> Personally, I've got waayyyy too much $$$ invested in FSX to dump it, and
> with my new barn burner Falcon North West PC, it's a pure joy. Tried the
> early P3D and was totally underwhelmed.... No interest in the X thing as
> long as FSX keeps me happy... But, I'm easy... :)
The X thing is moving faster than P3D. The enthusiasm with the sim being
open to all to contribute is amazing. There are some clever buggers out
there and it's so easy to produce your own scenery
I should do your Warthoggs field to show you
Anyway I've just downloaded seasonal trees to replace default. Anything you
download you just drag straight into the relative folder and it works. No
scenic library to configure.
Still enjoying FSX which I find is a lot easier. Take off an you are on a
rising safe highway. With XPlane you catch the drop, check the roll hold the
surge. Pick up your coffee and it's all over - can't do that at this point.
On reading some forums the roll is overdone and this bug needs rewriting.
Can't beat the PMDG 737 and the natural looking Orbx scenery in FSX. Objects
are seen further away in XPL. The general comments are that FSX airfield are
too easily seen and stand out with its glaring vasi's. The airfield blend
better in XPL but easy for visual guys to get lost.
With FSX I still get some textures like Vasi's going into black squares also
some grid textures doing likewise at time ie out at sea or a block in the
distance. I don't know if that is my system or what.
I think FSX impresses people (watching over your shoulder) more. It just
looks more natural in non scenic areas but turn off your add on's such as
Orbx and it's real shitty. Scenic area such as lakes and mountains XPlane
can be gob smacking.
Anyway DrP you sound as if your system is what perhaps what I should be
chasing after 4 years of pretty good gear. Frame rates are coming down with
the more I plant into the two sims.
So could you describe what you are driving there inside the PC tower or are
you gonna tell me to mind my own Falcon business??
:-)
Butts