Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Warcraft 3 And Windows 95B

233 views
Skip to first unread message

Zenigame

unread,
Sep 29, 2002, 7:13:12 PM9/29/02
to
Hi. Right now I have Windows95B (please don't laugh, I'm upgrading as
soon as I can). I bought Warcraft 3 today because i saw it for 30
bucks, which I thought was a pretty good price. I'm just wondering if
there is any way to get Warcraft 3 to run on Windows 95B. Thanks in
advance.

Paradox

unread,
Sep 29, 2002, 8:18:17 PM9/29/02
to

"Zenigame" <h...@t.com> wrote in message news:3D9788AF...@t.com...

I run war3 on Windows 98 Gold, its a hell of alot better then that tripe
they call Windows XP and Me.


Geruk Griy

unread,
Sep 29, 2002, 9:05:51 PM9/29/02
to
"Paradox" <l33ta0...@mindspring.com> wrote in news:1033345317.389779
@globe.atl2.mindspring.net:

Windows 98 Gold? What the Hell is that?

--
Geruk
===============
Grr. Arrgh.

Paradox

unread,
Sep 29, 2002, 10:19:22 PM9/29/02
to

"Geruk Griy" <GG...@nospamplease.HotPOP.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9298D692F799...@65.24.2.11...

"first edition"


Blind

unread,
Sep 30, 2002, 2:56:48 AM9/30/02
to

Second edition is better.

Zenigame

unread,
Sep 30, 2002, 12:26:56 AM9/30/02
to

Blind wrote:

Wow, thanks for your help, guys.

Scarehead @ USWest

unread,
Sep 30, 2002, 6:26:57 AM9/30/02
to
"Zenigame" <h...@t.com> wrote in message news:3D9788AF...@t.com...

I'm not sure if it'll work, and the manual does state '98 onwards, but try
upgrading '95 with the latest service packs and go from there. Other than
that I'm sure you could find a '95 to '98 upgrade CD for cheap.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 9/19/2002


Harcon

unread,
Sep 30, 2002, 9:36:26 AM9/30/02
to
"Scarehead @ USWest" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message news:<an98tg$sum$1...@knossos.btinternet.com>...

> "Zenigame" <h...@t.com> wrote in message news:3D9788AF...@t.com...
> > Hi. Right now I have Windows95B (please don't laugh, I'm upgrading as
> > soon as I can). I bought Warcraft 3 today because i saw it for 30
> > bucks, which I thought was a pretty good price. I'm just wondering if
> > there is any way to get Warcraft 3 to run on Windows 95B. Thanks in
> > advance.
>
> I'm not sure if it'll work, and the manual does state '98 onwards, but try
> upgrading '95 with the latest service packs and go from there. Other than
> that I'm sure you could find a '95 to '98 upgrade CD for cheap.
>
>

I think the real question is if his computer is powerful enough. I
mean, if he is running win95, then it is normally likely he has an old
system? Unless he upgraded of course.

Aquatoid

unread,
Sep 30, 2002, 9:49:40 AM9/30/02
to
www.blizzard.com they say that it doenst run on win95. First they said
war3 wuld support win95 but then it was changed. I think that if you try to
install war3 on it the installer will say that it cant be installed on that
system and it demands win98 and onwords. Maybe there could be some tweak and
you could run it on 95 but I dont think so


Mortis

unread,
Sep 30, 2002, 9:50:23 AM9/30/02
to
In article <10333453...@globe.atl2.mindspring.net>,
l33ta0...@mindspring.com says...

> I run war3 on Windows 98 Gold, its a hell of alot better then that tripe
> they call Windows XP and Me.

Actually, WinXP is a hell of alot better than 9x. Best thing to emerge
from the MS labs for quite a while IMO.
--

Mortis

[Insert sig here]

Blowfish

unread,
Sep 30, 2002, 9:45:28 PM9/30/02
to
In article <10333525...@globe.atl2.mindspring.net>,
l33ta0...@mindspring.com says...

> > > I run war3 on Windows 98 Gold, its a hell of alot better then that tripe
> > > they call Windows XP and Me.
> >
> > Windows 98 Gold? What the Hell is that?
> >
>
> "first edition"
>
>
>
XP is the best OS Microsoft has put out so far. 98 First edition is
crap, ME is probably the worst of them all, nothing but crashes with
that POS. The only 2 OSs I would even think of using is 98SE and XP.
MAybe your computer is too slow or doesn't have enough ram for XP but I
have never had a more stable, smoother running OS on my system.

dule

unread,
Oct 1, 2002, 2:15:00 AM10/1/02
to

"Blowfish" <glows...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.18029dfbb...@news-east.giganews.com...

> In article <10333525...@globe.atl2.mindspring.net>,
> l33ta0...@mindspring.com says...
> > > > I run war3 on Windows 98 Gold, its a hell of alot better then that
tripe
> > > > they call Windows XP and Me.
> > >
> > > Windows 98 Gold? What the Hell is that?
> > >
> >
> > "first edition"
> >
> >
> >
> XP is the best OS Microsoft has put out so far.
Bullshit!!!

98 First edition is
> crap, ME is probably the worst of them all, nothing but crashes with
> that POS.
Right!

The only 2 OSs I would even think of using is 98SE and XP.
Win 2000 is the best OS Microsoft have ever released, more stable and more
releiable than any other OS.
I run War3 on Win2000 without any problems and crashes even when the big
battles are going on.
Win98SE are better choice if you have slower proccesor but they are not so
stable.
But for god sake do not install Barbie windows on your machine they are so
full of crap!

Mortis

unread,
Oct 1, 2002, 6:56:36 AM10/1/02
to
In article <anbeia$4cji$1...@as201.hinet.hr>, dlaz...@rao.hr says...

> > XP is the best OS Microsoft has put out so far.

> Bullshit!!!

Nope. HTH.

Steven Ung

unread,
Oct 1, 2002, 7:15:08 AM10/1/02
to
"Mortis" <nos...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.18038fc3c...@News.CIS.DFN.DE...

> In article <anbeia$4cji$1...@as201.hinet.hr>, dlaz...@rao.hr says...
>
> > > XP is the best OS Microsoft has put out so far.
>
> > Bullshit!!!
>
> Nope. HTH.

Yeah... my window is the best. Only problem is, I need to clean it with
soap, due to dusty environment. :p

--
Steven Ung, ICQ# : 65203722 Nick : SuperNuubie

Xav)3onl) - "What are u going for?"
Steven Ung - "Peons"

"Towers sucks!! .. but I'm getting one anyway, just for precaution :P" -
Steven Ung, in 2v2 with Xav)3onl)


Mortis

unread,
Oct 1, 2002, 8:36:43 AM10/1/02
to
In article <anc0in$m7a$1...@news4.jaring.my>, gte...@gtekmy.po.my says...

> > > > XP is the best OS Microsoft has put out so far.
> >
> > > Bullshit!!!
> >
> > Nope. HTH.
>
> Yeah... my window is the best. Only problem is, I need to clean it with
> soap, due to dusty environment. :p

To clean the inside of monitors, turn monitor face down on a cloth to
protect the screen from scratches and pour luke warm (as you can scold
capacitors quite badly if the water is too hot) water and soap mix into
the grills at the back and top. I usually find Fairy Lemon Fresh
washing up liquid to be the best.

Cleaning CD/DVD/HD is just as easy but best to leave the comp switched
on as you pour the water in the back because this way the disks will be
spinning to aid the cleaning.

Now please note that since you have to move heavy units in this process
I will add that I bear no responsibility for any back strain, equipment
fault or other health/computer problems you may encounter. If unsure,
please consult the advice of a doctor.

distant

unread,
Oct 4, 2002, 8:33:48 PM10/4/02
to

"Blowfish" <glows...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.18029dfbb...@news-east.giganews.com...

Win98 first edition here. Tell me one reason why *I* would want Second
Edition?

d


Steven Ung

unread,
Oct 6, 2002, 9:53:49 PM10/6/02
to
"distant" <dista...@hottymail.com> wrote in message
news:anlc1c$gn6$1...@paris.btinternet.com...

> > XP is the best OS Microsoft has put out so far. 98 First edition is
> > crap, ME is probably the worst of them all, nothing but crashes with
> > that POS. The only 2 OSs I would even think of using is 98SE and XP.
> > MAybe your computer is too slow or doesn't have enough ram for XP but I
> > have never had a more stable, smoother running OS on my system.
>
> Win98 first edition here. Tell me one reason why *I* would want Second
> Edition?

You don't need Windows 98 Second Edition. You need a new computer that can
support Windows XP/2000 that has better support for hardware, especially USB
2.0. Burning a complete 640MB CDR on a 40x/24x/10x CDRW on a USB 2.0 takes
less than 3 minutes ! :pp

Blind

unread,
Oct 7, 2002, 3:46:02 AM10/7/02
to
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:53:49 +0800, "Steven Ung" <gte...@gtekmy.po.my>
wrote:

>"distant" <dista...@hottymail.com> wrote in message
>news:anlc1c$gn6$1...@paris.btinternet.com...
>> > XP is the best OS Microsoft has put out so far. 98 First edition is
>> > crap, ME is probably the worst of them all, nothing but crashes with
>> > that POS. The only 2 OSs I would even think of using is 98SE and XP.
>> > MAybe your computer is too slow or doesn't have enough ram for XP but I
>> > have never had a more stable, smoother running OS on my system.
>>
>> Win98 first edition here. Tell me one reason why *I* would want Second
>> Edition?
>
>You don't need Windows 98 Second Edition. You need a new computer that can
>support Windows XP/2000 that has better support for hardware, especially USB
>2.0. Burning a complete 640MB CDR on a 40x/24x/10x CDRW on a USB 2.0 takes
>less than 3 minutes ! :pp


Well, for one thing, I can use DOS with Win98. In XP you can't open a
DOS window while running Windows.

Steven Ung

unread,
Oct 7, 2002, 12:46:59 AM10/7/02
to
"Blind" <bl...@kali.net> wrote in message
news:gqe2quc4pffrrsshj...@4ax.com...

Dual boot? :-)


--
Steven Ung, ICQ# : 65203722 Nick : SuperNuubie

Low_Profile : <Signalling at double Orc tower rush>
SuperNuubie : OMFG! Europe server is full of Newbies!!!
Low_Profile : How do you think I can get to level 13?


Mortis

unread,
Oct 7, 2002, 7:29:31 AM10/7/02
to
In article <gqe2quc4pffrrsshj...@4ax.com>, bl...@kali.net
says...

> >You don't need Windows 98 Second Edition. You need a new computer that can
> >support Windows XP/2000 that has better support for hardware, especially USB
> >2.0. Burning a complete 640MB CDR on a 40x/24x/10x CDRW on a USB 2.0 takes
> >less than 3 minutes ! :pp
>
>
> Well, for one thing, I can use DOS with Win98. In XP you can't open a
> DOS window while running Windows.

That's because it's a new OS. Not a GUI to DOS.

distant

unread,
Oct 7, 2002, 12:47:17 PM10/7/02
to

"Steven Ung" <gte...@gtekmy.po.my> wrote in message
news:anqpua$gk7$1...@news5.jaring.my...

> "distant" <dista...@hottymail.com> wrote in message
> news:anlc1c$gn6$1...@paris.btinternet.com...
> > > XP is the best OS Microsoft has put out so far. 98 First edition is
> > > crap, ME is probably the worst of them all, nothing but crashes with
> > > that POS. The only 2 OSs I would even think of using is 98SE and XP.
> > > MAybe your computer is too slow or doesn't have enough ram for XP but
I
> > > have never had a more stable, smoother running OS on my system.
> >
> > Win98 first edition here. Tell me one reason why *I* would want Second
> > Edition?
>
> You don't need Windows 98 Second Edition. You need a new computer that can
> support Windows XP/2000 that has better support for hardware, especially
USB
> 2.0. Burning a complete 640MB CDR on a 40x/24x/10x CDRW on a USB 2.0 takes
> less than 3 minutes ! :pp
>

Don't need any of that. I'll be upgrading my system severly from P3 to P4
based soon, but I'll either keep Win98FE or move to Win98SE.

d


Thundercracker

unread,
Oct 8, 2002, 7:52:57 PM10/8/02
to
Blind <bl...@kali.net> wrote in message news:<gqe2quc4pffrrsshj...@4ax.com>...
> Well, for one thing, I can use DOS with Win98. In XP you can't open a
> DOS window while running Windows.

In XP it's called a Command Console or something like that. It isn't
really DOS but from the user standpoint it has the same functionality,
and unlike DOS, you can scroll the terminal window. However, the
performance seems to be a bit slow compared to Win9x DOS Prompts.
Also, some of the DOS commands were changed or consolidated into
switches, which gives it a more UNIX-like feel, which I suppose was
sensible given that NTFS is more similar to UNIX filesystems than to
FAT.

0 new messages