So any people with a similar system with benchmarks would be nice.
Even a high end MMX pentium or ppro might give me some idea...
--
IcEBuRN [N3D]
It aint glass, but it sure can hurt...
Replace spamproof with demon to reply.
>No, I don't have a 486 but it did get you in here didn't it:-)
>I have a PII300 and a voodoo1 and was wondering what the speed was like.
>I heard everyone raving that it runs fine on their voodoo2s (with
>p233/p2300s) and shit on their voodoo1s(p133/166).
>But I have not seen anyone (yet) say how Unreal runs on a voodoo1 with a
>high end CPU (no ones stupid enuough to be wasting it with a V1 anymore
>I guess:-))
>
>So any people with a similar system with benchmarks would be nice.
>Even a high end MMX pentium or ppro might give me some idea...
I run unReal on a k6-200, Monster 3D, Intel TX97 chipset motherboard
with 96 megs of SDRAM and it runs GREAT.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Castle Red Dog
palace://castle.lag.com:9998
The Castle Home Page
http://www.citycom.com/reddog/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Now, I have a K6-200, on a TX board (64MB), but no voodoo card. I am
considering getting a voodoo1 card. Tell me something, what kind of fps are
you getting... and i mean in the middle of a gunfight... Everything looks
fine for me at 512, but as soon as somebody starts firing missiles at me the
game slows to an unplayable rate.... Is it worth the $150cdn for a voodoo1,
or should I just hold off till the fall, when I plan to get a K6-3, 100Mhz
socket 7 board with 128MB ram, and a Matrox G200?
Getting more RAM is better for Unreal gameplay then upgrading your CPU or
the VooDoo (maybe you can get both the RAM and a VooDoo ;)
--
Please remove "nospam:" when replying by personal e-mail
Eric Hutton wrote in message <6ljfoj$emd$1...@nntp3.uunet.ca>...
>Why on earth do you have 96MB Ram on a TX97? That motherboard, like all TX
>chipset motherboards, only caches a maximum of 64MB Ram... adding that extra
>32MB's is actually SLOWING your system down!!!
Gee, you know... I never look at what the "experts" say about how much
ram to put on a particular motherboard... I let the results do the
talking. I teach Computer Electronics at a technical school, and
oversee 15-20 students building PC's from the parts every 3 months. I
see every motherboard/cpu/video card/sound card combination you can
think of.
The benchmarks we do involves both the Check-it Pro 5.0 and Winbench
98. Both benchmarks indicate improved performance across the board
with 96 or 128 MB of ram over just 64. It may not be cached by the TX
motherboard, but it is still faster than a swap to the hard drive.
>Now, I have a K6-200, on a TX board (64MB), but no voodoo card. I am
>considering getting a voodoo1 card. Tell me something, what kind of fps are
>you getting... and i mean in the middle of a gunfight... Everything looks
>fine for me at 512, but as soon as somebody starts firing missiles at me the
>game slows to an unplayable rate.... Is it worth the $150cdn for a voodoo1,
>or should I just hold off till the fall, when I plan to get a K6-3, 100Mhz
>socket 7 board with 128MB ram, and a Matrox G200?
I have never checked the FPS in Unreal - don't even know how to.
However, I have run it on identical systems - Ram, Primary Video card,
Motherboard, CPU, sound card, etc. And the difference with the Voodoo
is "Unreal"! Not only is it MUCH faster, but the Voodoo can do things
that a standard video card can't. Such as reflections...
transparencies... the volumetric lighting... the difference is
staggering. Get the Voodoo 1. It's worth the difference.
>On Thu, 4 Jun 1998 22:54:47 +0100, IcEBuRN
><IcE...@radium.spamproof.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>No, I don't have a 486 but it did get you in here didn't it:-)
>>I have a PII300 and a voodoo1 and was wondering what the speed was like.
>>I heard everyone raving that it runs fine on their voodoo2s (with
>>p233/p2300s) and shit on their voodoo1s(p133/166).
>>But I have not seen anyone (yet) say how Unreal runs on a voodoo1 with a
>>high end CPU (no ones stupid enuough to be wasting it with a V1 anymore
>>I guess:-))
>>
>>So any people with a similar system with benchmarks would be nice.
>>Even a high end MMX pentium or ppro might give me some idea...
>
>I run unReal on a k6-200, Monster 3D, Intel TX97 chipset motherboard
>with 96 megs of SDRAM and it runs GREAT.
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Castle Red Dog
> palace://castle.lag.com:9998
> The Castle Home Page
> http://www.citycom.com/reddog/
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I'm running on a PII 300 with the Diamond Monster 1 and 64M sdram.
It's really smooth but could be a bit better if I had my pci sound
card. Also I wish epic had put in a "timedemo" like quake 2. That
would help use FPS freaks a bit.
impact9
Specter Reseach Club of S.W. Oklahoma
http://www.intplsrv.net/impact9
SPAM And Be Terminated.
--
IcEBuRN [N3D]
I am always right, it is everyone else that is wrong.
sorry I cant see whole string....but..
one thing...
if your motherboard is older, it cant cache more than 64 megs of ram...
if you have more than 64 megs ram ....this can lower your speed !!!!
a friend of mine had 128ram in his old p200(non mmx) system(V1)...he had
about 14fps..!!! (640..)
after removing 64megs ram......what a surprise.....he reached
20 FPS .....smoth (nearly...)
so...check your system....
I stay very far away from the nearest P100