Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Brett Kimberlin: Liberals Embrace Convicted Criminal as Their Own

7 views
Skip to first unread message

The Revd

unread,
May 29, 2012, 11:22:58 AM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 08:11:28 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On May 28, 2:24�pm, Kulin <remai...@reece.net.au> wrote:
>> Looks like a left-wing, wannabe murderer and convicted domestic terrorist has
>> decided to start threatening several conservative bloggers over their posts
>> about his violent past. The scumbag in question, one Brett Kimberlin, even found
>> the home phone number of one of these bloggers and left a veiled threat to the
>> man�s wife and family.
>>
>> Robert Stacy McCain of The Other McCain has vacated his house for a while just
>> in case this convicted bomber decides to come calling. I�d say Robert observed a
>> good precaution since this monster called his house and threatened his wife and
>> family and since this leftists is a convicted bomber, and all.
>>
>> For a quick overview of who this creep is, Lee Stranahan made a short
>> introduction video on Brett Kimberlin...
>>
>> Read more about scumbag Brett Kimberlin here:
>>
>> http://wizbangblog.com/2012/05/24/brett-kimberlin-liberals-embrace-co...
>> criminal-as-their-own/
> There is hardly a dime's worth of moral difference between him and
>Anders Breivik.

There is hardly a dime's worth of moral difference between you and any
other rectum sucking gook.

The Revd

unread,
May 29, 2012, 3:35:22 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 10:38:05 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On May 29, 8:11 am, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On May 28, 2:24 pm, Kulin <remai...@reece.net.au> wrote:
>>
>> > Looks like a left-wing, wannabe murderer and convicted domestic terrorist has
>> > decided to start threatening several conservative bloggers over their posts
>> > about his violent past. The scumbag in question, one Brett Kimberlin, even found
>> > the home phone number of one of these bloggers and left a veiled threat to the
>> > man’s wife and family.
>>
>> > Robert Stacy McCain of The Other McCain has vacated his house for a while just
>> > in case this convicted bomber decides to come calling. I’d say Robert observed a
>> > good precaution since this monster called his house and threatened his wife and
>> > family and since this leftists is a convicted bomber, and all.
>>
>> > For a quick overview of who this creep is, Lee Stranahan made a short
>> > introduction video on Brett Kimberlin...
>>
>> > Read more about scumbag Brett Kimberlin here:
>>
>> >http://wizbangblog.com/2012/05/24/brett-kimberlin-liberals-embrace-co...
>> > criminal-as-their-own/
>>
>>    There is hardly a dime's worth of moral difference between him and
>> Anders Breivik.
>>
>>  Michael
> You are a Nazi.

You are calling yourself a Nazi, gook? LOL!!!

No, you are a gook, not a Nazi.

> As a Nazi, you are, above all else

As a craven gook who sucks jew rectums, you are, below all else.

Michael Ejercito

unread,
May 29, 2012, 6:37:16 PM5/29/12
to
You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.

Michael

The Revd

unread,
May 30, 2012, 6:30:41 AM5/30/12
to
YOU are a gook.

> As a Nazi, you are, above all else

As a craven gook who has loyalties only to 'Israel', you are, below
all else.

Michael Ejercito

unread,
May 30, 2012, 11:20:17 AM5/30/12
to
So what, boy?

>
> >   As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> As a craven gook who has loyalties only to 'Israel', you are, below
> all else.
You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

“Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

The Revd

unread,
May 30, 2012, 12:23:45 PM5/30/12
to
On Wed, 30 May 2012 08:20:17 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On May 30, 3:30 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:37:16 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On May 29, 8:22 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 29 May 2012 08:11:28 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >   There is hardly a dime's worth of moral difference between him and
>> >> >Anders Breivik.
>>
>> >> There is hardly a dime's worth of moral difference between you and any
>> >> other rectum sucking gook.
>> >   You are a Nazi.
>>
>> YOU are a gook.
> So what, boy?

WE aks the questions, gook. Geddit? WE aks, YOU answer.

You are a gook.

As a craven gook who sucks jew lies out of jew rectums and
misrepresents them as the truth, you are, below all else.


Michael Ejercito

unread,
May 30, 2012, 3:15:08 PM5/30/12
to
On May 30, 9:23 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 08:20:17 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 30, 3:30 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:37:16 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >   You are a Nazi.
>
> >> YOU are a gook.
> >   So what, boy?
>
> WE aks the questions, gook.  Geddit?  WE aks, YOU answer.
WE also ask the questions, nithing.

>
> You are a gook.
>
> As a craven gook who sucks jew lies out of jew rectums and
> misrepresents them as the truth, you are, below all else.
The following link explains you, boy.

http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-nazi


Michael

The Revd

unread,
May 30, 2012, 4:00:04 PM5/30/12
to
On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:15:08 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On May 30, 9:23 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 08:20:17 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On May 30, 3:30 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:37:16 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >   You are a Nazi.
>>
>> >> YOU are a gook.
>> >   So what, boy?
>>
>> WE aks the questions, gook.  Geddit?  WE aks, YOU answer.
> WE also ask the questions, nithing.

No, you DON'T. WE aks them, YOU answer them.

>>
>> You are a gook.
>>
>> As a craven gook who sucks jew lies out of jew rectums and
>> misrepresents them as the truth, you are, below all else.
> The following link explains you, boy.
>
> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-nazi

This link explains YOU, gook.

http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-gook

Michael Ejercito

unread,
May 30, 2012, 7:37:00 PM5/30/12
to
On May 30, 1:00 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:15:08 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 30, 9:23 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 30 May 2012 08:20:17 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >   So what, boy?
>
> >> WE aks the questions, gook.  Geddit?  WE aks, YOU answer.
> >   WE also ask the questions, nithing.
>
> No, you DON'T.  WE aks them, YOU answer them.
WE also ask the questions, boy.

>
>
>
> >> You are a gook.
>
> >> As a craven gook who sucks jew lies out of jew rectums and
> >> misrepresents them as the truth, you are, below all else.
> >   The following link explains you, boy.
>
> >  http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>
> This link explains YOU, gook.
>
> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
The following article explains your pathology, nithing.

History's oldest hatred

by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
March 11, 2009

http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred

ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so it
is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-
Semitism" -- a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-
hatred -- is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never had
anything to do with Semites or being Semitic. (That is why those who
protest that Arabs cannot be anti-Semitic since "Arabs are Semites
too" speak either from ignorance or disingenuousness.)

Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable and unyielding as
anti-Semitism. "The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan,
religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis
Prager in Why the Jews?, their classic study of anti-Semitism.
"Fascists have accused them of being Communists, and Communists have
branded them capitalists. Jews who live in non-Jewish societies have
been accused of having dual loyalties, while Jews who live in the
Jewish state have been condemned as 'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied,
and rich Jews are resented. Jews have been branded as both rootless
cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews who assimilate have been
called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay together spark hatred
for remaining separate."

So hardy is anti-Semitism, it can flourish without Jews. Shakespeare's
poisonous depiction of the Jewish moneylender Shylock was written for
audiences that had never seen a Jew, all Jews having been expelled
from England more than 300 years earlier. Anti-Semitic bigotry infests
Saudi Arabia, where Jews have not dwelt in at least five centuries;
its malignance is suggested by the government daily Al-Riyadh, which
published an essay claiming that Jews have a taste for "pastries mixed
with human blood."

Esther Confounding Haman (Engraving by Gustave Doré, 1875)
There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the
king:

"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among ... all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it
be written that they be destroyed." After winning royal assent, Haman
makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and destroy all the Jews, the
young and the elderly, children and women, in one day . . . and to
take their property for plunder."

What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism -- just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the
Church or Islam, or their expulsion from so many lands in Europe and
the Middle East, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and
Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the
president of Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state,
when a leader of Hamas vows to kill Jewish children around the world,
when firebombs are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and
Chicago, it is not because Jews deserve to be victimized.

Some Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. The Jewish
people are the object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the
haters' rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What, after all, do those who vilify Jews as greedy
bankers have in common with those who revile them as seditious
Bolsheviks? Nothing, save an irrational obsession with Jews.

At one point in the book of Esther, Haman lets the mask slip. He
boasts to his friends and family of "the glory of his riches, and the
great number of his sons, and everything in which the king had
promoted him and elevated him." Still, he seethes with rage and
frustration: "Yet all this is worthless to me so long as I see
Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate." That is the
unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend in, to
abandon his values, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting
there -- undigested, unassimilated, and for that reason unbearable.

Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat; so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his national identity or his professional achievements.
Ultimately, however, it is the Jew's Jewishness, and the call to
higher standards that it represents, that the anti-Semite cannot
abide.

With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their
role in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures
too, as obsessive and indestructible -- and deadly -- as ever.

(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)

The Revd

unread,
May 31, 2012, 6:11:38 AM5/31/12
to
On Wed, 30 May 2012 16:37:00 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On May 30, 1:00�pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:15:08 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On May 30, 9:23�am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 30 May 2012 08:20:17 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > � So what, boy?
>>
>> >> WE aks the questions, gook. �Geddit? �WE aks, YOU answer.
>> > � WE also ask the questions, nithing.
>>
>> No, you DON'T. �WE aks them, YOU answer them.
> WE also ask the questions, boy.

No, you fucking DON'T, gook. As a craven, subhuman, yellow,
slant-eyed gook, you ANSWER the questions.

>>
>>
>>
>> >> You are a gook.
>>
>> >> As a craven gook who sucks jew lies out of jew rectums and
>> >> misrepresents them as the truth, you are, below all else.
>> > � The following link explains you, boy.
>>
>> > �http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>>
>> This link explains YOU, gook.
>>
>> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
> The following article explains your pathology, nithing.
>
>History's oldest hatred
>
>by Jeff Jacoby

History's oldest REASON for hatred: the God-defying behaviour of jew
assholes such as Jeff Jakobstein.

You are a gook.

As a craven gook whose only loyalties are to 'Israel', you are, below
all else.

Michael Ejercito

unread,
May 31, 2012, 12:05:05 PM5/31/12
to
On May 31, 3:11 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 16:37:00 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 30, 1:00 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:15:08 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > WE also ask the questions, nithing.
>
> >> No, you DON'T. WE aks them, YOU answer them.
> >   WE also ask the questions, boy.
>
> No, you fucking DON'T, gook.
Yes, we DO ask the questions, nithing.

> As a craven, subhuman, yellow,
> slant-eyed gook, you ANSWER the questions.
>
You do not like the answers to your questions, boy.


The following poem was dedicated to you.

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/msg/9a7063668ce49326

THE REVD WENT PODY BIG

The Revd went pody big in the street,
The Revd usually jacks his meat.
Oh that we gun him down,
Because he is a homosexual clown.
He’s a pedophile and an asshole to be,
His main pastime is playing with his pee-pee.
He smells like a sewer and farts real loud,
Of him the gays are very proud.
He molests his hand in an unnatural way.
That is why he’s a queer that is why he is gay.
Everybody hates his guts all the time,
In his ass he stuck a very ripe lime.
He’s a sodomite and a moron that needs to die,
He jacked-off in his mothers cherry pie.
He has zits and pimples all over his face,
He’s a monkey that was kicked out of the human race.
His penis is small,
Not big at all.
He’s an anti-Semitic prick,
With a midget dick.
So if you see the Revd do him one kind deed,
Kick him hard in the gut so out of his mouth he will bleed!

The Revd

unread,
May 31, 2012, 4:17:27 PM5/31/12
to
On Thu, 31 May 2012 09:05:05 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On May 31, 3:11 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 16:37:00 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On May 30, 1:00 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:15:08 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > WE also ask the questions, nithing.
>>
>> >> No, you DON'T. WE aks them, YOU answer them.
>> >   WE also ask the questions, boy.
>>
>> No, you fucking DON'T, gook.
> Yes, we DO ask the questions, nithing.

No, you DON'T aks the questions, gook.

>> As a craven, subhuman, yellow,
>> slant-eyed gook, you ANSWER the questions.
>>
> You do not like the answers to your questions, boy.

*I* decide if I like your gook answers, gook.

>
> The following poem was dedicated to you.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/msg/9a7063668ce49326

You call that incoherent nigger shite a "poem", gook? LOL!

Michael Ejercito

unread,
May 31, 2012, 9:05:14 PM5/31/12
to
On May 31, 1:17 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 09:05:05 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 31, 3:11 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 30 May 2012 16:37:00 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >   WE also ask the questions, boy.
>
> >> No, you fucking DON'T, gook.
> >   Yes, we DO ask the questions, nithing.
>
> No, you DON'T aks the questions, gook.
Yes, we DO, boy.

>
> >> As a craven, subhuman, yellow,
> >> slant-eyed gook, you ANSWER the questions.
>
> >   You do not like the answers to your questions, boy.
>
> *I* decide if I like your gook answers, gook.
If you do not like our answers, that is your problem, nithing.

>
>
>
> >    The following poem was dedicated to you.
>
> >  http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/msg/9a7063668ce49326
>
> You call that incoherent nigger shite a "poem", gook?  LOL!
It describes you, boy.

The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism/msg/744028e4fe196d22

"Why do you think it constitutes animal abuse? If you or I tried to
fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice? It should not
only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative lifestyle.

The fact is that animals are incapable of giving or refusing
consent. To imagine otherwise is a ridiculous anthropomorphism (look
it up, Levinstein). Do we ask animals for their consent before we
kill them and eat them? By comparison, getting fucked is a minor
inconvenience"- The Revd

The Revd

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 6:02:56 AM6/1/12
to
On Thu, 31 May 2012 18:05:14 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On May 31, 1:17 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 May 2012 09:05:05 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On May 31, 3:11 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 30 May 2012 16:37:00 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >   WE also ask the questions, boy.
>>
>> >> No, you fucking DON'T, gook.
>> >   Yes, we DO ask the questions, nithing.
>>
>> No, you DON'T aks the questions, gook.
> Yes, we DO, boy.

No, you fucking DON'T, gook.

>>
>> >> As a craven, subhuman, yellow,
>> >> slant-eyed gook, you ANSWER the questions.
>>
>> >   You do not like the answers to your questions, boy.
>>
>> *I* decide if I like your gook answers, gook.
> If you do not like our answers, that is your problem, nithing.

Greek you and greek your answers, gook.

>> >    The following poem was dedicated to you.
>>
>> >  http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/msg/9a7063668ce49326
>>
>> You call that incoherent nigger shite a "poem", gook?  LOL!
> It describes you, boy.

It's not even English, gook.

> The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.

Sucking jew rectums is YOUR sexual disorientation.

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 11:16:32 AM6/1/12
to
On Jun 1, 3:02 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 18:05:14 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 31, 1:17 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 31 May 2012 09:05:05 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >   You do not like the answers to your questions, boy.
>
> >> *I* decide if I like your gook answers, gook.
> >   If you do not like our answers, that is your problem, nithing.
>
> Greek you and greek your answers, gook.
Your life greeks you, boy.

>
> >> >    The following poem was dedicated to you.
>
> >> >  http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/msg/9a7063668ce49326
>
> >> You call that incoherent nigger shite a "poem", gook?  LOL!
> >   It describes you, boy.
>
> It's not even English, gook.
It is in English, and it describes you, nithing.

>
> > The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.
>
> Sucking jew rectums is YOUR sexual disorientation.
The following ballad was dedicated to you.

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.women/msg/129e843df7563df9

THE BALLAD OF THE REVD {A Tale of a Homosexual}

Oh, the Revd is a funny sort of fellow,
When he’s sucking dick he’s kind of mellow.
Yes, the Revd is a homo and a queer,
And he drinks urine with his beer.
The Revd jacks his dick in broad daylight,
And with men he has no might.
He’s a pervert a deviate and a goy,
And his penis is his favorite toy.
Oh the Revd is a Satanist and a sodomite,
And on his carcass the flies will light.
Oh the Revd’s little peter is very small,
And he smells like a horse’s stall.

{MOVE UP ONE OCTAVE HERE IN THE SONG}

Oh, the Revd is a funny sort of fellow,
When he’s sucking dick he’s kind of mellow.
Like a Muslim he shits in the street,
Then proceeds to jack his meat.
Oh the Revd is a natural born terrorist thing,
And the ladies all laugh at his little ding.
He was fucked in his ass by a bull queer,
And of all good people he does fear.
Because the hackers want to kill him dead,
Because he’s AIDS infected and shits in his bed.
The Revd is a stupid so na fa bitch,
And he has that homosexual twitch.

{MOVE UP ONE MORE OCTAVE HERE IN THE SONG FOR THE FINAL STANZA}

Oh, the Revd is a funny sort of fellow,
When he’s sucking dick he’s kind of mellow.
Well the Revd picks his nose and eats the snot,
And he is descended from a whore that was hot.
He’s related to the murderer Cain,
And in his asshole there will always be pain.
He’s dying of a terrible disease,
And it is the Muslims he wants to appease.
He’s blasphemed the G-d of Israel,
And his body will always have a stink and smell.
We will all sing to G-d real loud,
When the Revd is dead we’ll be proud!

Exocet Missile

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 4:00:11 PM6/1/12
to
In article <eo4hs7lo6dr2frs74...@4ax.com>,
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:

> Fuck you all. If *I* decide that my children will suck
> jew rectums, then suck jew rectums they will. After all,
> they are *my* children. No one protested when my parents
> forced me to suck jew rectums and donkey-dicks.

That your parents did it to you does not mean you're
allowed to do it to your children. You're a sick, evil
bastard.

The Revd

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 7:09:21 AM6/2/12
to
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:16:32 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Jun 1, 3:02 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 May 2012 18:05:14 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On May 31, 1:17 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 31 May 2012 09:05:05 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >   You do not like the answers to your questions, boy.
>>
>> >> *I* decide if I like your gook answers, gook.
>> >   If you do not like our answers, that is your problem, nithing.
>>
>> Greek you and greek your answers, gook.
> Your life greeks you, boy.

The jews whose rectums you suck greek YOUR life, gook.

>>
>> >> >    The following poem was dedicated to you.
>>
>> >> >  http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/msg/9a7063668ce49326
>>
>> >> You call that incoherent nigger shite a "poem", gook?  LOL!
>> >   It describes you, boy.
>>
>> It's not even English, gook.
> It is in English, and it describes you, nithing.

It's in pidgin English niggerbabble and it's meaningless, you
slant-eyed yellow gook bastard.

>>
>> > The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.
>>
>> Sucking jew rectums is YOUR sexual disorientation.
> The following ballad was dedicated to you.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/soc.women/msg/129e843df7563df9

You call that incoherent, drug-fucked niggerbabble a "ballad", gook?
You have shite for brains.

NoSpamAtAll

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 9:21:57 AM6/2/12
to
In article <avsjs7l8p3jva2s5i...@4ax.com>,
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:

[...]

Repetition, shiteating limey bastard.

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 1:07:30 PM6/2/12
to
On Jun 2, 4:18 am, The Peeler <slapp...@themoronicRevd.invalid> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 07:09:21 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
> sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
> farted:
>
> <snip our resident psychopath's usual hysterical and psychotic garbage>
>
> Having your first hysterical hissy fits today already again, "The Rectum"?
> LOL
>
> Is "life" soooo miserable for you?
>
> Obviously it is!
>
> LMAO!
>
> Your master
>
> The Peeler
>
> --
> The top 5 truths about our colostomy bag wearing resident psychopath, aka
> "The Rectum":
>
> the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
> he can't get out of the house anymore,
> he got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
> he can't FUCK anymore,
> he got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!
The following ballad was dedicated to me.

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.veterans/msg/2a544ba4f0e8fc91

Well Michael is the guardian angel of Israel,
He tackles the anti-Semites that stink and smell,
He attacks them for what they are,
And he’s not a drunk sitting in a bar,
He rebuffs the Nazi and heathen scum,
He a clean sort of fellow and not a bum.
He’s courageous and brave as can be,
And he chastises the Revd for jacking his pee-pee.
Now we all know Michael is a good guy,
As we laugh at the anti-Semitics that step in cow-pie.
Well Michael Ejercito is an honorable man,
As he out smarts the Nazis of the Klu-Klux-Klan.
If he is a Jew or if he’s not,
He’s unlike the Revd that jacks his pecker snot.
Yes Michael seems to be a pretty good dude,
His mind is clean but the Revd’s is lude.
Michael we’re glad you’re on our side,
You’re a good example of Jewish pride.
The anti-Semites and the Huns are mad,
However, Michael when you post you makes people feel glad.
Dear Mike, Keep up the good work and remain well in mind and body,
While the Revd jacks his meat and washes in his pody.
Well that is all I have to say about Michael Ejercito the Gebor (גבר)
The Revd is a homo and his wife is a whore.
0 new messages