Part 2 - Why You Are Losing - NOT That This Is A Competition... No, It's A Fucking FIGHT - We're Fighting To Keep More of Our Money IN Our Pockets, While You Basement-Dwellers....

[AlleyCat]

... couldn't give less of a shit, because you're ARE mommy's little basement-
dwellers. You don't pay taxes, and if you do, you're just too damn much of
communists, Marxists, socialists, liberals and Democrats to care what your
mommies have to pay to keep you on the internet and on Usenet, where you show
everybody HOW much of communists, Marxists, socialists, liberals and Democrats
you are.

Go ahead... reply... just remember, your credentials are Kindergarten-level
compared to these guys. Oh... yeah... you can piss and moan about them not
having "climatology" degrees.

Compared to their PHYSICS degrees, a climatologist degree, is akin to a gender
studies "degree", so piss and moan on your own sleeves, pussies... this MAN
won't shed a tear if you feel slighted... at all.

=====

(continued from Part 1...)

According to Happer and Lindzen's testimony, "600 million years of CO2 and
temperature data contradict the theory that high levels of CO2 will cause
catastrophic global warming" - and they present the following chart which shows
little correlation between historical levels of CO2 and temperature, arguing
also that current CO2 levels are at a low point:

This chart shows CO2 levels (blue) and temperatures (red) over time, indicating
little correlation and current levels of both at historic lows [Analysis of the
Temperature Oscillations in Geological Eras by Dr. C. R. Scotese; Earth's
Climate: Past and Future by Mark Peganini; Marked Decline in Atmospheric Carbon
Dioxide Concentrations During the Paleocene, Science magazine vol. 309.]

https://i0.wp.com/electroverse.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/image-33.png?
ssl=1

"The often highly emphasized 140 [parts per million] increase in CO2 since the
beginning of the Industrial Age is trivial compared to CO2 changes over the
geological history of life on Earth," they stated. And in any case, "Increased
levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere create more food for people
worldwide, including more food for people in drought-stricken areas. Increases
in carbon dioxide over the past two centuries since the Industrial Revolution,
from about 280 parts per million to about 420 ppm, caused an approximate 20
percent increase in the food available to people worldwide, as well as
increased greening of the planet and a benign warming in temperature."

More CO2 in the atmosphere leads to more plant growth and higher farming
yields, even NASA concedes this. In addition, synthetic fertilizers, which are
derivatives of natural gas, are responsible for nearly half the world's food
production today. However, "net zero" goals would reduce CO2 emissions by more
than 40 gigatons per year, reducing the food supply proportionally.

https://electroverse.info/physicist-william-happer-there-is-no-climate-
emergency/

In addition to teaching physics at Princeton, decades of William Happer's life
have been devoted to physics, primarily atmospheric radiation and atmospheric
turbulence, and his inventions have been used by astronomers and in national
defense.

"Radiation in the atmosphere is my specialty," said Happer, "and I know more
about it than, I would guess, any climate scientists. [My expertise] involves
much of the same physics that's involved in climate, and none of it is very
alarming," he stated.

The global warming narrative argues that as people burn fossil fuels they emit
higher concentrations of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which absorbs
sunlight and creates a "greenhouse effect," trapping the Sun's radiation and
warming the Earth.

But one aspect of CO2 emissions that global warming models fail to take into
account, Happer explained, is a phenomenon called "saturation," or the
diminishing effect of CO2 in the atmosphere at higher concentrations.

"At the current concentrations of CO2, around 400 parts per million, it
decreases the radiation to space by about 30 percent, compared to what you
would have if you took it all away," Happer said. "So that's enough to cause
quite a bit of warming of the earth, and thank God for that; it helps make the
earth habitable, along with the effects of water vapor and clouds."

"But if you could double the amount of CO2 from 400 to 800, and that will take
a long time, the amount that you decrease radiation to space is only one
percent. Very few people realize how hard it is for additional carbon dioxide
to make a difference to the radiation to space. That's what's called
saturation, and it's been well known for a century."

The "greenhouse effect" of additional CO2 does not increase in proportion to
the amount of CO2 added [William Happer]

https://i0.wp.com/electroverse.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/image-34.png?
ssl=1

(continued)

=====

August... So Hot!

Record Cold Denver

Historic Snow pack Leads To Full Utah Reservoirs

B.C. Glaciers 28-49% Thicker Than Models Estimated

Record Cold Myanmar

Pakistan's Frigid 2023

Australia's Snow Warnings

U.S. Burn Acreage Fourth-Lowest on Record (Since 1926)

UT And CO Still Have Snow


Barrier Reef Holding On To Record Coral Gains

German Mountains See 4-Inches of Summer Snow

Cold Julys From Fiji To The UK

Historically Cold Italy

U.S. Ski Industry Reports Record-Breaking 65.4 Million Skier Visits Last Season

Cold Ireland

Cool U.S.

"Unusual" Temperature Drop Recorded Across Pacific Islands

Record-Cold Sweeps Europe As "Intense Snow" Continues To Pound Italy And Spain

Almanac Predicts Cold, Snowy Winter For U.S.

New August Low For Rapa Island

Europe's Colder-Than-Average (And Snowy) July

UK's Historically Cold Summer Drags On

Greenland Ice Sheet Uptick

Sierra Snow pack 1000% of Normal

Svalbard Polar Bears Enjoy Above Average Ice