Hate to kill an unarmed dragon :D
--
Moon Buggy
-----------------------------------------------------
AMD Components, Intel Components, all made in Taiwan!!!
MadOnion PCMark 2002
http://service.madonion.com/compare?pcm=153259
MadOnion 3DMark2001SE
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=2894064
just leave him be. you could have killed it, then captured its dead essence
into the little sphere then give it to the red dragon. it takes him down to
"badly wounded." i did that and regretted it but hey it didnt shift my
alignment towards evil so i didn't bother going back to redo it.
"Moon Buggy" <back...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ah3jg1$q0p97$1...@ID-64933.news.dfncis.de...
You regretted killing a blue dragon?
Then again, I can't talk, I left the green one alive.
--
Brad "GuppyShark"
"GuppyShark" <guppy...@sagamers.com> wrote in message
news:3d3fce92...@news.internode.on.net...
In D&D, evil. All metallic dragons are Good, all chromatic dragons are
Evil.
That said, judging anything by scale color is morally dubious at best.
A blue dragon in that state with almost no mind to begin with could have been
brought up any way. Is there some unbreakable law that says they would have to
be evil? What if it was taken to some local monastery and brought up by monks?
Well, if it has no mind to begin with, then killing it is at best putting
it out of its misery, and at worst nothing more serious than killing a fly.
In fact, Klauth says as much if you talk to him.
--
Hong Ooi | "I had to fight in the Arena to become
hong...@maths.anu.edu.au | Archmaster of my House."
http://www.zipworld.com.au/~hong/dnd/ | -- Q.
Sydney, Australia |
>On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:45:41 +0100, Memnoch
><mem...@nospamforme.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 10:57:38 GMT, Kish <Kis...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>
>>>diner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> well it didn't look evil... are blue dragons supposed to be evil or good? i
>>>> have no idea.
>>>
>>>In D&D, evil. All metallic dragons are Good, all chromatic dragons are
>>>Evil.
>>>
>>>That said, judging anything by scale color is morally dubious at best.
>>
>>A blue dragon in that state with almost no mind to begin with could have been
>>brought up any way. Is there some unbreakable law that says they would have to
>>be evil? What if it was taken to some local monastery and brought up by monks?
>
>Well, if it has no mind to begin with, then killing it is at best putting
>it out of its misery, and at worst nothing more serious than killing a fly.
>In fact, Klauth says as much if you talk to him.
No mind is probably inaccurate. More like an adult with a childs mind, a
newborn baby in an adult body. Given time it could probably be just as
intelligent as other dragons, but centuries behind if you see what I mean.
Blue Dragons are evil.
It's their nature. :)
So yes, according to D&D rules, your monk-raised blue dragon *would*
be evil.
--
Brad "GuppyShark"
That's just like saying all Indian people run corner shops. ;-)
D&D seems to have a weird technical meaning for good and evil, abstract from
actual morality.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Caroline
"Hong Ooi" <hong...@maths.anu.edu.au> wrote in message
news:1r00ku0ts6p1i6kdd...@4ax.com...
I never touched the blue, but went dancing with Klauth.
My biggest issue was my henchman (Herr Red Tiger) who required me to keep
using my recall stone to heal his dumb ass up.
Finally I just left him dead and showed Mr Klauth how a proper Gwar mosh pit
works.....
Physical damage wasn't that big of an issue, the main worry was the fire
breath attack...
>Blue Dragons are evil.
>
> It's their nature. :)
>
> So yes, according to D&D rules, your monk-raised blue dragon *would*
> be evil.
>
> --
> Brad "GuppyShark"
This is one of the reasons I have never agreed with the racial alignment
rules. It seems to me that Good and Evil should be learned things not
instinctual. (except in the case of the undead, and in that case there are a
couple of exceptions). And in some cases they could be unlearned (chaotic
good ranger drow for example)
Most DMs that I have had the pleasure of playing with didn't really enforce
this rule.
Agreed. Since we are talking about magical creatures I guess anything goes but
I personally don't believe that a creature widely reported to be Evil by
nature would grow up as such if brought up and taught to respect law and
order.
One way to look at it is that Good and Evil (and Law and Chaos) have a
special, technical meaning in D&D -- separate from morality. Few evil people
really think that they're evil -- but hey, Protection from Evil spells still
work against them.
It's a dragon.
They're not people.
--
Brad "GuppyShark"
Or all spiders that can like to weave webs.
--
Brad "GuppyShark"
Ummmm.. dude the Blue Dragon wouldn't be evil just cause it's a Blue
Dragon...
Why is Drizzt not the standard Drow Alignment??? Or any PC character not
made to be a Race Alignment??
I understand your point, but..... I have NEVER heard of a good blue, green,
or red dragon in any story. It is accepted that they being not human and
wishy washy, know what they are inherintly and have no qualms about being
evil or good, its simply what they are. Perhaps even has to do with the
God's who have dragon shapes being certain colors (platinum for instance for
good and red I think for evil). Kinda like the angels, at one time they
were one, but now you have either good or bad angels and thats it.
It does, and I believe it relates to respect for life, esp PC types of
life (human/elf/etc). In a campaign, a friend was turned into a troll.
He completely lost his understanding for life/death, considering himself
generally immortal and expecting others shared his views. I ruled that
he detected as evil.
stef
--
email: stef%swcp.com
Stunt Programmers Industries
How do you define "people," then? It's evident that D&D dragons are
quite sapient.
Thankyou the nearest explenation ive found is the dracon gods (chromatic=
evil metalic = good) dragons are people if half orks are people and drzt is
a unique individual how many good drow do you know of
According to D&D rules, yes, it is.
>Why is Drizzt not the standard Drow Alignment??? Or any PC character not
>made to be a Race Alignment??
PC races can be alignments. Blue Dragons aren't a PC race (anymore).
--
Brad "GuppyShark"
People = PC races ;)
--
Brad "GuppyShark"
Goblins are people too!!
P.E.T.G
Coming to a T-Shirt near you. :-)
Right on! That would make a wicked T! }:>
It would seem to me, at least, that one should look in the 3rd Ed MM, and
check aligment for the dragons. If it says "always <foo alignment>," it
will always be that alignment. However, if it says "usually <foo
alignment>," the creature TENDS to be that alignment, but there can
always be the rare exception to the race. Most PC compatible races in the
MM have that "usually" tag on their alignment. ;O)
Always never means always.