Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

first in 2022

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Captainretro

unread,
Jul 25, 2022, 7:30:20 PM7/25/22
to
if anyone is reading this, beans


MIners of neurons

unread,
Aug 27, 2022, 6:04:17 PM8/27/22
to
On 7/25/2022 5:30 PM, Captainretro wrote:
> if anyone is reading this, beans
>
>


https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html

Wills' claim is without merit.   As we have discussed, the residence is
the one and only “occupied structure” under the facts of this case.  
Had Wills' trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it
would have been overruled.

Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because
there was no legal basis for the motion or objection.   See State v.
Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was not
ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit).

IV. Disposition.

We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues.

AFFIRMED.

WIGGINS, Justice.

0 new messages