I lost them
--
If I could make a list, of my mistakes and regrets, I'd put your name on
top, and every line after it
--
If I could make a list, of my mistakes and regrets, I'd put your name on
top, and every line after it
"mackem" <mac...@sunderland.ndo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9ldpcf$8m2f6$1...@ID-48435.news.dfncis.de...
>
> "Gee" <evil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2pne7.7$_j3....@news.enterprise.net...
> > any chance of those 2 tactics nakano and dagger?
>
sorry
Gee
--
If I could make a list, of my mistakes and regrets, I'd put your name on
top, and every line after it
"mackem" <mac...@sunderland.ndo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9ldpcf$8m2f6$1...@ID-48435.news.dfncis.de...
>
> "Gee" <evil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2pne7.7$_j3....@news.enterprise.net...
> > any chance of those 2 tactics nakano and dagger?
>
Did you unlock it first?
--
Morten
---
"I stay away from that kind of food [junk food] as i already have a big
arse" - Clayton Zane
--
If I could make a list, of my mistakes and regrets, I'd put your name on
top, and every line after it
"Morten Galåsen" <mor...@frisurf.no> wrote in message
news:LiDe7.2514$Y53....@news1.oke.nextra.no...
thank you very much sir
u r a star
just shove them into the tactics folder of my champ man?
--
If I could make a list, of my mistakes and regrets, I'd put your name on
top, and every line after it
"mackem" <mac...@sunderland.ndo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9lf8vc$90jjr$1...@ID-48435.news.dfncis.de...
>
> "Gee" <evil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:IXAe7.21$_j3....@news.enterprise.net...
> > that site isn't loading for me
>
> i don't understand why.
>
> i'm using cis.dfn which is binary unfriendly. Reply if this mail
doesn't have the tactics.
>
>
>
Oi, sod off you binary posting sporn of the devil :o)
No seriously, couldn't you have e-mail them to him or posted them on the
binaries group?
Baggers
--
Evil Overlord Rule 155.
If I know of any heroes in the land, I will not under any circumstance kill
their mentors, teachers, and/or best friends.
Gee
--
If I could make a list, of my mistakes and regrets, I'd put your name on
top, and every line after it
"Baggers" <bag...@dobbers.f9.co.uk> wrote in message
news:s0He7.6379$NE.380664@wards...
No, but you'll be advised to pull on your asbestos y-fronts if you start
posting shit like that.
It's a waste of bandwidth. One binary will take up the same amount of news
server
space as hundreds of text posts.
Besides, if the person who requested the files in the first place is using
Freeserve or a
similar ISP, he won't see them anyway.
> will the world crumble into dust because he did this one thing?
I wouldn't bother Gee. If you miss out a full stop, then you'll bring the NG
to it's knees...
;o)
--
Dave
Try walking in my shoes,
You'll stumble in my footsteps.
--
Andy Smith aka Smiggs
Visit http://www.cmbelgium.net
and the newly revamped www.smiggsonline.co.uk
posting binaries is a waste of time , there not allowed here , mainly due to
the size and the fact that many people wont see them as their ISP filters
them out of non binarie groups. Thats why we have a binaries group
--
Decado [I.C.Q : 70083888 : I.R.C : #agcm (UnderNet)]
'I'd be surprised if all 22 players are on the field at the end of the
game - one's already been sent off.'
GEORGE BEST
>will the world crumble into dust because he did this one thing?
world ? what is this ?
--
MrT aka BA Baracus
toma...@clara.coz.uk (remove the z to reply)
ICQ# 16687608
alt.games.champ-man FAQ is at: http://www.agcm.co.uk/
Visit the #agcm IRC Channel on Undernet (London or Surrey will do)
A fictional entity that some people think exists outside the CM universe.
Baggers
--
Evil Overlord Rule 156.
If I have the hero and his party trapped, I will not wait until my Super
weapon charges to finish them off if more conventional means are available.
>MrT <toma...@clara.coz.uk> wrote in message
>news:p172otc8pbtqspk9r...@news.claranews.com...
>> On the day of Thu, 16 Aug 2001 04:33:58 +0100, "Gee"
>> <evil...@hotmail.com> headbutted their keyboard, producing the
>> following drivel, found in <JcHe7.9$%r3....@news.enterprise.net>:
>>
>> >will the world crumble into dust because he did this one thing?
>>
>> world ? what is this ?
>
>A fictional entity that some people think exists outside the CM universe.
>
>Baggers
outside, what is this?
"Baggers" <bag...@dobbers.f9.co.uk> wrote in message
news:s0He7.6379$NE.380664@wards...
They are still binaries which can carry viruses, double the amount that
people have to download (I have a slow collection, everything takes its
time), most people will not see it and it is a breach of netiquette you evil
top poster.
Baggers
--
Evil Overlord Rule 157.
Whenever plans are drawn up that include a time-table, I'll post-date the
completion 3 days after it's actually scheduled to occur and not worry too
much if they get stolen.
> Jonno <jonno...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b82e...@mk-nntp-1.news.uk.worldonline.com...
> > They're not very big you know!
>
> They are still binaries which can carry viruses, double the amount that
> people have to download (I have a slow collection, everything takes its
> time), most people will not see it and it is a breach of netiquette
I agree with all that...
> you evil top poster.
AAAAARRRGGGHHHHHH!!!!!! You're obsessed man!
You say it like it is bad.
not top posting
I shall shoot myself now
Gee
"Smiggs" <An...@spamfreesmith.karoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:tnnf0eb...@corp.supernews.co.uk...
have a cookie for being so quick off the mark
Gee
"Baggers" <bag...@dobbers.f9.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dLZg7.10620$Bp3.151073@news2-hme0...
Please do.
--
Stephen
http://boingfc.cjb.net
The WBA Internet Football Team
no really
I want to know more of your witty retorts
Gee
"Jack Cake" <spam...@jackcake.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9mtqn8$5pk$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
Good that you gave it to him, then. You obviously aren't.
(Hint: He was replying to the person who said that he was obsessed.)
--
Chigbo Ikejiani <shadow...@telusplanet.net>
Watching from the shadowed wings of life's stage.
Nemo me impune lacessit.
Stick around, no doubt as I type one of your equally retarded friends
will be sending somethnig as utterly awe-inspiring as "Yer mom" to the
group.
Brian
I have the internet
Gee
P.S. Your mother
"Brian Crowley" <b...@northfieldbham.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Snvk7.12591$Bp3.176902@news2-hme0...
Gee
"Chigbo Ikejiani" <shadow...@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.15fc2bf27...@news.cis.dfn.de...
if you are going to have an agrument about mothers, can you at least stop
the top posting!
I do not see the point of bottom posting
I find it very annoying
Gee
"damon.fleming" <damon_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:n3wk7.28607$wX5.3...@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com...
The point? It makes a thread much easier to follow. You wouldn't
read a book from back to front. Nor would you follow a newsgroup
thread from bottom to top, which is what you're doing when you
top post.
> I find it very annoying
Much like you then.
nairB
DNAH .DAOF .uoy rof ti etalsnart ot niarb a htiw enoemos dnif nac uoy
dedivorp ,oot gniyonna sihtdnif uoy epoH .uoy ekil stihspid fo derit ma I sa
,gnol eb annog t'nia sihT .niaga ti od ll'I yltnedive dna ,erofeb siht enod
ev'I
That'll be because you're an arsewipe, then.
--
Chew v2001 - reconfigured, reinstalled and SBPCI128 is still s**t.
ICQ: 21234564
IRC: #agcm on Undernet (possibly)
Chewie's Nokia Bits: http://www.chewieuk.org *Visit & Vote*
If it ain't broke, fix it 'til it is.
I hate being patronised, if you know what I mean...
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Then why didn't you congratulate the person who was _agreeing_ with you,
instead of the one who was and apparently still is violently disagreeing
with you?
--
Chigbo Ikejiani <shadow...@telusplanet.net>
Watching from the shadowed wings of life's stage.
"Here's what I know," said the physicist. "If we lived in a microscopic
world, trucks would crash into walls, fly apart and then reassemble
perfectly on the other side of the wall. This has been proven."
nomaD
nairb dias llew
Gee
"Chigbo Ikejiani" <shadow...@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.15fca5abe...@news.cis.dfn.de...
You see, this is how the conversation went:
Baggers to Jonno: "...you evil top poster."
Blue Dave to Baggers: "AAAAARRRGGGHHHHHH!!!!!! You're obsessed man!"
Baggers to Blue Dave: "You say that like it's a bad thing."
You to Baggers: "well done have a cookie for being so quick off the mark"
Now, Baggers is the one who harangues people for top-posting. Had you
been agreeing with him, as appears to be true, you've neatly shot
yourself in the foot. Had you been agreeing with Dave, who apparently
thinks that Baggers is being a little overzealous, you would have replied
to _him_ instead.
This doesn't even make sense if you were being sarcastic, because sarcasm
in your last statement depends on Baggers sincerely thinking that his
zealotry is a bad thing. In a word: No.
Now, has it become inconvenient to follow this conversation yet? Up and
down and up and down and up and down...
That is why you shouldn't top post.
Thank you for your time.
--
Chigbo Ikejiani <shadow...@telusplanet.net>
Watching from the shadowed wings of life's stage.
Far duller than a serpent's tooth it is to spend a quiet youth.
> You see, this is how the conversation went:
>
> Baggers to Jonno: "...you evil top poster."
> Blue Dave to Baggers: "AAAAARRRGGGHHHHHH!!!!!! You're obsessed man!"
> Baggers to Blue Dave: "You say that like it's a bad thing."
> You to Baggers: "well done have a cookie for being so quick off the mark"
>
> Now, Baggers is the one who harangues people for top-posting. Had you
> been agreeing with him, as appears to be true, you've neatly shot
> yourself in the foot. Had you been agreeing with Dave, who apparently
> thinks that Baggers is being a little overzealous, you would have replied
> to _him_ instead.
>
> This doesn't even make sense if you were being sarcastic, because sarcasm
> in your last statement depends on Baggers sincerely thinking that his
> zealotry is a bad thing. In a word: No.
>
> Now, has it become inconvenient to follow this conversation yet? Up and
> down and up and down and up and down...
>
> That is why you shouldn't top post.
>
> Thank you for your time.
nice intelligent well reasoned response , pity it was wasted on a top
posting fucknozzle :)
--
Decado [I.C.Q : 70083888 : I.R.C : #agcm (UnderNet)]
'The teams at the bottom of the premiership are conceding a lot of goals and
that's no coincidence.'
BARRY VENISON
I can't believe all this was caused because you can't spot the lowest form
of wit - sarcasm
I'm going to have to invent an even lower form for you
Gee
"Chigbo Ikejiani" <shadow...@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.15fded276...@news.cis.dfn.de...
nice
Gee
"Decado" <sit...@home.in.a.big.comfy.chair> wrote in message
news:mG5l7.96923$hm3.6...@news1.cableinet.net...
top posting makes a conversation easier to follow because you can see the
response straight away instead of scrolling through all the replies
Gee
"Jack Cake" <spam...@jackcake.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9mubv2$22u$1...@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...
Gee
"Brian Crowley" <b...@northfieldbham.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:iDyk7.12634$Bp3.177690@news2-hme0...
not an arsewipe
excuse me while I don't give a fuck
Gee
"Chewie" <che...@chew.ie> wrote in message
news:MPG.15fce4706...@mammoth.usenet-access.com...
Pros for top posting
Top posting means that people see what you have said without scrowling to
the bottom.
Cons against top posting
There is no reference to what you were talking about. It you are going to
top post, then you might as well snip the rest of the conversation off.
It is bad manners in a group where the general ettiquette
Bottom posting, as some people put it, is actually only slightly less
annoying than top posting. They way that it should be done is to post your
reply under each relivent comment
Pros for "bottom posting"
You can place a reply right under each point or comment made.
People do not have to scroll all over the place to make a thread make sense.
Conversations are easier to follow
It is much easier to clip irrelivent points from a conversation.
It is easier for other people to read and follow the points made in a
conversation when they are not the principles.
Cons against bottom posting
When people mess up and do not clip irrelevent comments and just add things
to the end then it can look messy.
When .sigs are not removed and people post after them things can look a bit
silly.
But since this is officially a non-top posting newsgroup, I would say the
most important reason to not to post is to be polite.
Baggers
--
Evil Overlord Rule 161.
I will occasionally vary my daily routine and not live my life in a rut. For
example, I will not always take a swig of wine or ring a giant gong before
finishing off my enemy.
<stuff clipped>
Woohoo. There was a complete arguement about me and I ignored the thread!
Hoo hum.
Baggers
--
See. By top posting that comment makes no sense without looking at other
posts are scrowling around much more than you normally would.
> top posting makes a conversation easier to follow because you can see the
> response straight away instead of scrolling through all the replies
See my post made below.
Baggers
--
> But since this is officially a non-top posting newsgroup, I would say the
> most important reason to not to post is to be polite.
Polite? You think this NG is polite?
Being flamed for being a newbie, is that polite?
Some people prefer to read top-posts, some prefer bottom-posts. Personally I
couldn't give a flying fuck, it's not the end of the world! Jeez!
--
Dave
Try walking in my shoes,
You'll stumble in my footsteps.
> oh no
>
> not an arsewipe
>
> excuse me while I don't give a fuck
Gee, if I was called that I'd have to go to therapy. Are you sure you ain't
mentally scarred by that? ;o)
I'll rephrase that. Compaired to some other alt. groups, this newsgroup is
polite. We even started for an agcm meetup in real life a few months ago!
That might have been because people wanted to bring weopons though. :o)
Congratulations.
You've made it into my kill file.
Your total lack of understanding of usenet makes it impossible to follow a
fucking word
you're saying.
Your refusal to accept simple directions from people with good intentions
(albeit in some
cases "overzealous") makes you look like, to quote, a total fucknozzle.
Not many people make it into the kill filter - maybe one day, when you learn
to
post correctly, you may make it back out. However I'm not holding my
breath.
John
I am talking about other groups like.
alt.kickme
alt.binaries.kiddiefiddlers
alt.fluff
Now they are real hard core groups.
Baggers
--
Evil Overlord Rule 162.
If I steal something very important to the hero, I will not put it on public
display.
> Baggers <bag...@dobbers.f9.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:URbl7.419$An4.4159@news1-hme0...
> >
> > I'll rephrase that. Compaired to some other alt. groups, this newsgroup is
> > polite. We even started for an agcm meetup in real life a few months ago!
> > That might have been because people wanted to bring weopons though. :o)
>
> I am talking about other groups like.
> alt.binaries.kiddiefiddlers
Really, I wouldn't know, I don't go into those kinds of groups...
>
> "Gee" <evil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uq7l7.10$OE5....@news.enterprise.net...
> > my god
> >
> > I can't believe all this was caused because you can't spot the lowest form
> > of wit - sarcasm
> >
> > I'm going to have to invent an even lower form for you
> >
>
> Congratulations.
>
> You've made it into my kill file.
Gee, will be in total despair now...
He may be hanging himself as we speak!
> Your total lack of understanding of usenet makes it impossible to follow a
> fucking word
> you're saying.
>
> Your refusal to accept simple directions from people with good intentions
> (albeit in some
> cases "overzealous") makes you look like, to quote, a total fucknozzle.
Fucknozzle eh? Would you like to explain what one is?
> Not many people make it into the kill filter - maybe one day, when you learn
> to
> post correctly, you may make it back out. However I'm not holding my
> breath.
Well as he's in you're kill-file, you'll never know will you...
Fuckspanner...
So...I doubt we'd be losing a cure for cancer.
(snip)
> Fucknozzle eh? Would you like to explain what one is?
I'll leave it to your imagination
>
> > Not many people make it into the kill filter - maybe one day, when you
learn
> > to
> > post correctly, you may make it back out. However I'm not holding my
> > breath.
>
> Well as he's in you're kill-file, you'll never know will you...
I do clear it out on the odd occasion.
>
> Fuckspanner...
Not anywhere near as good as fucknozzle.
John
--
Decado [I.C.Q : 70083888 : I.R.C : #agcm (UnderNet)]
'The World Cup is every four years, so it's going to be a perennial
problem.'
GARY LINEKER
You mean that you do go into alt.fluff? What kind of a sick individual are
you? :o)
but that makes no sense?
I doubt you ever will.
But I had to scroll down anyway to see what you were replying to.
Do you read the Editor's replies to letters in magazines before
reading the letter? That is what you're causing everyone else to
do by top-posting.
] Being flamed for being a newbie, is that polite?
Being flamed for being a dickfeatures you mean.
--
#agcm on Undernet - It's the badger.
If I could rap I would, but I'm too fuckin' white.
- Zakk Wylde
] fucknozzle
]
] nice
]
] Gee
What are you replying to?
Sarcasm in human speech is usually conveyed by variations in speaking
tone, facial expressions, and other visual cues. Due to Usenet being a
text-only medium, these are extremely difficult to convey, making sarcasm
a hit-or-miss proposition at best. It's best to make it obvious that
you're employing it. This was not.
You might _also_ note that I was trying to be civil. It makes very little
sense to insult those that are reasonably trying to correct you, while
contradicting yourself upthread by rightly pointing out that the insults
used by some others arguing with you here are both quite immature, and
mostly useless.
("fucknozzle"? Really, people..)
--
Chigbo Ikejiani <shadow...@telusplanet.net>
Watching from the shadowed wings of life's stage.
The mutant alien skull man has a smile for all smiles, an answer for all
answers.
Do I look like I care?
There are millions of arsewipes on this Earth of which you are but one; I
can't do anything about any of them so I don't worry about them.
Gee
--
This was brought to you by the letter V and the number 2
"fløff" <fl...@fluff.net> wrote in message
news:f7saptckmcsbv0fvo...@4ax.com...
Gee
--
This was brought to you by the letter V and the number 2
"Baggers" <bag...@dobbers.f9.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Yc8l7.281$An4.2411@news1-hme0...
Gee
--
This was brought to you by the letter V and the number 2
"Chigbo Ikejiani" <shadow...@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.15ff22389...@news.cis.dfn.de...
block me
see if I cry
Gee
--
This was brought to you by the letter V and the number 2
"Bluebird" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:3b95a3cb...@news.btinternet.com...
Heh, a telling response to reasoned argument, I'd say.
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001 19:40:53 +0100, Blue Dave <horny...@hotmail.com>
> wailed into alt.games.champ-man's microphone:
>
> ] Being flamed for being a newbie, is that polite?
>
> Being flamed for being a dickfeatures you mean.
You've just proved my point...
> > Really, I wouldn't know, I don't go into those kinds of groups...
>
> You mean that you do go into alt.fluff? What kind of a sick individual are
> you? :o)
I thought you made that up...
It only took you three days.
Brian
Ah, now you see, I have a shitty memory. Therefore I had no idea to what
you were replying to, because it was right at the end of your post. If your
reply had been after Dec calling you a fucknozzle, it would have been
clearer. This would also help if I had a newsserver as reliable as BTi
Brian
] decado calling me a fucknozzle
]
] Gee
Can you use proper etiquette and post underneath what you are replying
to, becuase the way you do it makes your posts hard to read. Thanks.
Go on. Say it. Say his mom does? For me? Please?
Brian
I have used usenet for years now and been in countless groups
I am not changing now
Gee
--
This was brought to you by the letter V and the number 2
"fløff" <fl...@fluff.net> wrote in message
news:9m7dptgui4v1f7u6o...@4ax.com...
cheers
another supporter
Gee
--
This was brought to you by the letter V and the number 2
"Brian Crowley" <b...@northfieldbham.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:d9xl7.13098$Bp3.185148@news2-hme0...
you killed her
Gee
--
This was brought to you by the letter V and the number 2
"Brian Crowley" <b...@northfieldbham.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:caxl7.13099$Bp3.185218@news2-hme0...
it's not real so I'm not going to devote my life in order a few cronies will
go 'nice post'
if you don't like it, tough
Gee
--
This was brought to you by the letter V and the number 2
"Chewie" <che...@chew.ie> wrote in message
news:MPG.16008e7b7...@mammoth.usenet-access.com...
Gee
--
This was brought to you by the letter V and the number 2
"Baggers" <bag...@dobbers.f9.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ta8l7.279$An4.2297@news1-hme0...
> Gee <evil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Cr7l7.12$OE5....@news.enterprise.net...
> > but no
>
> See. By top posting that comment makes no sense without looking at other
> posts are scrowling around much more than you normally would.
>
> > top posting makes a conversation easier to follow because you can see
the
> > response straight away instead of scrolling through all the replies
>
> See my post made below.
Gee
--
This was brought to you by the letter V and the number 2
"Decado" <sit...@home.in.a.big.comfy.chair> wrote in message
news:OYcl7.99758$hm3.6...@news1.cableinet.net...
>
> "Gee" <evil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Cr7l7.12$OE5....@news.enterprise.net...
> > but no
> >
> > top posting makes a conversation easier to follow because you can see
the
> > response straight away instead of scrolling through all the replies
> >
> Makes conversation easier ? It may , if your as thick as pigshit and only
> interested in 1 post threads . Try posting where the hell you like in the
> middle of a 50 post discussion thread and watch as it becomes unreadable
> simply because some fuckmuppet doesnt have a basic understanding of usenet
> and/or basic reading structures.
>
> --
> Decado [I.C.Q : 70083888 : I.R.C : #agcm (UnderNet)]
>
> 'The World Cup is every four years, so it's going to be a perennial
> problem.'
> GARY LINEKER
>
>
sorry I was out
I'll do better next time and religiously check it every hour ffs
Gee
--
This was brought to you by the letter V and the number 2
"Brian Crowley" <b...@northfieldbham.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:F4xl7.13097$Bp3.185225@news2-hme0...
Gee
--
This was brought to you by the letter V and the number 2
"Chewie" <che...@chew.ie> wrote in message
news:MPG.15ff847f1...@mammoth.usenet-access.com...
well fuck off back to where you came from then!!! if they will take you, you
fucking arsewipe
> well fuck off back to where you came from then!!! if they will take you, you
> fucking arsewipe
Yeah, like he's gonna fuck off because you said so...
Ah, this is a concept you have failed to grasp. This _is_ real. Unless
you believe that we're all elaborate AIs coded for your amusement?
Since you aren't posting from a hospital, I am forced to assume that you
are capable of some sort of reasonable argument. Perhaps you're only
polite in person. Most netters are. Anonymity allows so many abuses.
Regardless, if civility is nothing more than "bull shit" to you, then you
shall have none. Be thankful for immature insults. They seem right up
your alley, and they'll be all you get, as the voices of reason lose
their patience, as I have.
Don't bother with the artfully composed insult to my mother which I'm
sure your fingers are itching to type as you read this. I won't see it.
<plonk>
--
Chigbo Ikejiani <shadow...@telusplanet.net>
Watching from the shadowed wings of life's stage.
Anything not nailed down is mine. Anything I can pry loose is not nailed
down.
> but bottom posting means you have to scroll to the bottom EVERY time
yes, maybe so, but this is net ettiquette, everyone follows it, because
thats the way it is, so to be a top posting fucknut ruins it all.
the rules are there to keep order, dont make yourself look anymore stupid
than you already are.
--
Red Devil is gone again, back to Captain, bloody nick pinchers.
If you have done 6 impossible things today, visit Milliways
the Restaurant at the End of the Universe.
> Hark, denizens of alt.games.champ-man! On this blessed day of Wed, 5 Sep
> 2001 23:29:03 -0700, Gee chose to regale us with their infinite wisdom
> thusly...
> > equally I spend seconds answering bull shit posts
> >
> > it's not real so I'm not going to devote my life in order a few cronies will
> > go 'nice post'
>
> Ah, this is a concept you have failed to grasp. This _is_ real. Unless
> you believe that we're all elaborate AIs coded for your amusement?
>
> Since you aren't posting from a hospital, I am forced to assume that you
> are capable of some sort of reasonable argument. Perhaps you're only
> polite in person. Most netters are. Anonymity allows so many abuses.
>
> Regardless, if civility is nothing more than "bull shit" to you, then you
> shall have none. Be thankful for immature insults. They seem right up
> your alley, and they'll be all you get, as the voices of reason lose
> their patience, as I have.
>
> Don't bother with the artfully composed insult to my mother which I'm
> sure your fingers are itching to type as you read this. I won't see it.
>
> <plonk>
>
Oh no! Gee will be gutted!
>when you are being smart you might want to put a space between find and this
>
>Gee
a spelling flamer who top posts.... pkb :P
--
MrT aka BA Baracus
toma...@clara.coz.uk (remove the z to reply)
ICQ# 16687608
alt.games.champ-man FAQ is at: http://www.agcm.co.uk/
Visit the #agcm IRC Channel on Undernet (London or Surrey will do)
>well done
>
>have a cookie for being so quick off the mark
>
>Gee
and you, posting a week and a half later, are just as quick? I think
not...
>I missed the start of this thread, so let's see if I got it right.
>Gee is the top posting twat, yes?
correct :)
>fucknozzle
>
>nice
>
<snip>
you really should try snipping once in a while, its good for you,
really...
and have another word for your vocab book:-
fuckmuppet (© Brian Crowley 2001)
...But top posting meens that you need to scroll to the bottom to see what
you are replying to, and then back up to the top. At least by posting below
the message that you are replying to, people can make sense of you message,
what you are replying to, and the messages before hand with out getting
arthritus of the hand or RSI.
Baggers
--
Evil Overlord Rule 162.
If I steal something very important to the hero, I will not put it on public
display.
Chewie wished to add his word to the people who say this this is a bottom
posting group. I think that would have been a very valid point, even though
he made it after a lot of trash that he should of clip first, but he can't
help it. He has a SB128 and they are the worst sound card ever invented. I
think we should have simpathy for people who have that card (Like Chewie and
me).
Baggers
No. It exists. A few agcm members got into a newsgroup creation competion
around a year ago and one of the biggest ones that still exists is
alt.fluff.
/Baggers thinks well and hard.
I know that some newsgroups are officially top posters, but having looked
through a fair number of newsgroups over the past few years, and having read
their FAQs and the official newsgroup user rules and regulations, I know
that the majority of them are anti-topposting and ask people to post beneath
the comment that they are replying to. There are a few exceptions to this
rule, but they are few and far between (or sponsored by ms)
So far we have had the majority of this group come forward and say that they
prefer people posting below the relevant text. Would you please do so in
this newsgroup? Either that or you are calling everyone in this newsgroup
crap, in which case they would have a valid argument for ignoring you and
not paying any attention to the posts you make. This would make anything you
say irrelevant. Since I think that you might have something worth listening
to, can you please not top post from now on.
Gee <evil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sKul7.33$_L5....@news.enterprise.net...
> try and keep your attention up looking through 20 replies before getting
to
> the latest one, especially when all you need is what that person was
> replying to
I apologise humbly. For some strange reason, I look to look at what has been
said before I get involved in an argument with people. I also have to look
through over 100 different conversations in several different newsgroups in
a regular basis. From now on I will try my best to only focus on the post
that you make <that was sarcasm by the way>
I am sorry, but this is not a top posting group. Look at the number of
people you have upset by insisting on top posting. It could be considered as
rude. I would have thought that you would be especially keen on people
quoting the thing they are complaining about before posting below it, or
are you just replying in an aggressive fashion to everyone who posts in a
way that is even the slightest bit negative of top posting?
A case of the pot calling the kettle black? :)
--
Chigbo Ikejiani <shadow...@telusplanet.net>
Watching from the shadowed wings of life's stage.
"How many tentacles has Great Cthulhu got?" "Too many."
If everyone blocks you, then what is the point of posting. If you want to
make a point that is worth listening to when I would suggest making it in a
format that people will listen to. If you look through the world then you
will see that there are many formats that people have to stick to otherwise
they will be ignored. If I want the current thesis that I am working on then
I have to do it to a set pattern. Anything less than what is asked for and
people will not pay any attention to what I say, even if it is
groundbreaking and the greatest things that has ever been said. If I want to
write a column in a newspaper then I have to follow the format said by the
editors. If I do not then he might do anything from re-write it to sack me
and I would have no grounds for complaint if I took it to an industrial
tribunal.