> If you'd have followed the links, you'd have seen that the petition is
> sponsored by a progressive PAC, not a democratic one. That includes Greens,
> which is sponsoring the recount donation site. Nader would be the closest
> candidate to being progressive, esp. since the Democrats have been regressing
> for quite some time, so that they're merely the stage-right arm of the beast,
> appearing to the audience to be the left arm, and primariliy how the election
> was rigged. While there is a dime's worth of difference between Hairy Kerry &
> Bubya, it's only because they are the opposing sides of the establishment's
> debased dime.
So what do you suggest we do about it?
By the way I'm NOT a Democrat. I'm against Bushco.
sign!
Six prominent members of Congress have requested an investigation into
the integrity of the vote. The decision could come as soon as Monday.
Sign our petition* <http://www.moveon.org/investigatethevote/> demanding
a full investigation into whether the election was conducted honestly or
not. Also, share your personal story if you have one -- members of
Congress will use it in their call for an investigation.
<http://www.moveon.org/investigatethevote/>
Want evidence of fraud? How bout this:
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html
and this:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1106-30.htm
this:
http://memes.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=3667&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
this:
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
or this:
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/11/03/electronic.voting.ap/
or this:
http://rockymountainnews.com/drmn/election/article/0%2C1299%2CDRMN_36_3292190%2C00.html
or this:
http://www.local10.com/news/3861334/detail.html
or this:
http://www.livejournal.com/community/2004_elections/306938.html#cutid1
or this:
http://www.bluelemur.com/index.php?p=388
or these:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&e=1&u=/ap/voting_proble
http://img103.exs.cx/img103/4526/exit_poll.gif
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/11/05/voting.problems.ap/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/11/03/electronic.voting.ap/index.html
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/kerry_won_.php
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/an_election_spoiled_rotten.php
http://www.newswithviews.com/guest_opinion/guest29.htm
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/28/sunday/main632436.shtml
http://www.dailycollegian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/11/12/41940a9f25f6c
http://www.washingtondispatch.com/spectrum/archives/000715.html
http://www.washingtondispatch.com/spectrum/archives/000715.html
http://www.berkeleydaily.org/text/article.cfm?issue=11-09-04&storyID=20055
http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/11/03/wed1/index.html
http://www.slate.com/Default.aspx?id=2109053&
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0131-01.htm
http://www.ecotalk.org/VotingSecurity.htm
http://www.iht.com/articles/2004/11/02/news/observe.html
http://www.jhu.edu/~jhumag/0204web/vote.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html
http://www.opednews.com/fitrakis_111104_ohio_thefthtm.htm
and this is fun:
>meanwhile here's a petition and a whole bunch of references to election
>fraud for those hard headed republicans to argue against.
>
How about naming those "Prominent Memebers"?