I hereby declare SPNAK on Technocunter Neidork
£unar §aber™
(i.e. his 'chickens are asexual' posts). I challenged him to compile a list
of my posts in which I've fucked up as badly as him, or even at all. Three
times, I put forth the challenge, and three times he ignored it.
Guess what.....
SPNAK.
--
£§™
TechnoHunter Neidorf
Łunar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgbpp$fu1$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
Err..... No, wrong person.
I'm convinced that Marcus Yu has fucked up badly in this FlameWar.
He's admitted to liking young boys, AND admitted to fucking
chickens.
The only criticism I can level at YOU, Lunar Scrotum, is that you
are not very original or interesting. For instance...... your idea
of a "witty comeback" is usually "Arr Arr Arr". Quite how sounding
like a performing seal is supposed to make you look good, is
something only you will ever know.
Oh, and you did admit to changing people's posts around to make
yourself look good. But that's already in my sig, so I don't need to
compile ANYTHING to prove that.
And seeing as I've already told you I don't know what "SPNAK" is, I
wonder why you think declaring SPNAK on me will worry me in the
slightest.
Do I look bothered?
Oops.... you can't see me. Hold on.....
<checks in mirror, to see if he looks bothered>
Nope. I don't look bothered in the slightest.
Keep trying, though, Scrote. At least you're not *quite* so tedious
as Marcus. (His idea of a Worthwhile Post is to say "Chicken-Fucker"
five times).
I think somebody should speak to Marcus about that, by the
way....... we all KNOW he's obsessed with poultry-rape, but
"Chicken-Fucker" is all he EVER says in his posts, nowadays.
*sigh*. And to think I came after him because I thought he would be
an INTERESTING opponent. How wrong you can be, eh?
Neidorf.
----------
"I sure do love those kids"
- Marcus Yu, admitting his sexual preference.
----------------
"I just snipped away the entire post, leaving only bits to
make it look like I'm some sort of witty person and
that you keep fucking yourself"
- Lunar Saber, admitting his deceit.
------------------
Marcus : "You said you wanted to run, screaming to
the hills......"
Neidorf : "Err..... But I DIDN'T say that, though".
Marcus : "That's exactly what I said".
- Marcus Yu, demonstrating an uncanny
inability to even check his OWN posts,
let alone anybody else's.
----------------------------
"Don't talk back, son..... Now get down on all fours,
and take it like I want you to."
- Marcus Yu, CONFIRMING what they say about
him and little boys.
£unar §aber™
TechnoHunter Neidorf wrote in message <37bb...@news1.vip.uk.com>...
:
:Łunar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgbpp$fu1$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
I guess that means you don't accept the challenge. I always knew you were a
little pussy.
:Neidorf.
:----------
:"I sure do love those kids"
: - Marcus Yu, admitting his sexual preference.
: ----------------
:"I just snipped away the entire post, leaving only bits to
: make it look like I'm some sort of witty person and
: that you keep fucking yourself"
: - Lunar Saber, admitting his deceit.
: ------------------
:Marcus : "You said you wanted to run, screaming to
: the hills......"
:Neidorf : "Err..... But I DIDN'T say that, though".
:Marcus : "That's exactly what I said".
: - Marcus Yu, demonstrating an uncanny
: inability to even check his OWN posts,
: let alone anybody else's.
: ----------------------------
:"Don't talk back, son..... Now get down on all fours,
:and take it like I want you to."
: - Marcus Yu, CONFIRMING what they say about
: him and little boys.
:
:
--
Ł§™
Marcus Yu
¦
¦ £unar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgbpp$fu1$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
¦ >Neidork is convinced that I've fucked up several times in this
¦ flamewar
¦ >(i.e. his 'chickens are asexual' posts). I challenged him to
¦ compile a list
¦ >of my posts in which I've fucked up as badly as him, or even at
¦ all. Three
¦ >times, I put forth the challenge, and three times he ignored it.
¦ >
¦
¦ Err..... No, wrong person.
¦
¦ I'm convinced that Marcus Yu has fucked up badly in this FlameWar.
¦ He's admitted to liking young boys, AND admitted to fucking
¦ chickens.
This is where the lies come in huh? I have never admitted the like
and it looks like you're trying to fabricate stuff just to counter
your own fuck-ups. Well, it's not working, TechnoCunter.
¦ The only criticism I can level at YOU, Lunar Scrotum, is that you
¦ are not very original or interesting. For instance...... your idea
¦ of a "witty comeback" is usually "Arr Arr Arr". Quite how sounding
¦ like a performing seal is supposed to make you look good, is
¦ something only you will ever know.
¦
How about your "Dickhead Alert" or "Go fuck yourself, fuckwit"? You
think those are unoriginal? Or how about stealing lines directly from
the posts of JT and myself?
You're no original troll either, chicken fucker.
¦ Oh, and you did admit to changing people's posts around to make
¦ yourself look good. But that's already in my sig, so I don't need to
¦ compile ANYTHING to prove that.
¦
He was pointing out exactly what you do, moron.
¦ And seeing as I've already told you I don't know what "SPNAK" is, I
¦ wonder why you think declaring SPNAK on me will worry me in the
¦ slightest.
¦
Probably because it's fun to watch you scratch your head, your non-
existant nuts that you admitted to not having, and then taking a shit
in your pants before replying.
¦ Do I look bothered?
¦
Yes.
¦ Oops.... you can't see me. Hold on.....
¦
Okay.
¦ <checks in mirror, to see if he looks bothered>
¦
¦ Nope. I don't look bothered in the slightest.
¦
Hey moron, you just looked out the window at one of the chickens on
the sill. Go find a real mirror, you dumbass.
¦ Keep trying, though, Scrote. At least you're not *quite* so tedious
¦ as Marcus. (His idea of a Worthwhile Post is to say "Chicken-Fucker"
¦ five times).
¦
I've posted many posts that explained why you're a dumbass.
And what happens? You claim your news server dropped them. I repost
them. And what happens? You claim your newsreader died on you.
Why should I bother if you're just gonna keep making excuses,
TechnoCunter? If you want to fuck chickens instead of actually
reading what I write, then go ahead.
¦ I think somebody should speak to Marcus about that, by the
¦ way....... we all KNOW he's obsessed with poultry-rape, but
¦ "Chicken-Fucker" is all he EVER says in his posts, nowadays.
¦
Hey, answer this question again. Who is "we"? Why do you keep
referring to yourself in the plural? It's obvious that no one, and I
mean absolutely -no one- is on your side.
You aren't referring to yourself and the chickens you've been fucking
around with are you?
¦ *sigh*. And to think I came after him because I thought he would be
¦ an INTERESTING opponent. How wrong you can be, eh?
¦
Don't blame your ineptitude on me, TechnoCunter.
--
Marcus Yu
"Incidentally...... I remember from Biology classes that chickens
reproduce ASEXUALLY..... so the only way he could ACTUALLY be a
chicken-fucker is if he had no penis.
Yes,,,,,, The point is, (and this, I feel, is one of life's little
ironies) is that the well known cock doesn't actually HAVE a "cock".
The male rooster has no penis in the sense that we do.... (well, I
do, I can't speak for Dr Fuckwit here), and hence, reproduction is
"asexual", or "without sex".
Actually, now I come to think about it, maybe "asexual" is the wrong
word.... it's certainly something pretty similar."
-- TechnoHunter Neidorf, obviously an honor roll student.
<37b8...@news1.vip.uk.com>
TechnoHunter Neidorf
Łunar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgh2n$t3$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
>
>
>I guess that means you don't accept the challenge. I always knew
you were a
>little pussy.
>
Err..... No, of COURSE I don't accept the challenge, I already SAID,
you haven't fucked up.
How can you fuck up, when you never SAY anything?
Neidorf.
----------
"I sure do love those kids"
- Marcus Yu, admitting his sexual preference.
----------------
"I just snipped away the entire post, leaving only bits to
make it look like I'm some sort of witty person and
that you keep fucking yourself"
- Lunar Saber, admitting his deceit.
------------------
Marcus : "You said you wanted to run, screaming to
the hills......"
Neidorf : "Err..... But I DIDN'T say that, though".
Marcus : "That's exactly what I said".
- Marcus Yu, demonstrating an uncanny
inability to even check his OWN posts,
let alone anybody else's.
----------------------------
"This message was a "Trolling". That DOESN'T make
us Trolls"
- Andy Borne, talking bollocks.
TechnoHunter Neidorf
Marcus Yu wrote in message ...
>- TechnoHunter Neidorf wrote:
>¦
>¦ £unar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgbpp$fu1$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
>¦ >Neidork is convinced that I've fucked up several times in this
>¦ flamewar
>¦ >(i.e. his 'chickens are asexual' posts). I challenged him to
>¦ compile a list
>¦ >of my posts in which I've fucked up as badly as him, or even at
>¦ all. Three
>¦ >times, I put forth the challenge, and three times he ignored it.
>¦ >
>¦
>¦ Err..... No, wrong person.
>¦
>¦ I'm convinced that Marcus Yu has fucked up badly in this
FlameWar.
>¦ He's admitted to liking young boys, AND admitted to fucking
>¦ chickens.
>¦
>
>This is where the lies come in huh? I have never admitted the like
>and it looks like you're trying to fabricate stuff just to counter
>your own fuck-ups. Well, it's not working, TechnoCunter.
>
Err..... Yes you DID admit to the "I love those kids" bit..... (See
my sig. That is a DIRECT cut ''n' paste, no editing, no bits missed
out.
And I only have Evan's word for it that you admitted to the
chickens, but that's good enough for me. When it comes down to his
word against yours...... well, I'm hardly likely to side with the
Korean Poultry-Rapist, am I?
>¦ The only criticism I can level at YOU, Lunar Scrotum, is that you
>¦ are not very original or interesting. For instance...... your
idea
>¦ of a "witty comeback" is usually "Arr Arr Arr". Quite how
sounding
>¦ like a performing seal is supposed to make you look good, is
>¦ something only you will ever know.
>¦
>
>How about your "Dickhead Alert" or "Go fuck yourself, fuckwit"?
You
>think those are unoriginal? Or how about stealing lines directly
from
>the posts of JT and myself?
>
Yes, well, I haven't done THAT for a while..... not since I realise
what total fuckwits you both are, and decided that your material
wasn't worth shitting on, let alone stealing.
>You're no original troll either, chicken fucker.
>
>¦ Oh, and you did admit to changing people's posts around to make
>¦ yourself look good. But that's already in my sig, so I don't need
to
>¦ compile ANYTHING to prove that.
>¦
>
>He was pointing out exactly what you do, moron.
>
Not the way I (and everybody who reads my sig) saw it.
>¦ And seeing as I've already told you I don't know what "SPNAK" is,
I
>¦ wonder why you think declaring SPNAK on me will worry me in the
>¦ slightest.
>¦
>
>Probably because it's fun to watch you scratch your head, your non-
>existant nuts that you admitted to not having, and then taking a
shit
>in your pants before replying.
>
Really? You can SEE me? No...... honestly, if you told me what it
meant, and it really IS a decent insult, I might be put out by
it.....
Let me make it simpler for you (I keep having to do this.... make
things simple so Marcus Fuckwit can understand it).
Marcus..... you are a total HSGAL.
You see? Now....... does that worry you in the slightest? No, of
course not, because you don't know what it MEANS. So you don't even
need to bother responding to it.
Did it make any more sense this time, fuckwit?
>¦ Do I look bothered?
>¦
>
>Yes.
>
>¦ Oops.... you can't see me. Hold on.....
>¦
>
>Okay.
>
>¦ <checks in mirror, to see if he looks bothered>
>¦
>¦ Nope. I don't look bothered in the slightest.
>¦
>
>Hey moron, you just looked out the window at one of the chickens on
>the sill. Go find a real mirror, you dumbass.
>
Oh, back to bleating "Chicken-Fucker" again, are we? Could it be
that you couldn't think up a witty reply to that one?
I think THAT'S it...... You need *something* to put in whenever you
can't think of anything interesting to say...... And at the moment
you're using the "Chicken-Fucker" line. I can't remember what you
used before......
Ah. I see. Well, as long as I know what you're doing,
Chicken-fucker.
>¦ Keep trying, though, Scrote. At least you're not *quite* so
tedious
>¦ as Marcus. (His idea of a Worthwhile Post is to say
"Chicken-Fucker"
>¦ five times).
>¦
>
>I've posted many posts that explained why you're a dumbass.
>
No..... you're put in many posts simply *calling* me dumbass.... I
don't remember you actually *explaining* ANYTHING.
>And what happens? You claim your news server dropped them. I
repost
>them. And what happens? You claim your newsreader died on you.
>
>Why should I bother if you're just gonna keep making excuses,
>TechnoCunter? If you want to fuck chickens instead of actually
>reading what I write, then go ahead.
>
Like I said, I find it funny that, given the amount of bollocks you
*usually* talk, you should be able to come up with something
mindblowingly witty at the very MOMENT my server goes down.
And, again, like I said, post them again, in a *NEW* post marked
"Attn: TechnoHunter Neidorf" and I'll reply to them.
>¦ I think somebody should speak to Marcus about that, by the
>¦ way....... we all KNOW he's obsessed with poultry-rape, but
>¦ "Chicken-Fucker" is all he EVER says in his posts, nowadays.
>¦
>
>Hey, answer this question again. Who is "we"? Why do you keep
>referring to yourself in the plural? It's obvious that no one, and
I
>mean absolutely -no one- is on your side.
>
We is me.... and everybody who's joined the argument on my side. (or
at very least, against you),
More or less EVERYBODY who's joined the thread to cuss you has
called you a Chicken-Fucker.
>You aren't referring to yourself and the chickens you've been
fucking
>around with are you?
>
>¦ *sigh*. And to think I came after him because I thought he would
be
>¦ an INTERESTING opponent. How wrong you can be, eh?
>¦
>
>Don't blame your ineptitude on me, TechnoCunter.
>--
I'm not. I'm calling you a fuckwit. Can't you tell the difference?
Marcus Yu
¦
¦ Marcus Yu wrote in message ...
¦ >- TechnoHunter Neidorf wrote:
¦ >¦
¦ >¦ £unar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgbpp$fu1$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
¦ >¦ >Neidork is convinced that I've fucked up several times in this
¦ >¦ flamewar
¦ >¦ >(i.e. his 'chickens are asexual' posts). I challenged him to
¦ >¦ compile a list
¦ >¦ >of my posts in which I've fucked up as badly as him, or even at
¦ >¦ all. Three
¦ >¦ >times, I put forth the challenge, and three times he ignored it.
¦ >¦ >
¦ >¦
¦ >¦ Err..... No, wrong person.
¦ >¦
¦ >¦ I'm convinced that Marcus Yu has fucked up badly in this
¦ FlameWar.
¦ >¦ He's admitted to liking young boys, AND admitted to fucking
¦ >¦ chickens.
¦ >¦
¦ >
¦ >This is where the lies come in huh? I have never admitted the like
¦ >and it looks like you're trying to fabricate stuff just to counter
¦ >your own fuck-ups. Well, it's not working, TechnoCunter.
¦ >
¦
¦ Err..... Yes you DID admit to the "I love those kids" bit..... (See
¦ my sig. That is a DIRECT cut ''n' paste, no editing, no bits missed
¦ out.
¦
And that was taken completely out of context. You're trying to see
things that aren't there, TechnoCunter.
¦ And I only have Evan's word for it that you admitted to the
¦ chickens, but that's good enough for me. When it comes down to his
¦ word against yours...... well, I'm hardly likely to side with the
¦ Korean Poultry-Rapist, am I?
¦
I think you're just jumping on every opportunity to take the chicken
fucking spotlight off of you, chicken fucker.
¦
¦
¦ >¦ The only criticism I can level at YOU, Lunar Scrotum, is that you
¦ >¦ are not very original or interesting. For instance...... your
¦ idea
¦ >¦ of a "witty comeback" is usually "Arr Arr Arr". Quite how
¦ sounding
¦ >¦ like a performing seal is supposed to make you look good, is
¦ >¦ something only you will ever know.
¦ >¦
¦ >
¦ >How about your "Dickhead Alert" or "Go fuck yourself, fuckwit"?
¦ You
¦ >think those are unoriginal? Or how about stealing lines directly
¦ from
¦ >the posts of JT and myself?
¦ >
¦
¦ Yes, well, I haven't done THAT for a while..... not since I realise
¦ what total fuckwits you both are, and decided that your material
¦ wasn't worth shitting on, let alone stealing.
¦
You did it just yesterday, fool.
¦ >You're no original troll either, chicken fucker.
¦ >
¦ >¦ Oh, and you did admit to changing people's posts around to make
¦ >¦ yourself look good. But that's already in my sig, so I don't need
¦ to
¦ >¦ compile ANYTHING to prove that.
¦ >¦
¦ >
¦ >He was pointing out exactly what you do, moron.
¦ >
¦
¦ Not the way I (and everybody who reads my sig) saw it.
¦
That's because you're a moron, Neidork. And anybody reads your
signature just laughs at how much of a moron you are. I bet if you
were to take a poll, formal or informal, you'd find that no one, and I
mean absolutely no one takes you seriously.
¦ >¦ And seeing as I've already told you I don't know what "SPNAK" is,
¦ I
¦ >¦ wonder why you think declaring SPNAK on me will worry me in the
¦ >¦ slightest.
¦ >¦
¦ >
¦ >Probably because it's fun to watch you scratch your head, your non-
¦ >existant nuts that you admitted to not having, and then taking a
¦ shit
¦ >in your pants before replying.
¦ >
¦
¦ Really? You can SEE me? No...... honestly, if you told me what it
¦ meant, and it really IS a decent insult, I might be put out by
¦ it.....
¦
It's called figurative language, Neidork. For someone who thinks he's
some sort of expert on the English language, he sure doesn't know how
it's used. Ellipsis.. Ellipse.. LOL.
¦ Let me make it simpler for you (I keep having to do this.... make
¦ things simple so Marcus Fuckwit can understand it).
¦
¦ Marcus..... you are a total HSGAL.
¦
¦ You see? Now....... does that worry you in the slightest? No, of
¦ course not, because you don't know what it MEANS. So you don't even
¦ need to bother responding to it.
¦
¦ Did it make any more sense this time, fuckwit?
¦
If you weren't the dumbass you were, you'd realize SPNAK is a
trademark way of saying SPANK in the Flonk. I've already made several
posts where I've said "SPANK. Or in the words of the Flonk, SPNAK"
but I guess you're too much of an idiot to remember.
¦ >¦ Do I look bothered?
¦ >¦
¦ >
¦ >Yes.
¦ >
¦ >¦ Oops.... you can't see me. Hold on.....
¦ >¦
¦ >
¦ >Okay.
¦ >
¦ >¦ <checks in mirror, to see if he looks bothered>
¦ >¦
¦ >¦ Nope. I don't look bothered in the slightest.
¦ >¦
¦ >
¦ >Hey moron, you just looked out the window at one of the chickens on
¦ >the sill. Go find a real mirror, you dumbass.
¦ >
¦
¦ Oh, back to bleating "Chicken-Fucker" again, are we? Could it be
¦ that you couldn't think up a witty reply to that one?
¦
Or is it possible that you're so much in denial that you have to
respond by saying my reply wasn't witty?
¦ I think THAT'S it...... You need *something* to put in whenever you
¦ can't think of anything interesting to say...... And at the moment
¦ you're using the "Chicken-Fucker" line. I can't remember what you
¦ used before......
¦
¦ Ah. I see. Well, as long as I know what you're doing,
¦ Chicken-fucker.
¦
Nice job. You tell me that I put "chicken fucker" in whenever I can't
think of a reply and you do it yourself.
You're full of contradictions.
¦ >¦ Keep trying, though, Scrote. At least you're not *quite* so
¦ tedious
¦ >¦ as Marcus. (His idea of a Worthwhile Post is to say
¦ "Chicken-Fucker"
¦ >¦ five times).
¦ >¦
¦ >
¦ >I've posted many posts that explained why you're a dumbass.
¦ >
¦
¦ No..... you're put in many posts simply *calling* me dumbass.... I
¦ don't remember you actually *explaining* ANYTHING.
¦
That's because your news server conveniently dropped them and then
your newsreader coincidentally fucked up.
¦ >And what happens? You claim your news server dropped them. I
¦ repost
¦ >them. And what happens? You claim your newsreader died on you.
¦ >
¦ >Why should I bother if you're just gonna keep making excuses,
¦ >TechnoCunter? If you want to fuck chickens instead of actually
¦ >reading what I write, then go ahead.
¦ >
¦
¦ Like I said, I find it funny that, given the amount of bollocks you
¦ *usually* talk, you should be able to come up with something
¦ mindblowingly witty at the very MOMENT my server goes down.
¦
Or perhaps it doesn't go down and you claim to like I originally said.
¦ And, again, like I said, post them again, in a *NEW* post marked
¦ "Attn: TechnoHunter Neidorf" and I'll reply to them.
¦
I'm not resposting for a third time for your pathetic ass.
¦ >¦ I think somebody should speak to Marcus about that, by the
¦ >¦ way....... we all KNOW he's obsessed with poultry-rape, but
¦ >¦ "Chicken-Fucker" is all he EVER says in his posts, nowadays.
¦ >¦
¦ >
¦ >Hey, answer this question again. Who is "we"? Why do you keep
¦ >referring to yourself in the plural? It's obvious that no one, and
¦ I
¦ >mean absolutely -no one- is on your side.
¦ >
¦
¦ We is me.... and everybody who's joined the argument on my side. (or
¦ at very least, against you),
¦
And your side consists of what.. Nobody but you?
People may have jumped at me but they definitely weren't on your side
and I highly doubt they'd be happy to side with someone with as much
egg on his face as yourself.
¦ More or less EVERYBODY who's joined the thread to cuss you has
¦ called you a Chicken-Fucker.
¦
That's because they can't think of a reply like you said, remember?
¦ >You aren't referring to yourself and the chickens you've been
¦ fucking
¦ >around with are you?
¦ >
¦ >¦ *sigh*. And to think I came after him because I thought he would
¦ be
¦ >¦ an INTERESTING opponent. How wrong you can be, eh?
¦ >¦
¦ >
¦ >Don't blame your ineptitude on me, TechnoCunter.
¦ >--
¦
¦ I'm not. I'm calling you a fuckwit. Can't you tell the difference?
¦
Don't direct your anger due to your ineptitude at me, TechnoCunter.
--
Marcus Yu
"Who looks like a dumbness *now*, Marcus?"
-- TechnoHunter Neidorf, telling me who's boss.
<37bb...@news1.vip.uk.com>
£unar §aber™
:>
:>
:>I guess that means you don't accept the challenge. I always knew
:you were a
:>little pussy.
:>
:
:
:Err..... No, of COURSE I don't accept the challenge, I already SAID,
:you haven't fucked up.
No, Neidork, I don't think so. Point me to the message where you said that.
Or are you too much of a fucking coward and/or lazy ass to back up what you
say.
:How can you fuck up, when you never SAY anything?
I'm saying things now, you little bitch. I've been saying things since you
first planted your lazy ass in my newsgroup. Next time come up with a
relevant excuse.
I think you're getting worried, because you can't just come at me with a
barrage of "chicken fucker!" remarks. You actually hafta think. I bet it
hurts, doesn't it.
:Neidorf.
:----------
:"I sure do love those kids"
: - Marcus Yu, admitting his sexual preference.
: ----------------
:"I just snipped away the entire post, leaving only bits to
: make it look like I'm some sort of witty person and
: that you keep fucking yourself"
: - Lunar Saber, admitting his deceit.
: ------------------
:Marcus : "You said you wanted to run, screaming to
: the hills......"
:Neidorf : "Err..... But I DIDN'T say that, though".
:Marcus : "That's exactly what I said".
: - Marcus Yu, demonstrating an uncanny
: inability to even check his OWN posts,
: let alone anybody else's.
: ----------------------------
:"This message was a "Trolling". That DOESN'T make
: us Trolls"
: - Andy Borne, talking bollocks.
:
:
--
Ł§™
TechnoHunter Neidorf
Łunar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgn6m$gu1$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
>
>TechnoHunter Neidorf wrote in message
<37bb...@news1.vip.uk.com>...
>:
>:Łunar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgh2n$t3$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
>:>
>:>
>:>I guess that means you don't accept the challenge. I always knew
>:you were a
>:>little pussy.
>:>
>:
>:
>:Err..... No, of COURSE I don't accept the challenge, I already
SAID,
>:you haven't fucked up.
>
>
>No, Neidork, I don't think so. Point me to the message where you
said that.
>Or are you too much of a fucking coward and/or lazy ass to back up
what you
>say.
>
Err...... okay. It's the second post down from the start, in this
thread. Where I quite clearly (although not clearly enough for YOU,
obviously, fuckwit) say that it's MARCUS YU I'm accusing of fucking
up, and not you. The only criticism I can level at you, I go on to
say, is that you're unimaginative.
Whatssup, Scrotum....... Feeling a little silly now, are we?
>:How can you fuck up, when you never SAY anything?
>
>
>I'm saying things now, you little bitch. I've been saying things
since you
>first planted your lazy ass in my newsgroup. Next time come up with
a
>relevant excuse.
YOUR NewsGroup, Scrote?
I think I'm gonna start a new thread right now, and ask all
regulars of AGNP whether *they* consider this to be YOUR NewsGroup.
>
>I think you're getting worried, because you can't just come at me
with a
>barrage of "chicken fucker!" remarks. You actually hafta think. I
bet it
>hurts, doesn't it.
>
THINK? Against YOU????
Now THAT'S funny, Scrotum. Well done.
£unar §aber™
TechnoHunter Neidorf wrote in message <37bc0...@news2.vip.uk.com>...
:
:Łunar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgn6m$gu1$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
:>
:>TechnoHunter Neidorf wrote in message
:<37bb...@news1.vip.uk.com>...
:>:
:>:Łunar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgh2n$t3$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
:>:>
:>:>
:>:>I guess that means you don't accept the challenge. I always knew
:>:you were a
:>:>little pussy.
:>:>
:>:
:>:
:>:Err..... No, of COURSE I don't accept the challenge, I already
:SAID,
:>:you haven't fucked up.
:>
:>
:>No, Neidork, I don't think so. Point me to the message where you
:said that.
:>Or are you too much of a fucking coward and/or lazy ass to back up
:what you
:>say.
:>
:
:
:Err...... okay. It's the second post down from the start, in this
:thread. Where I quite clearly (although not clearly enough for YOU,
:obviously, fuckwit) say that it's MARCUS YU I'm accusing of fucking
:up, and not you. The only criticism I can level at you, I go on to
:say, is that you're unimaginative.
Back-pedaling. How many times prior to that post did you accuse me and JT of
fucking up, and claiming that you're gonna add the fuck-ups to your sig?
Many.
:Whatssup, Scrotum....... Feeling a little silly now, are we?
Not at all. And if I ever did, I would just go back and read that chickens
are asexual, and I would feel a whole lot better.
:>:How can you fuck up, when you never SAY anything?
:>
:>
:>I'm saying things now, you little bitch. I've been saying things
:since you
:>first planted your lazy ass in my newsgroup. Next time come up with
:a
:>relevant excuse.
:
:
:YOUR NewsGroup, Scrote?
:
: I think I'm gonna start a new thread right now, and ask all
:regulars of AGNP whether *they* consider this to be YOUR NewsGroup.
I figured you would take it that way. My newsgroup, as in "I post here, and
people know me here."
:>I think you're getting worried, because you can't just come at me
:with a
:>barrage of "chicken fucker!" remarks. You actually hafta think. I
:bet it
:>hurts, doesn't it.
:>
:
:
:THINK? Against YOU????
You really SHOULD think, Neidork. When you let your fingers get ahead of
your brain, strange things like asexual chickens appear.
:Now THAT'S funny, Scrotum. Well done.
Thanks.
:Neidorf.
:
:
TechnoHunter Neidorf
Łunar §aber™ wrote in message <7ph24r$i4s$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
Back-peddling yerself! This is an argument about whether or not I
accused you of fucking up.
Oh, good point..... I did, once (but then, I said THAT in my
original reply, too). And THAT'S in my sig, for good measure.
"I snip your posts to make myself look good and make you look like
you're fucking up".
Ring any bells, matey?
>:Whatssup, Scrotum....... Feeling a little silly now, are we?
>
>
>Not at all. And if I ever did, I would just go back and read that
chickens
>are asexual, and I would feel a whole lot better.
>
Ahhh.... can't think of anything else to say, so it's back to the
old "asexual chickens" thing.
C'mon, now...... Even Marcus Yu has dropped THAT one. If the Master
of Repetitive Flames has decided that something is past his prime,
it MUST be old.
>:>:How can you fuck up, when you never SAY anything?
>:>
>:>
>:>I'm saying things now, you little bitch. I've been saying things
>:since you
>:>first planted your lazy ass in my newsgroup. Next time come up
with
>:a
>:>relevant excuse.
>:
>:
>:YOUR NewsGroup, Scrote?
>:
>: I think I'm gonna start a new thread right now, and ask all
>:regulars of AGNP whether *they* consider this to be YOUR
NewsGroup.
>
>
>I figured you would take it that way. My newsgroup, as in "I post
here, and
>people know me here."
>
And people hate you here, it would appear.
Here goes.... end of message. Check out the second entry on my sig
for confimation of your fuckup, Scrote.
Neidorf.
-----------
£unar §aber™
TechnoHunter Neidorf wrote in message <37bc...@news1.vip.uk.com>...
:
:Łunar §aber™ wrote in message <7ph24r$i4s$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
If you had any sense whatsoever, you would have realized that I was showing
you exactly what you do. You snip away everything but what YOU want to
remain. As a matter of fact, you haven't done that in awhile. Nice to see
you're finally listening to the voice of reason.
:>:Whatssup, Scrotum....... Feeling a little silly now, are we?
:>
:>
:>Not at all. And if I ever did, I would just go back and read that
:chickens
:>are asexual, and I would feel a whole lot better.
:>
:
:Ahhh.... can't think of anything else to say, so it's back to the
:old "asexual chickens" thing.
:
:C'mon, now...... Even Marcus Yu has dropped THAT one. If the Master
:of Repetitive Flames has decided that something is past his prime,
:it MUST be old.
You're never gonna live it down, Niedork. After you get your ass handed to
you, and believe me, it will happen, you're never gonna be able to show your
face in ANY of the NG's that saw you fuck up.
All's fair in love and flamewars.
:>:>:How can you fuck up, when you never SAY anything?
:>:>
:>:>
:>:>I'm saying things now, you little bitch. I've been saying things
:>:since you
:>:>first planted your lazy ass in my newsgroup. Next time come up
:with
:>:a
:>:>relevant excuse.
:>:
:>:
:>:YOUR NewsGroup, Scrote?
:>:
:>: I think I'm gonna start a new thread right now, and ask all
:>:regulars of AGNP whether *they* consider this to be YOUR
:NewsGroup.
:>
:>
:>I figured you would take it that way. My newsgroup, as in "I post
:here, and
:>people know me here."
:>
:
:
:And people hate you here, it would appear.
Only the closeminded discriminating twits.
:Here goes.... end of message. Check out the second entry on my sig
:for confimation of your fuckup, Scrote.
Maybe it's time for MY trophy sig. Keep in mind that I'm going to just
randomly take things you've said out of context and slap them into my sig
with little or no explianation as to their origin or meaning.
And if you didn't realize it, the above sentence was a parody, dumbfuck.
:Neidorf.
:-----------
:"I sure do love those kids"
: - Marcus Yu, admitting his sexual preference.
: ----------------
:"I just snipped away the entire post, leaving only bits to
: make it look like I'm some sort of witty person and
: that you keep fucking yourself"
: - Lunar Saber, admitting his deceit.
: ------------------
:Marcus : "You said you wanted to run, screaming to
: the hills......"
:Neidorf : "Err..... But I DIDN'T say that, though".
:Marcus : "That's exactly what I said".
: - Marcus Yu, demonstrating an uncanny
: inability to even check his OWN posts,
: let alone anybody else's.
: ----------------------------
:"This message was a "Trolling". That DOESN'T make
: us Trolls"
: - Andy Borne, talking bollocks.
:
:
:
--
Ł§™
TechnoHunter Neidorf
Łunar §aber™ wrote in message <7ph855$6cr$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
>
>
>
>If you had any sense whatsoever, you would have realized that I was
showing
>you exactly what you do. You snip away everything but what YOU want
to
>remain. As a matter of fact, you haven't done that in awhile. Nice
to see
>you're finally listening to the voice of reason.
Yes, well, it was getting too easy for you twats to cuss me without
THINKING about the fact that what I was doing was snipping out all
the bits that didn't directly relate to the point I was replying
to.....
Now I leave everything in, so you have to scroll through the
already-covered stuff to find out what I've actually said.
>
>:>:Whatssup, Scrotum....... Feeling a little silly now, are we?
>:>
>:>
>:>Not at all. And if I ever did, I would just go back and read that
>:chickens
>:>are asexual, and I would feel a whole lot better.
>:>
>:
>:Ahhh.... can't think of anything else to say, so it's back to the
>:old "asexual chickens" thing.
>:
>:C'mon, now...... Even Marcus Yu has dropped THAT one. If the
Master
>:of Repetitive Flames has decided that something is past his prime,
>:it MUST be old.
>
>
>You're never gonna live it down, Niedork. After you get your ass
handed to
>you, and believe me, it will happen, you're never gonna be able to
show your
>face in ANY of the NG's that saw you fuck up.
>
Really? Well, EVERYONE who was reading in AGNP saw me "fuck up", and
I'm still here, aren't I? Or is posting fifty replies to you
fuckwits PER DAY your definition of "Not being able to show my
face"?
>All's fair in love and flamewars.
>
>:>:>:How can you fuck up, when you never SAY anything?
>:>:>
>:>:>
>:>:>I'm saying things now, you little bitch. I've been saying
things
>:>:since you
>:>:>first planted your lazy ass in my newsgroup. Next time come up
>:with
>:>:a
>:>:>relevant excuse.
>:>:
>:>:
>:>:YOUR NewsGroup, Scrote?
>:>:
>:>: I think I'm gonna start a new thread right now, and ask all
>:>:regulars of AGNP whether *they* consider this to be YOUR
>:NewsGroup.
>:>
>:>
>:>I figured you would take it that way. My newsgroup, as in "I post
>:here, and
>:>people know me here."
>:>
>:
>:
>:And people hate you here, it would appear.
>
>
>Only the closeminded discriminating twits.
>
Err..... well, there would appear to be quite a *few* of these
"closeminded, discriminating twits" in this NG, then. 'Cos not a lot
of people think you're anything other than a stupid little troll. An
*amusing* stupid little troll, but a stupid little troll
nonetheless.
>:Here goes.... end of message. Check out the second entry on my sig
>:for confimation of your fuckup, Scrote.
>
>
>Maybe it's time for MY trophy sig. Keep in mind that I'm going to
just
>randomly take things you've said out of context and slap them into
my sig
>with little or no explianation as to their origin or meaning.
>
>And if you didn't realize it, the above sentence was a parody,
dumbfuck.
>
So you're NOT going to randomly take things I've said out of context
and slap them into your sig, then?
Good stuff. And if you do, I can always come back to this post, snip
the above bit, and use it as proof of what you're doing.
Neidorf.
---------
£unar §aber™
TechnoHunter Neidorf wrote in message <37bc2...@news2.vip.uk.com>...
:
:Łunar §aber™ wrote in message <7ph855$6cr$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
:>
:
:>
:>
:>If you had any sense whatsoever, you would have realized that I was
:showing
:>you exactly what you do. You snip away everything but what YOU want
:to
:>remain. As a matter of fact, you haven't done that in awhile. Nice
:to see
:>you're finally listening to the voice of reason.
:
:
:Yes, well, it was getting too easy for you twats to cuss me without
:THINKING about the fact that what I was doing was snipping out all
:the bits that didn't directly relate to the point I was replying
:to.....
:
:Now I leave everything in, so you have to scroll through the
:already-covered stuff to find out what I've actually said.
There ya go snipping again.
I should have known you would revert back to stupidity as soon as I pointed
out you were doing something smart.
:>
:>:>:Whatssup, Scrotum....... Feeling a little silly now, are we?
:>:>
:>:>
:>:>Not at all. And if I ever did, I would just go back and read that
:>:chickens
:>:>are asexual, and I would feel a whole lot better.
:>:>
:>:
:>:Ahhh.... can't think of anything else to say, so it's back to the
:>:old "asexual chickens" thing.
:>:
:>:C'mon, now...... Even Marcus Yu has dropped THAT one. If the
:Master
:>:of Repetitive Flames has decided that something is past his prime,
:>:it MUST be old.
:>
:>
:>You're never gonna live it down, Niedork. After you get your ass
:handed to
:>you, and believe me, it will happen, you're never gonna be able to
:show your
:>face in ANY of the NG's that saw you fuck up.
:>
:
:
:Really? Well, EVERYONE who was reading in AGNP saw me "fuck up", and
:I'm still here, aren't I? Or is posting fifty replies to you
:fuckwits PER DAY your definition of "Not being able to show my
:face"?
Read: after you get your ass handed to you. Aka after you lose.
:>All's fair in love and flamewars.
:>
:>:>:>:How can you fuck up, when you never SAY anything?
:>:>:>
:>:>:>
:>:>:>I'm saying things now, you little bitch. I've been saying
:things
:>:>:since you
:>:>:>first planted your lazy ass in my newsgroup. Next time come up
:>:with
:>:>:a
:>:>:>relevant excuse.
:>:>:
:>:>:
:>:>:YOUR NewsGroup, Scrote?
:>:>:
:>:>: I think I'm gonna start a new thread right now, and ask all
:>:>:regulars of AGNP whether *they* consider this to be YOUR
:>:NewsGroup.
:>:>
:>:>
:>:>I figured you would take it that way. My newsgroup, as in "I post
:>:here, and
:>:>people know me here."
:>:>
:>:
:>:
:>:And people hate you here, it would appear.
:>
:>
:>Only the closeminded discriminating twits.
:>
:
:
:Err..... well, there would appear to be quite a *few* of these
:"closeminded, discriminating twits" in this NG, then. 'Cos not a lot
:of people think you're anything other than a stupid little troll. An
:*amusing* stupid little troll, but a stupid little troll
:nonetheless.
Here's how it works: If I like someone, I tell them. If I don't like them, I
flame them.
There are several smart AGNPers, and they know who they are.
And show some sense, Neidork. I didn't become a troll for popularity. If
you're hoping that being a troll will make you popular, then I suggest you
revert to whatever the fuck you were before. Mostly likely a regular in
alt.sex.bondage or something.
:>:Here goes.... end of message. Check out the second entry on my sig
:>:for confimation of your fuckup, Scrote.
:>
:>
:>Maybe it's time for MY trophy sig. Keep in mind that I'm going to
:just
:>randomly take things you've said out of context and slap them into
:my sig
:>with little or no explianation as to their origin or meaning.
:>
:>And if you didn't realize it, the above sentence was a parody,
:dumbfuck.
:>
:
:So you're NOT going to randomly take things I've said out of context
:and slap them into your sig, then?
'Parody' doesn't mean 'false' ediot. It means immitation. Of you, in this
case.
:Good stuff. And if you do, I can always come back to this post, snip
:the above bit, and use it as proof of what you're doing.
Read above.
:Neidorf.
:---------
:"I sure do love those kids"
: - Marcus Yu, admitting his sexual preference.
: ----------------
:"I just snipped away the entire post, leaving only bits to
: make it look like I'm some sort of witty person and
: that you keep fucking yourself"
: - Lunar Saber, admitting his deceit.
: ------------------
:Marcus : "You said you wanted to run, screaming to
: the hills......"
:Neidorf : "Err..... But I DIDN'T say that, though".
:Marcus : "That's exactly what I said".
: - Marcus Yu, demonstrating an uncanny
: inability to even check his OWN posts,
: let alone anybody else's.
: ----------------------------
:"This message was a "Trolling". That DOESN'T make
: us Trolls"
: - Andy Borne, talking bollocks.
:
:
--
Ł§™
Yes, I DID make the Guiness Book of All-Time Morons......
for using the phrase "Shut Up Chicken-Fucker".
-Technocunter Neidork, the genius.
Message ID: <37bb...@news1.vip.uk.com>
Marcus Yu
¦
¦ £unar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgn6m$gu1$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
¦ >
¦ >TechnoHunter Neidorf wrote in message
¦ <37bb...@news1.vip.uk.com>...
¦ >:
¦ >:£unar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgh2n$t3$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
¦ >:>
¦ >:>
¦ >:>I guess that means you don't accept the challenge. I always knew
¦ >:you were a
¦ >:>little pussy.
¦ >:>
¦ >:
¦ >:
¦ >:Err..... No, of COURSE I don't accept the challenge, I already
¦ SAID,
¦ >:you haven't fucked up.
¦ >
¦ >
¦ >No, Neidork, I don't think so. Point me to the message where you
¦ said that.
¦ >Or are you too much of a fucking coward and/or lazy ass to back up
¦ what you
¦ >say.
¦ >
¦
¦ Err...... okay. It's the second post down from the start, in this
¦ thread. Where I quite clearly (although not clearly enough for YOU,
¦ obviously, fuckwit) say that it's MARCUS YU I'm accusing of fucking
¦ up, and not you. The only criticism I can level at you, I go on to
¦ say, is that you're unimaginative.
¦ Whatssup, Scrotum....... Feeling a little silly now, are we?
¦
"Who looks like the *dumbness* now, Marcus?"
ROFLMAO.
--
Marcus Yu
"Who looks like a dumbness *now*, Marcus?"
-- TechnoHunter Neidorf, telling me who's boss.
<37bb...@news1.vip.uk.com>
"Yes, that was the my fault, whilst using the spellchecker. It didn't
recognize "dumbass" the second time around, and I clicked on
"Change" instead of "Ignore", thus changing it to "Dumbness", which
it did recognize."
-- TechnoHunter Neidorf, explaining to us the reason for the line
above. <37bb...@news1.vip.uk.com>
£unar §aber™
(Neidork dropped it) and not too much happened. It amounted to this: He
doesn't accept the challenge. What a pussy.
£unar §aber™ wrote in message <7pgbpp$fu1$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
:Neidork is convinced that I've fucked up several times in this flamewar
:(i.e. his 'chickens are asexual' posts). I challenged him to compile a list
:of my posts in which I've fucked up as badly as him, or even at all. Three
:times, I put forth the challenge, and three times he ignored it.
:
:Guess what.....
:
:SPNAK.
:
:--
:£§™
:
:
--
£§™
TechnoHunter Neidorf
Marcus Yu wrote in message ...
>
>"Who looks like the *dumbness* now, Marcus?"
>
Yes, as I've already explained, this quote doesn't make me look
silly all the time you're leaving the SECOND part of the of the sig
in.
I'm not going to explain it to you again. It doesn't make me look
too bad, so I don't really need to point it out to you any more than
twice.
Neidorf.
----------
Marcus Yu
·
· Marcus Yu wrote in message ...
·
· >
· >"Who looks like the *dumbness* now, Marcus?"
· >
·
·
· Yes, as I've already explained, this quote doesn't make me look
· silly all the time you're leaving the SECOND part of the of the sig
· in.
·
· I'm not going to explain it to you again. It doesn't make me look
· too bad, so I don't really need to point it out to you any more than
· twice.
Obviously, someone's been smoking a little crack lately. Where do you
get it from, TechnoCunter? From the crackwhore you call mother?
--
Marcus Yu
alt.games.nintendo.pokemon,rec.sport.pro-wrestling
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TechnoHunter
"Who looks like a dumbness *now*, Marcus?"
-- TechnoHunter Neidorf, showing who's boss.
<37bb...@news1.vip.uk.com>
"Incidentally...... I remember from Biology classes that chickens
reproduce ASEXUALLY..... so the only way he could ACTUALLY be a
chicken-fucker is if he had no penis.
Yes,,,,,, The point is, (and this, I feel, is one of life's little
ironies) is that the well known cock doesn't actually HAVE a "cock".
The male rooster has no penis in the sense that we do.... (well, I
do, I can't speak for Dr Fuckwit here), and hence, reproduction is
"asexual", or "without sex".
Actually, now I come to think about it, maybe "asexual" is the wrong
word.... it's certainly something pretty similar."
-- TechnoHunter Neidorf, being kind enough to share his knowledge.
<37b8...@news1.vip.uk.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you know there's an alt.fan.marcus-yu? Pretty cool, huh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to e-mail me, feel free to send all of your letters to
marc...@netzero.net. Word of warning, though, I never check my
e-mail. Don't attach any files or else I will be unable to see it due
to the fact I use MailStart.com to read my mail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Updated 8/20/99
TechnoHunter Neidorf
Marcus Yu wrote in message ...
---
> Did you know there's an alt.fan.marcus-yu? Pretty cool, huh.
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Really???
Regular posters : 1 (Marcus Yu) I suspect.
Oh, and quite possibly Loony Scrotum and Andy Boring, who seem
DETERMINED to bend down, pucker up and kiss you arse, Marcus.
Marcus Yu
·
· Marcus Yu wrote in message ...
· >-------------------------------------------------------------------
· ---
· > Did you know there's an alt.fan.marcus-yu? Pretty cool, huh.
· >-------------------------------------------------------------------
· ---
·
· Really???
·
· Regular posters : 1 (Marcus Yu) I suspect.
·
· Oh, and quite possibly Loony Scrotum and Andy Boring, who seem
· DETERMINED to bend down, pucker up and kiss you arse, Marcus.
Obviously you have no idea how USENET works.
--
Marcus Yu
alt.games.nintendo.pokemon,rec.sport.pro-wrestling
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TechnoHunter
"Who looks like a dumbness *now*, Marcus?"
-- TechnoHunter Neidorf, showing who's boss.
<37bb...@news1.vip.uk.com>
"Incidentally...... I remember from Biology classes that chickens
reproduce ASEXUALLY..... so the only way he could ACTUALLY be a
chicken-fucker is if he had no penis.
Yes,,,,,, The point is, (and this, I feel, is one of life's little
ironies) is that the well known cock doesn't actually HAVE a "cock".
The male rooster has no penis in the sense that we do.... (well, I
do, I can't speak for Dr Fuckwit here), and hence, reproduction is
"asexual", or "without sex".
Actually, now I come to think about it, maybe "asexual" is the wrong
word.... it's certainly something pretty similar."
-- TechnoHunter Neidorf, being kind enough to share his knowledge.
<37b8...@news1.vip.uk.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you know there's an alt.fan.marcus-yu? Pretty cool, huh.