On 4/12/2018 4:55 PM, Nurse Ratched aka Gerry Binder, a gun-shy, valor
stealing, J. Edgar loving, communist lying blowhard troll, welfare
fraudster, terrorist sympathizing, dole-bludging, race-baiting, control
freak, racist anarchist, cry-bully, village idiot poser who destroyed
AGMFS whined:
> Samantha Bee, after exhaustive reserach, has unmasked that "un-named
> Republican congressman".
>
> He is [allegedly] - Rep. Peter T. King.
>
Peter T. King, wonderful... A peach of a guy.... None better.... Your
kinda guy....... RINO and IRA sympathizer.
Why in the world would he bad mouth Trump. Trump only soundly rejected
the Muslim surveillance program idea of this bigoted asshole.
Peter King’s Really Bad Idea
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/20/opinion/peter-kings-really-bad-idea.html
WASHINGTON — Speaking last week in the lobby of Trump Tower in Manhattan
after a meeting with the president-elect, Donald J. Trump, the veteran
Republican congressman Peter T. King unveiled his latest proposal to
crack down on the civil liberties of law-abiding American Muslims: a
federal Muslim surveillance program.
“I suggested a program similar to what Commissioner Kelly did here in
New York,” Mr. King told reporters, referring to a secret New York
Police Department surveillance program under the former commissioner
Raymond W. Kelly, which, The New York Times reported, “dispatched
plainclothes detectives into Muslim neighborhoods to eavesdrop on
conversations and built detailed files on where people ate, prayed and
shopped.”
The program, Mr. King added, was “very effective in stopping terrorism”
and “really should be a model for the country.”
The congressman is correct in calling the surveillance “very effective”
only if you ignore the verdict of the Police Department itself. Its
intelligence chief acknowledged, in unsealed court testimony, that the
program never generated any leads, or led to a single terrorism-related
investigation.
Yet, from at least 2002 onward, the N.Y.P.D.’s Intelligence Division —
and specifically, the Demographics Unit that was built with the help of
the C.I.A. in the wake of 9/11 — subjected entire neighborhoods to what
the American Civil Liberties Union has called “religious profiling and
suspicionless surveillance.” Plainclothes police officers, so-called
rakers and crawlers, infiltrated mosques, student groups and businesses
ranging from grocery stores to restaurants and hookah cafes, in an
attempt to compile information on Muslim “hot spots.” They listened in
on private conversations, and reported back on the most innocuous of
sermons.
The Demographics Unit was disbanded in 2014 by Mr. Kelly’s successor as
commissioner, William J. Bratton. Responding earlier this year to a
proposal by Ted Cruz, then running for the Republican presidential
nomination, to revive the surveillance program and take it nationwide,
Mr. Bratton advised the Texas senator to “shut up,” affirming that there
was “not one actionable piece of intelligence that came out of that unit.”
What the program did accomplish was the alienation of American Muslim
communities from law enforcement agencies, creating what a 2013 report
from the City University of New York School of Law called “a pervasive
climate of fear and suspicion.” Is this record of failure and
divisiveness really what Mr. King wants to re-up?
But if Mr. King’s concern is with terrorism, it seems highly selective.
Despite loudly denouncing acts of terrorism committed by Muslims, the
representative from Long Island, who is the grandson of Irish Catholic
immigrants to the United States, had little issue with terrorist attacks
carried out by Irish nationalists.
In fact, starting in the early 1980s, Mr. King publicly campaigned on
behalf of Noraid, the Irish-American fund-raising organization long
regarded as a front for the Provisional Irish Republican Army. In 1981,
a United States District Court judge ruled that there was
“uncontroverted evidence” that Noraid was “an agent of the I.R.A.,
providing money and services for other than relief purposes.”
EDITORS’ PICKS
The ISIS Files: When Terrorists Run City Hall
How Cambridge Analytica Exploited the Facebook Data of Millions
Many People Taking Antidepressants Find They Cannot Quit
Mr. King was not only a tireless fund-raiser for Noraid but also an open
defender of the I.R.A., which he called a “legitimate force.” In 1987, a
State Department report called the I.R.A. “a deadly terrorist group
unconcerned about innocent bystanders.”
According to the Irish journalist Ed Moloney, when Mr. King attended
I.R.A. murder trials in Northern Ireland in the 1980s, “the police
singled him out for thorough body searches.” On one occasion, the
Republican politician was removed from a Belfast courtroom because, the
judge said, “he was an obvious collaborator with the I.R.A.”
To be fair, Mr. King — who once referred to himself as “the Ollie North
of Ireland” — has in recent years confessed to having “cooled” on Irish
issues. He has also claimed that his links to the I.R.A. have been
“distorted.”
Yet how would the congressman have responded if a federal surveillance
program had been carried out against Irish-American communities in the
1980s, at the height of the conflict in Northern Ireland? (During the
three decades of the Troubles, the I.R.A. killed about 1,800 civilians,
police officers and soldiers.)
Imagine if, according to the program Mr. King so admires, the N.Y.P.D.
had staked out Irish bars and restaurants, while the Boston Police
Department had spied on Irish grocery stores. Or if St. Patrick’s Day
parades had been used as an opportunity for police departments to gather
intelligence and identify activists in Irish-American communities. Or if
“moderate” church leaders, like the cardinals of the United States
Conference of Catholic Bishops, had been expected to attend hearings in
Congress and denounce terrorism, while undercover F.B.I. agents were
sent to infiltrate Sunday Mass and keep an eye out for any extremist
preaching.
Wouldn’t Mr. King have objected as loudly, and with as much legitimacy,
as American Muslim community leaders do today over dragnet surveillance
operations?
The truth is that what American Muslim communities in New York had to
endure was a historic injustice. In their 2015 ruling in a lawsuit over
the N.Y.P.D.’s program, judges in the United States Court of Appeals for
the Third Circuit compared it to the discrimination faced by “Jewish
Americans during the Red Scare, African-Americans during the Civil
Rights movement, and Japanese-Americans during World War II.”
No doubt, Mr. King expected a sympathetic hearing for his idea from Mr.
Trump, who has entertained the idea of a “Muslim registry,” or database,
and has promised to ramp up surveillance. The president-elect should
look carefully at the records both of the program and its booster, and
declare his rejection of both.
>
> I_love_ watching Full Frontal. Sam kicks ass!
You are exactly the type of low-life bottom feeder that would think a
profane racist slut like Bee would be the least bit funny. Congrats Bozo.
https://postimg.cc/image/qzs5nrzcf/
https://postimg.cc/image/ov7smpkv3/
https://postimg.cc/image/lbluwx5an/
https://postimg.cc/image/6fnbparb3/
https://postimg.cc/image/mqnflnltb/
https://postimg.cc/image/srl4ipdkf/
https://postimg.cc/image/5q4jczghr/
https://postimg.cc/image/kyugqqfb3/