Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

......

11 views
Skip to first unread message

SefirosuLB

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
People have been prejudged time and time again in this NG. Some people may
have not seen something they'd like to post, then post it not knowing it's been
posted before, then get called certain *names*. A person makes ONE mistake,
then that very person is prejudged in a harsh, severe way, and called a
*certain name*.
Until recently, I haven't been able to read anything concerning this NG, and
that was a LONG TIME. I've only had the time this week, and probably won't have
anymore time afterwards. I haven't read any posts before Monday (February 21 or
something), so I posted something and was prejudged. You people probably
already know what I and the post was called.
Why do people prejudge others? Why does one mistake mean everything to some
people? One thing can mean everything to one person. I don't appreciate that
fact. But if they have made repeated mistakes, that's okay. Answer my
questions, you people whom call others "scrubs" from making one or two
mistakes.
______________________
Dan GC
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
http://i.am/guardiancloud
UNDER MAJOR CONSTRUCTION!

"You're funny, but keep it up and you'll
just piss me off." - Xenogears ~ Fei
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

WhoaMoses

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
>
> People have been prejudged time and time again in this NG. Some people may
>have not seen something they'd like to post, then post it not knowing it's
>been
>posted before, then get called certain *names*. A person makes ONE mistake,
>then that very person is prejudged in a harsh, severe way, and called a
>*certain name*.
> Until recently, I haven't been able to read anything concerning this NG,
>and
>that was a LONG TIME. I've only had the time this week, and probably won't
>have
>anymore time afterwards. I haven't read any posts before Monday (February 21
>or
>something), so I posted something and was prejudged. You people probably
>already know what I and the post was called.
> Why do people prejudge others? Why does one mistake mean everything to some
>people? One thing can mean everything to one person. I don't appreciate that
>fact. But if they have made repeated mistakes, that's okay. Answer my
>questions, you people whom call others "scrubs" from making one or two
>mistakes.

Okay......I probably shouldn't respond to this, but let me take a crack at it.
We didn't prejudge anybody. LazyJae first proved to us that he was a jerk by
calling us all, and i quote, "dick-riders" because we argued with his views on
SF32i. Then he posted with different aliases and tried to back himself up,
because he had no real proof. Sorry, but I don't think that anyone here has to
put up with that kind of kiddie crap.

That's all I hafta say.

WhoaMoses

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Whoops.....sorry, i forgot to address the subject at hand, namely, why that
other guy got flamed. Well I dunno why you did. Maybe somebody thought you were
LazyJae? If it was me (I don't remember) i'm sorry dude. But I can't speak for
others.

SefirosuLB

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to

No, I'm not talking about LazyJae, that's obvious, he made repeated mistakes
and other stuff. Did you ever read the post "A Guile Combo"? I wasn't exactly
flamed, but I was prejudged just 'cuz of one mistake.

Stuart White

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to
SefirosuLB wrote:
: No, I'm not talking about LazyJae, that's obvious, he made repeated mistakes

: and other stuff. Did you ever read the post "A Guile Combo"? I wasn't exactly
: flamed, but I was prejudged just 'cuz of one mistake.

One person said 'You didn't need to post this', and another called you a
scrub. Personally, I think you are being a little sensitive if you are
going to take this so seriously, especially since the flames were very
gentle. There are always going to be assholes - live with it.

And it is a little prejudiced to base your opinion of the group solely on
the few critical responses you received for *one* post.

As to the post itself, pretty much everyone knew the combo. If you post
information that is widely known, it will be dismissed because it is a
waste of bandwidth.

Ignore it, put it behind you, and post something interesting.

0 new messages