Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Corel Painter 6 Rebate?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Full Throttle

unread,
Aug 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/24/00
to
Don't count on a rebate. I just bought Painter 6. No Coupon on the can. When
I called COREL they said that the offer had expired. Funny so had their web
page that claimed Dec 31 2000. If you buy Corel Painter make sure about the
rebate first!

The Doge

unread,
Aug 26, 2000, 1:28:39 AM8/26/00
to

Interesting. I just received mine today from buy.com, and sure enough, no
coupon. I hate being an asshole to customer service people, but I have a
feeling that's what it's gonna take here.

gb...@my-deja.com

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to
In article <sqela5b...@news.supernews.com>,
do...@venice.net (The Doge) wrote:
> In article <tDap5.536

I just received Painter 6.0 from buy.com (Northeast USA if that
matters) and the can DID have a rebate coupon on it. (It was still
listed on their site as '1-doc $200 mail in rabate). See
http://www.us.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=20317508&loc=105

Late last week, I called Corel and explained that I was planning to
buy Painter 6, and that the buy.com website had a rebate coupon referal
page to the Corel site, and this link did not display the coupon.

He said the offer was still good, and the can should have the coupon.
If not, he could send me one...

So, all hope may not yet be lost... Now I just hope they honor the
coupon...

FWIW, at last count CNET showed the coupon if you searched
for 'Painter 6.0' and clicked on '$netbate' next to the listing
for 'COREL PAINTER V6.0 WINDOWS SINGLE 1-DOC $200 MAIL IN REBATE '. See
http://shopper.cnet.com/ .

-Greg Bohn


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

nicky g.

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 10:11:02 PM8/29/00
to
The rebate is allegedly good until 12/31/2000...


On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 23:49:20 GMT, gb...@my-deja.com wrote:

>In article <sqela5b...@news.supernews.com>,
> do...@venice.net (The Doge) wrote:
>> In article <tDap5.536

0 new messages