In article <sr7ed7$5o3$
2...@news.freedyn.de>
Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>
> On 4/20/2022 9:06 AM, demonstrating his own futility once again, the imbecile
> came back with:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:25:33 -0700, Rudy Canoza
> > <c...@philhendrie.con> in alt.atheism with message-id
> > <yJU7K.59575$r_.1...@fx41.iad> wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/20/2022 5:59 AM, demonstrating his own futility once again, the imbecile came back with:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:29:16 -0500, Mitchell Holman
> >>> <
noe...@verizon.net> in alt.atheism with message-id
> >>> <
XnsAE7ECF5E1508E...@216.166.97.131> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <
klaus.schadenfreude.entfernen.@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>>>
news:os0u5h1pb2g6npkvh...@4ax.com:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:54:10 -0700, Rudy Canoza <
notg...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 4/19/2022 10:31 AM, oozing scarlet red maxipad attempted - and
> >>>>>> *failed* - to bullshit:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In news:7IB7K.599774$mF2.4...@fx11.iad, Rudy Canoza
> >>>>>>> <
NoB...@noplace.com> typed:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We know this because he *told* the police dispatcher he was going
> >>>>>>>> after Martin. The dispatcher told him not to do it, but he did it
> >>>>>>>> anyway.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Zimmerman started the fight.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Give it up, Rudy. Not guilty.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The jury found him not guilty of second degree murder, o oozing
> >>>>>> scarlet red maxipad. The jury did *not* find him not guilty of
> >>>>>> starting the fight. That wasn't the issue of the trial. The jury
> >>>>>> made no finding regarding who started the fight.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Zimmerman started the fight. We know this, o oozing scarlet red
> >>>>>> maxipad.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Zimmerman. NOT GUILTY
> >>>>> Rittenhouse. NOT GUILTY
> >>>> OJ Simpson. NOT GUILTY
> >>>
> >>> Lizzie Borden. NOT GUILTY - Jury verdict for a variety of
> >>> reasons.
> >>> John Hinckley. NOT GUILTY - By reason of insanity
> >>>
> >>
> >> Zimmerman started the fight. That means he did *not* act in self defense.
> >
> > You think he was guilty.
>
> He is factually guilty.
>
> >
> > The jury was correct.
>
> The jury got it wrong, as juries often do.
The jury got it right in this case.
> Zimmerman started the fight. He was not acting in self defense. He was the
> aggressor. You know this.
Who threw the first punch?