First Posted: 11-22-09 11:37 AM | Updated: 11-22-09 02:55 PM
Read More: Jenny D'Attoma, Martha Stewart, Martha Stewart Sarah Palin,
Showbiz Tonight Martha Stewart, Media News
By now everyone is getting a word in on Sarah Palin, including Martha
Stewart, who used some tough language to describe Palin. Stewart made
it clear to CNN HLN's Showbiz Tonight producer Jenny D'Attoma that
she's not a big fan:
"She's very boring to me, very boring. And a very, to me, kind of a
dangerous person. I mean, she's dangerous. She speaks, she's, she's so
confused. And anyone like that in government is a real problem."
Watch D'Attoma's interview with Stewart:
{{{skulduggerypleasant.org video goes here}}}
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/22/martha-stewart-calls-sara_n_366810.html
> "She's very boring to me, very boring. And a very, to me, kind of a
> dangerous person. I mean, she's dangerous.
Dangerous but boring?
Now, that's interesting.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN be...@iphouse.com
Said the convicted felon...
Man! That's big news. What more do we need to be convinced that
Sarah Palin is bad? Hell, Martha Stewart says so.
But I guess I'm just a natural born rebel and a sucker for the
underdog. I'm an Obama man, but I can't help but think that Sarah
Palin must have something going to cause the kind of frenzy we see in
the media. The lady has done nothing but speak her mind. Much of
what she said during McCain's campaign were fed to her by the McCain
clan. I'm definitely going to buy her book and see what she has to say
for herself.
I can't help but like this lady. I don't like her opposition to
healthcare reform, and I certainly don't like her undying support for
that little nest of poisonous reptiles called Israel, but I can't
shake the impression that this gal really wants to do the right thing
by the common people of the United States. Her manhandling of the
arrogant oil barons while governor of Alaska and doling out money to
the Alaskans to cover the increased fuel costs indicate a character
geared to protecting the commoners against the greed of the
oligarchs. That's a rare quality in American politics--one that is
badly needed today.
> I can't help but like this lady. I don't like her opposition to
> healthcare reform, and I certainly don't like her undying support for
> that little nest of poisonous reptiles called Israel, but I can't
> shake the impression that this gal really wants to do the right thing
> by the common people of the United States. Her manhandling of the
> arrogant oil barons while governor of Alaska and doling out money to
> the Alaskans to cover the increased fuel costs indicate a character
> geared to protecting the commoners against the greed of the
> oligarchs. That's a rare quality in American politics--one that is
> badly needed today.
A Republican who "really wants to do the right thing by the common
people of the United States"? Oh, how hard you make me laugh.
Isn't taxing the oil companies and then dolling out a check to every
citizen in the state (a state that does not pay state taxes) the most
blatant form of Socialism there is?
Only if you define Socialism as any action against big business. And
that's pretty much the standard Republican definition today. But in
Palin's case, there are other considerations. The oil companies
operating in Alaska are draining the natural resources of the state
without regard to the citizens of the state.
Under the ridiculous system in the United States, the oil companies
acquire clear ownership all the oil under the surface by simply
leasing the surface. And the oil companies alone decide whether and
when to produce, when and where to sell, and how much to charge.
In almost all the other countries, the government claims the oil for
all the people in the state and shares the profits with the oil
companies. Not in the United States. So Palin simply got around that
the only way she could: she levied taxes against production and
distributed the proceeds to the citizens of Alaska. Clever gal, don't
you think?
> By now everyone is getting a word in on Sarah Palin, including
> Martha Stewart, who used some tough language to describe Palin.
> Stewart made it clear to CNN HLN's Showbiz Tonight producer
> Jenny D'Attoma that she's not a big fan:
>
> "She's very boring to me, very boring. And a very, to me, kind of a
> dangerous person. I mean, she's dangerous. She speaks, she's,
> she's so confused. And anyone like that in government is a real
> problem."
It does not surprise me, given that Martha is a Hollywood elitist, but
it is disappointing to hear that Martha is that far out of touch with
things.
--
It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
for them, it's failing.
Is Connecticut close to Hollywood, then?
She lives in Bedford, NY, now.
Only a stone's throw from Hollywood for Superman, though.
Does Steve mind sharing his whore?
> On Nov 22, 6:57�pm, Taylor <lukebenw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "She's very boring to me, very boring. And a very, to me, kind of a
> > dangerous person. I mean, she's dangerous. She speaks, she's,
> > she's so confused. And anyone like that in government is a real
> > problem."
I'm sure Palin appreciates the convicted-felon's opinion of her.
Sharon Johnston, sentenced to three years in prison on those drug
charges? Is that who you're talking about?
I'm sure she's too stupid for that.