Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
and lo, i beheld a pale horse..
30 views
Skip to first unread message
e.g. krebs
Aug 28, 2015, 3:28:00 PM8/28/15
to
it's been a while. had to compile a command-line
client to even get back in (tin 2.2.1). what've
I been up to? stuff. nanowrimo, for example.
wrote a novel in 2012 called 'from within'. it
is officially available from amazon, but others
stores seem to be reselling it for a profit.
client to even get back in (tin 2.2.1). what've
I been up to? stuff. nanowrimo, for example.
wrote a novel in 2012 called 'from within'. it
is officially available from amazon, but others
stores seem to be reselling it for a profit.
DG
Aug 30, 2015, 4:46:04 PM8/30/15
to
ervaqre schreef op 29-8-2015 20:36:
> 你舌头太长了，孩子！
>
I haven't been 16 in a long while, the RRRRR is wrong on that. And I'm
not Gene Simmons either.
--
Danny.
>
I haven't been 16 in a long while, the RRRRR is wrong on that. And I'm
not Gene Simmons either.
--
Danny.
DG
Sep 1, 2015, 2:31:33 AM9/1/15
to
ervaqre schreef op 1-9-2015 1:51:
> unrelated nonsense. Poor Esben will be totally confused, not having
> been to Aglami for more than 10 years. He might even think this place
> has become a House for the Drunkards and Salty Lunatics!
>
You mean crazy pirates? Seems on topic, sorta, even.
--
Danny.
>>>
>>> 你舌头太长了，孩子！
>>>
>> I haven't been 16 in a long while, the RRRRR is wrong on that. And I'm
>> not Gene Simmons either.
>
> I don't believe this is the thread where we reply with totally
>>> 你舌头太长了，孩子！
>>>
>> I haven't been 16 in a long while, the RRRRR is wrong on that. And I'm
>> not Gene Simmons either.
>
> unrelated nonsense. Poor Esben will be totally confused, not having
> been to Aglami for more than 10 years. He might even think this place
> has become a House for the Drunkards and Salty Lunatics!
>
You mean crazy pirates? Seems on topic, sorta, even.
--
Danny.
Pixel "#~
Sep 2, 2015, 2:17:19 PM9/2/15
to
--
pixel
"This song is for the guy who keeps
yelling from the balcony, and it's
called 'we hate you, please die."
DG
Sep 10, 2015, 4:40:38 PM9/10/15
to
ervaqre schreef op 10-9-2015 11:00:
> the [OT]-tag was the best invention ever.
>
No [OT]-tag, that was unusually foresighted. Then again, if a thread
goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on
topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of
probability.
--
Danny.
>>> I don't believe this is the thread where we reply with totally
>>> unrelated nonsense. Poor Esben will be totally confused, not having
>>> been to Aglami for more than 10 years. He might even think this place
>>> has become a House for the Drunkards and Salty Lunatics!
>>>
>> You mean crazy pirates? Seems on topic, sorta, even.
>
> I guess that's why this thread doesn't have an [OT]-tag. Seriously,
>>> unrelated nonsense. Poor Esben will be totally confused, not having
>>> been to Aglami for more than 10 years. He might even think this place
>>> has become a House for the Drunkards and Salty Lunatics!
>>>
>> You mean crazy pirates? Seems on topic, sorta, even.
>
> the [OT]-tag was the best invention ever.
>
No [OT]-tag, that was unusually foresighted. Then again, if a thread
goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on
topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of
probability.
--
Danny.
Pixel "#~
Sep 19, 2015, 10:11:34 AM9/19/15
to
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:01:17 +0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
Someone who never came back?
Luke?
wrote:
>>>it's been a while. had to compile a command-line
>>>client to even get back in (tin 2.2.1). what've
>>>I been up to? stuff. nanowrimo, for example.
>>>wrote a novel in 2012 called 'from within'. it
>>>is officially available from amazon, but others
>>>stores seem to be reselling it for a profit.
>>
>> OMG
>
>Whose job was it again to say: "They all come back! BWAAHAHAHA!!" ?
>>>it's been a while. had to compile a command-line
>>>client to even get back in (tin 2.2.1). what've
>>>I been up to? stuff. nanowrimo, for example.
>>>wrote a novel in 2012 called 'from within'. it
>>>is officially available from amazon, but others
>>>stores seem to be reselling it for a profit.
>>
>> OMG
>
Someone who never came back?
Luke?
Pixel "#~
Sep 19, 2015, 10:12:43 AM9/19/15
to
DG
Sep 19, 2015, 10:34:08 AM9/19/15
to
Pixel "#~ schreef op 19-9-2015 16:12:
--
Danny.
>>>> You mean crazy pirates? Seems on topic, sorta, even.
>>>
>>> I guess that's why this thread doesn't have an [OT]-tag. Seriously,
>>> the [OT]-tag was the best invention ever.
>>>
>> No [OT]-tag, that was unusually foresighted. Then again, if a thread
>> goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on
>> topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of
>> probability.
>
> The [OT}-tag was for post that were _on_ topic, wasn't it?
>
>
OT! Not OT. Oh, wait, that was pine.
>>>
>>> I guess that's why this thread doesn't have an [OT]-tag. Seriously,
>>> the [OT]-tag was the best invention ever.
>>>
>> No [OT]-tag, that was unusually foresighted. Then again, if a thread
>> goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on
>> topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of
>> probability.
>
> The [OT}-tag was for post that were _on_ topic, wasn't it?
>
>
--
Danny.
DG
Dec 30, 2015, 6:16:36 AM12/30/15
to
ervaqre schreef op 30-12-2015 2:20:
> [PINE] tag so that I can filter all threads about pine? There! I did
> it. It's official now. So talk about pine all you want!
>
Of course when we're not talking about pine, but pine, we don't need the
[PINE] tag. So good thing I removed it. We wouldn't want you to miss out.
--
Danny.
>>>> No [OT]-tag, that was unusually foresighted. Then again, if a thread
>>>> goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on
>>>> topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of
>>>> probability.
>>>
>>> The [OT}-tag was for post that were _on_ topic, wasn't it?
>>>
>> OT! Not OT. Oh, wait, that was pine.
>
> I am getting so sick of thise pine thing. How about we introduce a
>>>> goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on
>>>> topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of
>>>> probability.
>>>
>>> The [OT}-tag was for post that were _on_ topic, wasn't it?
>>>
>> OT! Not OT. Oh, wait, that was pine.
>
> [PINE] tag so that I can filter all threads about pine? There! I did
> it. It's official now. So talk about pine all you want!
>
Of course when we're not talking about pine, but pine, we don't need the
[PINE] tag. So good thing I removed it. We wouldn't want you to miss out.
--
Danny.
Pixel "#~
Dec 30, 2015, 3:07:14 PM12/30/15
to
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 01:20:19 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:
>>>> No [OT]-tag, that was unusually foresighted. Then again, if a thread
>>>> goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on
>>>> topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of
>>>> probability.
>>>
>>> The [OT}-tag was for post that were _on_ topic, wasn't it?
>>>
>> OT! Not OT. Oh, wait, that was pine.
>
wrote:
>>>> No [OT]-tag, that was unusually foresighted. Then again, if a thread
>>>> goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on
>>>> topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of
>>>> probability.
>>>
>>> The [OT}-tag was for post that were _on_ topic, wasn't it?
>>>
>> OT! Not OT. Oh, wait, that was pine.
>
>I am getting so sick of thise pine thing. How about we introduce a
>[PINE] tag so that I can filter all threads about pine? There! I did
>it. It's official now. So talk about pine all you want!
Why did you spell pine wrong?
>[PINE] tag so that I can filter all threads about pine? There! I did
>it. It's official now. So talk about pine all you want!
Pixel "#~
Dec 30, 2015, 3:08:33 PM12/30/15
to
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 01:25:11 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:
>>>Whose job was it again to say: "They all come back! BWAAHAHAHA!!" ?
>>
>> Someone who never came back?
>>
>> Luke?
>
>How about we start the Furious Aglamian Retrieval Team, the FART. Then
>we locate all Aglamians who never came back, abduct them and then put
>them in little boxes underneath the sink. OK SO HOW ABOUT IT!! I AM
>GETTING ALL EXCITED!! WHOO!!
>
>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
I like that.
Acronym of the day...
wrote:
>>>Whose job was it again to say: "They all come back! BWAAHAHAHA!!" ?
>>
>> Someone who never came back?
>>
>> Luke?
>
>we locate all Aglamians who never came back, abduct them and then put
>them in little boxes underneath the sink. OK SO HOW ABOUT IT!! I AM
>GETTING ALL EXCITED!! WHOO!!
>
>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
I like that.
Acronym of the day...
Pixel "#~
Dec 30, 2015, 4:47:39 PM12/30/15
to
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:08:36 +0100, "Pixel \"#~" <m...@me.com> wrote:
>>> Someone who never came back?
>>>
>>> Luke?
>>
>>How about we start the Furious Aglamian Retrieval Team, the FART. Then
>>we locate all Aglamians who never came back, abduct them and then put
>>them in little boxes underneath the sink. OK SO HOW ABOUT IT!! I AM
>>GETTING ALL EXCITED!! WHOO!!
>>
>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>
>Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>I like that.
>Acronym of the day...
Oh, and Mike Ball asks if that is a APF-department..
>>> Someone who never came back?
>>>
>>> Luke?
>>
>>How about we start the Furious Aglamian Retrieval Team, the FART. Then
>>we locate all Aglamians who never came back, abduct them and then put
>>them in little boxes underneath the sink. OK SO HOW ABOUT IT!! I AM
>>GETTING ALL EXCITED!! WHOO!!
>>
>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>
>Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>I like that.
>Acronym of the day...
DG
Jan 2, 2016, 4:36:06 AM1/2/16
to
ervaqre schreef op 2-1-2016 2:37:
> [PINE] tag once more. After all, this thread is about pine. Next time
> you want to talk about pine rather than pine, please learn how to
> spell. It is 'pine' and not 'pine'!!!!
>
Damn you! Auto correct!!!
--
Danny.
>>>> OT! Not OT. Oh, wait, that was pine.
>>>
>>> I am getting so sick of thise pine thing. How about we introduce a
>>> [PINE] tag so that I can filter all threads about pine? There! I did
>>> it. It's official now. So talk about pine all you want!
>>>
>> Of course when we're not talking about pine, but pine, we don't need the
>> [PINE] tag. So good thing I removed it. We wouldn't want you to miss out.
>
> Since you talked about pine instead of pine, I had to insert the
>>>
>>> I am getting so sick of thise pine thing. How about we introduce a
>>> [PINE] tag so that I can filter all threads about pine? There! I did
>>> it. It's official now. So talk about pine all you want!
>>>
>> Of course when we're not talking about pine, but pine, we don't need the
>> [PINE] tag. So good thing I removed it. We wouldn't want you to miss out.
>
> [PINE] tag once more. After all, this thread is about pine. Next time
> you want to talk about pine rather than pine, please learn how to
> spell. It is 'pine' and not 'pine'!!!!
>
Damn you! Auto correct!!!
--
Danny.
DG
Jan 2, 2016, 4:36:52 AM1/2/16
to
ervaqre schreef op 2-1-2016 2:38:
>
Good job ignoring it.
--
Danny.
>>>> OT! Not OT. Oh, wait, that was pine.
>>>
>>> I am getting so sick of thise pine thing. How about we introduce a
>>> [PINE] tag so that I can filter all threads about pine? There! I did
>>> it. It's official now. So talk about pine all you want!
>>
>> Why did you spell pine wrong?
>
> This thread has the official Aglami [PINE] tag. I am ignoring it!
>>>
>>> I am getting so sick of thise pine thing. How about we introduce a
>>> [PINE] tag so that I can filter all threads about pine? There! I did
>>> it. It's official now. So talk about pine all you want!
>>
>> Why did you spell pine wrong?
>
>
Good job ignoring it.
--
Danny.
Kasper
Jan 2, 2016, 11:48:31 AM1/2/16
to
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 01:50:19 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:
>Pixel "#~ is a mighty pirate...
>You do realize the penalty for that is DEATH, don't you?
We have a parallel Aglami on Facebook. Didn't you know?
--
Kasper
wrote:
>Pixel "#~ is a mighty pirate...
>
>>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>>
>>>Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>>>I like that.
>>>Acronym of the day...
>>
>> Oh, and Mike Ball asks if that is a APF-department..
>
>Okay, so you communicate with Aglamians outside of Aglami?
>>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>>
>>>Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>>>I like that.
>>>Acronym of the day...
>>
>> Oh, and Mike Ball asks if that is a APF-department..
>
>You do realize the penalty for that is DEATH, don't you?
We have a parallel Aglami on Facebook. Didn't you know?
--
Kasper
Pixel "#~
Jan 3, 2016, 12:04:16 PM1/3/16
to
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 01:50:19 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:
>>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>>
>>>Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>>>I like that.
>>>Acronym of the day...
>>
>> Oh, and Mike Ball asks if that is a APF-department..
>
>Anyway, ask him if he still has my weewaa site please, the one with
>the epileptic attack, the list of people going to Mafraan and the glow
>in the dark menu at the bottom. I seem to have lost that wonderful
>piece of art and I believe he keeps a .zip copy of it in his
>underpants.
Question sent.
wrote:
>>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>>
>>>Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>>>I like that.
>>>Acronym of the day...
>>
>> Oh, and Mike Ball asks if that is a APF-department..
>
>Okay, so you communicate with Aglamians outside of Aglami?
>You do realize the penalty for that is DEATH, don't you?
I communicate with you outside of Aglami, don't I?
>You do realize the penalty for that is DEATH, don't you?
>Anyway, ask him if he still has my weewaa site please, the one with
>the epileptic attack, the list of people going to Mafraan and the glow
>in the dark menu at the bottom. I seem to have lost that wonderful
>piece of art and I believe he keeps a .zip copy of it in his
>underpants.
Question sent.
Pixel "#~
Jan 3, 2016, 12:05:00 PM1/3/16
to
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 17:48:30 +0100, Kasper <nos...@thanks.com> wrote:
>>>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>>>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>>>
>>>>Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>>>>I like that.
>>>>Acronym of the day...
>>>
>>> Oh, and Mike Ball asks if that is a APF-department..
>>
>>Okay, so you communicate with Aglamians outside of Aglami?
>>You do realize the penalty for that is DEATH, don't you?
>
>We have a parallel Aglami on Facebook. Didn't you know?
Yeah, there is like a group thing that nobody ever posts to.
>>>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>>>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>>>
>>>>Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>>>>I like that.
>>>>Acronym of the day...
>>>
>>> Oh, and Mike Ball asks if that is a APF-department..
>>
>>Okay, so you communicate with Aglamians outside of Aglami?
>>You do realize the penalty for that is DEATH, don't you?
>
>We have a parallel Aglami on Facebook. Didn't you know?
It's like almost exactly like the real Aglami in that way...
Pixel "#~
Jan 3, 2016, 12:05:26 PM1/3/16
to
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 01:38:57 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:
>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>
>> Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>> I like that.
>> Acronym of the day...
>
>Okay, now get to work! Throw your baby aside and be a real ultimate
>detective! We need to retrieve those who never returned!!
Well, _WHO_ never returned?
wrote:
>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>
>> Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>> I like that.
>> Acronym of the day...
>
>detective! We need to retrieve those who never returned!!
Well, _WHO_ never returned?
Kasper
Jan 5, 2016, 3:21:10 PM1/5/16
to
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:05:31 +0100, "Pixel \"#~" <m...@me.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 01:38:57 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
>wrote:
>
>>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>>
>>> Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>>> I like that.
>>> Acronym of the day...
>>
>>Okay, now get to work! Throw your baby aside and be a real ultimate
>>detective! We need to retrieve those who never returned!!
>
>Well, _WHO_ never returned?
They always come back.
>On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 01:38:57 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
>wrote:
>
>>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour
>>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>>
>>> Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>>> I like that.
>>> Acronym of the day...
>>
>>Okay, now get to work! Throw your baby aside and be a real ultimate
>>detective! We need to retrieve those who never returned!!
>
>Well, _WHO_ never returned?
--
Kasper
0 new messages