victim Patricia...

Here's Alex mentioning Patricia again - you remember, the guy who
lied about never mentioning her....

>you too
can be
>stalked down, your (real) name and address and familial details
posted.
>Just like your friends hereabouts have done to others. Do hope
one of
>them around here forwards that little warning to you...before
it's too
>late.

Seig Heil, Mein Fuhrer! Resorting to fascist threats will get you
no friends (not that you have any).

Nick

Wull

unread,
Jul 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/23/00
to
There's Nick speaking for everyone again.

I admit that I don't agree with everything that Alex says, but I'd
consider him more of a friend than Nick, any day.

In fact, on the ladder of worst to best, Nick is next to bottom on my
ladder. No, I take that back, he is second from bottom.

So please stop Nick from speaking for the whole group. Won't you
ever learn? I know for a fact that you scream from the highest apex
when anyone tries to speak for you. Turn about is fair play but you
don't believe in fairness so I guess I am asking too much.

Wull

Nick wrote:

Copper Queen

unread,
Jul 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/23/00
to
Sacha wrote:

>
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 19:07:16 GMT, alex...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> >In article <397AAA2E...@hers.com>,
> > fla...@his.com wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Nick wrote:
> >>
> >> > And no-one here, including me, harassed any
> >> > sick woman to death. Proof please.
> >>
> >> Don't hold your breath. I didn't hold mine.
> >________________________________________________________________
> >
> >It's you two who owe an explanation to your victim's family, not I or
> >anyone else. I won't hold my breath waiting for your reprobate
> >attitude to change however.
> >________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >> > Or are you just trying to
> >> > upset the sick woman's family yet AGAIN (you know, the woman you
> >> > claim never to mention but always manage to do so?
> >>
> >> It's the problem with truth that he claims anyone who denies
> >> his lies has.
> >>
> >> Susan
> >> _______________________________________________________________
> >
> >Fishwife Cohen imagines she can play a game with me whereby she pokes
> >her long, oily nose into threads to make her lying, malevolent retorts
> >on posts where she has me "kilfilled". Well, Cohen, we can always
> >escalate the game a bit further and take a page from the much-denied-
> >but-well-documents incident with your victim Patricia...you too can be

> >stalked down, your (real) name and address and familial details posted.
> >Just like your friends hereabouts have done to others. Do hope one of
> >them around here forwards that little warning to you...before it's too
> >late.
> >
> >alex d.SS
>
> Susan, in your shoes I'd take this post straight to your local police
> and your lawyer. It's a clear threat to your safety.
>
> --
> Sacha
> S. Devon
> www.garden.demon.co.uk


If any resident of the United States is given reason to fear for their
safety or the safety of their family members, they only need to contact
their local FBI office. Wull can testify to this fact.

cq

---
WIFELET
http://www.catnip.co.uk/longleat/longleat.html

Wull

unread,
Jul 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/23/00
to
Come on Morley, grow up.
Alex did not say he would stalk that person, he said it could be done. There
is a difference.

When the overt threat was made to my family by a raving maniac, the two
people that I remember egging him on were Nick and SC.

Wull-who agrees that the statement was wrong but it was not an overt threat,
IMO. Besides, Alex should realize that no one (I am speaking for one and
all just like Nick) cares who or where either of those two people are.

Wull

unread,
Jul 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/23/00
to
Dear Sacha,

If age is your criteria then you must remember as I have mentioned several times,
I am 69 two weeks ago. But I decline to compare life experiences.

I think my quarrel with stalking is due to the fact that I have been stalked in
the classic way (as defined by the new stalking law in California) by S Cohen. I
have mentioned it at least two times in this ng (and maybe more) and no one said
made one negative comment about her behavior. I take that to be an approval of
what she did. I even have the proof, her email sent to another news group. That
is why I felt that Alex's note was a random burst of bravado. But I could be
wrong.
I also said that I did not approve either. But I drew the line at reporting
anything but an overt threat to safety.

You have always been associated with the reporting group of people in this ng and
this thread falls right in line with what has transpired in the past.

My own personal opinion about privacy is that the only people who need to worry
about it
are those whose livelihood might depend on their employers not knowing that they
post in a gossip group. This fact was pointed out to me many moons ago.
Actually, I would even welcome meeting Nick or Andy if the occasion arose. :-)

Wull

Sacha wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 15:04:23 -0500, Wull <wjma...@datarecall.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Come on Morley, grow up.
> >Alex did not say he would stalk that person, he said it could be done. There
> >is a difference.

> Don't tell me to grow up, Wull, please. I'm a 54 year old woman who's
> raised three children and has as much and possibly more varied
> experience of life than you have, so don't even attempt to patronise
> me.
> Alex is perpetually and at times verbally and violently hostile to
> several members of this group. I think Susan should take this very
> seriously and indeed, I think he's threatening her! How else can you
> possibly read it? "Do as I say or I'll publish details of your life
> that may harm you" is the translation. How much more clear do you
> want this to be? I don't know what other people did and I'm not able
> to comment on that. I'm talking about what's in front of my face
> tonight.

Susan Cohen

unread,
Jul 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/23/00
to

Nick wrote:

> alex...@my-deja.com wrote:
> >In article <397AAA2E...@hers.com>,


>
> >Fishwife Cohen imagines she can play a game with me whereby she
> pokes
> >her long, oily nose into threads to make her lying, malevolent
> retorts
> >on posts where she has me "kilfilled". Well, Cohen, we can
> always
> >escalate the game a bit further and take a page from the
> much-denied-

> >but-well-documents incident with your victim Patricia...
>
> Here's Alex mentioning Patricia again - you remember, the guy who
> lied about never mentioning her....

Nick - he's obviously not well. Even if you think you
are "giving him enough rope", he doesn't need any "help"
to expose himself. The kindest thing to do would be
to just leave him alone to play with himself.

> >you too
> can be
> >stalked down, your (real) name and address and familial details
> posted.
> >Just like your friends hereabouts have done to others. Do hope
> one of
> >them around here forwards that little warning to you...before
> it's too
> >late.
>

> Seig Heil, Mein Fuhrer! Resorting to fascist threats will get you
> no friends (not that you have any).

You see what I mean? If he were halfway sane, he would know
that posting threats only makes him liable if anything does happen.

Susan


Susan Cohen

unread,
Jul 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/23/00
to

Sacha wrote:

> Susan, in your shoes I'd take this post straight to your local police
> and your lawyer. It's a clear threat to your safety.

Yes, I realize this, but I need the full headers to do anything.
having killfiled him, I don't see any of his messages until
someone replies to him.

I appreciate the concern for my safety, but I am not afraid
of him. I know this will only enfuriate him further, but I do
want to reasure everyone else who is obviously worried.

Susan

Susan Cohen

unread,
Jul 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/23/00
to

Sacha wrote:

> I'm a 54 year old woman who's
> raised three children and has as much and possibly more varied
> experience of life than you have, so don't even attempt to patronise
> me.
> Alex is perpetually and at times verbally and violently hostile to
> several members of this group. I think Susan should take this very
> seriously and indeed, I think he's threatening her!

Of course he is. But, please, stop worrying.
I am not worrying - there's nothing he can do to harm me.

alex...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jul 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/24/00
to
In article <397B4D94...@bellsouth.net>,

Copper Queen <etow...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Sacha wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 19:07:16 GMT, alex...@my-deja.com wrote:
> >
> > >In article <397AAA2E...@hers.com>,
> > > fla...@his.com wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Nick wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > And no-one here, including me, harassed any
> > >> > sick woman to death. Proof please.
> > >>
> > >> Don't hold your breath. I didn't hold mine.
> > >________________________________________________________________
> > >
> > >It's you two who owe an explanation to your victim's family, not I
or
> > >anyone else. I won't hold my breath waiting for your reprobate
> > >attitude to change however.
> > >________________________________________________________________
> > >>
> > >> > Or are you just trying to
> > >> > upset the sick woman's family yet AGAIN (you know, the woman
you
> > >> > claim never to mention but always manage to do so?
> > >>
> > >> It's the problem with truth that he claims anyone who denies
> > >> his lies has.
> > >>
> > >> Susan
> > >> _______________________________________________________________
> > >
> > >Fishwife Cohen imagines she can play a game with me whereby she
pokes
> > >her long, oily nose into threads to make her lying, malevolent
retorts
> > >on posts where she has me "kilfilled". Well, Cohen, we can always
> > >escalate the game a bit further and take a page from the much-
denied-
> > >but-well-documents incident with your victim Patricia...you too

can be
> > >stalked down, your (real) name and address and familial details
posted.
> > >Just like your friends hereabouts have done to others. Do hope
one of
> > >them around here forwards that little warning to you...before it's
too
> > >late.
> > >
> > >alex d.SS

> >
> > Susan, in your shoes I'd take this post straight to your local
police
> > and your lawyer. It's a clear threat to your safety.
> >
> > --
> > Sacha
> > S. Devon
> > www.garden.demon.co.uk
>
> If any resident of the United States is given reason to fear for their
> safety or the safety of their family members, they only need to
contact
> their local FBI office. Wull can testify to this fact.
>
> cq
>
____________________________________________________________________

They can contact, but they had better have a good reason to contact,
else they may be sued for malicious harassment. Read the post, stupid,
I said that it was possible she could be stalked down in the way she
and her friends (perhaps including you?) have stalked down other
posters names and addresses and posted them on this board, and not long
ago either. And I did not say I was about to do it either, merely that
it would be karmic justice if it were done. Where were you when Andy-
Pandy posted northlincs' name/address on this board? Not talking about
the FBI then, were you? Hypocrites and liars certainly don't scare me.

alex...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jul 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/24/00
to
In article <397B4FC7...@datarecall.net>,

Wull <wjma...@datarecall.net> wrote:
> Come on Morley, grow up.
> Alex did not say he would stalk that person, he said it could be
done. There
> is a difference.
>
> When the overt threat was made to my family by a raving maniac, the
two
> people that I remember egging him on were Nick and SC.
>
> Wull-who agrees that the statement was wrong but it was not an overt
threat,
> IMO. Besides, Alex should realize that no one (I am speaking for one
and
> all just like Nick) cares who or where either of those two people are.
>
_____________________________________________________________________

Wull, they are just looking for a reason to try on "another Patricia"
with me, so ignore it. However, thank you for exposing moronic Morley
in the new alter ego of Sacha. And trust Burbidge and Fishwife to be
the two who were egging on the real psychopath against you, you could
have got them as accessories on that one. As to Fishwife SC, who would
bother with the bitch, really.

alex...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jul 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/24/00
to
In article <18791f72...@usw-ex0101-005.remarq.com>,

Nick <choules...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
> alex...@my-deja.com wrote:
> >In article <397AAA2E...@hers.com>,

>
> >Fishwife Cohen imagines she can play a game with me whereby she
> pokes
> >her long, oily nose into threads to make her lying, malevolent
> retorts
> >on posts where she has me "kilfilled". Well, Cohen, we can
> always
> >escalate the game a bit further and take a page from the
> much-denied-
> >but-well-documents incident with your victim Patricia...
>
> Here's Alex mentioning Patricia again - you remember, the guy who
> lied about never mentioning her....
___________________________________________________________________

Oh I intend to mention her till the bitter end, rest assured. There's
no way you're going to get out of hearing about your little past dirty
deeds, scumbag. And you're part of the clique that goes on lying about
lying about never having harassed her to death.
___________________________________________________________________


>
> >you too
> can be
> >stalked down, your (real) name and address and familial details
> posted.
> >Just like your friends hereabouts have done to others. Do hope
> one of
> >them around here forwards that little warning to you...before
> it's too
> >late.
>

> Seig Heil, Mein Fuhrer! Resorting to fascist threats will get you
> no friends (not that you have any).
>

> Nick
>
___________________________________________________________________

Sorry but your Fuehrer Oswald Moseley is dead, that's probably why you
emigrated, being the obvious Fascist Pig you are in all your opinions.
Off to Canada where you can cozy up to all the ex-Nazis hiding out from
WWII still.

Wull

unread,
Jul 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/24/00
to
So who won the thousand dollars???
I must have missed that post because I would have surely commented on it.

Wull-guessing that there was a little reneging on that matter

alex...@my-deja.com wrote:

> In article <397B4D94...@bellsouth.net>,
> Copper Queen <etow...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > Sacha wrote:
> > >

> > > On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 19:07:16 GMT, alex...@my-deja.com wrote:
> > >
> > > >In article <397AAA2E...@hers.com>,

> > > > fla...@his.com wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Nick wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > And no-one here, including me, harassed any
> > > >> > sick woman to death. Proof please.
> > > >>
> > > >> Don't hold your breath. I didn't hold mine.
> > > >________________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > >It's you two who owe an explanation to your victim's family, not I
> or
> > > >anyone else. I won't hold my breath waiting for your reprobate
> > > >attitude to change however.
> > > >________________________________________________________________
> > > >>
> > > >> > Or are you just trying to
> > > >> > upset the sick woman's family yet AGAIN (you know, the woman
> you
> > > >> > claim never to mention but always manage to do so?
> > > >>
> > > >> It's the problem with truth that he claims anyone who denies
> > > >> his lies has.
> > > >>
> > > >> Susan
> > > >> _______________________________________________________________
> > > >

> > > >Fishwife Cohen imagines she can play a game with me whereby she
> pokes
> > > >her long, oily nose into threads to make her lying, malevolent
> retorts
> > > >on posts where she has me "kilfilled". Well, Cohen, we can always
> > > >escalate the game a bit further and take a page from the much-
> denied-

> > > >but-well-documents incident with your victim Patricia...you too


> can be
> > > >stalked down, your (real) name and address and familial details
> posted.
> > > >Just like your friends hereabouts have done to others. Do hope
> one of
> > > >them around here forwards that little warning to you...before it's
> too
> > > >late.
> > > >

> > > >alex d.SS
> > >
> > > Susan, in your shoes I'd take this post straight to your local
> police
> > > and your lawyer. It's a clear threat to your safety.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sacha
> > > S. Devon
> > > www.garden.demon.co.uk
> >
> > If any resident of the United States is given reason to fear for their
> > safety or the safety of their family members, they only need to
> contact
> > their local FBI office. Wull can testify to this fact.
> >
> > cq
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________
>
> They can contact, but they had better have a good reason to contact,
> else they may be sued for malicious harassment. Read the post, stupid,
> I said that it was possible she could be stalked down in the way she
> and her friends (perhaps including you?) have stalked down other
> posters names and addresses and posted them on this board, and not long
> ago either. And I did not say I was about to do it either, merely that
> it would be karmic justice if it were done. Where were you when Andy-
> Pandy posted northlincs' name/address on this board? Not talking about
> the FBI then, were you? Hypocrites and liars certainly don't scare me.
>

Copper Queen

unread,
Jul 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/24/00
to
Wull wrote:
>
> So who won the thousand dollars???
> I must have missed that post because I would have surely commented on it.
>
> Wull-guessing that there was a little reneging on that matter
>

It certainly wasn't me! I thought it was you!

the Fleming

unread,
Jul 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/24/00
to
Sacha wrote in message <39841bcc...@news.demon.co.uk>...
>On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 20:18:55 -0400, Susan Cohen <fla...@hers.com>
>wrote:

>>
>>Copper Queen wrote:
>>
>>> Martha Tassi wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Heck, I'm still trying to figure out when Morley gave
>>> > > > any such hints, and who really thinks anyone will
>>> > > > believe that Morley's a phony???
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Susan
>>> > >
>>> > > Morley's a phoney what?!
>>> > >
>>> > > cq
>>> >
>>> > ===
>>> > "Phoney baloney"?
>>> >
>>> > -Martha
>>> > ===
>>>
>>> Wellll! I've known her to carry a thread on for several days just on
>>> puns, but I can't recall any genuine baloney. I was able to trade puns
>>> with her for awhile, but she was still going strong when I dropped out
>>> of the thread!
>>>
>>> cq
>>
>>Do they even make baloney in England?
>>
>>Susan
>>
>>
>Not consciously! ;-)
>Actually, I don't know. I don't think I've ever seen it for sale but I
>haven't gone looking for it either. I'll have a look in Safeways!
>;-)
>--
>Sacha

I think the closest you can get over here is 'luncheon meat' sausage. From
what I understand 'baloney' to be.

the Fleming

the Fleming

unread,
Jul 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/24/00
to
Sacha wrote in message <39984326...@news.demon.co.uk>...
>On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 13:47:00 -0400, Copper Queen
><etow...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>>Sacha wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 16:42:15 GMT, Martha Tassi <mta...@home.com>

>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Copper Queen wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Martha Tassi wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > > > Sometimes my server misses threads but what kind of violence
are you
>>> >> > > > > speaking of???? Susie

>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > Heck, I'm still trying to figure out when Morley gave
>>> >> > > > any such hints, and who really thinks anyone will
>>> >> > > > believe that Morley's a phony???
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > Susan
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Morley's a phoney what?!
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > cq
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ===
>>> >> > "Phoney baloney"?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > -Martha
>>> >> > ===
>>> >>
>>> >> Wellll! I've known her to carry a thread on for several days just on
>>> >> puns, but I can't recall any genuine baloney. I was able to trade
puns
>>> >> with her for awhile, but she was still going strong when I dropped
out
>>> >> of the thread!
>>> >>
>>> >> cq
>>> >
>>> >=====
>>> >"Silly Salame"?
>>> >
>>> >-Martha
>>> >======
>>> >
>>> Why, thank you. Silly Sausage is a very affectionate English-ism!
>>> ;-)
>>> --
>>> Sacha
>>
>>
>>Like 'my little cabbage' is to the French? ;o)
>>
>>cq
>Er, yes. but sausage and cabbage starts to move towards the Teutonic
>rather! That's Teutonic dear, just in case you were about to start
>warming the Tectonic plates! ;-) My, aren't we international on
>here?!
>
>--
>Sacha

Along the same vein, I find it rather puzzling that (in French) "my little
flea" is a term of endearment (I heard a father using it to his young
daughter at a dance class), while "species of camel" is a grave insult...

the Fleming

Susan Cohen

unread,
Jul 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/24/00
to

Copper Queen wrote:

> Wull wrote:
> >
> > So who won the thousand dollars???
> > I must have missed that post because I would have surely commented on it.
> >
> > Wull-guessing that there was a little reneging on that matter
> >
>
> It certainly wasn't me! I thought it was you!

If it's what I think it is, no one did.

Susan

DeadeyeDev

unread,
Jul 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/24/00
to

>alex...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
>>They can contact, but they had better have a good reason to
>>contact, else they may be sued for malicious harassment. Read
>>the post, stupid, I said that it was possible she could be
>>stalked down in the way she and her friends (perhaps including
>>you?) have stalked down other posters names and addresses and
>>posted them on this board, and not long ago either. And I did
>>not say I was about to do it either, merely that it would be
>>karmic justice if it were done. Where were you when Andy- Pandy
>>posted northlincs' name/address on this board? Not talking
>>about the FBI then, were you? Hypocrites and liars certainly
>>don't scare me.
>alex d.SS

>


>So who won the thousand dollars???
>I must have missed that post because I would have surely
commented on it.
>
>Wull-guessing that there was a little reneging on that matter
>

I won the grand prize, Wull. Me! the guy who's response you
won't be able to read since you killfiled me a year ago.

However, I felt compelled to return Andy's money when I saw how
destitute he was left -- reduced to begging cornbread crumbs off
Copper Queen. What a sad sight, Andy begging on his knees in
front of a woman.

Well... that, as well as the demands by the producers of the
Fugitive (Paramount 1993) for a hefty cut. These Hollywood types
have to get their fingers into everything. Have you noticed?

BTW, someone should recommend the film to Alex d_ss. I think
he'd enjoy it. Richard Kimble (played by Harrison Ford) is
relentlessly pursued by Det. Gerard (Tommy Lee Jones) for the
murder of Kimble's wife. Kimble becomes a master of disguises
and always manages to keep one step ahead of the bumbing police,
while at the same time getting some tail! What a guy!

I rated it a "Two Thumbs Up" and even Phil gave it four stars.
Of course it may

DeadeyeDev

unread,
Jul 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/24/00
to

Of course it may go over Alex's head...

--------------

Wull

unread,
Jul 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/24/00
to
What in the world are you talking about?
I had no idea that you were a male.
I do not have a killfile. I don't even know what that is.

True, there is one person and one person only that I do not normally
read unless I am included in the thread.

I have made comments in the past about skipping the trolls from all
of those odd named news groups. If you were one of them I have
forgotten you.

So tell me, what is Phil's real name? Just out of curiosity. I am
not one of any group that ever tried to have his toss'd or what ever
you call it.

And what is your real name? You can email it to me if you are shy,
:-). But from the tenor of your posts I doubt if you are shy.

I think I discovered today that long lost Jim is jabberwocky, but I
am not for sure.

Have a nice day
Wull

DeadeyeDev wrote:

His Jadedness

unread,
Jul 25, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/25/00
to
>So who won the thousand dollars???
>I must have missed that post because I would have surely commented on it.

There was no reneging on the bet. Deadeye provided a very good send-up but my
sources in England couldn't verify it.

As of this date I have *NOT* posted any personal information on Phil.. I think
Alex needs to learn, among other things like civility and manners, to read
posts more closely.


His Jadedness, Andy; http://members.aol.com/agh3rd/index.htm
Nec petita nec cupita approbatio tua

alex...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jul 25, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/25/00
to
In article <20000725003704...@ng-fc1.aol.com>,
_____________________________________________________________________

You posted a so-called bounty as we all well know, liar, and the offer
was taken up and an address posted. I think you need to learn, among
other things like the truth, that hypocrisy like yours will always go
on stinking. So your own verbal violence that speeded Patricia on to
her death is something I could never nor would never want to
approximate.

alex d.SS

"Et mea messis erit"

0 new messages