Yasmine's fella is the father of his ex-girlfriend's baby
AGC Gossip
The love lives of "Nash Bridges" beauty Yasmine Bleeth and Richard Grieco grew
a little more complicated -- and a lot more bizarre -- when Richard's
ex-girlfriend, Kimber Sissons, gave birth to HIS baby!
An 8-pound 4-ounce baby boy was recently born to Sissons by cesarean section at
Cedars- Sinai Medical Center in L.A. A short time later Grieco took a DNA test
to determine paternity.
The results have come back, and they indicate little Dylan Justice Sissons is
indeed the son of the macho "21 Jump Street" star!
"You only have to take a look at the baby to know," an insider told The
ENQUIRER.
"He looks just like Richard, complete with olive skin and dark hair. He's a
beautiful baby!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
FAST FACTS: Grieco got his first TV job after his very first audition -- as a
skiing playboy on the soap opera, "One Life to Live."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Grieco met Sissons over 10 years ago and began an on-and-off relationship with
her that Sissons claims continued even after he fell in love with Bleeth in
1996.
Now he says he wants nothing more to do with Sissons and still hasn't seen the
baby. But negotiations have begun over child support.
"He's made it clear he's prepared to live up to his financial obligation like a
man, but doesn't want to resume his romantic relationship with Kimber," the
insider said.
Meanwhile, Yasmine has decided to stand by her man. "All she wants is to settle
down with him and start their own family," said a friend. "To Yasmine, Richard
is a real catch."
-- PATRICIA TOWLE and ALAN BUTTERFIELD
Send all email to PUSSS...@aol.com
Jenni
told us:
>Yasmine has decided to stand by her man. "All she wants is to settle
>down with him and start their own family," said a friend. "To Yasmine,
>Richard (Grieco)
>is a real catch."
Yasmine thinks the "catch" is a man who:
>Now (Grieco) says he wants nothing more to do with Sissons and still hasn't
seen
>the
>baby. But negotiations have begun over child support.
Okay...but at least...
>"He's made it clear he's prepared to live up to his financial obligation like
>a
>man, but doesn't want to resume his romantic relationship with Kimber," the
>insider said.
Huh? He's a "man" for paying for the kid but he hasn't seen the baby?
Okay. Maybe I am still bitchy from my migraine. But this just sounds wacko.
He'll pay (maybe), but he won't see the child. Whatta guy! Yes, that is a
MAN. LOL. Great father.
Stormy Spice...Keeper of Sam Waterston and Kate Winslet...
"There's nothing wrong with being a bitch...but you'll burn in hell if you're a
stupid bitch." ~~ Words of Puzz
"It was scary. When I looked up, she wasn't wearing many clothes."~~ Tiger
Woods
Annie
father of his ex-girlfriend" because my newsreader cut it off.
I was scratching my head, and then I clicked on it to read up about the
alleged incest, and saw that it was "his ex-girlfriend's baby". Thank
goodness!
annie
CzarCasm
> NATIONAL ENQUIRER....
>
"All she wants is to settle
> down with him and start their own family," said a friend. "To Yasmine, Richard
Maybe it is true what I heard that, Yasmine is as dumb as a box of rocks...
Lac...@aol.com
agcg...@aol.comBillie (AGC Gossip) wrote:
> NATIONAL ENQUIRER....
>
>
> Meanwhile, Yasmine has decided to stand by her man. "All she wants is
to settle down with him and start their own family," said a friend. "To
Yasmine, Richard is a real catch."
>
Proving once again that those "Baywatch" chicks really aren't the
sharpest tools in the shed!!!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Lac...@aol.com
strmy...@aol.comNoSpam (Jenni) wrote:
> >agcg...@aol.comBillie (AGC Gossip)
> told us:
>
> >down with him and start their own family," said a friend. "To
Yasmine,
> >is a real catch."
>
> Yasmine thinks the "catch" is a man who:
>
> >Now (Grieco) says he wants nothing more to do with Sissons and still
hasn't
> seen
> >the
> >baby. But negotiations have begun over child support.
>
> Okay...but at least...
>
> >"He's made it clear he's prepared to live up to his financial
obligation like
> >a
> >man, but doesn't want to resume his romantic relationship with
Kimber," the
> >insider said.
>
> Huh? He's a "man" for paying for the kid but he hasn't seen the baby?
> Okay. Maybe I am still bitchy from my migraine. But this just sounds
wacko.
> He'll pay (maybe), but he won't see the child. Whatta guy! Yes, that
is a
> MAN. LOL. Great father.
>
him) should be strung up by his bal
Stockm2115
Billie - AGC Queen
<<Yasmine's ass is to big. SHe needs to eat less and exercise. Badly!>>
Are you sure you're not confusing her with Tiffany-Amber Theissen? (sp?)
Billie
Annie
in response to:
> <<Yasmine's ass is to big. SHe needs to eat less and exercise. Badly!>>
>
> Are you sure you're not confusing her with Tiffany-Amber Theissen? (sp?)
>
> Billie
>
What ever did happen to Tiffani-Amber??? She just didn't gain weight after
the Saved By the Bell years........her whole face changed. I have never
seen someone gain 30-40lbs and have their face balloon like that. And
another thing I don't get....why on earth did she get breast implants after
gaining all that weight?
Don't get me wrong.....she is not fat. That's not what I'm saying...I'm
simply saying that the weight gain was no big deal but it changed her
entire face- and on top of that, the breast implants make her weight gain
look more pronounced.
I'm just wondering...if I had all the resources she did, I would have gone
about things a different way I guess.
annie (don't flame me, not trying to offend anyone)
Toni
wrote:
>stock wrote:
><<Yasmine's ass is to big. SHe needs to eat less and exercise. Badly!>>
This is a troll. do not feed them.
>Are you sure you're not confusing her with Tiffany-Amber Theissen? (sp?)
What's wrong with either of them? I think they look great,
unlike those thin gals like Tori.
--
=== You're reading the words of Toni Taia ===
We shall see to which one the Olympian grants the glory.
Email: ta...@NOSPAMxtra.co.nz (sub the NOSPAM for guess what? :)
Billie - AGC Queen
PK wrote:
>Are you sure you're not confusing her with Tiffany-Amber Theissen? (sp?)>>
**What's wrong with either of them? I think they look great, unlike those thin
gals like Tori.**
Nothing...I think they're both gorgeous..however, Tiffany is heavier, and in
the past some at this group have confused the two.
Billie
Lac...@aol.com
Lac...@aol.com
sorry ass into court for past due child support. Over the course of
the past four months, Grieco has reportedly made only one payment of
$1,000 to Sissons (which wouldn't feed a hamster nowadays). Sissons
alleges that she and the baby are "struggling" and that if it weren't
for Grieco's sister, her friends and family, she and the baby would be
"out on the street."
Meanwhile, Grieco is busy wining, dining and sixty-nining his
girlfriend, Yasmine Bleeth, at his $1.46 million home in Bel-Air,
sitting his FAT ASS all over his home furnishings worth a reported $92K,
admiring his artwork valued at $34K, and tooling around town in one of
four custom Harleys he owns.
Grieco hasn't seen the baby yet for fear that Bleeth will dump him if he
has any involvement with the child whatsoever. According to Sissons,
Bleeth is unaware that she actually spent an ENTIRE month at Grieco's
place (Grieco apparently told Bleeth that the baby was the result of a
one-time "big mistake" that "would never happen again"). I guess it
won't. . . those pesky paternity suits sure can take the fizzle outta
any fling!!!!
Ms. Diva to you.....
herself pregnant trying to trap him so he would stay with her and the baby.
Only problem, he didn't, so not she's selling her story. I doubt she is just
"getting by". And besides, support should go to the child, its not his
responsibility to support her too. She can get a job. I think he should go for
support of the kid and take it away from her irresponsible ass and raise it
with Jasmine.
Official Keeper of Carlos Santana and Patti Labelle
"Men are only as faithful as their options" Chris Rock
"The things that come to those who wait are probably things left by those who
got there first" Steven Tyler
Brute!
years. If he has, it's been very low-profile work which can't pay
much.
On 17 Aug 1999 07:12:53 GMT, div...@aol.comRedRum (Ms. Diva to
you.....) wrotd:
Puzzla
"Ms. Diva to you....." wrote:
>
> Ok, time to disagree once again. I think the woman is full of it, and got
> herself pregnant trying to trap him so he would stay with her and the baby.
> Only problem, he didn't, so not she's selling her story. I doubt she is just
> "getting by". And besides, support should go to the child, its not his
> responsibility to support her too. She can get a job. I think he should go for
> support of the kid and take it away from her irresponsible ass and raise it
> with Jasmine.
That's what I thought when I read the story. Whatever happened to
getting off YOUR ass to take care of the child? Sheesh. She's had nine
months to determine what she was going to do for a living. I'm sure
that once most of us reach a certain age, we realize we shouldn't depend
on
a man (or anyone else for that matter) for our survival.
Puzz
Billie - AGC Queen
<<'Just read that Richard Grieco's ex, Kimber Sissons, is haulin' his
sorry ass into court for past due child support. Over the course of
the past four months, Grieco has reportedly made only one payment of
$1,000 to Sissons (which wouldn't feed a hamster nowadays). Sissons
alleges that she and the baby are "struggling" and that if it weren't
for Grieco's sister, her friends and family, she and the baby would be
"out on the street.">>
Since paternity has been established, she should have no trouble having the
court settle child support payments...and Richard should NOT be paying her
anything, except through the court. And I agree with everyone else...she's
healthy enough to spread her legs and have a baby...get a job!
Billie
Lac...@aol.com
According to the report, Sissons is merely asking for what Grieco is
required by law to pay for the support of HIS child. Also, Grieco DOES
NOT WANT custody of the baby. . . in fact, he refuses to have ANY
involvement with the child at all for fear that it will interefere with
his relationship with Bleeth. Now, I ask you -- WHO'S BEING THE
IRRESPONSIBLE ASS?
In article <19990817031253...@ng-fm1.aol.com>,
div...@aol.comRedRum (Ms. Diva to you.....) wrote:
> Ok, time to disagree once again. I think the woman is full of it, and
got herself pregnant trying to trap him so he would stay with her and
the baby. Only problem, he didn't, so not she's selling her story. I
doubt she is just "getting by". And besides, support should go to the
child, its not his responsibility to support her too. She can get a job.
I think he should go for support of the kid and take it away from her
irresponsible ass and raise it with Jasmine
Lac...@aol.com
this entire newsgroup! I think some of you should try being a single
mom for a while! And why should SHE be forced to haul HIS ass into
court to make him own up to his responsibility??!!
Bottom Line -- There's a little kid who needs a dad and a jerk who's
unwilling to be one (financially or otherwise).
In article <19990817160135...@ng-cp1.aol.com>,
pusss...@aol.com (Billie - AGC Queen) wrote:
> Since paternity has been established, she should have no trouble
having the court settle child support payments...and Richard should NOT
be paying her anything, except through the court. And I agree with
everyone else...she's healthy enough to spread her legs and have a
baby...get a job!
>
> B
Lac...@aol.com
In article <37b9a1e3...@nntp.we.mediaone.net>,
y...@spammers.can.all.drop.dead.com (Brute!) wrote:
> What I want to know is what's Grieco living off?
k00l...@my-deja.com
weren't married, they didn't even have a realtionship then. She was NOT
his girlfriend then. It looks like she trapped him in, especially all
this running around through press now. Why does she not keep on
acting/working to support herself? she was a rather successless actress
and it seems, she wanted to make herself a better life and hoped to get
Grieco this way, but didn't. Of course it's shit, he cheated on
Yasmine, but I guess he's in enough trouble for that already. And what
would u think about this situation , if you were in it? This all does
not sound to easy. This is not a planned or wanted child or a child
that sprang from a relationship. The mother (and the father, too , but
who knows what she told him. this all looks too much planned) should
have thought about this first before becoming pregnant. Poor baby.
In article <7pfq3e$be$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Billie - AGC Queen
<<According to the report, Sissons is merely asking for what Grieco is
required by law to pay for the support of HIS child. Also, Grieco DOES
NOT WANT custody of the baby. . . in fact, he refuses to have ANY
involvement with the child at all for fear that it will interefere with
his relationship with Bleeth. Now, I ask you -- WHO'S BEING THE
IRRESPONSIBLE ASS?>>
I'd call the mother lucky...if Grieco doesn't want anything to do with the
baby, better she know it now, than have him taking the baby for visitation and
have it mistreated. I say take her child support and run.
Billie
Puzzla
>
>
>According to the report, Sissons is merely asking for what Grieco is
>required by law to pay for the support of HIS child. Also, Grieco DOES
>NOT WANT custody of the baby. . . in fact, he refuses to have ANY
>involvement with the child at all for fear that it will interefere with
>his relationship with Bleeth. Now, I ask you -- WHO'S BEING THE
>IRRESPONSIBLE ASS?
>
She and he is. The problem that *I* saw was that she had to depend on
others just so that she and the baby will have something to eat.
Getting support from him is one thing, feeding a child that you
knowingly gave birth to is another. Whatever happened to his support
being icing? Why must his support be the only income that she has?
Sheesh.
Puzz
>
>In article <19990817031253...@ng-fm1.aol.com>,
> div...@aol.comRedRum (Ms. Diva to you.....) wrote:
>> Ok, time to disagree once again. I think the woman is full of it, and
>got herself pregnant trying to trap him so he would stay with her and
>the baby. Only problem, he didn't, so not she's selling her story. I
>doubt she is just "getting by". And besides, support should go to the
>child, its not his responsibility to support her too. She can get a job.
>I think he should go for support of the kid and take it away from her
>irresponsible ass and raise it with Jasmine
>
>
Puzzla
>'Just lovin' that "Blame the Woman" mentality that seemingly pervades
>this entire newsgroup!
Huh? Care to take us down memory lane on this one?
>I think some of you should try being a single
>mom for a while!
And how can YOU say that you aren't talking to one or two or thousands
of single mothers? You know nothing of our lives. Sheesh.
>And why should SHE be forced to haul HIS ass into
>court to make him own up to his responsibility??!!
Probably because this is the only reason she will get any support. I
have no problem with her getting support from this jerk. My problem
is her sob story on how she can't make ends meet unless she gets
support from him. Sheesh.
>
>Bottom Line -- There's a little kid who needs a dad and a jerk who's
>unwilling to be one (financially or otherwise).
>
But I doubt this is news to her. She was probably given that low-down
seconds after she told him of the pregnancy. She had nine months to
prepare for his behavior. But instead of getting off her ass to get a
job, she's floating news blurbs on how he is such an asshole.
Puzz
>
>In article <19990817160135...@ng-cp1.aol.com>,
> pusss...@aol.com (Billie - AGC Queen) wrote:
>
>> Since paternity has been established, she should have no trouble
>having the court settle child support payments...and Richard should NOT
>be paying her anything, except through the court. And I agree with
>everyone else...she's healthy enough to spread her legs and have a
>baby...get a job!
>>
>> B
>
>
Baranduyn
>>NOT WANT custody of the baby. . . in fact, he refuses to have ANY
>>involvement with the child at all for fear that it will interefere with
>>his relationship with Bleeth. Now, I ask you -- WHO'S BEING THE
>>IRRESPONSIBLE ASS?
>>
>
>She and he is. The problem that *I* saw was that she had to depend on
>others just so that she and the baby will have something to eat.
>Getting support from him is one thing, feeding a child that you
>knowingly gave birth to is another. Whatever happened to his support
>being icing? Why must his support be the only income that she has?
>Sheesh.
>
>Puzz
>
>
>>
>>In article <19990817031253...@ng-fm1.aol.com>,
>> div...@aol.comRedRum (Ms. Diva to you.....) wrote:
>>> Ok, time to disagree once again. I think the woman is full of it, and
>>got herself pregnant trying to trap him so he would stay with her and
>>the baby.
Well, he could have avoided much of this if only he'd memorized the words "Mr.
Condom is your friend."
BTW, why ARE they messing around sans raincoat? Do they think that
hetero=immune?
They're both lucky that all they got out of this is a baby.
*************************************************
Ecstatic keeper of Antonio Banderas
Lac...@aol.com
puz...@usa.net wrote:
>
> And how can YOU say that you aren't talking to one or two or thousands
> of single mothers? You know nothing of our lives. Sheesh.
Because if you were, you'd obviously show a little more empathy than you
have so far.
> >Bottom Line -- There's a little kid who needs a dad and a jerk who's
> >unwilling to be one (financially or otherwise).
> >
>
> But I doubt this is news to her. She was probably given that low-down
> seconds after she told him of the pregnancy. She had nine months to
> prepare for his behavior. But instead of getting off her ass to get a
> job, she's floating news blurbs on how he is such an asshole.
I think she has a right to be pissed off and tell the world about it!
And congratuFUCKINGlations on missing my point entirely. . .you're
obviously very young, very stupid or both.
Lac...@aol.com
In article <19990819140636...@ng-ba1.aol.com>,
bara...@aol.com (Baranduyn) wrote:
> >
> Well, he could have avoided much of this if only he'd memorized the
words "Mr. Condom is your friend."
>
> BTW, why ARE they messing around sans raincoat? Do they think that
> hetero=immune?
>
> They're both lucky that all they got out of this is a baby.
>
> *************************************************
> Ecstatic keeper of Antonio Banderas
>
Lac...@aol.com
k00l...@my-deja.com wrote:
> C'mon people Grieco only has to support the child, not the woman.
The report did not say that SHE's asking for support for herself. .
.just for the care of the baby. The point IS he's NOT supporting HIS
child!!!!
>Why does she not keep on acting/working to support herself? she was a
>rather successless actress
Well, I think you just answered your own question, didn't you? And,
"Successless?" If anyone knows about that, I'm sure it's Mr. Grieco.
>It looks like she trapped him in, especially all
> this running around through press now. And what
> would u think about this situation , if you were in it?
OOOOOhhhh plllleasse!!! Only a TOTAL MORON ruled by his hormones would
get himself into a situation like this!!! If she trapped him, then he
was obviously stupid (or just plain horny) enough to allow it in the
first place! Contraception is the RESPONSIBILITY of BOTH parties . . .he
should've taken HIS OWN precautions!!!
>This is not a planned or wanted child or a child
> that sprang from a relationship.
Yes, but nevertheless it is still A CHILD who's being ignored by his
father. And why should Grieco be permitted to walk away from his
responsibility???? He could learn a thing or two from his
contemporaries Johnny Depp and Christian Slater. Their babies were
unplanned as well, but you don't see THEM turning their backs on their
children like cowards.
Billie - AGC Queen
Puzz:
<<I think she has a right to be pissed off and tell the world about it!
And congratuFUCKINGlations on missing my point entirely. . .you're
obviously very young, very stupid or both.>>
Lace...be afraid, very, very afraid. Puzz..take it away.
Billie
BTW, didn't we already establish that you are a R.G. stalker...either a spurned
lover, or an unrecognized crew member? (see below). Get lost troll...have a
nice day!
Subject: Richard Grieco's "Stream" of Consciousness
Date: 1998/10/24
Author: Laceria <Lac...@aol.com>
Get your cameras ready, girls!!!
"I have this bad habit of going out in the morning and peeing. Maybe someone
took a picture. I hope not." -- Richard Grieco, in "Entertainment Weekly,"
trying to explain away nude pictures of himself on the Internet.
Yet another thinly-veiled, desperate plea for attention by Richard Grieco, king
of the Hollywood has-beens.
Well, at least we know he's housebroken, if not toilet-trained.
* * *
Subject: Richard Grieco Fesses Up!
Date: 1999/03/03
Author: Laceria <Lac...@aol.com>
Richard Grieco has agreed to take a DNA test to prove (or unprove, as the case
may be) the paternity of Kimber Sissons' baby. Apparently, he FINALLY
confessed to Yasmine Bleeth that there was "a possibility" that he could be the
father. Poor little Yasmine was soooo overcome with grief at the news, she
requested a break during shooting on the "Nash Bridges" set, however, after
much soul searching (and given the fact that Grieco is reportedly "supernatural
in the sack"), she's decided to stand by her man come what may. Hillary Clinton
would be proud!
Doesn't it just warm the cockles of your heart? <<sigh! cough!
* * *
Subject: Suggestions for Yasmine B. re: Grieco's Love Child
Date: 1998/12/14
Author: Laceria <Lac...@aol.com>
Chaosinred wrote:
>>Seems [Richard Grieco} and his ex-Kimber sissons are going to have a kid..and
this all happened when he cheated on yasmine bleeth, allegedly.
Kimber is willing to take DNA tests to prove it..She says the date was aug 11.
Oh my...what WILL Yasmine do? LOL<<
Suggestions for Yasmine:
1. Chop off his dick and make Lorena Cordon Bleu for dinner. 2. Steal his
credit card (if the loser even has one) and buy 30 pastel-color blazers (ala
Miami Vice). Replace the 30 Armani suits in his closet with them. (okay so this
one was a bit lame. . . so sue me!) 3. Go to every Blockbuster Video Store in
L.A. and hide his videos (all three of 'em) behind cassettes of "Fear and
Loathing in Las Vegas."
Let's just hope little Grieco, Jr. stays away from acting (talent DOES NOT run
in the family)!!!
* * *
Subject: Richard Grieco = Pathetic!!!!!
Date: 1998/10/04
Author: Laceria <Lac...@aol.com>
Just when I thought Richard Grieco couldn't get any more pathetic, he surprises
me once again!
He sounded completely drunk and/or just plain stupid on Thursday's Howard Stern
show (during the very few times in which he actually spoke, that is)!! Then, a
caller described an incident in which Grieco was having sex in a college
dormitory and accidentally burned his dick when he rolled over onto a hot
radiator. I'm sure many listeners thought, "Wow, he must have a huge cock!" I,
on the other hand, thought, "What a fucking loser! He probably paid someone to
call in with THAT story!"
And, based on the reviews of his role in "A Night at the Roxbury," it sounds
like he's definitely living up to his reputation as a total Hollywood reject!
Yasmine Bleeth would be wise to get away from this guy as quickly as possible!
k00l...@my-deja.com
c'mon you still don't get my point. Slater and Depp ARE with the
mothers of their childs and they had and still have a relationship with
them. and as far as the news go, grieco pays for his child 1000 dollars
a month. it is kimber, who says she is struggling with this money - the
money is for the child, not for Kimber. noone forces kimber to be an
actress if she is unsuccessful with that. she can do other things. she
must have done other things before to survive so far. grieco is not as
unsuccessful as kimber. he has movie productions constantly and he has
his own firm. kimber and grieco had an on&off realtionship for 10 years
as she said and so far there didnt spring a child from it, so even if
they use condoms elsewhere, this can be a situation where u think u
know the partner and nothing happens. I#m not claiming grieco is
intellectual - neither is kimber, the whole situation is shit , but it
still looks like kimber used grieco to me. thats about it.
In article <7pinp2$39u$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Puzzla
>In article <37bc41e9...@news.pdq.net>,
> puz...@usa.net wrote:
>>
>> And how can YOU say that you aren't talking to one or two or thousands
>> of single mothers? You know nothing of our lives. Sheesh.
>
>Because if you were, you'd obviously show a little more empathy than you
>have so far.
>
Huh? Why should *I* have empathy or sympathy for someone who is
obviously trying to sway public opinion to her favor? This is just a
ploy to get more money out of him. Btw, you still haven't answered
how you KNOW I'm not a single mother.
>
>> >Bottom Line -- There's a little kid who needs a dad and a jerk who's
>> >unwilling to be one (financially or otherwise).
>> >
>>
>> But I doubt this is news to her. She was probably given that low-down
>> seconds after she told him of the pregnancy. She had nine months to
>> prepare for his behavior. But instead of getting off her ass to get a
>> job, she's floating news blurbs on how he is such an asshole.
>
>I think she has a right to be pissed off and tell the world about it!
>And congratuFUCKINGlations on missing my point entirely. . .
And what point would that be o' stupid one? You are the person so
obsessed with trashing Greico that you can't read straight. Since
that concave in your forhead makes reading comprehension hard, I'll do
the human thing and make it easier for someone as stupid as you
understand. Here is a quote from the original post that upset most of
us.
BEGIN QUOTE: Sissons alleges that she and the baby are "struggling"
and that if it weren't for Grieco's sister, her friends and family,
she and the baby would be "out on the street". END QUOTE.
Now since you're too stoopid to be believed, I'll break it down even
more. WE aren't arguing that he SHOULDN'T pay child support. WE are
saying his child support shouldn't be the difference between living in
a house and living on the street. Now do you get it? Or is your mind
as full of cheese as your panties?
>you're
>obviously very young,
Thank you.
>very stupid
Well, at least I can follow the general train of thought. Can YOU say
the same?
Puzz
-=JR=-
of wits with an unarmed opponent is unfair.
-=JR=-
--
You have the right to remain silent.
Anything you say will be misquoted
and used against you.
CiRa
relationship that he continued through his relationship with Yasmine,
unbeknownst to the Baywatch chick. Kimber could have gotten pregnant to
"snatch" him way before this...I think this one's on Grieco.
Cira
CiRa
~~~~~~~~~
>baby's daddy!!!
>From: Lac...@aol.com
>Date: Fri, 20 August 1999 12:23 AM EDT
>Message-id: <7pil8b$1ms$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>
>
>FINALLY, an INTELLIGENT RESPONSE and valid point!
>
>In article <19990819140636...@ng-ba1.aol.com>,
> bara...@aol.com (Baranduyn) wrote:
>> >
>> Well, he could have avoided much of this if only he'd memorized the
>words "Mr. Condom is your friend."
>>
>> BTW, why ARE they messing around sans raincoat? Do they think that
>> hetero=immune?
>>
>> They're both lucky that all they got out of this is a baby.
>>
>> *************************************************
>> Ecstatic keeper of Antonio Banderas
>>
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Cira
CiRa
get somewhere with a career;a child could crimp her style in "hollyweird." Now
that she has the baby, I believe she is ecstatic, but not for any money Grieco
could give the baby.
Cira
Lac...@aol.com
While I am deeply moved and truly honored by the recognition, I find it
quite pathetic that you have nothing better to do with your time than
accumulate MY Deja postings regarding Richard Grieco. Mickey D's must
have given you the week off, huh?
If, by your definition, airing my opinion about a celebrity is the
equivalent of stalking, then I think everyone in this newsgroup is
guilty of that. And, at least I'm consistent in voicing my distaste for
this man. You, on the other hand, seem to be suffering from some sort
of Bipolar Disorder. One minute, you're defending him, the next you're
calling him a potential child abuser. Given your obviously minuscule
mentality, allow me to refresh your memory:
In article <19990820092513...@ng-fd1.aol.com>,
pusss...@aol.com (Billie - AGC Queen) wrote:
and Richard should NOT be paying her anything, except through the court.
In article <19990820092513...@ng-fd1.aol.com>,
pusss...@aol.com (Billie - AGC Queen) wrote:
I'd call the mother lucky...if Grieco doesn't want anything to do with
the baby, better she know it now, than have him taking the baby for
visitation and have it mistreated.
And, "Bill," as for the following childish admonition:
> Lace...be afraid, very, very afraid. Puzz..take it away.
Given what I've observed of her illogical, poorly reasoned arguments
thus far, I'm quite confident that I have NOTHING AT ALL to fear!
In article <19990820092513...@ng-fd1.aol.com>,
pusss...@aol.com (Billie - AGC Queen) wrote:
> Laceria who is more than a little interested in Richard Grieco wrote
regarding
> Puzz:
>
> <<I think she has a right to be pissed off and tell the world about
it!
-=JR=-
--
You have the right to remain silent.
Anything you say will be misquoted
and used against you.
<Lac...@aol.com> wrote in message news:7pko5m$jjs$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
Billie - AGC Queen
<<Given what I've observed of her illogical, poorly reasoned arguments
thus far, I'm quite confident that I have NOTHING AT ALL to fear!>>
Wrong...look in the mirror...lol.
Billie..good idea Judith <PLONK>
Lac...@aol.com
In article <Odqi79y6#GA.304@cpmsnbbsa02>,
"-=JR=-" <jro...@NOSPAM.MSN.com> wrote:
> Please, Puzz, stop playing with the trolls. You *know* a battle
> of wits with an unarmed opponent is unfair.
>
> -=JR=-
> --
> You have the right to remain silent.
> Anything you say will be misquoted
> and used against you.
>
>
Lac...@aol.com
puz...@usa.net wrote:
> Huh? Why should *I* have empathy or sympathy for someone who is
obviously trying to sway public opinion to her favor? This is just a
ploy to get more money out of him. Btw, you still haven't answered
how you KNOW I'm not a single mother.
If you ARE indeed a single mother, then your obdurate remarks just prove
that you're an even bigger FOOL than I suspected! I realize that
"obdurate" is a BIIGGG SCARRRRY word for a BUFFOON like you, so you'd
better sound it out carefully and then go find a dictionary . . .if you
even own one, that is. It's probably buried under your G.E.D.
certificate (which DID NOT pay off, by the way) and welfare checkstubs.
In article <37bd82ff...@news.pdq.net>,
puz...@usa.net wrote:
> And what point would that be o' stupid one?
Although it ABSOLUTELY AMAZES me that someone as PATHETICALLY DENSE as
you can actually SURVIVE in this day and age, I'll repeat my point again
(Pay attention this time, STUPID!!!):
Bottom Line -- There's a little kid who needs a dad and a jerk who's
unwilling to be one (financially or otherwise).
In article <37bd82ff...@news.pdq.net>,
puz...@usa.net wrote:
> You are the person so obsessed with trashing Greico that you can't
read straight. WE aren't arguing that he SHOULDN'T pay child
support. WE are saying his child support shouldn't be the difference
between living in a house and living on the street.
And YOU'RE so obsessed with blaming Sissons that you just CANNOT get it
through YOUR THICK FUCKING SKULL that a baby requires more than just
financial support. EVERY child deserves the love and emotional support
of BOTH parents. At least Sissons is providing that. . . Grieco's too
busy running around with his "Baywatch" trophy.
In article <37bd82ff...@news.pdq.net>,
puz...@usa.net wrote:
>Well, at least I can follow the general train of thought.
Honey, THAT train left you standing on the platform LOOOOONG AGO!!!!
If you can follow it, you'd better start running, bitch!
Lac...@aol.com
pusss...@aol.com (Billie - AGC Queen) wrote:
>
> Wrong...look in the mirror...lol.
>
Oh BRAVOOOO! What a witty retort, you stupid fucking "Pussy!" Why
don't you just crawl back to your trailer park and DO NOT ADDRESS ME
until you've come up with a remark that is worthy of consideration.
Given that monumental task for your diminutive brain, I'm quite CERTAIN
that I won't be hearing from the likes of you again.
> Billie..good idea Judith <PLONK>
Oooooh, goodie! Idiotspeak! Not surprising, considering the source!
Lac...@aol.com
k00l...@my-deja.com wrote:
> Hi there,
> c'mon you still don't get my point. Slater and Depp ARE with the
> mothers of their childs and they had and still have a relationship
with them.
Grieco doesn't have to have a relationship with Sissons. . . but it is
HIS responsibility to have a relationship with HIS SON!!!!!
>and as far as the news go, grieco pays for his child 1000 dollars
> a month.
Actually the report said that Grieco has made ONE payment of $1,000 thus
far (not $1,000 per month).
>grieco is not as unsuccessful as kimber. he has movie productions
constantly and he has his own firm.
Well, then. . . all the more reason for him to PAY UP!!
Puzzla
>In article <37bd82ff...@news.pdq.net>,
> puz...@usa.net wrote:
>
>> Huh? Why should *I* have empathy or sympathy for someone who is
>obviously trying to sway public opinion to her favor? This is just a
>ploy to get more money out of him. Btw, you still haven't answered
> how you KNOW I'm not a single mother.
>
>If you ARE indeed a single mother, then your obdurate remarks just prove
>that you're an even bigger FOOL than I suspected! I realize that
>"obdurate" is a BIIGGG SCARRRRY word for a BUFFOON like you, so you'd
>better sound it out carefully and then go find a dictionary . . .
Why would I do both? LOL There's no need for me to 'sound' it out,
if you've taken the time to spell it here. LMAO!!
>if you
>even own one, that is. It's probably buried under your G.E.D.
>certificate (which DID NOT pay off, by the way) and welfare checkstubs.
There you go again. I wonder... when YOU assume things about me,
isn't that the same as me assuming things about Sissions? LOL
Hypocrite much?
>
>In article <37bd82ff...@news.pdq.net>,
> puz...@usa.net wrote:
>
Boo, there is no need to put this into your post twice. Can't you
work AOL? Isn't their slogan, "It's easy to use". I guess not for
some. And deja is even easier. LOL
>> And what point would that be o' stupid one?
>
>Although it ABSOLUTELY AMAZES me that someone as PATHETICALLY DENSE as
>you can actually SURVIVE in this day and age, I'll repeat my point again
>(Pay attention this time, STUPID!!!):
>
Getting pissed? I wonder why, since you've got the 'superior brain'.
LMAO!!
>Bottom Line -- There's a little kid who needs a dad and a jerk who's
>unwilling to be one (financially or otherwise).
>
No, that's not the bottom line. The bottom line is, she chose to
carry to term a child that wasn't wanted by the father. She is such a
buffoon. Now she wants sympathy? She won't get any from me.
>In article <37bd82ff...@news.pdq.net>,
> puz...@usa.net wrote:
>
We KNOW. LOL
>> You are the person so obsessed with trashing Greico that you can't
>read straight. WE aren't arguing that he SHOULDN'T pay child
>support. WE are saying his child support shouldn't be the difference
>between living in a house and living on the street.
>
>And YOU'RE so obsessed with blaming Sissons that you just CANNOT get it
>through YOUR THICK FUCKING SKULL that a baby requires more than just
>financial support.
And we both know that at this point the child won't get more than his
financial support, so why go around the bend? Do you think he should
be FORCED to provide more than financial support for a child he hates
and probably never wanted? You're not very smart even with the big
words.
>EVERY child deserves the love and emotional support
>of BOTH parents.
That is how it SHOULD be, but isn't how it is. So should she continue
to leak news blurbs on how she and the child are starving because he
doesn't give her $1000 a month? She should get off her lazy ass and
work.
>At least Sissons is providing that. . .
No she isn't. She's providing proof that one night stands with idiots
never work out.
>rieco's too
>busy running around with his "Baywatch" trophy.
>
You sound like this pisses you off. Are you in love with the guy or
do you hate him? Sheesh. Perhaps you should take pointers from
Sissions on slutty behavior and maybe, just maybe he will put a bun in
your oven.
>In article <37bd82ff...@news.pdq.net>,
> puz...@usa.net wrote:
>
This again? LMAO!!
>>Well, at least I can follow the general train of thought.
>
>Honey, THAT train left you standing on the platform LOOOOONG AGO!!!!
>If you can follow it, you'd better start running, bitch!
>
BITCH?!! LOL Sounds like you popped a gasket. Calm down, boo. This
doesn't mean anything. Unless... are you Sissions? Are you here
trying to drum up support from us? LMAO!! Too bad it blew up in your
face! Now get off usenet and feed that baby, you lazy twit!
Puzz
Puzzla
>In article <Odqi79y6#GA.304@cpmsnbbsa02>,
> "-=JR=-" <jro...@NOSPAM.MSN.com> wrote:
>> Please, Puzz, stop playing with the trolls. You *know* a battle
>> of wits with an unarmed opponent is unfair.
>>
I know, but she's just about to 'bust' a gasket. Can't I play with
her a little bit longer? PUH-LEASE!!
Puzz
Lac...@aol.com
that it's just soooooo damn easy!!!
In article <37bec8d...@news.pdq.net>,
puz...@usa.net wrote:
>
> Why would I do both? LOL There's no need for me to 'sound' it out,
> if you've taken the time to spell it here. LMAO!!
I realize that you lack the ability to deliver a persuasive, coherent
argument, but apparently SPELLING isn't your forte either, Einstein.
Witness:
>You are the person so obsessed with trashing Greico that you can't
> >read straight.
> >Perhaps you should take pointers from Sissions on slutty behavior and
maybe, just maybe he will put a bun in your oven.
If you're going to defend and/or trash someone, you should at least know
how to spell that person's name correctly. Speaking of which, I believe
that YOU should drop the last three letters of your screen name and
place a "t" between the "u" and the remaining "z" -- the result would be
so much more suitable!
>
> >In article <37bd82ff...@news.pdq.net>,
> > puz...@usa.net wrote:
> Boo, there is no need to put this into your post twice. Can't you
> work AOL? Isn't their slogan, "It's easy to use". I guess not for
> some. And deja is even easier. LOL
Well, I realize that you're a bit on the slow side, so I'm just trying
to help you out, schnookums!!! My assistance doesn't seem to be working
though. . .your comments are as asinine as ever!
>
>I wonder why, since you've got the 'superior brain'.
Well, THAT'S a given, especially in light of the following statement:
>
> No, that's not the bottom line. The bottom line is, she chose to
> carry to term a child that wasn't wanted by the father. Now she wants
sympathy? She won't get any from me.
Sooooo, she should have aborted the fetus just because its father wasn't
willing to take responsibility for its existence? It's quite clear that
she chose the more courageous path and should be commended for doing so!
But congratulations on making one of the stupidest, most insensitive
remarks I have ever heard! Who are you anyway, president of "Deadbeat
Dads of America?" You really should check between your legs, because I
refuse to believe that a woman would make such an incredibly dumb
statement!
>She is such a buffoon.
Well, isn't THAT the pot calling the kettle black! LOL!
> That is how it SHOULD be, but isn't how it is. So should she continue
> to leak news blurbs on how she and the child are starving because he
> doesn't give her $1000 a month?
She should continue to speak out against this jerk until he is shamed
into providing for the child he helped to create.
> > She's providing proof that one night stands with idiots
> never work out.
She was at his place for an entire month and prior to that, they had a
ten-year relationship.
> You sound like this pisses you off. Are you in love with the guy or
> do you hate him? Sheesh. Perhaps you should take pointers from
> Sissions on slutty behavior and maybe, just maybe he will put a bun in
> your oven.
Well, if he did, I certainly wouldn't come running to YOU for any
"pointers" on motherhood! Hell, you're not intelligent enough to raise
a goldfish!
> BITCH?!! LOL Sounds like you popped a gasket. Calm down, boo. This
> doesn't mean anything. Unless... are you Sissions? Are you here
> trying to drum up support from us? LMAO!! Too bad it blew up in your
> face! Now get off usenet and feed that baby, you lazy twit!
Hmmmm, and YOU must be a "Grieco" (note the spelling) relative! That
DEFINITELY explains your uncanny ability to make a complete idiot of
yourself!
Putz, I must say that this has been TREMENDOUS fun! I invite you to
continue to put your foot in your mouth so that I can continue to push
it further down your throat!
Lac...@aol.com
homes, right? Or . . . no, wait, don't tell me --- you're co-workers!
One of you runs the drive-thru while the other flips the burgers! LOL!
In article <37bed7ab...@news.pdq.net>,
Puzzla
>Oh, how completely touching! Lemme guess, you two own adjoining trailer
>homes, right? Or . . . no, wait, don't tell me --- you're co-workers!
>One of you runs the drive-thru while the other flips the burgers! LOL!
Umm.. this isn't the trailer park newsgroup. LOL
Puzz
Puzzla
>Ya know, I just LOVE tearing idiots like you apart! The only problem is
>that it's just soooooo damn easy!!!
If it were so easy, why haven't you done it? I see it took you
several days just to respond. What happened? Did you need time to
calm down? LOL. You were a little over the top there, but it was a
joy to read.
>puz...@usa.net wrote:
>>
>> Why would I do both? LOL There's no need for me to 'sound' it out,
>> if you've taken the time to spell it here. LMAO!!
>
>I realize that you lack the ability to deliver a persuasive, coherent
>argument, but apparently SPELLING isn't your forte either, Einstein.
>Witness:
But you didn't address the point. LMAO!
>If you're going to defend and/or trash someone, you should at least know
>how to spell that person's name correctly.
Why should I care how it's spelled? You're the person hung up on this
couple. You're the person who flew into a rage. LOL! Don't you know
that I don't give a damn?
>Speaking of which, I believe
>that YOU should drop the last three letters of your screen name and
>place a "t" between the "u" and the remaining "z" -- the result would be
>so much more suitable!
Ouch! Now that one was below the belt. I'm deeply hurt. Who would
have thought that one little change to my screen name would result in
so biting an insult? >Sob<
>Well, I realize that you're a bit on the slow side, so I'm just trying
>to help you out, schnookums!!! My assistance doesn't seem to be working
>though. . .your comments are as asinine as ever!
LOL. Okay, let me get this straight. You don't operate AOL's easy
quoting software correctly, but it was only because you wanted to
teach ME a lesson. Yeah, right. LOL
>>
>>I wonder why, since you've got the 'superior brain'.
>
>Well, THAT'S a given, especially in light of the following statement:
>
Sarcasm. I'm sure it's in a dictionary or two.
>Sooooo, she should have aborted the fetus just because its father wasn't
>willing to take responsibility for its existence?
No, she should have aborted you, since you should never have been
born. I bet that if we asked your mother, she'd say, "Oh, I was
planning on aborting Licorice, but there was a sale at the Piggly
Wiggly that day."
> It's quite clear that
>she chose the more courageous path and should be commended for doing so!
How narrow minded of you. Some women feel that NOT taking an unwanted
child to term and using it, as a ploy to squeeze more money out of
slime would be the courageous path to take.
>But congratulations on making one of the stupidest, most insensitive
>remarks I have ever heard!
Why thank you. You do realize that I've been here an awfully long
time. LOL
>Who are you anyway, president of "Deadbeat
>Dads of America?"
No I'm the President of the Bitch Slappers Club >SLAP!< Now, don't
you feel better? I know I do.
>You really should check between your legs, because I
>refuse to believe that a woman would make such an incredibly dumb
>statement!
Why don't you check for me? The day after my period.
>
>>She is such a buffoon.
>
>Well, isn't THAT the pot calling the kettle black! LOL!
I resent that statement. I have never been a pot or a kettle. You
take that back you insane stalker!
>She should continue to speak out against this jerk until he is shamed
>into providing for the child he helped to create.
Now that would make a proud father; someone 'shamed' into showing love
for his child. I think I should give YOU the award for stupidest
thing said on usenet (but hey, there's always SCarras).
>She was at his place for an entire month and prior to that, they had a
>ten-year relationship.
Is THAT the lie she's telling? Sheesh. And anyone stupid enough to
stick with someone that long, knowing him for the dog that he is,
shouldn't be allowed near dick.
>Well, if he did,
Ah, so you admit there is a possibility that you WOULD say 'yes' if he
asked. I thought so. Stupid stalker troll.
>I certainly wouldn't come running to YOU for any
>"pointers" on motherhood!
I'm sure you wouldn't. You'd go straight for usenet to plead your
case for child support, while sitting on your lazy ass.
>Hell, you're not intelligent enough to raise
>a goldfish!
You feed them daily and when they start to float, you flush them.
What's so hard about that? I can hear your mother, "If only Licorice
were small enough to flush..."
>
>Hmmmm, and YOU must be a "Grieco" (note the spelling) relative! That
>DEFINITELY explains your uncanny ability to make a complete idiot of
>yourself!
Boo, you are the only person who overlooked my entire argument and
zeroed in on my misspelling of his name. Idiot! LOL
>
>Putz, I must say that this has been TREMENDOUS fun!
LIAR! You're forgetting the day you lost it. I'm sure your meltdown
wasn't fun, at all.
> I invite you to
>continue to put your foot in your mouth so that I can continue to push
>it further down your throat!
LMAO! Is that what you've been doing? >rollin<
Puzz
k00l...@my-deja.com
they are doing. and noone knows what goes on in kimbers or richards mind
or when she found the time is right etc. she is not getting younger
either. and she knew that this was not a relationship and that he was
with yasmine. they both knew their conditions. and kimber didnt want to
be with richard steady before, because she couldnt bear that he had more
success than her - at least that's what went through the news.
k00l...@my-deja.com
>
> Actually the report said that Grieco has made ONE payment of $1,000
thus
> far (not $1,000 per month).
well, that was the report, you posted here. I heard other news, that he
pays what he should pay by law, but that Kimber runs around and is not
satisfied and wants sth. for herself, too.
Billie - AGC Queen
>
> Actually the report said that Grieco has made ONE payment of $1,000
thus
> far (not $1,000 per month).
**well, that was the report, you posted here. I heard other news, that he
pays what he should pay by law, but that Kimber runs around and is not
satisfied and wants sth. for herself, too.**
Now, this story is starting to make more sense...
Billie
CiRa
that woman, he didn't use a condom and that pretty much says it. SHE is
responsible too, but HE wears the condom. Neither one of us are in their
situation or in their head, but I know them both.
~~~~~~~~~~
>Date: Tue, 24 August 1999 06:51 AM EDT
>Message-id: <7pttg2$ol1$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>
Cira
Puzz
CiRa wrote:
>
> Both are responsible. However, if Grieco does NOT want a kid that badly
with
> that woman, he didn't use a condom and that pretty much says it.
Maybe she told him she was on the pill? Maybe she took his used condom
out of the trash? Maybe she's an hermaphrodite?
Puzz ~ just kidding on the first one.
k00l...@my-deja.com
knows about the circumstances. at least noone is forced to have a baby.
there are several ways of avoiding before and afterwards, also with a
pill afterwards - it doesnt need to go to abortion, but hey , this is no
lesson in school..so;) Cira, you said u say all this cause u know both,
so u asked grieco "u didnt use a condom and its all your fault" and he
said "yes its all my fault and kimber has got nothing to do with it" or
what?
Lac...@aol.com
puz...@usa.net wrote:
> I see it took you several days just to respond. What happened? Did
you need time to calm down? LOL.
Unlike you, loser, I don't spend every waking moment checking the
newsgroup posts. Geeeeez, get a fucking life, why don't ya!!!!
>
> Why should I care how it's spelled? You're the person hung up on this
> couple. You're the person who flew into a rage. LOL! Don't you know
> that I don't give a damn?
Oh, really? Then why are you online EVERY DAY checking the message
thread? I guess Jerry Springer's new season hasn't started yet!
>
> >Speaking of which, I believe
> >that YOU should drop the last three letters of your screen name and
> >place a "t" between the "u" and the remaining "z" -- the result would
be >so much more suitable!
>
> Ouch! Now that one was below the belt. I'm deeply hurt. Who would
> have thought that one little change to my screen name would result in
> so biting an insult? >Sob<
Is that the BEST you can do, dummy?
>
>
> LOL. Okay, let me get this straight. You don't operate AOL's easy
> quoting software correctly, but it was only because you wanted to
> teach ME a lesson. Yeah, right. LOL
>
Well, since you're obviously the poster child for A.D.D., someone needs
to teach you a lesson!
>
> Sarcasm. I'm sure it's in a dictionary or two.
Then look it up and use the concept effectively next time, stupid!
>
> >Sooooo, she should have aborted the fetus just because its father
wasn't willing to take responsibility for its existence?
>
> No, she should have aborted you, since you should never have been
> born. I bet that if we asked your mother, she'd say, "Oh, I was
> planning on aborting Licorice, but there was a sale at the Piggly
> Wiggly that day."
NOW who's not addressing the point? You've obviously realized how
ludicrous your statement was! Getting alittle flustered and irrational
are ya, Putz? LOL!
>
> How narrow minded of you. Some women feel that NOT taking an unwanted
> child to term and using it, as a ploy to squeeze more money out of
> slime would be the courageous path to take.
So according to your twisted rationale, it's the father's opinion that
determines whether or not a child is "wanted," and if the mother doesn't
happen to agree and decides to give birth, she's on her own. Aren't you
gagging on that foot yet, Putz?
>
>
> Why thank you. You do realize that I've been here an awfully long
> time. LOL
So, you're telling me that you've made an ass of yourself on several
prior occasions? I believe THAT!
>
>
> No I'm the President of the Bitch Slappers Club >SLAP!< Now, don't
> you feel better? I know I do.
Hmmmmm, now who's starting to blow a gasket, Putz? I must have hit a
nerve! LMAO!
>
> >You really should check between your legs, because I
> >refuse to believe that a woman would make such an incredibly dumb
> >statement!
>
> Why don't you check for me? The day after my period.
No, thank you. I'm allergic to cheese.
> >>She is such a buffoon.
> >
> >Well, isn't THAT the pot calling the kettle black! LOL!
>
> I resent that statement. I have never been a pot or a kettle. You
> take that back you insane stalker!
LMAO! You are just TOO entertaining, Putz!
>
> Now that would make a proud father; someone 'shamed' into showing love
> for his child. I think I should give YOU the award for stupidest
> thing said on usenet (but hey, there's always SCarras).
No, my dear, you are definitely the UNDEFEATED World Champion of Stupid
Remarks!
>
>
> >Well, if he did,
>
> Ah, so you admit there is a possibility that you WOULD say 'yes' if he
> asked. I thought so. Stupid stalker troll.
Hey, listen up, everybody --- Putz had her first "thought!" WhewhOOOOO!
Actually, I think Grieco's more YOUR type -- a sleazy, pathetic nobody
without a single functioning brain cell. And, YOU'RE the one who seems
curiously intent on shifting the blame away from him.
>
> >I certainly wouldn't come running to YOU for any
> >"pointers" on motherhood!
>
> I'm sure you wouldn't. You'd go straight for usenet to plead your
> case for child support, while sitting on your lazy ass.
You mean like the way YOU sit on YOUR lazy ass EVERY SINGLE DAY posting
messages to the newsgroup?
>
> >Hell, you're not intelligent enough to raise
> >a goldfish!
>
> You feed them daily and when they start to float, you flush them.
> What's so hard about that? I can hear your mother, "If only Licorice
> were small enough to flush..."
Yep and I bet you've had your fair share of "floaters," Putz . . .only
yours come out the opposite end!
>
> >
> >Hmmmm, and YOU must be a "Grieco" (note the spelling) relative! That
> >DEFINITELY explains your uncanny ability to make a complete idiot of
> >yourself!
>
> Boo, you are the only person who overlooked my entire argument and
> zeroed in on my misspelling of his name. Idiot! LOL
Putz, you wouldn't know a good argument if it BITCH SLAPPED you up side
your head!
>
> LIAR! You're forgetting the day you lost it. I'm sure your meltdown
> wasn't fun, at all.
Oh, Pleeeeaase! Do you HONESTLY think that I take delusional, no-life
losers like you seriously? LOL!
>
> > I invite you to
> >continue to put your foot in your mouth so that I can continue to
push
> >it further down your throat!
>
> LMAO! Is that what you've been doing? >rollin<
>
Rollin? Are you on fire, Putz? Hang on while I go get some gasoline!
Billie - AGC Queen
missing is 'youse'...sorry, I meant 'use'.
Billie
k00 wrote:
In article <37C4382B...@usa.net>,
puz...@usa.net wrote:
>
>
> CiRa wrote:
> >
> > Both are responsible. However, if Grieco does NOT want a kid that
badly
> with
> > that woman, he didn't use a condom and that pretty much says it.
>
> Maybe she told him she was on the pill? Maybe she took his used
condom
> out of the trash? Maybe she's an hermaphrodite?
>
> Puzz ~ just kidding on the first one.
>
**Puzz, I think you're right here. it's not only on the man and noone
knows about the circumstances. at least noone is forced to have a baby.
there are several ways of avoiding before and afterwards, also with a
pill afterwards - it doesnt need to go to abortion, but hey , this is no
lesson in school..so;) Cira, you said u say all this cause u know both,
so u asked grieco "u didnt use a condom and its all your fault" and he
said "yes its all my fault and kimber has got nothing to do with it" or
what?**
Puzz
Lac...@aol.com wrote:
>
> In article <37c21066...@news.pdq.net>,
> puz...@usa.net wrote:
> > I see it took you several days just to respond. What happened? Did
> you need time to calm down? LOL.
>
> Unlike you, loser, I don't spend every waking moment checking the
> newsgroup posts. Geeeeez, get a fucking life, why don't ya!!!!
Oh, that cliché is never uttered on Usenet. Do you know that you are
the first? Sheesh. Like shooting newbie flesh in a barrel.
>
> >
> > Why should I care how it's spelled? You're the person hung up on this
> > couple. You're the person who flew into a rage. LOL! Don't you know
> > that I don't give a damn?
>
> Oh, really? Then why are you online EVERY DAY checking the message
> thread?
Read it again, please. LOL Just in case it's too hard for you. One
has nothing to do with the other. I don't give a damn about 'Greico' or
Sissions, so why should I care how to spell their names.
I'm online everyday because...
1. I can
2. I love this group
3. I love gossip
4. I love the people here.
If I were online searching this message thread only (like you appear to
be doing), then I wouldn't participate in other threads (like you appear
to be doing). Now is it clear? Somehow, I doubt it'll penetrate, but
you can't blame a girl for trying.
>I guess Jerry Springer's new season hasn't started yet!
I dunno. I stopped watching after they outlawed fights. Oh, you
thought that was an insult. LOL!!
> > Ouch! Now that one was below the belt. I'm deeply hurt. Who would
> > have thought that one little change to my screen name would result in
> > so biting an insult? >Sob<
>
> Is that the BEST you can do, dummy?
LOL. Pointing out the overabundance of Usenet clichés uttered by you?
Well, yes. >rollin<
> > LOL. Okay, let me get this straight. You don't operate AOL's easy
> > quoting software correctly, but it was only because you wanted to
> > teach ME a lesson. Yeah, right. LOL
> >
>
> Well, since you're obviously the poster child for A.D.D., someone needs
> to teach you a lesson!
>
LOL Oh, you were serious. Damn!
> >
> > Sarcasm. I'm sure it's in a dictionary or two.
>
> Then look it up and use the concept effectively next time, stupid!
Calm down, boo. LOL
> > No, she should have aborted you, since you should never have been
> > born. I bet that if we asked your mother, she'd say, "Oh, I was
> > planning on aborting Licorice, but there was a sale at the Piggly
> > Wiggly that day."
>
> NOW who's not addressing the point?
That's not the topic today? "Should Licorice have been aborted?" Oops,
I thought it was.
>You've obviously realized how
> ludicrous your statement was!
That you should never have been born? No, that's not ludicrous at all
Licorice.
>Getting alittle flustered and irrational
> are ya, Putz? LOL!
Nevah!
> So according to your twisted rationale, it's the father's opinion that
> determines whether or not a child is "wanted," and if the mother doesn't
> happen to agree and decides to give birth, she's on her own. Aren't you
> gagging on that foot yet, Putz?
LOL No, I don't think the father's opinion determines whether or not
the child should be aborted (that's your distorted version of my
statements). She should take him to court, get the money and move on.
Btw, why haven't you responded to the person who said she's lying about
the support? LOL
> So, you're telling me that you've made an ass of yourself on several
> prior occasions? I believe THAT!
Sure I have, but not as spectacular as you have this week and last.
> > No I'm the President of the Bitch Slappers Club >SLAP!< Now, don't
> > you feel better? I know I do.
>
> Hmmmmm, now who's starting to blow a gasket, Putz?
LMAO!! You have zero understanding don't you? >rollin< You think
that's blowing a gasket? Keep it up, boo. This is the most fun I've
had since... no, I don't want to mention THOSE people.
>I must have hit a
> nerve! LMAO!
No, you've hit my funny bone. And it's strange that you're trying to
get humorous (and falling short, I might add), after I turned that
corner. Give it up, boo. The thread really pisses you off. Admit it.
> > Why don't you check for me? The day after my period.
>
> No, thank you. I'm allergic to cheese.
Damn. There you go using 'cheese' so soon after I accused YOU of having
cheese in your panties. LOL Can't you come up with something
original? I know. How about calling us trailer park trash again.
> LMAO! You are just TOO entertaining, Putz!
Oh I aim to please. But I wonder if you actually GOT the joke or are
you pretending that you got the joke? One never knows with you.
> No, my dear, you are definitely the UNDEFEATED World Champion of Stupid
> Remarks!
I notice how you didn't address the father being 'shamed' into showing
love for his child. Oh, well.
> > Ah, so you admit there is a possibility that you WOULD say 'yes' if he
> > asked. I thought so. Stupid stalker troll.
>
> Hey, listen up, everybody --- Putz had her first "thought!" WhewhOOOOO!
Free cheese for everyone!!
> Actually, I think Grieco's more YOUR type -- a sleazy, pathetic nobody
> without a single functioning brain cell.
Boo, I love dumb >gorgeous< men. But, I don't think Grieco qualifies as
gorgeous or dumb. He has managed to attach himself to someone rich and
famous, so he can't be too stupid. And his hairline has been receding
since his 'Jump Street' days, so he definitely can't be called
gorgeous. Btw, he's a somebody. If he were a nobody, we wouldn't be
talking about him.
>And, YOU'RE the one who seems
> curiously intent on shifting the blame away from him.
LOL You're having so much trouble following. Should I? Oh, what the
hell.... Boo, I never said he wasn't to blame. I think he should pay
her support for their child. I think I mentioned this a week ago, but
you were probably lost in our trailer park.
> > I'm sure you wouldn't. You'd go straight for usenet to plead your
> > case for child support, while sitting on your lazy ass.
>
> You mean like the way YOU sit on YOUR lazy ass EVERY SINGLE DAY posting
> messages to the newsgroup?
EXACTLY!! But I would never float news stories on how my kids are
starving because their father doesn't give them support (it has been
reported that he does give support, btw). I'd get off my ass and
provide for them, until such a time as he's forced to give support.
> > You feed them daily and when they start to float, you flush them.
> > What's so hard about that? I can hear your mother, "If only Licorice
> > were small enough to flush..."
>
> Yep and I bet you've had your fair share of "floaters," Putz . . .only
> yours come out the opposite end!
Huh? Are you talking about SHIT? Jeeze, then say it. Oh, I forgot,
AOL doesn't allow such language. But getting back to your point (see
how easy that is? Now you try it), yes I've had my fair share of
floating stool (I bet AOL will let you use that one and knowing you,
you'll steal it).
"Wire Service: Today, Licorice, crazed Usenet Troll, was found stealing
shit. 'I only want the floaters, because it has medicinal properties.',
the pimply faced Licorice said while being led to her holding cell."
> > Boo, you are the only person who overlooked my entire argument and
> > zeroed in on my misspelling of his name. Idiot! LOL
>
> Putz, you wouldn't know a good argument if it BITCH SLAPPED you up side
> your head!
I am the bitch slapper, not the bitch slapee (I see you've lifted that
as well, LOL). Maybe you should stick to your old adage, "If you can't
say something original, correct their spelling."
> >
> > LIAR! You're forgetting the day you lost it. I'm sure your meltdown
> > wasn't fun, at all.
>
> Oh, Pleeeeaase! Do you HONESTLY think that I take delusional, no-life
> losers like you seriously? LOL!
Yes! Especially when it comes to that lazy Sissions and that ugly
Grieco
guy. You care, or you wouldn't be here commenting on that subject and
that subject only.
> Rollin? Are you on fire, Putz? Hang on while I go get some gasoline!
No, >rollin< means I'm laughing so hard at your inane comebacks that I'm
rolling on the floor.*
Puzz
*I'm sure you'll say you knew what >rollin< meant, but one can never
be
too sure with insane stalkers like you.
MissEvonne
Uh, condom anyone?
Lac...@aol.com
STILL here making a complete ass of yourself! Sad, very sad.
In article <37C57734...@usa.net>,
puz...@usa.net wrote:
>
> Oh, that cliché is never uttered on Usenet. Do you know that you are
> the first? Sheesh. Like shooting newbie flesh in a barrel.
Well, gosh golly, I guess you WOULD be familiar with every over-used
cliche on Usenet, since you DO spend all of your sad, lonely days here!
All hail, Putz, Queen of the Usenet Losers!
> > I don't give a damn about 'Greico' or Sissions, so why should I care
how to spell their names.
For someone who doesn't give a damn, you sure seem intent on continually
commenting about their situation.
> I'm online everyday because...
Oh, God, so you actually ADMIT that you have no life! What a FREAKIN'
maroon you are, Putz!
> 1. I can
Especially since your phone hasn't exactly been ringing off the hook,
now has it?
> 2. I love this group
Because you obviously don't have any REAL friends.
> 3. I love gossip
Because it helps you to forget how truly pathetic your own life is.
> 4. I love the people here.
See Number Two above.
>
> If I were online searching this message thread only (like you appear
to be doing), then I wouldn't participate in other threads (like you
appear to be doing).
And if you had some semblance of a life, you wouldn't be online every
day "participating" in other threads. . .if THAT'S what you call talking
out of your butt!
>
> > Well, since you're obviously the poster child for A.D.D., someone
needs to teach you a lesson!
> LOL Oh, you were serious. Damn!
> That's not the topic today? "Should Licorice have been aborted?"
>Oops, I thought it was.
Forgot to take your Ridlin today, huh, Putz?
>That you should never have been born? No, that's not ludicrous at all
>Licorice.
Well, Putz, you seem to be the EXPERT on abortions around here, so
please tell us -- exactly how many times HAVE you spread your legs and
gotten scraped out? But thank you so much for doing the rest of us a
favor! The last thing this world needs is more idiots like YOU running
around!
> LOL No, I don't think the father's opinion determines whether or not
> the child should be aborted (that's your distorted version of my
> statements).
No, that's the import of your statements, no distortion necessary.
Can't you even follow your own twisted logic, Putz? Obviously not,
since you keep contradicting your own assertions.
>Btw, why haven't you responded to the person who said she's lying about
> the support? LOL
Patience! One loser at a time, Putz! Remember, unlike you, I don't
spend EVERY waking moment on Usenet!
> > So, you're telling me that you've made an ass of yourself on several
> > prior occasions? I believe THAT!
> Sure I have,
Well, at least you're willing to admit it!
> This is the most fun I've had since... no, I don't want to mention
THOSE people.
You mean that time you took on your dad and all of your uncles at the
Putz Family Reunion and had to go get scraped out?
> No, you've hit my funny bone. And it's strange that you're trying to
> get humorous (and falling short, I might add), after I turned that
> corner.
The only corner you've turned, Putz, is the one at the intersection of
Silly and Pathetic Streets.
>Give it up, boo. The thread really pisses you off. Admit it.
Many things piss me off, Putz, but elaborate displays of stupidity by
cyberspace morons like you aren't among them. Not being able to get an
11:00 tee time at my golf club. . . NOW THAT pisses me off!
Besides, YOU'RE the one who's determined to keep the thread going!
> Damn. There you go using 'cheese' so soon after I accused YOU of
>having cheese in your panties. LOL Can't you come up with something
> original?
You mean like that original "stalker" tag you stole from your gender-
confused pal Billie?
> I know. How about calling us trailer park trash again.
Okay, trailer park trash! LOL!
>
> > LMAO! You are just TOO entertaining, Putz!
> Oh I aim to please.
I know. . . your dad told me. ;-)
>But I wonder if you actually GOT the joke or are
> you pretending that you got the joke? One never knows with you.
Oh, Putz, with your simple mind, EVERYTHING'S a mystery to you! LOL!
> I notice how you didn't address the father being 'shamed' into showing
> love for his child. Oh, well.
Once again, you missed the point, and I just didn't feel like walking
your dumb ass through it for the umpteenth time. To be honest, your
ignorance is beginning to bore me, Putz.
> Boo, I love dumb . . . men.
Well, ya know what they say about birds of a feather! Too bad you can't
attract someone outside of your immediate family, though.
> LOL You're having so much trouble following.
Only because you're having so much trouble making a logical, cohesive
argument.
>I'd get off my ass and provide for them, until such a time as he's
forced to give support.
What, and miss a day of Usenet? Not you, Putz!
> Huh? Are you talking about SHIT?
Yea, ya know that stuff you've been spewing for about two weeks now?
>But getting back to your point
Oh, Bravo!
>(see how easy that is?
I know, that's what I've been trying to tell you, dummy!
>Now you try it)
No, YOU'RE the one who needs serious practice. But you ARE making
progress, albeit slow. Very good, Putzie, here's a Scooby Snack! Now
go run off and play with the other mongrels in your trailer park!
>yes I've had my fair share of floating stool
Gee, thanks for sharing.
(I bet AOL will let you use that one and knowing you,
> you'll steal it).
> "Wire Service: Today, Licorice, crazed Usenet Troll, was found
stealing shit. 'I only want the floaters, because it has medicinal
properties.', the pimply faced Licorice said while being led to her
holding cell."
Wire Service? You mean you are actually aware of a news source other
than a tabloid? Oh, congrats, you deserve ANOTHER Scooby Snack for that
one, Putzie!!!
> I am the bitch slapper, not the bitch slapee (I see you've lifted that
> as well, LOL).
Naaa, you're just a bitch. And a stupid one at that.
> Maybe you should stick to your old adage, "If you can't
> say something original, correct their spelling."
Well, it's a helluva lot better than your motto, "If you don't have a
good comeback, just make a lame-ass remark that reflects your inferior
mentality."
Witness:
> > > I guess Jerry Springer's new season hasn't started yet!
> I dunno. I stopped watching after they outlawed fights. Oh, you
thought that was an insult. LOL!!
> > > Well, since you're obviously the poster child for A.D.D., someone
needs to teach you a lesson!
> LOL Oh, you were serious. Damn!
> > Sarcasm. I'm sure it's in a dictionary or two.
> > > Then look it up and use the concept effectively next time, stupid!
> Calm down, boo. LOL
> Yes! Especially when it comes to that lazy Sissions and that ugly
> Grieco guy. You care, or you wouldn't be here commenting on that
subject and that subject only.
Actually, I just find losers like you immensely entertaining. But I
will admit that I am growing a bit weary of your bonehead babble.
>
> > Rollin? Are you on fire, Putz? Hang on while I go get some
gasoline!
> No, >rollin< means I'm laughing so hard at your inane comebacks that
I'm rolling on the floor.
Sticking to that motto of yours, huh, Putzie?! LOL!
>I'm sure you'll say you knew what >rollin< meant, but one can never
be too sure with insane stalkers like you.
BTW, that's a butt ugly shirt you're wearing! ;-)
Puzz
Lac...@aol.com wrote:
You again? I thought you'd crawled under a rock by now. You are the
person who bites the hand that feeds us all (by insulting Billie), you
don't know how to cut some of this crap down and you STILL don't
understand that this isn't the Trailer Park Newsgroup. That group would
be ASG, not AGC. Sheesh. But lets see what you've written and if
you've learned anything.
>
> Good God, Putz! I've just returned from a FABULOUS vacation, and you're
> STILL here making a complete ass of yourself! Sad, very sad.
Oops, I don't have to read any further. I think we all know that you
don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. But let's see how bad
things have gotten for you.
> Well, gosh golly, I guess you WOULD be familiar with every over-used
> cliche on Usenet, since you DO spend all of your sad, lonely days here!
> All hail, Putz, Queen of the Usenet Losers!
Yet another reference to online time and not having a life. I wonder if
she realizes that all it takes is one hour or less to skim these
messages? Oh, well...
> For someone who doesn't give a damn, you sure seem intent on continually
> commenting about their situation.
WRONG. This is about YOU. This has been about you since day one, or
have you forgotten my stalker comment? I wasn't talking about Richard
or whatsherface.
>
> > I'm online everyday because...
>
> Oh, God, so you actually ADMIT that you have no life! What a FREAKIN'
> maroon you are, Putz!
2nd time you've equated no life to online time. >sigh<
>
> > 1. I can
>
> Especially since your phone hasn't exactly been ringing off the hook,
> now has it?
Huh? What has that to do with the fact that I'm online because I can be
online? >sigh< so sad.
>
> > 2. I love this group
>
> Because you obviously don't have any REAL friends.
So you're saying that the people here aren't real? LOL Tell that to
some of the people I've met online then IRL.
>
> > 3. I love gossip
>
> Because it helps you to forget how truly pathetic your own life is.
No, because I love knowing. Sheesh. Why is this so hard?
>
> > 4. I love the people here.
>
> See Number Two above.
And see my response. >shrug<
> And if you had some semblance of a life, you wouldn't be online every
> day "participating" in other threads. . .
But if I had a life, I wouldn't be online at all, right? So according
to YOUR logic, you don't have a life either, no matter how many fabulous
vacations you 'say' you've taken. Frankly, I don't think you went
anywhere. You were just searching your feeble brain for some one
liners, and a 'vacation' is the only cover you could think of.
Especially since I caught one of your brain lapses a week or so ago.
>if THAT'S what you call talking
> out of your butt!
No. I call it typing a response. This really is hard for you, huh?
> Forgot to take your Ridlin today, huh, Putz?
Um... what's Ridlin? LOL I thought you had a dictionary and all.
> Well, Putz, you seem to be the EXPERT on abortions around here,
That I am.
>so
> please tell us -- exactly how many times HAVE you spread your legs and
> gotten scraped out?
Never. And you?
> But thank you so much for doing the rest of us a
> favor! The last thing this world needs is more idiots like YOU running
> around!
Again, Licorice, you don't know if I have kids or not. Trying to read
something into my posts is so very newbie of you.
> No, that's the import of your statements, no distortion necessary.
And yet you continue to distort them anyway.
> Can't you even follow your own twisted logic, Putz?
Well, duh!! Obviously I can. You are the person who is having a lot of
trouble.
>Obviously not,
> since you keep contradicting your own assertions.
Wrong. I've not once contradicted myself. You are the person who wants
to string the guy up for not paying his child support and surprise,
surprise, I agree with you (that seems to be the part you're having
trouble with).
>
> >Btw, why haven't you responded to the person who said she's lying about
> > the support? LOL
>
> Patience! One loser at a time, Putz! Remember, unlike you, I don't
> spend EVERY waking moment on Usenet!
Liar. You haven't responded because you have no answer for her.
> Well, at least you're willing to admit it!
Unlike you, I can admit my mistakes. That is the adult thing to do.
> You mean that time you took on your dad and all of your uncles at the
> Putz Family Reunion and had to go get scraped out?
No, that's not one of MY memories. Boo, you're probably having a
flashback to your own life. Sheesh. Get this girl some 'Ridlin'!
> The only corner you've turned, Putz, is the one at the intersection of
> Silly and Pathetic Streets.
>groan< That was awful. Sheesh. You really should go back to your rant mode, because humor is beyond you.
> Many things piss me off, Putz, but elaborate displays of stupidity by
> cyberspace morons like you aren't among them. Not being able to get an
> 11:00 tee time at my golf club. . . NOW THAT pisses me off!
LIAR. This pisses you off and it shows in your responses. What
happened? Did you get pregnant and the guy left you?
>
> Besides, YOU'RE the one who's determined to keep the thread going!
>
Huh? I'm not the person who just returned from a 'fabulous vacation' to
post a follow-up to a post from a week or so ago. LOL Try again,
sweetie
> You mean like that original "stalker" tag you stole from your gender-
> confused pal Billie?
No, I didn't steal stalker from Katt, because you are a stalker. Btw,
Katt knows what she is, do you? See, this is yet another newbie mistake
on your part. You should lurk in a group before you start posting.
Because if you'd lurked for a while, you'd know there was a picture
page; and on that page, you'll find Katt. >sigh< So much learnin so
little time.
>
> > I know. How about calling us trailer park trash again.
>
> Okay, trailer park trash! LOL!
You really don't get it huh? It was funny the first time this went over
you head, now it's just pathetic. Boo, we aren't the trailer park
group. We don't have trailer lots here. That group is ASG as in
alt.showbiz.gossip. You are currently posting to AGC, as in
alt.gossip.celebrities. >sigh< I hope this sticks this time, because
frankly I'm tired to correcting you.
> I know. . . your dad told me. ;-)
Wink? Does this mean what I think it means....
> Oh, Putz, with your simple mind, EVERYTHING'S a mystery to you! LOL!
Oh, I guess not. Damn. Boo, I've got to get simple, because YOU are.
>
> > I notice how you didn't address the father being 'shamed' into showing
> > love for his child. Oh, well.
>
> Once again, you missed the point, and I just didn't feel like walking
> your dumb ass through it for the umpteenth time. To be honest, your
> ignorance is beginning to bore me, Putz.
Really? And yet you continue to respond? Sounds like someone is
lying. Imagine that?!
> Well, ya know what they say about birds of a feather! Too bad you can't
> attract someone outside of your immediate family, though.
Damn!! What kind of life have YOU had that you can imagine something as
awful as this? Sheesh. I can almost feel sorry for you. Almost.
> Only because you're having so much trouble making a logical, cohesive
> argument.
Wrong! My stance has been and always will be... he should pay child
support. If he doesn't pay child support, she should get off her lazy
ass and provide for the child until he does. Imo, her motives for
having the child was to keep him closer to her. And if that's the case,
then she shouldn't have had the child in the first place, because she's
known from day one that he didn't want to be with her. Notice how nice
and neatly that was done? Now you give it a try.
> What, and miss a day of Usenet? Not you, Putz!
LOL You're the only person who can't spend an hour on usenet and keep a
full time job. Boo, lots of people do it. You can too.
>
> > Huh? Are you talking about SHIT?
>
> Yea, ya know that stuff you've been spewing for about two weeks now?
Well, say SHIT! Sheesh. Oh, yeah, I'd forgotten, AOL frowns on that
kind of shit.
> I know, that's what I've been trying to tell you, dummy!
LIAR. You haven't been trying to tell me anything. You're just here to
defend Scissors to one and all. I imagine you don't really care about
Scissors. All you want to do is trash Grieco and his lovely girlfriend
Yasmine.
>
> >Now you try it)
>
> No, YOU'RE the one who needs serious practice. But you ARE making
> progress, albeit slow. Very good, Putzie, here's a Scooby Snack! Now
> go run off and play with the other mongrels in your trailer park!
Now I get it. You've lost the argument, so now you're just going to
throw out the insults. Well, lets see what dejanews has to say about
YOU. Yikes! I've just completed a dejanews search for all things
'Licorice' and lo and behold, it's all things Grieco as well. Boo, you
are so pitiful. You know where he's from. You know about his business
dealings. You know who signs his autographed pictures. You hate him,
but you follow every post about him on usenet. You hate his girlfriend
Yasmine and yet you can't stop posting about her either. I've GOT to
see more, because as frightening as you appear, I'm still amazed at the
depths to which you'll sink... TICKLING!! Jeeze, Licorice, you're a
stalker freak!!
Plonkity Ploo!!
(snip of everything else)
Puzz
Some comments from Licorice to show the depth to which she'll sink to
insult Richard and his lovely girlfriend Yasmine:
>> Forum: alt.collecting.autographs
>> Thread: Success!
>> Message 2 of 9
Subject:
Re: Success!
Date:
1999/03/19
Author:
Laceria <Lac...@aol.com>
Posting History
No, Loki, it's true. Although he is from Watertown, Grieco's
primary residence is in L.A. His mother runs his website and
personalizes each picture (he signs his name and the main
greeting "All the Best" on several batches of photos, and then
his mom writes in your name). No, I'm NOT an autograph
collector, but I do know this to be true (SAD AND PATHETIC,
but tru
>> Community
>> Forum: alt.christnet.satanism
>> Thread: The Satan you worship will burn
in Hell for eternity -even as he tried to throw
God out of heaven
>> Message 1 of 1
Subject:
Re: The Satan you worship will
burn in Hell for eternity -even as
he tried to throw God out of
heaven
Date:
1999/05/04
Author:
Laceria <Lac...@aol.com>
Posting History
In article <372a54e3...@news.seanet.com>,
ha...@spam.com wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 1999 01:13:29 +0800, Cwurk
<clu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Yasmine Bleeth is God
>
> (haven't you seen her on Baywatch?)
Oh pleeeeaaaazeee spare me!!! Yasmine Bleeth is nothing
but a cock-sucking, Jewish whore.
Dane
> Oh pleeeeaaaazeee spare me!!! Yasmine Bleeth is nothing
> but a cock-sucking, Jewish whore.
Really... fascinating. Anti-Semitic on top of all of it.
Hm.
Dane
Puzz
Dane wrote:
>
> Puzz wrote that Laceria wrote:
>
> > Oh pleeeeaaaazeee spare me!!! Yasmine Bleeth is nothing
> > but a cock-sucking, Jewish whore.
>
> Really... fascinating. Anti-Semitic on top of all of it.
>
> Hm.
>
> Dane
It really is. I thought her obsession with him was one thing, (in a
crazy kinda way), then I saw the above and I knew something else was at
work here. I've noticed that everyone in my killfile has spewed some
racists crap at one time or another.
Puzz
JesusELvis
troll.
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
JesusELvis
was not thinking clearly. my apologies Puzz