This post should be accompanied by a steam calliope, like they do at
P.S. -- An audit of Canadian birth records through 1930 proves that M&M
don't even exist!
"Well Done" <Well...@WellHoned.com> wrote in message
But the left-wing (communist/facist, which are flip sides of the same
coin) eco-terrorists refuse to admit this, and insist on promoting
their racist, xenophobic and anti-capitalist, nilhilist views on the
rest of us. It's the Club of Rome doomsdayers all over again, in new
But you have no clothes.
But for a tiny increase in temperatures since 1980, possibly due to
undiscovered effects, there is no "global warming". In fact, during
the middle of the last century tempratures decreased, as they do today
in the American south. And Antarctic ice is actually increasing. But
some Bozo can always tweak the backwardly looking, curve - fitting (and
thereby bogus) polynomial to accomidate these facts by saying "weather
is becoming more extreme (both hotter and colder) in different parts of
the world, all due to the Arrhenius CO2 model for Global Warming!" And
get research dollars for another cut-and-paste computer simulation.
Obscene if you ask me.
"raylopez99" <raylo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Funny you should mention that. McCarthy was right. Joseph Welch was wrong
and cried for the audience. The press didn't like McCarthy and you can guess
>"Steve Bloom" <spb...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>There's a distinction between "well done" and putrified, as this two year
>>old information demonstrates.
>Two years ago the facts were the same as they are today.
>M & M 's work was compromised by the IPCC, which means the IPCC report
>is at least twice removed from being objective science.
>That means the IPCC report is a load of shit.
You'll need a time machine to get this nuts to turn into soup.
M&M's reports came out after the IPCC.
You call that a 'report'? They never finished the analysis and got most of
THAT wrong, then had to publish it in a 'vanity press' run by a crank. How
does that make a 'report'?