Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Gone?
9 views
Skip to first unread message
Shenanigunner
Sep 29, 2012, 12:05:05 PM9/29/12
to
So are any of the oldsters still tapped in here?
George Johnson
Sep 30, 2012, 7:17:25 AM9/30/12
to
"Shenanigunner" <n...@NOnitrosyncreticSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA0DD7AEEF1095...@94.75.214.39...
Seems most everyone migrated to website forums or other forms of
immediate communications (with less archive permanance).
news:XnsA0DD7AEEF1095...@94.75.214.39...
> So are any of the oldsters still tapped in here?
Well, nobody else but you and I have posted for literally months.
Seems most everyone migrated to website forums or other forms of
immediate communications (with less archive permanance).
Shenanigunner
Oct 3, 2012, 3:03:41 PM10/3/12
to
"George Johnson" <matr...@charter.net> wrote in news:maX9s.3043$PN3.918
@newsfe20.iad:
Some of the old schoolers still responded to posts here as recently as
about a year ago. Thought some of them might have seen the smoke signals or
checked in with the news about CoX.
Time to delete XNews, too, I guess.
I never could get into the web forums - too garish and hard to read, and
too loaded with... users interested in everything but discussion.
Ave atque vale.
@newsfe20.iad:
about a year ago. Thought some of them might have seen the smoke signals or
checked in with the news about CoX.
Time to delete XNews, too, I guess.
I never could get into the web forums - too garish and hard to read, and
too loaded with... users interested in everything but discussion.
Ave atque vale.
Brian Palmer
Oct 13, 2012, 1:48:43 AM10/13/12
to
Shenanigunner <n...@NOnitrosyncreticSPAM.com> writes:
> "George Johnson" <matr...@charter.net> wrote in news:maX9s.3043$PN3.918
> @newsfe20.iad:
>
>> "Shenanigunner" <n...@NOnitrosyncreticSPAM.com> wrote in message
>> news:XnsA0DD7AEEF1095...@94.75.214.39...
>>> So are any of the oldsters still tapped in here?
>>
>> Well, nobody else but you and I have posted for literally months.
>> Seems most everyone migrated to website forums or other forms of
>> immediate communications (with less archive permanance).
>
> Some of the old schoolers still responded to posts here as recently as
> about a year ago. Thought some of them might have seen the smoke signals or
> checked in with the news about CoX.
Well, some of us are just bad about checking in regularly :) The news
> "George Johnson" <matr...@charter.net> wrote in news:maX9s.3043$PN3.918
> @newsfe20.iad:
>
>> "Shenanigunner" <n...@NOnitrosyncreticSPAM.com> wrote in message
>> news:XnsA0DD7AEEF1095...@94.75.214.39...
>>> So are any of the oldsters still tapped in here?
>>
>> Well, nobody else but you and I have posted for literally months.
>> Seems most everyone migrated to website forums or other forms of
>> immediate communications (with less archive permanance).
>
> Some of the old schoolers still responded to posts here as recently as
> about a year ago. Thought some of them might have seen the smoke signals or
> checked in with the news about CoX.
is a hard blow :(
--
I'm awfully glad I'm a Beta, because I don't work so hard.
0 new messages