IF the Neon250 is delayed and won't come out at the proposed date of
June, who will be foolish enough to wait more time???
This is not meant as a troll.
-Moishe
--
|email|moishe at kosher dot com|
|icq|21160099=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
Depends how soon afterwards Series 3 will arrive (judging by NEC/VL's
previous record, it'll be out in 2001). I'll probably get the Neon250 no
matter when it is released.
--
Andrew Gillett http://argnet.fatal-design.com/ ICQ: See homepage
Abducensnerve
Next............
Reg.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
"Don't you feel anything for the pain and
suffering you'll bring to the world?"
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Of course I feel for them, what I feel is
a mighty sense of god-like triumph, to
inflict pain is the greatest power of all!!!"
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ragh Beempalasi <moi...@globalserve.net> wrote in message
news:373061CC...@globalserve.net...
> I just want to know:
>
> IF the Neon250 is delayed and won't come out at the proposed date of
> June, who will be foolish enough to wait more time???
>
Matrox may have a good card in the G400, but how many people are going to
play the waiting game with that card for Certified drivers. I'm sure as hell
not going to get a card from them without a full certified OpenGL driver,
probably never, like their promise of DVD decoding on card........
Leon.
Steve
Its funny how people swear by or slave to a particular hardware brand.
IMHO I have found that the best method of buying hardware is to determine
which software you are going to be using. For example I play ID based engine
games, Unreal (lots!), Starcraft, and Descent Freespace. The new games I am
looking at buying are possbile Everquest, new version of TeamFortress, Diablo
II, Unreal Tournament, Q3 arena, and hopefully Blizzard will come out with a
similar new version of StarCraft that will look like Diablo II.
Now what system do most of these natively support? Glide and d3d. Sure
most of them support d3d, but I have seen side by side demos of Glide vs.
d3d (TNT) playing Everquest and there was a very noticable difference.
I had an m3d and was eternally messing with drivers, patches, lockups,
freezes, and searching around for the aforementioned software. Seriously
I would say that comparing the time I spent playing to the time I spent
getting my system to run games with the m3d was perhaps 1 hour tweaking for
every 5 playing. With the 3dfx I can say it was far, far less. Now if I
wanted to play Unreal online I would have to get the newest patch which
does not support SGL.
Being more than familiar with computer software, when recommending hardware
to people who are not so but wish participate in 3d gaming, what do you
think I am going to recommend? What is the easiest to use, install, and
play games with? What has the most support? How do these factors compare
with the cost?
With the amount that folks complain about drivers, openGl, support for this
and that, one would think that the manufacturers would have figured out that
it is the support and software/drivers , not the hardware or specs, that most
people are concerned about. What the heck good is a feature of the chipset
if it is not enabled through the drivers, might as well not have it at all.
cheers,
academomancer
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
FWIW, after Matrox released register-level specs for the G200,
an open-source project was started by an SGI employee (independently
of both MGA and SGI tho) to produce a GLX module for it. Its based on an
older, software-glx module. The X-display-server has been available
thru XF86 for a while.
Bearing this in mind, and the amount of feedback (ie-none) that I got
from VDO/NEC on it, I gave up on the otherwise wonderful sounding
Neon-250 and got a G200 last week. Sure, so it probably isn't that fast
or that pretty, but it's my 1st 3D card (never had pcx2, only read this NG
for the series 2) and it looks GREAT to me.
Unfortunately, I haven't tried out the Linux drivers as I've spent the
week playing Shogo and looking to patch Unreal to use D3D on windoze :P
But from what I can tell, the driver is pretty good considering the
project's
only been going about 2 or 3 months, and they haven't got access to
DMA transfers or the WARP engine microcode yet. John Carmack
has been making occasional hints and pointers on the mailing list
and recently said he'd got himself a Linux box with a G200 to test with.
Apparently people have got the Linux Q3A test to work with it OK...
So now I've crossed over to the other side, if VDO suddenly
produce a Linux driver like nVidia are doing, or give out specs like
MGA did, then it'll be too late for me, and I won't be able to use the
very fast very pretty card, 'cos I'm not buying ANOTHER card.
Otherwise, the G200 will work out way faster on Linux than the
Neon, because it won't be software only, so I'm happy.
<snip>
>With the amount that folks complain about drivers, openGl, support for this
>and that, one would think that the manufacturers would have figured out
that
>it is the support and software/drivers , not the hardware or specs, that
most
>people are concerned about. What the heck good is a feature of the
>chipset if it is not enabled through the drivers,
>might as well not have it at all.
Exactly.
--
Tom Barnes-Lawrence (aka Tomble the Bod)
Kindly remove eggs and spam from email address
in order to email me (or don't bother)
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---