Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Liam Neeson Keeps His Manhood Under Cover

137 views
Skip to first unread message

Rick in Oz

unread,
Nov 25, 2004, 8:29:29 AM11/25/04
to
http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/entertainment/14192004.htm

Liam Neeson Keeps His Manhood Under Cover
November 25, 2004, 9:42:08 NEESON: 'I'M NOT SHOWING MY PENIS ON FILM'

Movie actor LIAM NEESON had a "good working relationship" with co-star PETER
SAARSGAARD while filming a gay love scene in KINSEY, but he refused to
expose his penis.

Neeson, who plays real-life sex expert ALFRED KINSEY in the controversial
film, wasn't worried about shooting the difficult sequence because he
wouldn't have to reveal his manhood.

He says, "Well, it obviously has to be choreographed to some extent. We shot
it in a room at the Chelsea Hotel (in New York). This sleazy little room in
a hotel. It kinda made it all the more sleazier because of the 1950s
furniture.
"But we had a really good working relationship. We did choreograph it, more
for Peter, because he's, you know, buck naked.

"I wouldn't have done that. I'm not showing my dick out."

From Sunny Oz, Rick :)
Proud Keeper of the talented & beautiful Halle Berry.


nimue

unread,
Nov 25, 2004, 8:48:35 AM11/25/04
to

Damn it, damn it, damn it. It's funny -- I just posted that he was a
celebrity I would like to see naked. Sheesh! What a selfish, selfish man.
God gives him a, well, from what I have heard, an ENORMOUS gift, and he
won't share the sight of it with the world? Grrr. ;-)


>
> From Sunny Oz, Rick :)
> Proud Keeper of the talented & beautiful Halle Berry.

--
nimue

"If I had created reality television I would have had a much greater
influence, but then I would have had to KILL MYSELF." Joss Whedon

"If any of these right-wing, born-again Christian, Republican control
freaks acutally met Jesus, they would crucify him." my husband, while
listening to Merle Haggard


A Adams

unread,
Nov 25, 2004, 8:58:37 AM11/25/04
to

"nimue" <cup_o...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Tolpd.13233$Yh2.4...@twister.nyc.rr.com...

> Damn it, damn it, damn it. It's funny -- I just posted that he was a
> celebrity I would like to see naked. Sheesh! What a selfish, selfish
man.
> God gives him a, well, from what I have heard, an ENORMOUS gift, and he
> won't share the sight of it with the world? Grrr. ;-)


I believe Big J has a picture of him naked

(see aforementioned thread about michael vartan)


Big J

unread,
Nov 25, 2004, 10:44:42 AM11/25/04
to
"A Adams" <ya...@antispamers.com> wrote in news:hylpd.38534$g21.23301
@fe1.texas.rr.com:

URL: http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bigjgossip
folder: gossip
name: neesonL03-SSW

He's much younger in the pic.

Big J

-----

Ellzeena

unread,
Nov 25, 2004, 10:46:14 AM11/25/04
to
>From: Big J bi...@myrealbox.com

>>
>> "nimue" <cup_o...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:Tolpd.13233$Yh2.4...@twister.nyc.rr.com...
>>> Damn it, damn it, damn it. It's funny -- I just posted that he was a
>>> celebrity I would like to see naked. Sheesh! What a selfish, selfish
>>> man. God gives him a, well, from what I have heard, an ENORMOUS gift,
>>> and he won't share the sight of it with the world? Grrr. ;-)
>>
>>
>> I believe Big J has a picture of him naked
>>
>> (see aforementioned thread about michael vartan)
>
>URL: http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bigjgossip
>folder: gossip
>name: neesonL03-SSW
>
>He's much younger in the pic.
>
>Big J
>

I dunno who y'all ladies have been with, but "that" is NOT huge.


++++++
That HAIR!!!!!

http://journals.aol.com/ellzeena/FixThatHAIR/


Message has been deleted

Tina

unread,
Nov 25, 2004, 1:22:12 PM11/25/04
to
>>
>I dunno who y'all ladies have been with, but "that" is NOT huge.
>

For a flaccid penis, it's big. Besides, the man is standing outside buck naked.
You got to take in the shrinkage factor.

I'm glad you've been lucky enough to be with only large men but not all of us
have. FWIW the best lover I ever had was not well endowed.

FYI:

http://www.allsexadvice.com/penis.htm

<<But with that said, many studies conducted by the Kinsey Institute have
determined that the average size of an erect penis of men living in the U.S. is
between 5 and 7 inches long. The average girth (thickness) was between 4 and 6
inches around. Other studies have concluded that the average size of a flaccid
penis is between 2 1/2 inches to 4 inches long. If you'd like to find out
exactly how long your erect penis is, measure the distance from the tip of the
glans (the head) to the base (where the penis meets the body). >>

::::::Tina::::::

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I may disagree with what you say but I will defend, to the death, your right
to say it." - Voltaire

SPQR1978A

unread,
Nov 25, 2004, 2:09:51 PM11/25/04
to
>I dunno who y'all ladies have been with, but "that" is NOT huge.
_____________________________
If that is big then I am huge. Let's hope he just got out of a cold shower.


Ellzeena

unread,
Nov 25, 2004, 4:52:19 PM11/25/04
to
>From: Alan Moorman amoo...@visi.com

>On 25 Nov 2004 15:46:14 GMT, ellz...@aol.comNOSPAM


>(Ellzeena) wrote:
>
>>>From: Big J bi...@myrealbox.com
>>
>>>>
>>>> "nimue" <cup_o...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:Tolpd.13233$Yh2.4...@twister.nyc.rr.com...
>>>>> Damn it, damn it, damn it. It's funny -- I just posted that he was a
>>>>> celebrity I would like to see naked. Sheesh! What a selfish, selfish
>>>>> man. God gives him a, well, from what I have heard, an ENORMOUS gift,
>>>>> and he won't share the sight of it with the world? Grrr. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I believe Big J has a picture of him naked
>>>>
>>>> (see aforementioned thread about michael vartan)
>>>
>>>URL: http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bigjgossip
>>>folder: gossip
>>>name: neesonL03-SSW
>>>
>>>He's much younger in the pic.
>>>
>>>Big J
>>>

>>I dunno who y'all ladies have been with, but "that" is NOT huge.
>>
>>

>Maybe it's a 'surprise package' -- and gets bigger under the
>right circumstances!!!
>
Well, duh, they ALL do that (or should!) LOL!!!

Ellzeena

unread,
Nov 25, 2004, 4:57:46 PM11/25/04
to
>From: lisa...@aol.comspamsx (Tina)

>>>
>>I dunno who y'all ladies have been with, but "that" is NOT huge.
>>
>
>For a flaccid penis, it's big.

I don't think so, but my original comment was (dare I say it) tongue in cheek.

> Besides, the man is standing outside >buck
>naked.
>You got to take in the shrinkage factor.
>

I've seen "shrinkage", didn't look that way to me, but who knows! (visions of
"George" ....)

>I'm glad you've been lucky enough to be with only large men but not all of us
>have. FWIW the best lover I ever had was not well endowed.
>

LOL! 'Tween us girls, I could tell you a couple of really funny stories about
"size" but not HERE! yikes!

> FYI:
>
>http://www.allsexadvice.com/penis.htm
>
><<But with that said, many studies conducted by the Kinsey Institute have
>determined that the average size of an erect penis of men living in the U.S.
>is
>between 5 and 7 inches long. The average girth (thickness) was between 4 and
>6
>inches around. Other studies have concluded that the average size of a
>flaccid
>penis is between 2 1/2 inches to 4 inches long.

That's TINY! Wow maybe I have been "lucky"!

Lady Chatterly

unread,
Nov 25, 2004, 6:10:16 PM11/25/04
to
In article <20041125132212...@mb-m06.aol.com> lisa...@aol.comspamsx (Tina) wrote:
>
>>>
>>I dunno who y'all ladies have been with, but "that" is NOT huge.
>>
>
>For a flaccid penis, it's big. Besides, the man is standing outside buck naked.
>You got to take in the shrinkage factor.

Heaven lent you a soul Earth will lend a grave.

>I'm glad you've been lucky enough to be with only large men but not all of us
>have. FWIW the best lover I ever had was not well endowed.

Why do you wonder if you are glad they have been lucky enough to be
with only large men but not all of us have?

>FYI:

Are you sure that's why?

>http://www.allsexadvice.com/penis.htm
>
><<But with that said, many studies conducted by the Kinsey Institute have
>determined that the average size of an erect penis of men living in the U.S. is
>between 5 and 7 inches long. The average girth (thickness) was between 4 and 6
>inches around. Other studies have concluded that the average size of a flaccid
>penis is between 2 1/2 inches to 4 inches long. If you'd like to find out
>exactly how long your erect penis is, measure the distance from the tip of the
>glans (the head) to the base (where the penis meets the body). >>

How do you know for certain?

--
Lady Chatterly

"Kali was child's play compared to Lady Chatterly - but I'm confident
you'll prevail in the end! Just don't give up!" -- Roofshadow

Marianna Trench

unread,
Nov 25, 2004, 6:15:39 PM11/25/04
to
>><<But with that said, many studies conducted by the Kinsey Institute have
>>determined that the average size of an erect penis of men living in the U.S.
>>is
>>between 5 and 7 inches long. The average girth (thickness) was between 4 and
>>6
>>inches around. Other studies have concluded that the average size of a
>>flaccid
>>penis is between 2 1/2 inches to 4 inches long.

>That's TINY! Wow maybe I have been "lucky"!

Kinsey, my ass. I think Paris Hilton did this study. She's seen more different
dicks under a variety of conditions than fifteen people working for the Kinsey
Institute for twenty years.

Yes, I'm kidding.

Marianna

Shut up and get in the truck

btaylor

unread,
Nov 25, 2004, 9:16:48 PM11/25/04
to
my god..that is not even adequate..very disappointing

Ambrose

unread,
Nov 27, 2004, 3:57:28 AM11/27/04
to

"Big J" <bi...@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95AC4E8DF8ECD...@38.119.71.33...
Mr Neesom was once seen running naked a movie he made with Laura San
Giacomo. I'm only judging by myself but he loorked sort of ordinary. However
he's suposed to be huge according to size queen Dana Delaney but all I can
say is she must have spent a lot of time with Irish and Japanese guys. In
addition, while I am far from a penile expert, in comparison to the issue of
female nudity which is prety much self explanitory, female tits don't puff
up when a woman is aroused, if anything they pucker some or at least the
nipples do, and there is the topice of pre-coital muscus discharge of women
or the G spot liquid non-urine female genital discharge which is way off
topic, but within the contest of this post, more importantly there is is the
more improtant grower versus shower point in male nudity which is unless on
film Mr. Happy is portrayed in a tumescent state, which makes the whole
subject mute of who is huge and who isn't.
I recently, was unwantedly drawn into a conversation on this topic by
several gay men friends and several straight female friends who were
arguing that you can't tell much about a man in tight pants, and I must say
the gay men seemed to know considerably more about male Whohaws than the
women, and pointed out themsituation of the permenant semi-tumescent or
(nigger dicked flacid male member versus (forgive the racial epethet) the
more usual for causcasions, less engorged flacid state and that either
flacid state may be unrepresentative of the male member in it's angry
condition.
Even in that scenario--having known girls who worked on porn films--who
is to know who is semi-tumescent or not, because if they have fluff girls
working on set to get some male star who is a grower and not a shower
looking up to stuff he man have consideravle shrinkage in his usual state.
Almost no man comes out of a cold ocean in a speedo looking big. My theory
about male nudity on fil--not that I'd miss it if I never had to see it on
screen again--is that unless they show male stars in full erection that you
don't realy know who is big and who isn't. Besides do we really care? I
think the whole issue is one of context anyway, sort of a Full Metal Jacket
explaination. For instance, when I was living in Jamaica, my 71/2"-8"
wee-wee was chased after some of the most gorgeous ladies dark ladies I have
ever seen who repeatedly came back for second helpings, and these ladies who
were well used to the (speculated aerage 9"to 11"average of black Jamaican
men.--a fact I was told by a international medical aid worker who said the
way you judge the endowment of a country is by how many men asked for the
large sized condoms.
Interestingly, as much as I dispise condoms I, in a moment of necessity
because it was with a woman who's former lover left Magnums behind, which I
was required to I've put on and there isn't actually that much differese. So
I think even that is a marketing scheme.
IMO people worry too much on this topic. So unless Hollywood is going to
demand a fully erect full monty from all it's male stars it will be an
enless source of speculation.
Having suffered through, growing in a house with one bathroom of of
ten to two twenty people with no privacy and then later enduring complusive
nakedness in hippie communes, MO is that nakedness female or male is highly
over-rated and not, to me at least, very appealing except in the context of
being with someone whom I would like to make love. Honestly I'd much rather
not know about Gary Cooper or Paul Newmans (two of y favorite male actors)
joysticks and frankly I'd rather not know if arrousal causes the pre-coital
discharges of (Nicole Kidman or Demi Moore) two of my favorite female
actresses to stinkup the room. Perhaps had the late slockmaster William
Castle lived, his Smell-o-rama would have provided the cunt sniffer
audiences with the answers it desired but frankly I'd rather not know unless
I'm already a guest in the particular ladies boudior, and then I'm pretty
acceptant of whatever her particular personal fragrance is.
But for those with a need to know the intimate details of particular
stars genitalia, male or female, never mind me, I'm old and getting older by
the minute. I think I my be turning into Dana Carvey's grumpy old man: "I
don't like things the way they are compared to the way we used to be."
Slamming fist on desk "That's the way it was and we-eee liked it! :-) Hope
I've been of some help.
Your friend,
Ambrose
> -----


Marianna Trench

unread,
Nov 27, 2004, 11:46:03 AM11/27/04
to
ambrose wrote:
>My theory
>about male nudity on fil--not that I'd miss it if I never had to see it on
>screen again--is that unless they show male stars in full erection that you
>don't realy know who is big and who isn't. Besides do we really care?

I do! (ahem) Well, of course, in an entirely scientific and detached way.
(cough cough).

Big J

unread,
Nov 27, 2004, 1:53:39 PM11/27/04
to
freeg...@aol.complexity (Marianna Trench) wrote in
news:20041127114603...@mb-m13.aol.com:

I saw Liam Neeson last night in Kinsey. He does indeed keep his clothes on.
But the guy he does it with is a cutie. He isn't very big at all, but
adorable.

An excellent movie - I highly recommend it. The scene with LN and John
Lithgow (as his father) near the end is some of the best acting I've seen in
years.

Big J

-----

Lily

unread,
Nov 27, 2004, 2:58:42 PM11/27/04
to
<<URL:   http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bigjgossip
folder: gossip
name:   neesonL03-SSW
He's much younger in the pic.
Big J>>

Then maybe it grew? It doesn't look that big to me either. IIRC, there
was a picture of him running on a beach, or outdoors somewhere, and he
looked much bigger.

In any case, whatever the size of his penis, in this photo the rest of
him looks flabby and tres not buff.

Lily--never dates guys with bigger breasts than she has

Lolli

unread,
Nov 27, 2004, 3:10:39 PM11/27/04
to

"Ambrose" <ambrose...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:PoXpd.6499$PA6....@fe06.lga...
> <snipped for brevity>

Hope
> I've been of some help.
> Your friend,
> Ambrose

What would we do without you, Ambrose? You post far too infrequently.
<gets on her tiptoes and kisses on the cheek> Lolli


Lolli

unread,
Nov 27, 2004, 3:28:20 PM11/27/04
to

"Big J" <bi...@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95AC4E8DF8ECD...@38.119.71.33...

Ok, I've spent far too much time looking at Big J's collection of photos....
>
> -----


tron

unread,
Nov 27, 2004, 3:32:40 PM11/27/04
to
if anyone has read janice dickensons book no life guard on duty. she has
a affair with liam and says his dick is like a water bottle. huge!!!!!
Also janice has slept with everyone who was anyone in the 80's so i
think she has seen a wide range of dicks.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Ellzeena

unread,
Nov 30, 2004, 5:15:52 PM11/30/04
to
>From: the tin man tin...@emerald.city.oz

>In article <20041125132212...@mb-m06.aol.com>,


> lisa...@aol.comspamsx (Tina) wrote:
>
>> >>
>> >I dunno who y'all ladies have been with, but "that" is NOT huge.
>> >
>>

>> For a flaccid penis, it's big. Besides, the man is standing outside buck
>> naked.
>> You got to take in the shrinkage factor.
>>

>> I'm glad you've been lucky enough to be with only large men but not all of
>us
>> have. FWIW the best lover I ever had was not well endowed.
>>

>> FYI:
>>
>> http://www.allsexadvice.com/penis.htm


>>
>> <<But with that said, many studies conducted by the Kinsey Institute have
>> determined that the average size of an erect penis of men living in the
>U.S.
>> is
>> between 5 and 7 inches long. The average girth (thickness) was between 4
>and
>> 6
>> inches around. Other studies have concluded that the average size of a
>> flaccid

>> penis is between 2 1/2 inches to 4 inches long. If you'd like to find out
>> exactly how long your erect penis is, measure the distance from the tip of
>> the
>> glans (the head) to the base (where the penis meets the body). >>
>

>But do you measure on the side, top, or bottom?
>
Inside out...that's the measure of a man. <snark>

Tina

unread,
Nov 30, 2004, 10:42:04 PM11/30/04
to
>> http://www.allsexadvice.com/penis.htm
>>
>> <<But with that said, many studies conducted by the Kinsey Institute have
>> determined that the average size of an erect penis of men living in the
>U.S.
>> is
>> between 5 and 7 inches long. The average girth (thickness) was between 4
>and
>> 6
>> inches around. Other studies have concluded that the average size of a
>> flaccid
>> penis is between 2 1/2 inches to 4 inches long. If you'd like to find out
>> exactly how long your erect penis is, measure the distance from the tip of
>> the
>> glans (the head) to the base (where the penis meets the body). >>
>
the tin man tin...@emerald.city.oz
wrote:

>But do you measure on the side, top, or bottom?

I doubt it matters

pat_...@yahoo.co.uk

unread,
Nov 23, 2012, 5:33:27 PM11/23/12
to
He gets his manhood out in under suspicion. It is rather huge. Got a clip on my phone, wish I could upload it for you.
0 new messages