Re: A Conservative Judge Urges Supreme Court to Disqualify Fat Tubby from Office

[Skeeter]

In article <n3VuN.319834$c3Ea....@fx10.iad>,
mike.am...@earthlink.nut says...
>
> On 2/1/2024 12:15 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>
> > In article <mCQuN.377254$p%Mb.3...@fx15.iad>, l...@cap.con says...
> >>
> >> On 2/1/2024 4:31 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> >>> On 1/31/24 21:05, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>> David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote in news:8_
> >>>> 2dnaBz2tuMVyf4n...@giganews.com:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 1/31/24 07:53, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>>>> David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote in
> >>>>>> news:i7qdnVBfmrPHvif4...@giganews.com:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 1/30/24 21:06, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>>>>>> David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote in
> >>>>>>>> news:xl2dnfK7RPTNGCT4...@giganews.com:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> There was no insurrection and there is no evidence that Trump took
> >>>>>>>>> part in the riot.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>        Then why is Trump so desperate to
> >>>>>>>> get immunity for what he did on Jan 6?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Where is your evidence?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>         Ask the grand jury, they saw the
> >>>>>> evidence and indicted him over it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Which is a clear admission that you do not know of any information.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>      I don't need to. You trusted grand jury
> >>>> indictments when it came to Jeffrey Epstein
> >>>> Edward Snowden and Bill Cosby, but Trump,
> >>>> well, it is "merely an indictment"
> >>>
> >>> Did I?
> >>
> >> Yes. What the fuck? You have said these are "nothing" but political
> >> prosecutions. For fuck's sake, you said this only *yesterday*:
> >>
> >> When they engage in politically based prosecutions [of Trump]...
> >>
> >> Also yesterday, you wrote:
> >>
> >> Looking more and more like political persecution.
> >>
> >> And despite being instructed to the contrary, you continue to lie and say there
> >> is no "evidence" supporting the indictments ? which you often stupidly write as
> >> "no 'actual' [sic] evidence."
> >>
> >> You have expressly stated the indictments are "merely" political, which, of
> >> course, they are not. Stop lying.
> >>
> >> And fuck off with your "Did I?" bullshit. *Whenver* someone says that you did or
> >> said something, it is *always* the case that you did or said it. Fuck off.
> >
> > Remember those failed impeachments?
>
> They only failed due to Republiscum/QAnon treason.

Just like the Russian collusion. Failure.