Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
The Spanish can't have it both ways.
3 views
Skip to first unread message
PaulusAr
Dec 25, 2006, 11:49:59 PM12/25/06
to
If the Spanish claim that the Isthmus was never ceded in the Treaty of
Utrecht and is in dispute, doesn't this mean that the rest of Gibraltar
was ceded to Britain in the treaty and is not in dispute?
Utrecht and is in dispute, doesn't this mean that the rest of Gibraltar
was ceded to Britain in the treaty and is not in dispute?
Paulus
Lynx
Dec 26, 2006, 12:12:06 AM12/26/06
to
"PaulusAr" <paul...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167108599....@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Logical argument.
Greetings to Canada
Ken
Dec 26, 2006, 4:49:54 AM12/26/06
to
> If the Spanish claim that the Isthmus was never ceded in the Treaty of
> Utrecht and is in dispute, doesn't this mean that the rest of Gibraltar
> was ceded to Britain in the treaty and is not in dispute?
> Utrecht and is in dispute, doesn't this mean that the rest of Gibraltar
> was ceded to Britain in the treaty and is not in dispute?
YOU know that and I know that, but try telling it to THEM - and the UK,
which will bend over backwards and sell out her grandmother lest she offend
Spain!
K
Jim Watt
Dec 26, 2006, 5:35:39 AM12/26/06
to
Thats why the Brussels agreement refers to the issues of sovereignty
- Spain wants it both ways.
The claim to the isthmus is simply trying to get a foot in the door
for the rest.
--
Jim Watt
http://www.gibnet.com
0 new messages