You ( Eric Gisse, “would be” net·cop ) imagined: “ Relf's site is still down, too. ”. No, YOU LOST and FastMail.FM* won. ( *: running nginx on Linux ) Thanks for the promotion; I'd return the favor but... you don't have a web·site... LOSER ! WORSE, you can't read { much less (re)POST }: “ Content-Type: Text/HTML; charset=UTF-8 ”![]()
""?????!????? you can't read.""
Jeff, you undoubtedly have the oddest web site I've ever seen in the
present. You might as well be living back in the 80's when the best people
could do was run a Radio Shack TRS80.
--
Gregory Hall
Eternal·Sep* users can't read my HTML posts**;
ya got to give me that, no ?
*: www.Eternal-September.ORG
**: www.google.com/group/alt.free.newsservers/msg/cd034697302cb631
I agree, your website is like a walk in Jurassic Park.
---
Gregory Hall
No one wants to read *any* of yer posts, HTML or otherwise.
> No one wants to read *any* of yer posts, HTML or otherwise.
Wrong! I enjoy reading his posts.
--
Gregory Hall
> <Gro...@JeffRelf.F-M.FM> wrote in message
> news:_@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.2010_Jan3.0.13pm.VX...
>> You ( Eric Gisse, "would be" net�cop ) imagined:
>> " Relf's site is still down, too. ".
>>
>> No, YOU LOST and FastMail.FM* won. ( *: running nginx on Linux )
Looks like it is still down, Relf.
As a curiosity, how much free bandwidth has fastmail given you? I'm guessing
north of 50 gigs.
[...]
Okay... no one *with any brains* or who *isn't a sock puppet* wants to
read *any* of his posts, HTML or otherwise.
As a curiosity, how much have you spent so far on
third·world IP·address/band·wdith ? Nice of you to help them so.
FastMail hasn't pulled out its big guns yet... yet.
>
> It took you ( Eric Gisse, wannbe net�cop )
> hours to get started again, I see.
If it were me, and it wasn't, I would hypothesize that I have better things
to do than make sure your website is down.
>
> As a curiosity, how much have you spent so far on
> third�world IP�address/band�wdith ? Nice of you to help them so.
What makes you think I am spending money, Jeff?
I just visited your site about twenty minutes ago and clicked on the links
to most of your family photos and they came right up. I sure didn't notice
anything being down.
--
Gregory Hall
FastMail.FM is getting EVER BETTER at putting WOULD·BE net cops down.
For a while there, I was getting 100 thousand downloads per day;
the same few files, tiny files, were downloaded over and over again.
Eric Gisse claims he's NOT attacking my band·width yet, oddly,
he knows IMMEDIATELY when it goes down ( VERY BRIEFLY ).
Either he's “in the know” or he's tracking it closer than I am.
If it's not Eric, then it's Robb.
Besides Eric, Robb is the only one traking this closely.
Robb took my posting privileges away*.
I think he runs OctaNews too... perhaps TeraNews as well.
( *: because I HATE attachments/binary·servers { FastMail is better } )
Besides being a net·cop·type, he's big on proxies and Anonymity;
“Lenny Nero” might be one of his socks.
It's pretty pathetic, isn't it.
>
> As you* noted, my website** is back up again.
> ( *: Gregory Hall; **: www.JeffRelf.F-M.FM )
>
> FastMail.FM is getting EVER BETTER at putting WOULD�BE net cops down.
> For a while there, I was getting 100 thousand downloads per day;
> the same few files, tiny files, were downloaded over and over again.
You must have pissed someone off, relfy.
How long do you think fastmail.fm will support a user that attracts that
much bad attention? I don't think they'll be too upset at losing 10$/yr when
they realize how much headache would go away.
>
> Eric Gisse claims he's NOT attacking my band�width yet, oddly,
> he knows IMMEDIATELY when it goes down ( VERY BRIEFLY ).
> Either he's ?in the know? or he's tracking it closer than I am.
Really, Jeff? How many times have I said it is down?
>
> If it's not Eric, then it's Robb.
> Besides Eric, Robb is the only one traking this closely.
Who is robb and what did you do to piss him off? Perhaps you shouldn't try
to piss off everyone with your idiotic off-topic posts, your web-bug view
tracking, your idiotic quoting and posting style, your stalking, your
deliberate non-compliance with accepted RFC's, your sociopathic
tendencies...
>
> Robb took my posting privileges away*.
> I think he runs OctaNews too... perhaps TeraNews as well.
> ( *: because I HATE attachments/binary�servers { FastMail is better } )
>
> Besides being a net�cop�type, he's big on proxies and Anonymity;
> ?Lenny Nero? might be one of his socks.
Nobody seems to like you relfy. Perhaps you should meditate on that.
I bet all your problems would go away if you just stopped posting to USENET.
>Tracking?, hardly. I run over a fair amount of critters, sometimes
>I just *have* to look at the greasy grimey gopher guts spewed across
>the road.
How about the "mutilated monkey meat"?
>Gro...@JeffRelf.F-M.FM wrote:
>>
>> Robb took my posting privileges away*.
>> I think he runs OctaNews too... perhaps TeraNews as well.
>> ( *: because I HATE attachments/binary·servers { FastMail is better } )
>>
>> Besides being a net·cop·type, he's big on proxies and Anonymity;
>> ?Lenny Nero? might be one of his socks.
>
>Nobody seems to like you relfy. Perhaps you should meditate on that.
>
>I bet all your problems would go away if you just stopped posting to USENET.
All? He'd stop being a deadbeat dad, a crappy programmer, a
sucker for every con artist in town . . . ?
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank]
I wouldn't call it pathetic. It's just 'old-fashioned' but it does work. It
might even be better than many modern websites that display a bunch of crap
and play music and such and sometimes even cause the browser to crap out -
you know, things that are more bother than anything.
--
Gregory Hall
There's no doubt Robb's sort of weird but he's no net abuser, IMO. I wish I
could say the same for Steven Crooked and the BananaBoi.
--
Gregory Hall
And I bet if you'd stop being such an arrogant asshole you might have some
friends and wouldn't have to spend your time doing DOS attacks.
Try to remember something. What goes around often comes around. You might
think you're the tough guy on the block but try not to forget that you're
small change.
--
Gregory Hall
A “yes” or “no” will do fine, thank you.
Gregory Hall told Eric Gisse:
“ You might think you're the tough guy on the block but
try not to forget that you're small change. ”.
I don't know if it's Eric or not, it might be Robb or someone else.
At any rate, there's NO END to my bandwidth and
FastMail.FM's “devs” have started work on a solution.
>
> ? robb @shared-secrets.com ?,
> are you attacking my website*'s bandwidth ?
> [ *: www.JeffRelf.F-M.FM ]
>
> A ?yes? or ?no? will do fine, thank you.
>
> Gregory Hall told Eric Gisse:
> ? You might think you're the tough guy on the block but
> try not to forget that you're small change. ?.
>
> I don't know if it's Eric or not, it might be Robb or someone else.
>
> At any rate, there's NO END to my bandwidth and
> FastMail.FM's ?devs? have started work on a solution.
Really Jeff, no end to your bandwidth? Are you sure?
> Jeff Relf wrote:
>
>>� robb @shared-secrets.com �,
>>are you attacking my website*'s bandwidth ?
>>[ *: www.JeffRelf.F-M.FM ]
>>
>>A �yes� or �no� will do fine, thank you.
>
> No Jeff, I have many things to do other than dink around with OP's stuff.
> But you already *knew* that, I'm suprised you asked me such a question.
Am I the only one wondering why Relf insists on pissing off so many people?
[...]
Jeff, I worry about you. Did you stop taking your lithium again?
Proxies in third·world countries WERE using “ wget -r ”
to download my website ( -r downloads local links as well ).
over and over again, several times per minute.
They're still doing it, but they've been throttled back some.
FastMail.FM's devs aren't done yet.
Note: Browsers never do anything like that, they cache images.
So I say:
“ an IP that downloads THE SAME FILE, over and over again,
―― 5+ times in 10 minutes or less ――
should be black·listed for 3 months or so. ”.
Most images/files are a few kilo·bytes, not .5 meg;
so people can click on a few links now and then.
FastMails “devs” have only just begun.
Browsers cache images; so I say:
>
> No one can exhaust my wesite*'s bandwidth Gisse.
> [ *: www.JeffRelf.F-M.FM ]
Is that a challenge?
>
> You ( Robb ) replied to Gisse yet excluded Sci.Physics... ha ha.
>
> Proxies in third�world countries WERE using ? wget -r ?
> to download my website ( -r downloads local links as well ).
> over and over again, several times per minute.
>
> They're still doing it, but they've been throttled back some.
> FastMail.FM's devs aren't done yet.
>
> Note: Browsers never do anything like that, they cache images.
>
> So I say:
> ? an IP that downloads THE SAME FILE, over and over again,
> ?? 5+ times in 10 minutes or less ??
> should be black�listed for 3 months or so. ?.
I'm impressed. It only took you and your moron host a week to figure out
what it would have taken me 15 minutes to solve.
“ Browsers cache images;
so an IP that downloads THE SAME FILE, over and over again,
―― 5+ times in 10 minutes or less ――
should be black·listed for 3 months or so. ”.
Even without caching, there's no need to re·download
THE SAME FILE 5+ times within a 10 minute interval.
Those that do so can be blacklisted for 3 months, I say.
FastMail's dev's ( back from a long holliday ) could make it an option.
You ( Robb ) wrote:
“ FM should have already "done it", if they know how,
when does your part and FM's meet? ”.
They say they've never seen anything like this before.
I'd never attack a web·site, what SICK fucker would ? !
> They say they've never seen anything like this before.
How long do you think they'll appreciate the novelty before realizing you
are too much of a burden?
> I'd never attack a web�site, what SICK fucker would ? !
What SICK fucker would attempt to delve into my personal life the way you
do?
>
> Am I the only one wondering why Relf insists on pissing off so many people?
>
Probably :-). I figured out a long time ago that he thinks violating
the RFC standard is a hoot. Any employer should be wary of any of his
code.
/BAH
>Gro...@JeffRelf.F-M.FM wrote:
>Is that a challenge?
sounds like he's looking for someone with access to a botnet to give him
a reason to whine "Nobody can access my files including my work files!"
for the rest of January.
What a maroon.
> There's no doubt Robb's sort of weird but he's no net abuser, IMO. I wish I
> could say the same for Steven Crooked and the BananaBoi.
Same chip, different year
No, you're just showing off your hand ( i.e. your proxies ).
These proxies cost money ( beer money ) and they're short·lived.
You caught FastMail's dev's while they were out on a long holiday.
They know how to handle your ILLEGAL activities, it's their job.
FastMail doesn't care about me, of course, but
they make a living out of putting down script·kiddies like you.
Even if FastMail doesn't come through for me,
I've got the time and talent to find one that does.
> I'm impressed. It only took you and your moron host a week to figure out
> what it would have taken me 15 minutes to solve.
You took a coffee break?
You seem to be speculating about Octanews.