California Pot Growers Consume More Water Than Fracking

[Chom Noamsky]

Hey man (phhhhht), like, fracking is sucking all our water dry (cough...
wheeze):

http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/07/california-pot-growers-consume-more-water-than-fracking/

[Catoni]

So funny..... but then ... maybe not..

Wonder why the silence from the leftist Global Warming Alarmists in this group ? ?

Where's Gordo and Unum and Desertphile and C.A.I. and Kym et al. ? ?

[Chom Noamsky]

Probably deciding what outfit to put on their Global Warming Barbies.

[abu.ku...@gmail.com]

I guess that htis has ben the big cause of a)
deforesttation in California;
how much so in other states

[gordo]

What do you mean global warming alarmists? I don't want fracking and
I sure as hell do not support californias commercial pot growers
wasting water. I do not like Nestles taking almost free water in BC
and selling it back to idiots who still have water in their taps.
Fracking and commercial grow ops are both big wasters of water. So
what did you learn today?

[gordo]

What a stupid post.

[$27 TRILLION to PAY for KYOTO]

And the simple act of rising containers for recycling consumes 3.7 BILLION litres of water per year in California.

[Catoni]

On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 12:27:53 AM UTC-4, gordo wrote:

> What do you mean global warming alarmists? I don't want fracking and
> I sure as hell do not support californias commercial pot growers
> wasting water. I do not like Nestles taking almost free water in BC
> and selling it back to idiots who still have water in their taps.
> Fracking and commercial grow ops are both big wasters of water. So
> what did you learn today?

Except that more and more fracking companies are pumping the fracking water back out of the ground.. and treating and recycling it... the water often ending up cleaner than when they first got it.

Gordo won't be able to use that complaint much longer.... he'll have to find something else to complain about..

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Im here in california, read the article and tell me what your problem is.
"What should be noted, however, is that both fracking and CDFW's estimates of how much water is used in pot cultivation amount to only a fraction of California's total annual water use."

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Do you think it cant contaminate precious aquifers?

If one drills down about 400-600 feet to get good flow in the southern california high desert the water is actually about 2000 years old.

[Catoni]

Do you have any knowledge at all of what frack well casing is like ? ?

Out of more than a MILLION fracked wells.....

Except for one case case where the gas was very close to the surface.... and there is some contamination.. in one small little community.. .. and a spill of a few thousand gallons of frack fluid in one case in Pennsylvania...

... the idea stressed by fracking critics that deep-injected fluids will migrate into groundwater is mostly false.

Basic geology prevents such contamination from starting below ground. A fracture caused by the drilling process would have to extend through the several thousand feet of rock that separate deep shale gas deposits from freshwater aquifers. According to geologist Gary Lash of the State University of New York at Fredonia, the intervening layers of rock have distinct mechanical properties that would prevent the fissures from expanding a mile or more toward the surface. It would be like stacking a dozen bricks on top of each other, he says, and expecting a crack in the bottom brick to extend all the way to the top one. What's more, the fracking fluid itself, thickened with additives, is too dense to ascend upward through such a channel. EPA officials are closely watching one place for evidence otherwise: tiny Pavillion, Wyo., a remote town of 160 where high levels of chemicals linked to fracking have been found in groundwater supplies. Pavillion's aquifer sits several hundred feet above the gas cache, far closer than aquifers atop other gas fields. If the investigation documents the first case of fracking fluid seeping into groundwater directly from gas wells, drillers may be forced to abandon shallow deposits--which wouldn't affect Marcellus wells.

https://barryonenergy.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/casing-and-cementing.jpg

[Catoni]

On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 2:09:09 AM UTC-4, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:

> Do you think it cant contaminate precious aquifers?

Yeah... Sure it can.... ... maybe one or two out of more than a million fracked wells in the U.S. and Canada.. .over seventy years.... might become contaminated...

(So let's shut 'em all down and not permit any more" 5555555 ;)

yeah... okay..... LOL

Fracking in Canada..... .since the mid 1960's......

Fracking in the U.S. since 1949.

There's literally tens of thousands of fracked wells in several individual states..... and in a number of Canadian provinces... Since 2005, Texas and Colorado have been operating the most fracking wells, with 33,753 and 18,168 wells in each state presently operating.

More than a million in all of North America all together ...

Fracking in Canada: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGC0K9tPPTo

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

So i guess you are saying if you include the messed up wells, that would increase the amount of water taken by fracking 5555555

Hint take a look at the OP

[gordo]

Water Use Rises as Fracking Expands

And certain wells use far more water than others, a possible threat in
dry regions
"Though some of the water used for fracking is recycled, most of it is
disposed deep underground, almost entirely removed from the water
cycle and never to be used again."
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/water-use-rises-as-fracking-expands/

[Catoni]

On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 12:49:17 PM UTC-4, gordo wrote:

> And certain wells use far more water than others, a possible threat in
> dry regions
> "Though some of the water used for fracking is recycled, most of it is
> disposed deep underground, almost entirely removed from the water
> cycle and never to be used again."
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/water-use-rises-as-fracking-expands/

Scientific American is no longer the objective science magazine it once was...

Over the last few decades it has become more and more left/political. and has lost its objectivity.

I, for one.... feel the loss. Scientific American used to be one of my favourite magazines to look forward to each month.

There is still the odd good article... that I will buy the magazine to read... but those articles are now fewer and fewer....

Such a loss......... :(

[Chom Noamsky]

True that, Scientific American has become a lot like the old Omni Magazine.

[Tunderbar]

Hey gordo, do you smoke pot?

[abu.ku...@gmail.com]

yeah, that is better than tap-off-of-toilette

[Tunderbar]

On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 11:49:17 AM UTC-5, gordo wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 23:06:04 -0700 (PDT), Catoni
> <cato...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 12:27:53 AM UTC-4, gordo wrote:
> >
> >> What do you mean global warming alarmists? I don't want fracking and
> >> I sure as hell do not support californias commercial pot growers
> >> wasting water. I do not like Nestles taking almost free water in BC
> >> and selling it back to idiots who still have water in their taps.
> >> Fracking and commercial grow ops are both big wasters of water. So
> >> what did you learn today?
> >
> >
> > Except that more and more fracking companies are pumping the fracking water back out of the ground.. and treating and recycling it... the water often ending up cleaner than when they first got it.
> >
> > Gordo won't be able to use that complaint much longer.... he'll have to find something else to complain about..
>
> Water Use Rises as Fracking Expands
>
> And certain wells use far more water than others, a possible threat in
> dry regions

How much water do you think fracking takes? I think maybe you are assuming that it uses a massive amount of water over an extended period of time. I think you are wrong, and stupid, and exceedingly alarmist. And a nutbag.

[Catoni]

On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 2:11:41 PM UTC-4, Tunderbar wrote:

> Hey gordo, do you smoke pot?

I read somewhere that British Columbia, Canada has some famous weed they call "B.C. Bud"

Supposedly some pretty powerful shit. Gordo might know.... he lives there..

Actually.... Wikipedia says there are varieties of British Columbia bud weed called "BC Arctic Sun" and , "BC God Bud."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BC_Bud

I'll guess that our pal Gordo has had some personal experience with the stuff.. .

[Chom Noamsky]

Probably drinks a lot of bong water.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Oh wow, how about you post your complete list of pharmaceuticals, and if you drink any alcohol while under the influence of those other drugs.

I heard this is a real problem with people of your demographic

[Tunderbar]

Bat you 10 bucks he doesn't answer the question because he will not want to admit to being a pothead.

[Tunderbar]

Do you smoke pot?

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

do you take prescription drugs?

[Tunderbar]

Actually no, no prescription drugs if I can avoid it. Except for Naproxen, an anti-inflammatory, every once in a long while when my back acts up, but generally no. Nor do I do any illegal drugs, including pot. But I do enjoy a nice sip of good whisky once in a while.

You?

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Firstly, making whiskey takes water as well, the local mini beer brewery craze around here uses a lot of water as well do you drink beer?

Secondly, california has laws which show your statement of legality is not valid.

Third i have no need to trust that is all you take i refer you to your phrase "if i can avoid it", nor do i have a need to reveal any personal information.

[gordo]

It keeps printing science and you think it is a communist conspiracy
to take over the world.

[gordo]

It keeps printing science that you don't like.

[gordo]

On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:15:44 -0700 (PDT), Tunderbar
<tdco...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 11:49:17 AM UTC-5, gordo wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 23:06:04 -0700 (PDT), Catoni
>> <cato...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>> >On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 12:27:53 AM UTC-4, gordo wrote:
>> >
>> >> What do you mean global warming alarmists? I don't want fracking and
>> >> I sure as hell do not support californias commercial pot growers
>> >> wasting water. I do not like Nestles taking almost free water in BC
>> >> and selling it back to idiots who still have water in their taps.
>> >> Fracking and commercial grow ops are both big wasters of water. So
>> >> what did you learn today?
>> >
>> >
>> > Except that more and more fracking companies are pumping the fracking water back out of the ground.. and treating and recycling it... the water often ending up cleaner than when they first got it.
>> >
>> > Gordo won't be able to use that complaint much longer.... he'll have to find something else to complain about..
>>
>> Water Use Rises as Fracking Expands
>>
>> And certain wells use far more water than others, a possible threat in
>> dry regions
>
>How much water do you think fracking takes? I think maybe you are assuming that it uses a massive amount of water over an extended period of time. I think you are wrong, and stupid, and exceedingly alarmist. And a nutbag.

You are a stupid nut bar shithead who is trying for a record shithead
status.

[gordo]

Are you a child molester?

[gordo]

[gordo]

And you probably rape little girls, or is it boys.

[Chom Noamsky]

It's long been known that the editors of Scientific American are
fanatical greenmob activists.

Real and credible science journalism doesn't add activist slant to
everything.

[gordo]

On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:01:20 -0700 (PDT), Tunderbar
<tdco...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 1:26:07 PM UTC-5, Catoni wrote:
>> On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 2:11:41 PM UTC-4, Tunderbar wrote:
>>
>> > Hey gordo, do you smoke pot?
>>
>> I read somewhere that British Columbia, Canada has some famous weed they call "B.C. Bud"
>>
>> Supposedly some pretty powerful shit. Gordo might know.... he lives there..
>>
>> Actually.... Wikipedia says there are varieties of British Columbia bud weed called "BC Arctic Sun" and , "BC God Bud."
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BC_Bud
>>
>> I'll guess that our pal Gordo has had some personal experience with the stuff..

Bet you won't admit to being a child molester.

[Chom Noamsky]

Hmmm, I see the bong comment really really stung you... I guess I nailed
it... LOL!

[Chom Noamsky]

Haha! gordo's reaction pretty much confims it. But he admitted it
years ago on can.politics:

"Guess what. I never registered my guns. I was made an instant criminal
with the gun law registration. I did not register my pot plants either
but I was made an instant criminal under Perogy Harper's insane
omnibus bill and will be sentenced to mandatory jail sentence for my
terrible crime of what?"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/can.politics/EmHlfqQtgAo/y7o8du8fK6IJ

Nope, gordo doesn't smoke it, just bakes it in cookies, or maybe takes
it as a supository... lol!

[Chom Noamsky]

On 7/8/2015 3:21 PM, n...@home.anymor wrote:

> I didn't know that about gordo.
>
> Explains a lot.
>
> Tough for him to use it as a supository though as his head usually
> occupies that space.

If you really want to get gordo revved-up, ask him why he retired on
Vancouver Island instead of Lethbridge Alberta... lol!

[Chom Noamsky]

On 7/8/2015 3:30 PM, n...@home.anymor wrote:

> Getting to you gordo?
> Why do you speak of child molestation gordo?
> Another demonstration of your Sociopathy.
> Sociopathy is more likely the product of childhood trauma and
> physical/emotional abuse.
> Were you molested as a child? Could explain a lot.

Well, he was raised in the Catholic school system, and everyone knows
about Catholic clergy's fondness for little children. The stats show
that the abused generally become abusers, so gordo's grandchildren could
be at risk. But whatever happened, gordo's okay with it now because
Pope Francis has joined the greenmob.

[Chom Noamsky]

> I have seen you ask that but I never noticed a reply. Did he give on
> or just rant on about something?

The response is generally "it's none of your damn business why I'm a
warmer climate migrant!"

[gordo]

On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:22:45 -0700, Chom Noamsky

How would you know. The closest you get to science is the junk from
WSWT

[Chom Noamsky]

The closest I ever got to science was a science degree.

Did ya ever get your grade 12?

[gordo]

On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:25:24 -0700, Chom Noamsky

So why run away. Is it little girls or is it boys that you rape.

[gordo]

On 08 Jul 2015 22:30:43 GMT, n...@home.anymor wrote:

>Getting to you gordo?
>Why do you speak of child molestation gordo?
>Another demonstration of your Sociopathy.
>Sociopathy is more likely the product of childhood trauma and
>physical/emotional abuse.
>Were you molested as a child? Could explain a lot.

I am not obsessed with you but you sure as hell are with me. Watch
your blood pressure and get help with your obsession. It is not
healthy to be so hateful and overpowered with your obsession.

[gordo]

On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 15:40:39 -0700, Chom Noamsky

You also need medical intervention for your obsession. Your hate is
real and you are a danger to yourself and others.

[Bret Cahill]

> Hey man (phhhhht), like, fracking is sucking all our water dry (cough...
> wheeze):
>
> http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/07/california-pot-growers-consume-more-water-than-fracking/

OK, ok, now that you twisted my arm (ouch) I agree. Water rates should be progressive.

Each Californian gets his first 40 gallons/day free of charge.

The next 20 gallons is $0.50. The next 20 gallons is $1.00. And so on.

[gordo]

On 08 Jul 2015 22:36:56 GMT, n...@home.anymor wrote:

>Chom Noamsky wrote:
>

>LOL. gordo the altar boy. Certainly could explain his comments about
>the Pope.
>
>You are certainly correct about the abused/abusers. Hopefully
>someone keeps an eye on him when he is near kids. Particularly kids
>he has the trust of. Stats show most molestations are done to kids
>by people they are familiar with.\

Your hateful remarks are making you sick. You will not sleep well
tonight trying to sort out why you are so hateful.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Oh wow, come on quote some reefer madness, you can do it, dust off ye old crusty grumpy old fart political propaganda from your good ole days.

[Chom Noamsky]

The bong water comment really set you off, didn't it... lol!

[Chom Noamsky]

Note to alt.g-w, never accuse gordo of drinking bong water... lol!

[Chom Noamsky]

Such a massive overaction to an innocent bong water comment... yup,
nailed it... LOL!

[Chom Noamsky]

I'm all for pot decriminalization, always have been, can't stand stoners
though. I've known people whose lives completely revolve around using
marijuana... lazy, ambitionless, paranoid, lives and careers in a
shambles, but toke up and (cough wheeze) life is gooooood. I hear it's a
great painkiller, about the only good use for it.

[Chom Noamsky]

Yeah, like grow operators will honour that, most of the time they pirate
electricity AND water.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Still more irrelevant ranting from your contrived soap box, the funny thing is you really didnt care about the wheezing as a result of bitumen production when i cited the stats showing it rivaled a forest fire.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 9:41:46 PM UTC-7, Chom Noamsky wrote:" I hear it's a great painkiller, about the only good use for it."

interesting tundy cites a non-natural drug he uses as an anti inflammatory others use it as a pain killer, but the side effects include heartburn, dizziness, headache, constipation and yet you missed those.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

[gordo]

On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:42:03 -0700, Chom Noamsky

Of course. If you got a science degree demand your money back.
>
>
>
>

[gordo]

On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 21:31:28 -0700, Chom Noamsky

Your obsession is real. I have answered all your insulting posts with
a similar suggestion that you have to answer, do you rape little girls
or boys. See how it works out?
>
>

[Chom Noamsky]

What is it about bong water that gets you so revved-up? I can only
imagine your extreme reaction is because it hit the truth... lol!

[Chom Noamsky]

On 7/8/2015 10:54 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 9:41:46 PM UTC-7, Chom Noamsky wrote:" I hear it's a great painkiller, about the only good use for it."
>
> interesting tundy cites a non-natural drug he uses as an anti inflammatory others use it as a pain killer, but the side effects include heartburn, dizziness, headache, constipation and yet you missed those.

I've taken naproxen in the past, never had any side effects. You do
understand that the vast majority never experience side effects.
Infrequent pot use is fairly harmless for most people, but people with
underlying pyschoses can have those psychoses amplified with heavy use,
to the point they become quite mentally unwell and neurotic. I know so
because I've seen the effects personally in two relatives. So dependent
on pot it becomes their entire pathetic, ambitionless lifestyle.

[Chom Noamsky]

Lukewarmers and skeptics are generally better educated than
greenmobbers. It's a fact that has been reported on multiple times.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Your false logic seems to directly rely on you projecting your personal problems and family issues onto others, california is deciding to limit fracking because of the potential dangers to the water system which is an example of one company hurting many.

Your relatives could have easily selected the choice of many life wreckers, whiskey, another water consuming selection listed by tunderbar. The side effects like nopraxen can require additional drugs, which means additional water.

I have personally seen somebody who is suffering cancer, subjecting their body to chemo, choose a natural remedy like marijuana as a means to survive the brutal beating her body was taking from the cancer treatment. You can spout all you want about your weak genetic tree, the fact is the article you used to start this thread is pure bs, your a joke, but if you want to come to california to spend your money that would be cool.

[Chom Noamsky]

Another common characteristic of dependent dope smokers is extreme
defensiveness when their heavy usage is questioned. Both you and gordo
have responded quite defensively to just joking about it...

... hmmmm, things are starting to click.

[Tunderbar]

gordo has still not said whether or not he smokes pot. LOL.

The lack of response is as good as an admission.

[Tunderbar]

On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 10:54:53 AM UTC-5, Chom Noamsky wrote:
> On 7/8/2015 10:54 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 9:41:46 PM UTC-7, Chom Noamsky wrote:" I hear it's a great painkiller, about the only good use for it."
> >
> > interesting tundy cites a non-natural drug he uses as an anti inflammatory others use it as a pain killer, but the side effects include heartburn, dizziness, headache, constipation and yet you missed those.
>
> I've taken naproxen in the past, never had any side effects. You do
> understand that the vast majority never experience side effects.

Which is why I use it. It is relatively safe and in some cases effective.

And note to columbiaalphabetname, it is a pain killer because it is an anti inflammatory.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Why act so self centered? For the chemo patient was a navy wife, who passed, my emotion is purely connected to the fact i was not there to support her in her dying days. She passed at the naval hospital, about 17 years ago, your callous attitude toward her suffering is exactly the reason california needed a law.
That goes along with your callous attitude towards the potential tainting of life giving aquifers here in my state.

Perhaps you feel compelled to use lame attempts at ad hom smears because you know the study in the article you cited is pretty weak.

Come on spinner, you just got busted trolling in your own thread now thats funny, you might stop popping so many pills and doing so many shots of your favorite hard drink before you make a fool of your self again.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 10:52:17 AM UTC-7, Tunderbar wrote:"The lack of response is as good as an admission."

stalin would be proud of you

[Chom Noamsky]

Kind of a pointless rant... I support decriminalization, so have yer
medicine and take it too. Just don't become dependent on it to the
point it becomes your entire lifestyle.

The irony of the whole article is that dope smokin' hippies use more
water resources than frackers. The accounting did not even consider
indoor cultivation.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

The irony or your a pointless rant from idiots like you, is that you somehow wont consider the amount of water used for your pills or your favorite beer or hard drink, the study was pure bs ready for an idiot like you to take it out of context jumping around incorrectly assuming you have some valid logical point.

Dude, global warming is happening, human actions are connected to influencing the climate, co2 reductions is needed included dropping bitumen production. Get over it, you failed to spin, you failed at your PR, and you just failed.

[gordo]

No I don't smoke pot but if I did it is none of your goddamned
business. Now crawl back under your rock.

[gordo]

I was treated for cancer for 6 weeks in Victoria and saw lots of sick
and dying patients who smoked pot. It changed my whole perception of
pot.

[gordo]

I don't smoke pot and it is none of your goddamned business if I did.

[Tunderbar]

So.... you support pot use then. Okay.

[george152]

On 10/07/2015 9:00 a.m., n...@home.anymor wrote:

> Hateful? I don't hate anyone gordo. I think you are an idiot but
> there is no hatred involved.
>
He's pissed that you don't accept his claim to being a god...
:)

[george152]

On 10/07/2015 9:04 a.m., n...@home.anymor wrote:

> What bothers me about gordo's comment is he seems to think a little
> bong water is on par with molesting children.
>
Who knows what secret depravities he is heir to
Or cares

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Ah yes, the stalin like tactic, why dont you get his neighbors to spy on him eh?

[Chom Noamsky]

Somebody needs a toke, or maybe an edible... lol!

[Chom Noamsky]

The vast majority of pot users are neither sick nor dying. My general
POV on life is libertarian, you want to grow weed and use it for
medicine, recreation or as a coping tool for a pathetic life, knock
yourself out.

The point is greenmobbers get hysterical about fracking's use of water
resources, while turning a blind eye to an industry that is even more
consumptive of water resources.

The article acheived what it was meant to, expose the goofy double
standards of greenmobbers.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

The fact is your contrived argument is almost like a bitumen users confessional performed at your sacred site of tar sands.

[abu.ku...@gmail.com]

you forgot about "inland seas, created by the process
of fracking permeable bedrocks for hydrocabons; as for pot,
the primary toxicity of smoking plants,
is OCO (it also produces HOH, but

[gordo]

On 09 Jul 2015 21:05:32 GMT, n...@home.anymor wrote:

>gordo wrote:
>

>> On 08 Jul 2015 22:36:56 GMT, n...@home.anymor wrote:
>>
>>>Chom Noamsky wrote:
>>>

>>>> On 7/8/2015 3:30 PM, n...@home.anymor wrote:
>>>>> gordo wrote:
>>>>>

>>>LOL. gordo the altar boy. Certainly could explain his comments
>>>about the Pope.
>>>
>>>You are certainly correct about the abused/abusers. Hopefully
>>>someone keeps an eye on him when he is near kids. Particularly
>>>kids he has the trust of. Stats show most molestations are done
>>>to kids by people they are familiar with.\
>>
>> Your hateful remarks are making you sick. You will not sleep well
>> tonight trying to sort out why you are so hateful.
>
>If I lose any sleep tonight it will be because I am thinking of the
>safety of your grand kids.

Why, are you thinking of molesting them? They are all adults but then
maybe you are thinking of molesting my great grandchildren. Piss off
and get back under your rock.

[gordo]

Here comes georgy pordgy from under his slimy rock.Why did you decide
to take part? You are a coward georgy pordgy. If you wish to discuss
AGW you are in the right newsgroup. You do not belong with these
thugs. Get back under your slimy rock.

[gordo]

On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 15:25:29 -0700, Chom Noamsky

The planet keeps heating up. We know why and we know what must happen
if we are to slow the destruction of life on earth . Our attempts to
protect our water supplies have been changed by the fact that many
places on earth the water we were trying to protect is no longer
there.

[Bret Cahill]

> >> Hey man (phhhhht), like, fracking is sucking all our water dry (cough...
> >> wheeze):
> >>
> >> http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/07/california-pot-growers-consume-more-water-than-fracking/
> >
> > OK, ok, now that you twisted my arm (ouch) I agree. Water rates should be progressive.
> >
> > Each Californian gets his first 40 gallons/day free of charge.
> >
> > The next 20 gallons is $0.50. The next 20 gallons is $1.00. And so on.
>
> Yeah, like grow operators will honour that, most of the time they pirate
> electricity AND water.

Nope, it's law and order avocado farmers types doing the stealing:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2015/07/08/tom-selleck-accused-of-stealing-water-for-california-ranch/29870463/

[Chom Noamsky]

blah blah fucking blah...

[Wally W.]

If gordo could rewrite the last scene in color from the Wizard of Oz:

Repetition makes it true ... click, click, click ...
Repetition makes it true ... click, click, click ...
Repetition makes it true ... click, click, click ...

Upon Dorothy returning to her comfort zone:

Oh, Aunty Em ... I knew the world was black and white!

[abu.ku...@gmail.com]

izgordOacOOk