Mary Kay & Villi on NBC tonight.....
Wild Monkshood
appear sincere and truly committed and in love. I say, bully for them.
Of course, I might have missed some salient points, as every time they
did a Villi close-up, I was startled by what a large head he has. Plus,
I notice his mouth scar was covered by make-up. Anyone know how he came
by that?
Wild (gossipy) Monkshood
AnthonyM1975
He got it on his first date with Mary Kay he had a tricycle accident.
Wild Monkshood
AnthonyM1975 wrote:
Sure. Thanks for playing.....
Wild Monkshood
>
avery
"Wild Monkshood" <wild_mo...@bellsloth.net> wrote in message
news:b26gg.7664$EX2....@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
She forgot to shave?
Wild Monkshood
avery wrote:
You should have signed this post as "Nick"...
Wild Monkshood
>
>
Faye wedding planner
wrong & illegal to have sex w/ a 13 yr old, if they could've kept sex
out til he got to be 18, I say live & let live. but when she broke the
law she had to be prosecuted, even though I agree they had a special
circumstance & do think they make a good couple and compliment each
other well. she should've kept it a friendship crush instead of letting
the sex happen, if it was gonna last 4ever, you could wait 5 years to
have sex..i mean if he could wait 7 yrs for her in jail, whats the diff?
I find it BS that she didn't know it was illegal , I'm 31 & know it's a
law not to screw 13 yr old boys..sheesh...she was 34 & a teacher for
God's sake.. she knew!!
gjs...@gmail.com
>
> >
> >
Sorry to say I missed it. Will there be a repeat?
The last I read, the kid was so stupid that he couldn't qualify for a
tattoo license.
"Joy" from "My Name is Earl" got her "hole piercin' license".
Jesus! How stupid do you have to be when an imaginary character could
stick you with needles and you can't even trace a chalk line?
Just kidding, of course.
: )
Wild Monkshood
gjs...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>>
>
> Sorry to say I missed it. Will there be a repeat?
No doubt. If dateline can repeat those Internet Predator broadcasts a
million times, I'm sure this will repeat.
Wild Monkshood
>
> : )
>
Alic...@gmail.com
======================
lol Lol LOL
Polonius...@excite.com
"It has been positively mind-boggling to observe the fawning by the
national news media over the one year 'wedding anniversary' of these
two pitiful people. Last week, the beaming couple was on the cover of
People Magazine. ...
But rather than telling the sick tale of a child predator who wound up
pregnant by her victim, the media seems positively enamored by the
relationship these two have, now that they've been officially married
for a year. Instead of asking Letourneau probing questions about why
she engaged in such sick, depraved behavior, they want to know if the
couple argues very much. Rather than ask the young man about what
it's like to be the victim of a sexual predator, reporters and
broadcasters ask him things like what it's like to be famous, if
he's recognized when he goes to the grocery store.
Once again, the American media wallows in a moral cesspool and tries to
glamorize a degenerate.
If it weren't so tragic, it would actually be a bit comical to
consider the double standard involved here. If a 40 year old man raped
a 13 year old girl and she became pregnant and they ended up married,
it's not likely they'd be featured on "Dateline" or on the
cover of People Magazine. In fact, if a man sexually molested a 13 year
old boy, I doubt that reporters would be clamoring to cover the story 8
years later if the boy moved in with the man.
Calling the relationship between Mary Kay Letourneau and Vili Fualaau a
marriage is a slap in the face to just about every single man and woman
who ever made the lifelong commitment to love, honor and obey one
another."
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/MikeGallagher/2006/06/02/199561.html
avery
You'll have to forgive me -- is that a pun (you know, nicks, shaving) or am
I being somehow mercilessly mocked? Or is there another answer, a subtlety I
may have missed? An pert essay answer would be preferable.
Wild Monkshood
avery wrote:
> "Wild Monkshood" <wild_mo...@bellsloth.net> wrote in message
> news:Ti7gg.7691$EX2....@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
>
>>
>>avery wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Wild Monkshood" <wild_mo...@bellsloth.net> wrote in message
>>>news:b26gg.7664$EX2....@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Okay, I watched it. Yes, it was a softball interview, but dang it, the
>>>>appear sincere and truly committed and in love. I say, bully for them. Of
>>>>course, I might have missed some salient points, as every time they did a
>>>>Villi close-up, I was startled by what a large head he has. Plus, I
>>>>notice his mouth scar was covered by make-up. Anyone know how he came by
>>>>that?
>>>
>>>
>>>She forgot to shave?
>>
>>You should have signed this post as "Nick"...
>
>
> You'll have to forgive me -- is that a pun (you know, nicks, shaving) or am
> I being somehow mercilessly mocked? Or is there another answer, a subtlety I
> may have missed? An pert essay answer would be preferable.
Nick/Shaving. No mocking......
Wild Monkshood
>
>
Kathy
> Wild Monkshood wrote:
>
>>avery wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Wild Monkshood" <wild_mo...@bellsloth.net> wrote in message
>>>news:b26gg.7664$EX2....@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Okay, I watched it. Yes, it was a softball interview, but dang it, the
>>>>appear sincere and truly committed and in love. I say, bully for them. Of
>>>>course, I might have missed some salient points, as every time they did a
>>>>Villi close-up, I was startled by what a large head he has. Plus, I notice
>>>>his mouth scar was covered by make-up. Anyone know how he came by that?
>>>
>>>
>>>She forgot to shave?
>>
>> You should have signed this post as "Nick"...
>>
>>Wild Monkshood
>
>
>
>
>
>>>
>
> Sorry to say I missed it. Will there be a repeat?
>
> The last I read, the kid was so stupid that he couldn't qualify for a
> tattoo license.
> "Joy" from "My Name is Earl" got her "hole piercin' license".
He didn't sound stupid to me. I thought he was quite articulate and
sounded much more mature than I expected. She seems younger than 44 and
he seems older than 22. I also would have expected her to dominate in
the interview, but he spoke up before her quite a bit. She did stare
adoringly at him whenever he spoke.
Kathy
gjs...@gmail.com
As I stated, I didn't see the interview but it does seem that they're
more interested in each other when the press comes around. A few years
ago, Villi said he was no longer in love but changed his mind when the
reporters showed up.
http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/psychology/marykay_letourneau/1.html
He showed artistic talent in 2nd grade, but can't get a license as a
tattoo artist? What does the test involve?
> the interview, but he spoke up before her quite a bit. She did stare
> adoringly at him whenever he spoke.
>
You don't need to be a licensed psychologist to see through this
control game. It's a sick relationship, and I suspect the happy couple
will remain happy only as long as the press is interested. If a few
years go by w/o press coverage they'll probably hold a press conference
announcing their split, (how many normal people call reporters to talk
about their personal lives), then announce another reconciliation for
the cameras.
How are these 2 SICK-Os supporting their sick, co-dependant
relationship anyway? Do they have jobs?
Did Dateline "pay" them? Maybe they just gave them a "gift" or a
"donation".
I'd really like an answer to these questions.
Patt...@aol.com
> As I stated, I didn't see the interview but it does seem that they're
> more interested in each other when the press comes around. A few years
> ago, Villi said he was no longer in love but changed his mind when the
> reporters showed up.
>
Not that I am trying to defend them or anything but I did see the
interview and you have it wrong. It wasn't about the publicity as far
as Villi changing his mind. It was all about the money. He claims he
said "what he had to" to try to get money from the lawsuit when him and
his mother sued the school "for allowing this to happen". He said he
had no regrets about lying on the stand because he needed money to
support the kids. Of course it backfired and he didn't get any $$$.
Not that I believe he only wanted money to support the kids. Have no
idea if they got paid for this interview but it sounds like they have
done really well financially somehow. A house on the beach, etc. That
said, they seem to be in love in their twisted sort of way.
Wild Monkshood
Patt...@aol.com wrote:
According to the show, they may have been paid upwards of a million
dollars for their wedding being filmed/promoted....
Wild Monkshood
parula
I know this is a wildly unpopular point of view, particularly with
some of the more vitriolic posters on this group, but I have thought
it was some kind of love relationship all along, not classic
pedophilia. They weren't born at the "right" times for each other by
today's standards, but she wanted HIM and no other. No one ever
accused her of going after other underage males.
None of which excuses striking up a sexual relationship with one so
young, and while married on top of that. But pedophilia -- no. If one
believes in karmic groups, multiple lives, etc. it could be said that
they have some kind of longterm connection perhaps. Me, I don't know
whether it works that way or not. But there's something powerful going
on between these two.
parula
gjs...@gmail.com
So, If a male teacher of the same age "fell in love" with a 13 year-old
girl, got her pregnant, spent time in prison, got out on parole and got
her pregnant again in the backseat of a car, went back to prison, and
came back to marry the girl, it wouldn't be pedophilia because he
claims they "knew each other in another life", it would be okay?
Is that correct?
If I rob a bank and said I"d done it because I was required to
according to my karmic destiny, I shouldn't go to prison, or to serve a
short sentence, be paroled, and rob the same bank for the same reason.
Me, I don't know
> whether it works that way or not. But there's something powerful going
> on between these two.
I do, but according to your reason, no one should ever have to go to
prison as long as they claim there was a powerful supernatural force
that compelled to them commit the crime in the first place.
Please explain the difference between a criminal and a religious person
who commits criminal acts because god told them that it is okay to do
so.
parula
I never said no one should go to prison or that what she did was legal
or acceptable behavior. Read my post again.
I was commenting on the pedophilia diagnosis that was put on the
situation, not the societal ramifications or whether there shouldn't
be consequences for such behavior.
And personally I think someone who behaves criminally in the name of
religion is a criminal. I also thnk that folks who claim to hear the
voice of god in their heads often lack introspection and insight into
themselves, so they are basically clueless about what drives them and
are given to blaming something "out there" for everything they do; or
they're schizophrenic, bipolar or have schizo-affective disorder. But
then I don't have much use for religion and its trappings. YMMV.
parula
Solitary Sunshine
Your comments were disgusting and pathetic. Don't try to backpedal now.