Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bad Plastic Surgery: Nancy Reagan and Marcia Clark

152 views
Skip to first unread message

noosepam

unread,
Jun 11, 2004, 6:25:05 PM6/11/04
to
Yikes! Talk about awful results from plastic surgery. Nancy Reagan looks
like she got pulled so tight over that tiny little skeleton of hers, all you
see on tv is a walking stick figure with huge glasses. Sure, she looks 20
years younger, but is looking like a 65 year old chimp really an
improvement?

Also, Marcia Clark on ET yesterday was just unrecognizable! You know you
have a really bad case of awful plastic surgery on your hands when you go
"Oh my God!" when they say the name of the person and you realize you would
have never recognized who it was if they hadn't told you!

Just goes to show you money can't buy everything, certainly not taste or
good looks.


Reaganite

unread,
Jun 11, 2004, 6:56:05 PM6/11/04
to

Nothing like another great post from the compassionate demmykkkrats.


justme

unread,
Jun 11, 2004, 7:04:19 PM6/11/04
to

"Reaganite" <R...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9Mqyc.70037$0X2.3...@twister.tampabay.rr.com...

>
>
> Nothing like another great post from the compassionate demmykkkrats.
>
>
whats compassionate about that fucking slut of a whore..nancy?


Ivana Newhouse

unread,
Jun 11, 2004, 7:06:14 PM6/11/04
to
<< Subject: Bad Plastic Surgery: Nancy Reagan and Marcia Clark
From: "noosepam" noos...@noosepam.cum
Date: Fri, Jun 11, 2004 3:25 PM
Message-id: <cadbg2$118$0...@pita.alt.net>

>>>Yikes! Talk about awful results from plastic surgery. Nancy Reagan looks
like she got pulled so tight over that tiny little skeleton of hers, all you
see on tv is a walking stick figure with huge glasses. Sure, she looks 20
years younger, but is looking like a 65 year old chimp really an
improvement?<<<<<

snip

A) You're a fucking idiot
B) She looks just fine, I'll go as far as to
say she looks really good.
C) If you make it to the age of 83 you should
pray that you look at good as she does
D) With you're amazing sense of decency and
class you won't make it to the age of 83,
your family will surely poison your food
before then.


Eris

unread,
Jun 11, 2004, 7:07:26 PM6/11/04
to
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:56:05 GMT, "Reaganite" <R...@aol.com> wrote:

>
>
> Nothing like another great post from the compassionate demmykkkrats.
>

You hound Hillary for being a bitch, dyke, whore. Why would someone
like Nancy get a free ride?

Reaganite

unread,
Jun 11, 2004, 7:21:50 PM6/11/04
to
Difference being Hillary is.

Robert Morrisette

unread,
Jun 11, 2004, 7:25:22 PM6/11/04
to
A liberal compares Nancy Reagan to a chimp. Typical liberal stupidity.

Sabu

"noosepam" <noos...@noosepam.cum> wrote in message
news:cadbg2$118$0...@pita.alt.net...

Nancy Reagan

unread,
Jun 11, 2004, 8:29:40 PM6/11/04
to

"Robert Morrisette" <writ...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:Cbryc.5487$Di3....@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

> A liberal compares Nancy Reagan to a chimp. Typical liberal stupidity.

I agree, it should've said Ronald Reagan.


Gogarty

unread,
Jun 11, 2004, 8:35:37 PM6/11/04
to
In article <i8ryc.70042$0X2.3...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, R...@aol.com
says...
>
>
> Difference being Hillary is.
>
Nancy is documented. Hilary is not. Nancy Davis was a whore.

Foxtrot

unread,
Jun 11, 2004, 10:51:08 PM6/11/04
to
Eris <Vith...@comcast.net> wrote:

>You hound Hillary for being a bitch,

Yup!

>dyke,

Right again, Anus!

>whore.

Bingo!

>Why would someone
>like Nancy get a free ride?

Because Nancy didn't try to wield enormous power that
she didn't deserve, like Hillary did. Nancy understood
that supporting Ron was the most important thing for her
to do. She wasn't scheming to further her own political
empire, like Hillary.

Peter Vos

unread,
Jun 11, 2004, 11:57:36 PM6/11/04
to
Foxtrot <fox...@null.com> wrote in
news:jgrkc09akvd0nb2d6...@4ax.com:

> Because Nancy didn't try to wield enormous power that
> she didn't deserve, like Hillary did.

hahahaa..,.. you must be smoking crack.....

Nancy... the woman who used to tell VP Bush what his job was? Notice he
didn't even look at her at the funeral?

dparks

unread,
Jun 12, 2004, 1:08:39 AM6/12/04
to
"noosepam" <noos...@noosepam.cum> wrote in message news:<cadbg2$118$0...@pita.alt.net>...

I didnt' see Marcia Clark, but I have seen many little old ladies who
look like Nancy Reagan, thin smooth skin, without plastic surgery -
everyone ages differently - plus NR never gave the vibe that she much
cared what anyone else thought of her; Ron? Yes - her? No.

DP

Sara

unread,
Jun 12, 2004, 10:58:57 AM6/12/04
to
Peter Vos wrote:

Didn't try to wield any power? That *is* funny. Reagan's Chiefs of
Staff were not overly fond of her influence. Baker called her a dragon
lady and rumors of Regan's dislike and resentment of her abounded.
Supposedly he hung up on her once and lost his job shortly after, going
on to write a tell-all that revealed Nancy Reagan's use of astrologers
in running state affairs.

Chris

unread,
Jun 12, 2004, 11:39:03 AM6/12/04
to

"dparks" <davepa...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4e4f3cf9.04061...@posting.google.com...

We should have had Nancy Reagan prosecute OJ, she would have done a better
job. Come to think of it Ronald Reagan could have done a better job.

>
> DP

Foxtrot

unread,
Jun 12, 2004, 2:15:13 PM6/12/04
to
Sara <safra...@rr.com> wrote:

>Peter Vos wrote:
>>Foxtrot <fox...@null.com> wrote

>>>Because Nancy didn't try to wield enormous power that
>>>she didn't deserve, like Hillary did.

>>Nancy... the woman who used to tell VP Bush what his job was? Notice he

>>didn't even look at her at the funeral?
>>
>Didn't try to wield any power? That *is* funny. Reagan's Chiefs of
>Staff were not overly fond of her influence. Baker called her a dragon
>lady and rumors of Regan's dislike and resentment of her abounded.

She may have disagreed with the president's staff from
time to time, but that's normal, she was protective of him.
She didn't try to seize control of a huge part of American
business, like Hillary tried to do with health care (with
**zero** authority to do so).

> Supposedly he hung up on her once and lost his job shortly after, going
>on to write a tell-all that revealed Nancy Reagan's use of astrologers
>in running state affairs.

And Hillary channeled with long dead Eleanor Roosevelt.

Carole

unread,
Jun 12, 2004, 8:40:15 PM6/12/04
to
>> > Also, Marcia Clark on ET yesterday was just unrecognizable.

I'll say. I was shocked. The only way I knew it was her was because of her
voice. Her eyes looked totally different.


Carole

Brett

unread,
Jun 12, 2004, 8:57:29 PM6/12/04
to
noosepam <noos...@noosepam.cum> wrote:

I knew there was something wrong with Marcia Clark the moment the OJ
trial started. Any woman that has a different hairstyle every day is
mentally unstable. I'm suprised the city of LA trusted this deranged
woman with such a high profile trial. Well, the results were
inevitable.

She should have stayed home trading hair and makeup tips with her lady
neighbors in her Knotts Landing-esque cul de sac. She's obviously off
her rocker, even to this day. She's switched jobs since the OJ trial
as many times as she has switched hairstyles. And now apparently
she's addicted to plastic surgery too. Oh goody, just what an insane
out of control woman needs. Looks like she's the next candidate for
the Jocelyn Wildenstein award.

http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/archives/000351.html


Chemqueries

unread,
Jun 14, 2004, 3:10:46 AM6/14/04
to
>From: "noosepam" noos...@noosepam.cum


>Just goes to show you money can't buy everything, certainly not taste or>good
looks.

There have been many threads on this topic. It just goes to show you that
cosmetic surgery is "hit or miss." But rather than "blame" the patient, I think
the fault lies primarily with the greedy arrogant cosmetic surgeons.

0 new messages