FOOTMAN VS. GRUNT
Wmwaa
WHO WOULD YOU WANT TO WIN GRUNT OR FOOTMAN?
G FOR
GRUNT----- --F FOR FOOTMAN
C Makowka
grunt they kick ass
Mike
Grunts and footman are the exact same. They have no difference except
for appearance.
C Makowka wrote:
> grunt they kick ass
Meices
Mike wrote:
> Grunts and footman are the exact same. They have no difference except
>
> for appearance.
>
One difference often overlooked is the difference in the upgrades at the
smith. Footman use way less lumber, more gold. This can have a big
effect early and later in the game, (sooner to TH upgrades,) This can be
significant, esp. on sea it seems.
HavaJob
--
"Let's face it. Life is radically finite."
Visualize Ballard
PogoCrack
G G G G G G G G G G and G
No_One
Assuming same level and 1v1.
Whoever hits who first.
Simple
Gets fun though, figuring out Upgraded Shields v Upgraded Swords and
various upgrade paths until they are both on Level 5.
Level 2 Sword V Level 2 Shield. Who win??
Level 3 Sword only V Level 3 (1-Shield and 1-Sword) Who win??
Has anybody tested theses scenarios or other upgrade combinations??
That would have been a better question.
:)
Wmwaa <wm...@aol.com> wrote in article
<19971218005...@ladder02.news.aol.com>...
Sameolpuff
g although that is a really dumb question
Dr. Bull
Footman all the way
spades
ancap
I think FOOTMEN are just cooler so they win anyway
Morgan
bye
spades schrieb in Nachricht <34A6B9...@swfla.infi.net>...
K S Koh
spades <es...@swfla.infi.net> wrote in article
<34A6B9...@swfla.infi.net>...
> Dr. Bull wrote:
> >
> > Footman all the way
> >
> > Wmwaa <wm...@aol.com> wrote in article
> > <19971218005...@ladder02.news.aol.com>...
> > > WHO WOULD YOU WANT TO WIN GRUNT OR FOOTMAN?
> >
> > >
> >
> > > G
FOR
> > > GRUNT----- --F FOR FOOTMAN
> > >
> the grunts are better it's cheaper to upgrade
Depends on whether lumber or gold is more important at the beginning.
Sometimes when you have lots of gold and little lumber, footmen are better.
KS
J Roberson
In article <01bd16b9$6cb1e2c0$1fc315a5@pentium166>, "K S Koh"
<ko...@mbox4.singnet.com.sg> wrote:
> spades <es...@swfla.infi.net> wrote in article
> > the grunts are better it's cheaper to upgrade
> Depends on whether lumber or gold is more important at the beginning.
> Sometimes when you have lots of gold and little lumber, footmen are better.
For this same reason, I usually play humans on sea maps. I can upgrade my
troops and still have lumber for ships and their upgrades.
--
J Roberson est 1973 http://www.io.com/~orlando
"Take chickens and ram them together, serve them broken."
"Take rabbits and smite them to pieces; seethe them in grease."
-- from The Forme of Curry, a fourteenth century cookbook.
Preferred Customer
If the orc were to get the first hit then i would think that it would be
the orc who would win.
ancap <an...@metronet.de> wrote in article
<689h5v$mm1$1...@news.metronet.de>...
> I think FOOTMEN are just cooler so they win anyway
>
> Morgan
>
> bye
>
> spades schrieb in Nachricht <34A6B9...@swfla.infi.net>...
> >Dr. Bull wrote:
> >>
> >> Footman all the way
> >>
> >> Wmwaa <wm...@aol.com> wrote in article
> >> <19971218005...@ladder02.news.aol.com>...
> >> > WHO WOULD YOU WANT TO WIN GRUNT OR FOOTMAN?
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> > G
FOR
> >> > GRUNT----- --F FOR FOOTMAN
> >> >
Reyboy
If the Footman or Grunt would battle, it would be a tie.
It depends on what level they are, if a Footman level 2 battles a Grunt level
1, the Footman would win.
If you look at there hit points, attack points, armor, speed, and everything
when they are at level 1 both of them are the same.
I hope this helps to all the ignorant people out there.
K S Koh wrote:
> spades <es...@swfla.infi.net> wrote in article
> <34A6B9...@swfla.infi.net>...
> > Dr. Bull wrote:
> > >
> > > Footman all the way
> > >
> > > Wmwaa <wm...@aol.com> wrote in article
> > > <19971218005...@ladder02.news.aol.com>...
> > > > WHO WOULD YOU WANT TO WIN GRUNT OR FOOTMAN?
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > G
> FOR
> > > > GRUNT----- --F FOR FOOTMAN
> > > >
> > the grunts are better it's cheaper to upgrade
>
> Depends on whether lumber or gold is more important at the beginning.
> Sometimes when you have lots of gold and little lumber, footmen are better.
>
> KS
--
<<<-Rè¥ßô¥'$ Dôpë $ïgnåtûrè Fïlê->>>
mailto:djr...@megsinet.com
My Web Page = http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Dungeon/5770
"If ya can't beat them, then don't fight them in the first place..."
J Roberson
In article <01bd17db$7fd3b720$46a9f482@jakke>, "@ZghouL"
<jakob.o...@pc-programs.se> wrote:
> > If the Footman or Grunt would battle, it would be a tie.
> It would NOT! The guy that hit the other one FIRST will win:)
Not always - there is a variable amount of damage done. On more than one
occasion I've gotten in th first blow, two blows sometimes, and still lost
to an equally upgraded enemy unit.
@ZghouL
> If the Footman or Grunt would battle, it would be a tie.
It would NOT! The guy that hit the other one FIRST will win:)
--
@ZghouL
http://home3.swipnet.se/~w-38277/jakke/nw2r.htm
http://home.eznet.net/~jaynmeli/starcraft/starcraft.html
No_One
What game r u playing???
Tip! Don't touch yr man while he is fighting. That is why u die in a 1 on 1
Footman/Grunt fight.
If he hits 1st he will win. If he doesn't hit 1st then he will die. This
assumes same level.
Just don't click on him.
ok?
;-)
J Roberson <visit...@thesig.com> wrote in article
<visitmysite-02...@1cust129.tnt7.nyc3.da.uu.net>...
In article <01bd17db$7fd3b720$46a9f482@jakke>, "@ZghouL"
<jakob.o...@pc-programs.se> wrote:
> > If the Footman or Grunt would battle, it would be a tie.
> It would NOT! The guy that hit the other one FIRST will win:)
Not always - there is a variable amount of damage done. On more than one
J Roberson
In article <01bd1ade$3093dae0$0100a8c0@no-one>, "No_One"
<No_One@No_Where.com> wrote:
> What game r u playing???
Warcraft II. At least is says so on the bo and title screen.
> Tip! Don't touch yr man while he is fighting. That is why u die in a 1 on 1
> Footman/Grunt fight.
Wrongo dude. Look in the manual. There is a variable amount of damage done.
Adam Borowski
> Tip! Don't touch yr man while he is fighting. That is why u die in a 1 on 1
> Footman/Grunt fight.
> assumes same level.
Not ok. The damage they inflict is random. Just look at their specs
"Damage A-B+2", where B is much greater than A.
So, if you have much more luck than your opponent, one your footman can
kill two his grunts. Yes, such things happen very rarely (have you ever
heard about "calculus of probability"?). But it is quite often that one
which got the first blow loses.
> > > If the Footman or Grunt would battle, it would be a tie.
> > It would NOT! The guy that hit the other one FIRST will win:)
> Not always - there is a variable amount of damage done. On more than one
> occasion I've gotten in th first blow, two blows sometimes, and still lost
> to an equally upgraded enemy unit.
* * * **** *
* * * * * * *****
* * * *** * * * ***
** * * * * **** * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * *****
* * * * * * * * * * * *
* * ** ** *** **** *** ** ***
Where do YOU want to die today? *
**
e-mail: kilo...@iname.com
URL : http://free.polbox.pl/k/kilobyte/
DedOnMarz
>> > If the Footman or Grunt would battle, it would be a tie.
>
>> It would NOT! The guy that hit the other one FIRST will win:)
>
>
Actually, it would probably depend on which had the better armor and swords due
to blacksmith upgradeing
******************
DedO...@aol.com
"Never accept green meat from strangers"
Walder/Hickman
it depends on who has the highest level why if a footman was upgraded all
the way he could beat up an orge-mage level2
No_One wrote in message <01bd1ade$3093dae0$0100a8c0@no-one>...
>What game r u playing???
>
>Footman/Grunt fight.
>
>If he hits 1st he will win. If he doesn't hit 1st then he will die. This
>assumes same level.
>
>
>ok?
>
>;-)
>
>
>J Roberson <visit...@thesig.com> wrote in article
><visitmysite-02...@1cust129.tnt7.nyc3.da.uu.net>...
>In article <01bd17db$7fd3b720$46a9f482@jakke>, "@ZghouL"
><jakob.o...@pc-programs.se> wrote:
>
>
>> It would NOT! The guy that hit the other one FIRST will win:)
>
>occasion I've gotten in th first blow, two blows sometimes, and still lost
>to an equally upgraded enemy unit.
>
J Roberson
In article <69elbj$f...@examiner.concentric.net>, "Walder/Hickman"
<hick...@concentric.net> wrote:
> it depends on who has the highest level why if a footman was upgraded all
> the way he could beat up an orge-mage level2
Yeah, but what would I be doing with Level Two O-Ms lying around? ;)
By the time Ogres and Paladins can be upgraded to magic levels, they
should be fully trussed up with blacksmith upgrades. In my opinion,
anyway.
SchunkenStein
Here Here!!
J Roberson wrote in message ...