Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Storms

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jim Watt

unread,
Feb 3, 2007, 5:02:33 PM2/3/07
to
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 16:35:19 -0000, "Ken" <k...@k1at.freeserve.co.uk>
wrote:

>The weather in Gib has been a bit inclement of late. I received a pic by
>email and attach it here - at least my newsreader lets me attach a pic.
>Don't know whether this will be readable on te NG. If not, anyone wanting to
>see it please post a valid e-dress and I'll send it directly.

It comes through albeit poor resolution. I saw a sequence from
Johnnu Bugeja at the chronicle last week take there which were
awesome.

However, its generally considered bad practice to post binaries
to text newsgroups.

I'll send you one of my images of last Sunday.

see also an intersting road accident at

http://www.gibnews.net/cgi-bin/gn_view.pl/?GPIX070203_1.xml
--
Jim Watt
http://www.gibnet.com

Ken

unread,
Feb 3, 2007, 8:14:23 PM2/3/07
to

"Jim Watt" <jim...@aol.no_way> wrote in message
news:1d1as2ptnaagiqu05...@4ax.com...

It's one of those oops! pics.

Seen the sequence of a car that falls into to the sea at a harbour. A crane
comes along to lift it out, and ends up in the brink too. A larger crane
comes to get the smaller crane out- and ends up in the water as well.
Eventually the third crane does it.

K


Ken

unread,
Feb 3, 2007, 8:37:21 PM2/3/07
to

"Jim Watt" <jim...@aol.no_way> wrote in message
news:1d1as2ptnaagiqu05...@4ax.com...

Curious though. Gib gets storms every year. Some years areworse than others,
some storms are worse than others, but every winter around this time Gib
gets winds which hit close to or over 100mph. Some damage is inevitably
sustained - the cars you point out, the wall along the cliff-top walk where
these waves are breaking, some trees are uprooted. Yet life goes on
virtually uscathed. Yet elsewhere in the world such weather is the cause of
evacuations and massive loss of life. The waves such as shown the pic pack
one hell of a punch, and elsewhere in the world are associated with massive
shoreline damage. I personally recall having seen waves at this location
where the drawback before the wave hit was so great that the sea bottom was
completely exposed for about 30m out from the cliff face.

Bad form or not to post pics - this one is certainly relevant to the NG!

K


Jimmy@jock.net JimmyGibby

unread,
Feb 3, 2007, 10:59:57 PM2/3/07
to

"Jim Watt" <jim...@aol.no_way> wrote in message
news:1d1as2ptnaagiqu05...@4ax.com...

Another classic piece from Jim Watt, images are copyright 2006 and then
shows images claiming to be from 2007, genius!
And just what the f*ck does stabalise mean anyway?

Jimmy@jock.net JimmyGibby

unread,
Feb 3, 2007, 11:24:33 PM2/3/07
to

"Jim Watt" <jim...@aol.no_way> wrote in message
news:1d1as2ptnaagiqu05...@4ax.com...
Had a 1 minute look at the rest of this rubbish website, what a load of
cr*p. Full of errors, about as accurate as his laughable 'FAQ'
So the entire website is copyright 2005, that's OK I'll only copy the stuff
from 1/1/2006 onwards then?
A drugs raid that was reported by him on 30th February 2007, you sure do
have problems with dates don't you? There is no 30th February 2007, Idiot.

Lynx

unread,
Feb 4, 2007, 12:25:51 AM2/4/07
to

"JimmyGibby" <Seeu Ji...@jock.net> wrote in message
news:Y7GdnQ2736Sd_VjY...@pipex.net...

The result of mad (dogs and) Englishmen walking in the midday sun.
Especially Gibraltar's midday sun. :))


Jim Watt

unread,
Feb 4, 2007, 6:44:58 AM2/4/07
to
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 03:59:57 -0000, "JimmyGibby" <Seeu Ji...@jock.net>
wrote:

You really are a bittle little shit.

Jim Watt

unread,
Feb 4, 2007, 7:00:22 AM2/4/07
to
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 04:24:33 -0000, "JimmyGibby" <Seeu Ji...@jock.net>
wrote:

>

You really are a bittle little shit, and a liar too.

Jim Watt

unread,
Feb 4, 2007, 7:04:55 AM2/4/07
to
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 01:37:21 -0000, "Ken" <k...@k1at.freeserve.co.uk>
wrote:

>Curious though. Gib gets storms every year. Some years areworse than others,
>some storms are worse than others, but every winter around this time Gib
>gets winds which hit close to or over 100mph. Some damage is inevitably
>sustained - the cars you point out, the wall along the cliff-top walk where
>these waves are breaking, some trees are uprooted. Yet life goes on
>virtually uscathed. Yet elsewhere in the world such weather is the cause of
>evacuations and massive loss of life. The waves such as shown the pic pack
>one hell of a punch, and elsewhere in the world are associated with massive
>shoreline damage. I personally recall having seen waves at this location
>where the drawback before the wave hit was so great that the sea bottom was
>completely exposed for about 30m out from the cliff face.
>
>Bad form or not to post pics - this one is certainly relevant to the NG!

The wall on the arm or Rosia bay has certainly taken a battering, but
I guess thats what its there for, and no doubt its been smashed to
bits before and rebuilt. Given the high winds over that weekend
its surprising that satellite dishes have not taken flight as many
were (I believe) poorly mounted.

On pictures, put them on a website and post a link.

Jimmy@jock.net JimmyGibby

unread,
Feb 4, 2007, 9:11:47 AM2/4/07
to

"Jim Watt" <jim...@aol.no_way> wrote in message
news:3eibs29t4egldgcna...@4ax.com...
> Jim Watt bittle little shit, and a liar too

You should be thanking me for pointing out your mistakes. Proof reading for
free, don't knock it.


Jim Watt

unread,
Feb 4, 2007, 9:41:19 AM2/4/07
to
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 14:11:47 -0000, "JimmyGibby" <Seeu Ji...@jock.net>
wrote:

You really are a bitter little shit.

Jimmy@jock.net JimmyGibby

unread,
Feb 4, 2007, 9:50:48 AM2/4/07
to

"Jim Watt" <jim...@aol.no_way> wrote in message
news:12sbs2pj1tb29dfhn...@4ax.com...
> You > --
> Jim Watt really are a bitter little shit.

Tut tut, hitting a raw nerve I see, changed that page yet?


darius

unread,
Feb 7, 2007, 2:50:49 AM2/7/07
to
On 4 Feb, 05:24, "JimmyGibby" <Seeu J...@jock.net> wrote:
> So the entire website is copyright 2005, that's OK I'll only copy the stuff
> from 1/1/2006 onwards then?

I'd advise you to be very cautious generally - certainly if your
comment reflects your current understanding of copyright.

;)

Jimmy@jock.net JimmyGibby

unread,
Feb 7, 2007, 4:24:36 AM2/7/07
to

"darius" <Darius....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1170834649....@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
It was tongue in cheek, who'd want to copy such out of date, inaccurate,
error filled, rubbish anyway?


0 new messages