Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

1.09 Patch: Blizzard wants input on new units.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Zealot the Crazy Han

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 1:01:47 PM6/19/01
to
I was using some stimpacks in alt.games.starcraft on Tue, 19 Jun 2001
16:20:44 GMT, when NoE...@Please.com (TN) the high templar said,
"1.09 Patch: Blizzard wants input on new units.". I got another stim
pack and said:
>1.09 patch is suppose to have new units, blizzard has decided to make new units based
>on user feedback.
>
>I porposed the following units. [all races get similair units]
>
>1. Aircraft carrier/frigget see craft [travel through waterways, lay sea mines,
>offload units etc, cannon fire from boats to land, missiles to air units from boat]
>
>2. Ability to load tanks, bc's, carriers and other large units with smaller units
>[like loading a battlecrusier with 12 marines which can shoot WHILE inside the BC and
>be offloaded]
>
>3. BOMBS - Carriers, BC and mutas all get an upgrade to drop napam or nukes [LINE OF
>SIGHT], just release bomb and fly away.
>
>4. Allow tanks to shoot at unoccupied ground area [just click an area of ground and
>tank will continue to shoot that area , could make a maze of 12 tanks laying down
>fire in a square to make sure NOTHING gets through.
>
>IDEAS? SUGGESTIONS?

yeah, I have one. QUIT DREAMING LIAR!!

--
DOH!
=)
PA Official Web Site webmaster

"Great chese comes from happy cows
Happy Cows come from California" - commercial

Supporter of Charlie Mox the firebat.
http://members.home.net/ktwilson9999/charlie_mox.jpg

"Eat a bag of hell." - Cyric The Mad

"Did you have sex with my sister?" - Leslie
"Uh . . . No, only in that one dream." - Luc

ICQ:65589349
Zealot the Crazy Han
http://www.crazyzealot-starcraft.com/
http://pronounarmy.homestead.com/
re-vamped sig v2L SP2.1

Eric Byers

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 4:04:45 PM6/19/01
to
Stardate Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:20:44 GMT, in the alt.games.starcraft
galaxy, I heard an echo in space. It was NoE...@Please.com (TN) , and
he told me the following:

>1.09 patch is suppose to have new units, blizzard has decided to make new units based
>on user feedback.

Uh. I think not.

--
Eric Byers

If there is some confusion
of who's to blame.

www.trendy.dk/byers
starcrafting.cjb.net

Christopher Childs

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 4:52:56 PM6/19/01
to
TN wrote:

> 1.09 patch is suppose to have new units, blizzard has decided to make new units based
> on user feedback.
>

> I porposed the following units. [all races get similair units]
>
> 1. Aircraft carrier/frigget see craft [travel through waterways, lay sea mines,
> offload units etc, cannon fire from boats to land, missiles to air units from boat]


Frigate sea craft, I hope you mean, and no.


>
> 2. Ability to load tanks, bc's, carriers and other large units with smaller units
> [like loading a battlecrusier with 12 marines which can shoot WHILE inside the BC and
> be offloaded]


Nah. See below.


>
> 3. BOMBS - Carriers, BC and mutas all get an upgrade to drop napam or nukes [LINE OF
> SIGHT], just release bomb and fly away.


Nah. We're not playing D2 where one character can kill the world...


>
> 4. Allow tanks to shoot at unoccupied ground area [just click an area of ground and
> tank will continue to shoot that area , could make a maze of 12 tanks laying down
> fire in a square to make sure NOTHING gets through.


That sounds almost like a serious idea.


--
Christopher Childs

Insert a signature here.

Kane / Carnage

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 6:55:17 PM6/19/01
to
VERY nice Story... *LOL*


--
Kane / Carnage
===================================
e-Mail: Ka...@Guardians-of-Time.de
===================================
Guild: Guardians-of-Time
Shard: Drachenfels
HP: http://www.Guardians-of-Time.de
===================================

"TN" <NoE...@Please.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3b3a7a78.169415666@news...


> 1.09 patch is suppose to have new units, blizzard has decided to make new
units based
> on user feedback.
>
> I porposed the following units. [all races get similair units]
>
> 1. Aircraft carrier/frigget see craft [travel through waterways, lay sea
mines,
> offload units etc, cannon fire from boats to land, missiles to air units
from boat]
>

> 2. Ability to load tanks, bc's, carriers and other large units with
smaller units
> [like loading a battlecrusier with 12 marines which can shoot WHILE inside
the BC and
> be offloaded]
>

> 3. BOMBS - Carriers, BC and mutas all get an upgrade to drop napam or
nukes [LINE OF
> SIGHT], just release bomb and fly away.
>

> 4. Allow tanks to shoot at unoccupied ground area [just click an area of
ground and
> tank will continue to shoot that area , could make a maze of 12 tanks
laying down
> fire in a square to make sure NOTHING gets through.
>

> IDEAS? SUGGESTIONS?
>
>
> ---------
> --Interesting? - http://www.bettybowers.com/jenna.html


The Insidious Spyda

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 12:59:19 AM6/20/01
to
TN wrote:
>
> 1.09 patch is suppose to have new units, blizzard has decided to make new units based
> on user feedback.
>
> IDEAS? SUGGESTIONS?

No offence but I think all your ideas are pretty bad. And I VERY strongly
doubt that Blizzard wants to include new units.

--
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/spyda
ICQ#: 39921647
_ _ _ _
\\ \\ // //
\\ || || //
_ \\ \\ // //
|________________________\\ \\_// //_____________________________
| ____________________ \\/ \// ____________________________/
| /_\ /_\ /
|_______________________// | | \\_________________________/
_| // /| |\ \\
// //| |\\ \\
// // \___/ \\ \\
// \\

Jason H.

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 10:01:18 AM6/20/01
to
New units? Patches suppose to include some fixes and better game balance
with no new units and features. If they are, it might be better if they do
another expansion pack for whole lot. This is only my speculation but
Blizzard always come up with more new alternatives. I really don't expect
that new units will be added in the next patch. My only rough guess is
either Blizzard do another expansion pack or the whole new sequel of
Starcraft. Again, don't blame me for this.


"The Insidious Spyda" <sp...@adjective-army.com> wrote in message
news:3B302DA7...@adjective-army.com...


> TN wrote:
> >
> > 1.09 patch is suppose to have new units, blizzard has decided to make
new units based
> > on user feedback.
> >
> > IDEAS? SUGGESTIONS?
>
> No offence but I think all your ideas are pretty bad. And I VERY strongly
> doubt that Blizzard wants to include new units.
>
> --
> http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/spyda
> ICQ#: 39921647
> _ _ _ _
> \\ \\ // //
> \\ || || //
> _ \\ \\ // //

> |________________________\\ \\_// file://_____________________________


> | ____________________ \\/ \// ____________________________/
> | /_\ /_\ /
> |_______________________// | | \\_________________________/
> _| // /| |\ \\

> // file://| |\\ \\
> // // \___/ \\ \\
> // \\


MeazLe

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 10:10:58 AM6/20/01
to

--
MeazLe
uin:62538194>prolly offline
TN <NoE...@Please.com> wrote in message news:3b3a7a78.169415666@news...


> 1.09 patch is suppose to have new units, blizzard has decided to make new
units based
> on user feedback.
>

StfU, 1.09 is already finished and is being tested as we speak..


Jason H.

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 10:45:53 AM6/20/01
to
Meazle, how do you know 1.09 is already finished? Where do you get that
source from?

"MeazLe" <ComeOn...@meazle.tmfweb.nl> wrote in message
news:9gqb0q$6cb$1...@cyan.nl.gxn.net...

Christopher Childs

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 12:26:31 PM6/20/01
to
MeazLe wrote:

> StfU, 1.09 is already finished and is being tested as we speak..
>
>
>

Oops, you lose. Try again.

Brank

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 12:50:44 PM6/20/01
to
patch will be way to big to get new units
TN <NoE...@Please.com> schreef in berichtnieuws 3b3a7a78.169415666@news...

> 1.09 patch is suppose to have new units, blizzard has decided to make new
units based
> on user feedback.
>

MeazLe

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 4:30:22 PM6/20/01
to

> Meazle, how do you know 1.09 is already finished? Where do you get that
> source from?


i've read that somewhere, i'll try to find the source again.

--
MeazLe
uin62538194


0 new messages