On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:13:05 +1000, Walt_M <
walt...@live.com> wrote:
>
>BTW, I know who you're thinking of and there's no way that it's Doug
>Cox (Toosmokey).
>
>That's not to say that it wasn't Doug Cox who originally (directly or
>indirectly) provided Mike Winwood with his "ammunition". And yes.
>he'd be the sort of tattooed Harley-riding gutless bastard who would
>have done that. But he's not BasilBrush.
And your evidence is.........?
>And now consider this: BasilBrush is no friend of this newsgroup or
>he would not post so much shit here.
And you don't post shit.....?
>Voicing his hatred of me and
How many times do I have to tell you, Drongo? I like you, without you
I would not have anyone to troll with!
>bullying me has become more important than sparing the newsgroup.
Bullying you? Sorry, mate, have I been a little too rough with you?
Never mind, Nursy Ratarse will be along soon to give you your meds and
tuck you in bed.
>This fits Mike Winwood's profile to a tee. He's never forgiven me
>for catching him out peddling that string of lies about how he came by
>"that picture".
http://s8.postimg.org/ee7pkl491/image.png
More lies, Drongo.
>Remember that by then, his videos had become quite
>abusive towards me.
You told Peter how much you enjoyed them, seeing as you had a starring
role, or words similar. It's all in the archives, mate, I've checked.
> He had already lost the plot way back then. And
>you guys cheered him on !!!
And you did. Look what I found in the archives, mate.
>This is your problem Walter, you twist things around to suit your argument
>at the time, like your statement above, then when that doesn't work you
>resort to downright lies. Before you state, "Show me blah, blah,blah, which
>is your normal tactic at this stage, here is the original post. Again I have
>PROVED that you are a constant LIAR.
>> By the way, thanks for spending so much of the video on me. I was
>> most flattered. Especially since I subscribe to the view that all
>> publicity is good publicity.
>
>> Thanks for feeding the troll. Feel free to wind me up in your
>> next video. Should be good for several l-o-n-g riposts.
>
>>> Yes, I know that, but you didn't say whether you liked it or not.
>
>> I liked nearly all of it. I just thought the very end was a bit
>> heavy.
>
>>> Yes, I intend to agree with you there, as I commented earlier, I sailed a
>>> bit close to the wind in parts. Sorta got carried away a bit.
>
>> But then again, given my own comments in the past it was
>> nothing I did not deserve. So, you can tatke that to be "well done"
>> from me too.
There you go, dipshit you liked nearly all of it. You just thought the
end bit was a bit heavy. Now lie you're way out of that!
>Oh yes, Mike Winwood was a toxic troll even way back then. Nothing
>has changed since, except that now thinking people can see that he
>cares naught for this newsgroup and that all that matters to him is
Quote from Liar Gerry,
> "I'll bury you AND THIS NEWSGROUP. I have nothing whatsoever to lose.
> That makes me the more dangerous."
>
> One really wonders Why O Why!!!
>
>Walt
>* * *
>Offence freely given to those who wish to take it
>email:
waltK...@live.com
>(Replace "K5J4H3K" with "mitty")
>that he attack the guy who outed him as a liar and a bullying, toxic
>troll.
Show us evidence of just one lie I've told, mate.
YOU on the other hand have been exposed as a Toxic Troll, a mega mouth
liar and a Newsgroup impersonator. Nobody on this group is ever going
to believe anything you say again. Your credibility has gone forever.
If you lie once, you have to lie again and again to cover up the first
lie.
>
>And you guys are still sucked in by that prick. Still covering for
>him.
>
Your projecting again, in other words, lying.
>Nice one, Defective Inspector Butts...
>
>And the beat goes on...