Part 1 - Why You Are Losing - NOT That This Is A Competition... No, It's A Fucking FIGHT - We're Fighting To Keep More of Our Money IN Our Pockets, While You Basement-Dwellers....

[AlleyCat]

... couldn't give less of a shit, because you're ARE mommy's little basement-
dwellers. You don't pay taxes, and if you do, you're just too damn much of
communists, Marxists, socialists, liberals and Democrats to care what your
mommies have to pay to keep you on the internet and on Usenet, where you show
everybody HOW much of communists, Marxists, socialists, liberals and Democrats
you are.

Go ahead... reply... just remember, your credentials are Kindergarten-level
compared to these guys. Oh... yeah... you can piss and moan about them not
having "climatology" degrees.

Compared to their PHYSICS degrees, a climatologist degree, is akin to a gender
studies "degree", so piss and moan on your own sleeves, pussies... this MAN
won't shed a tear if you feel slighted... at all.

=====

Calling Out The Climate Scam: A Princeton Professor, An MIT Scientist, And A
Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist...

August 16, 2023 Cap Allon

Two prominent climate scientists recently argued, in testimony, that new
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) rules to cut CO2 emissions "will be
disastrous for the country, for no scientifically justifiable reason."

William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and
Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT) argue, quoting extensive data, that the EPA's
justification of the new regulations are not based on scientific facts but
rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently been
proven wrong.

"The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review,
government opinion, models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting
voluminous contradictory data, is commonly employed in these studies and by the
EPA in the Proposed Rule," Happer and Lindzen stated. "None of the studies
provides scientific knowledge, and thus none provides any scientific support
for the Proposed Rule."

"All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test
of the scientific method: they grossly over-predict the warming versus actual
data," they stated. "The scientific method proves there is no risk that fossil
fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming and extreme weather."

Climate models like the ones that the EPA is using have been consistently wrong
for decades in predicting actual outcomes, Happer told The Epoch Times,
offering the table below to illustrate his point:

https://i0.wp.com/electroverse.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/image-32.png?w=
600&ssl=1

"That was already an embarrassment in the 1990s, when I was director of energy
research in the U.S. Department of Energy," continued Happer. "I was funding a
lot of this work, and I knew very well then that the models were over-
predicting the warming by a huge amount."

One popular way to fight the EPA's climate regulations is cite what's called
the "major questions doctrine", which argues that the agency does not have the
authority to invent regulations that have such an enormous impact on Americans
without clear direction from Congress. Happer and Lindzen, however, have taken
a different tack, arguing that the EPA regulations fail the "State Farm" test
because they are "arbitrary and capricious."

"Time and again, courts have applied "State Farm's" principles to invalidate
agency rules where the agency failed to consider an important aspect of the
problem, or cherry-picked data to support a pre-ordained conclusion," they
explained, referring to the 2003 case of State Farm v. Campbell in which the
Supreme Court argued that "a State can have no legitimate interest in
deliberately making the law so arbitrary that citizens will be unable to avoid
punishment based solely upon bias or whim."

(continued)


=====

August... So Hot!

Record Cold Denver

Historic Snow pack Leads To Full Utah Reservoirs

B.C. Glaciers 28-49% Thicker Than Models Estimated

Record Cold Myanmar

Pakistan's Frigid 2023

Australia's Snow Warnings

U.S. Burn Acreage Fourth-Lowest on Record (Since 1926)

UT And CO Still Have Snow


Barrier Reef Holding On To Record Coral Gains

German Mountains See 4-Inches of Summer Snow

Cold Julys From Fiji To The UK

Historically Cold Italy

U.S. Ski Industry Reports Record-Breaking 65.4 Million Skier Visits Last Season

Cold Ireland

Cool U.S.

"Unusual" Temperature Drop Recorded Across Pacific Islands

Record-Cold Sweeps Europe As "Intense Snow" Continues To Pound Italy And Spain

Almanac Predicts Cold, Snowy Winter For U.S.

New August Low For Rapa Island

Europe's Colder-Than-Average (And Snowy) July

UK's Historically Cold Summer Drags On

Greenland Ice Sheet Uptick

Sierra Snow pack 1000% of Normal

Svalbard Polar Bears Enjoy Above Average Ice