Shame on McDonalds!
Corey Richardson
Tasty in the US?) from my local McDonalds. However, when I returned home
I found that the burger patty on it wasn't from a Big 'N' Tasty, it was
long and thin and something like a patty from the new McDonalds UK "M"
'McDonalds' range http://www.mcdonalds.co.uk/ It was also bulked out
with cheese and bacon to make it seem as large as a real Big 'N' Tasty
patty!
Since when has McDonalds been allowed to this sort of thing without
informing the customer beforehand?
TFM®
"Corey Richardson" <coreyr...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:cccde4hs4qk44kb2b...@4ax.com...
The new Sauk has arrived.
TFM®
Corey Richardson
wrote:
You do know you can eat fast-food as part of a healthy diet, don't you?
DK
Foreign Sauks are assholes and have poor entertainment value.
-swwsswwwwwswsswswswsssssssssssssssssssssssss...
cybercat
TFM®
"Corey Richardson" <coreyr...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:d1fde4l9qhn9oum92...@4ax.com...
I ate $6 worth of Taco Bell food today alone.
I'm the healthiest eating mother fucker you'll ever encounter on this
newsgroup. I eat fast food about twice a year. I do have an opinion on it
when I do.
70% of what I ate today from Taco Bell was quite good. The one soft taco
with chunks of the red food-colored taco shell was almost inedible.
I don't remember what I ordered. I was looking for the most calories for
the buck. Their receipt is cryptic at best.
If I feel a need to feed, Taco Bell is top of my list. I'm a big, fat,
gluttonous pig, and I can get absolutely stuffed at the Bell for less than a
dime.
Anybody who eats $15 worth of their fare in one sitting is an absolute hawg!
TFM®
Paco
"TFM®" <hillbi...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:48e6bbd2$0$592$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com...
First thing that crossed my mind after reading his post. Except this
version likes to share his idiocy across multiple groups.
Crossposting not removed as a public service.
-sw
Jerry Sauk
> I eat fast food about twice a year.
LIAR! You east SHIT'S every day of your life's yuo's jsut dont wnat
to amdit it!
Corey Richardson
wrote:
>Corey Richardson <coreyr...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, I ordered a Big 'N' Tasty with cheese...
>
>I got a Big and Tasty with Cheese Sauce for you Corey <unziiiippp>.
Eh? I said "cheese", not yeast!
TFM®
"Jerry Sauk" <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gc6iuu$u6n$1...@registered.motzarella.org...
That's obviously a spoof.
TFM®
TFM®
"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
news:031008.210648af...@sqwertz.com...
> Corey Richardson <coreyr...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, I ordered a Big 'N' Tasty with cheese...
>
> I got a Big and Tasty with Cheese Sauce for you Corey <unziiiippp>.
>
> -sw
PIMP
TFM®
Mike
are you a Shill or what?
Mike
Speaking of Jerry.
What happened to Hogzillah. That was a big fat pig
Mike
"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>
> -sw
>
> -sw
Yes just like us, those assholes need to feel the pain of the almighty
Saukzillah
sw
Mike
Its Fumundah cheese, Bitch
TFM®
"Mike" <rnr_cons...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:L7qdnSaHsvEsfXvV...@comcast.com...
Yes,or.
TFM®
sf
Posting from the US.
I didn't know there was any such thing as a big N tasty until
yesterday! I ordered it and was completely satisfied. My first
thought was to order it with no cheese, because I don't like cheese
with vegetables... but I was really hungry - so I said "yes" to
everything and I wasn't sorry I did it. BTW: I ordered the "Meal
deal" and couldn't finish all the fries or the drink (water for me).
Eat your hearts out Corey haters. I will order a Big N Tasty again.
Not tomorrow, not next week... but I will order it again.
BWAHAHAHAHA!
Next time, I'll order it w/o cheese. OK, I'm weird. It's usually
cheese, no vegetables or vegetables, no cheese. I was starving so I
was a total slut with toppings.
What's your opinion about BK burgers (Jr. Whoppers)? I used to LOVE
them, but I think they've gone down hill.
--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.
Mae West
Jeßus
LOL, what a convenient philosophy :)
You're deluding yourself. Sure, you can eat it with no apparent ill
effects. But that does NOT make a "healthy diet" healthy.
Corey Richardson
wrote:
>Corey Richardson wrote:
>> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:41:42 -0400, TFM® <hillbi...@tampabay.rr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Corey Richardson" <coreyr...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:cccde4hs4qk44kb2b...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thursday, I ordered a Big 'N' Tasty with cheese (is that a Big &
>>>> Tasty in the US?) from my local McDonalds. However, when I returned home
>>>> I found that the burger patty on it wasn't from a Big 'N' Tasty, it was
>>>> long and thin and something like a patty from the new McDonalds UK "M"
>>>> 'McDonalds' range http://www.mcdonalds.co.uk/ It was also bulked out
>>>> with cheese and bacon to make it seem as large as a real Big 'N' Tasty
>>>> patty!
>>>>
>>>> Since when has McDonalds been allowed to this sort of thing without
>>>> informing the customer beforehand?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The new Sauk has arrived.
>>>
>>> TFM®
>>
>> You do know you can eat fast-food as part of a healthy diet, don't you?
>
>LOL, what a convenient philosophy :)
No, it's not just convenient, it's true!
>You're deluding yourself. Sure, you can eat it with no apparent ill
>effects. But that does NOT make a "healthy diet" healthy.
No, alone it does not make a healthy diet. However, as *part* of a
healthy diet it's quite valid.
Corey Richardson
Corey Richardson
>On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:08:27 +0100, Corey Richardson
><coreyr...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thursday, I ordered a Big 'N' Tasty with cheese (is that a Big &
>>Tasty in the US?) from my local McDonalds. However, when I returned home
>>I found that the burger patty on it wasn't from a Big 'N' Tasty, it was
>>long and thin and something like a patty from the new McDonalds UK "M"
>>'McDonalds' range http://www.mcdonalds.co.uk/ It was also bulked out
>>with cheese and bacon to make it seem as large as a real Big 'N' Tasty
>>patty!
>>
>>Since when has McDonalds been allowed to this sort of thing without
>>informing the customer beforehand?
>>
>
>Posting from the US.
>
>I didn't know there was any such thing as a big N tasty until
>yesterday! I ordered it and was completely satisfied. My first
>thought was to order it with no cheese, because I don't like cheese
>with vegetables... but I was really hungry - so I said "yes" to
>everything and I wasn't sorry I did it. BTW: I ordered the "Meal
>deal" and couldn't finish all the fries or the drink (water for me).
I'm glad you enjoyed it, sf.
>Eat your hearts out Corey haters. I will order a Big N Tasty again.
>Not tomorrow, not next week... but I will order it again.
>
>BWAHAHAHAHA!
Oooh, now you're in the 'bad books'!
>Next time, I'll order it w/o cheese. OK, I'm weird. It's usually
>cheese, no vegetables or vegetables, no cheese. I was starving so I
>was a total slut with toppings.
>
>What's your opinion about BK burgers (Jr. Whoppers)? I used to LOVE
>them, but I think they've gone down hill.
I often like BK burgers, although the flame-grilling often leaves them
over cooked and a tad dry.
Jeßus
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:54:18 +1000, Jeßus <nonewha...@all.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Corey Richardson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:41:42 -0400, TFM® <hillbi...@tampabay.rr.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Corey Richardson" <coreyr...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:cccde4hs4qk44kb2b...@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Thursday, I ordered a Big 'N' Tasty with cheese (is that a Big &
>>>>> Tasty in the US?) from my local McDonalds. However, when I returned home
>>>>> I found that the burger patty on it wasn't from a Big 'N' Tasty, it was
>>>>> long and thin and something like a patty from the new McDonalds UK "M"
>>>>> 'McDonalds' range http://www.mcdonalds.co.uk/ It was also bulked out
>>>>> with cheese and bacon to make it seem as large as a real Big 'N' Tasty
>>>>> patty!
>>>>>
>>>>> Since when has McDonalds been allowed to this sort of thing without
>>>>> informing the customer beforehand?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The new Sauk has arrived.
>>>>
>>>> TFM®
>>> You do know you can eat fast-food as part of a healthy diet, don't you?
>> LOL, what a convenient philosophy :)
>
> No, it's not just convenient, it's true!
True, according to mainstream 'authorities' - whose priorities and
motives cannot be trusted - period.
>> You're deluding yourself. Sure, you can eat it with no apparent ill
>> effects. But that does NOT make a "healthy diet" healthy.
>
> No, alone it does not make a healthy diet.
Agreed.
> However, as *part* of a healthy diet it's quite valid.
That is an oxymoron, really.
In no way can *anything* sold by the likes of mcdonalds be considered
'healthy' (unless you are literally starved of food, of course).
The scale and way they operate simply makes it impossible.
But I /do/ understand basically what you're saying and coming from
regardless.
dsi1
Sorry to hear of your troubles. The reality is that they can pretty much
do whatever they have to do to get you that piece of meat on a bun -
maybe it was all they had. :-)
However, you should be able to walk into a McDonald's and get your
standardized grub as God intended and McDonald agreed to when they made
that covenant with God back in those ancient times. As a show of
solidarity with the plight of your people, well, maybe just you - I will
order a Big n' Tasty the next time I find myself in that establishment.
I have to say however, that I don't think I've ever seen that one the
menu. However, if it's there, I'll be eating the burger in solidarity
with you, my brother.
Shalom!
Mike
and you wonder why your called a knuckle head
Jerry Sauk
That's 100% percent TRUE! And it's a proven fact.
Omelet
"Jerry Sauk" <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Corey Richardson" <coreyr...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> news:d1fde4l9qhn9oum92...@4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:41:42 -0400, TFM® <hillbi...@tampabay.rr.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >"Corey Richardson" <coreyr...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> > >news:cccde4hs4qk44kb2b...@4ax.com...
> > >> On Thursday, I ordered a Big 'N' Tasty with cheese (is that a Big &
> > >> Tasty in the US?) from my local McDonalds. However, when I returned
> home
> > >> I found that the burger patty on it wasn't from a Big 'N' Tasty, it was
> > >> long and thin and something like a patty from the new McDonalds UK "M"
> > >> 'McDonalds' range http://www.mcdonalds.co.uk/ It was also bulked out
> > >> with cheese and bacon to make it seem as large as a real Big 'N' Tasty
> > >> patty!
> > >>
> > >> Since when has McDonalds been allowed to this sort of thing without
> > >> informing the customer beforehand?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >The new Sauk has arrived.
> > >
> > >TFM®
> >
> > You do know you can eat fast-food as part of a healthy diet, don't you?
> >
>
>
> That's 100% percent TRUE! And it's a proven fact.
But Jerry, you are not supposed to eat it in EXCESS!!!!
--
Peace! Om
"He who has the gold makes the rules"
--Om
"He who has the guns can get the gold."
-- Steve Rothstein
Buck
>
> That's 100% percent TRUE! And it's a proven fact.
I hope you're not trying to say that you're a shining example of that
"fact". You weigh 320lbs ferchristsakes.
Bucky
Jerry Sauk
"Omelet" <ompo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ompomelet-414E0...@news.giganews.com...
I never said I DO eat it in excess. What are you worried about.
Jerry Sauk
"Buck" <bcl...@hotmale.com> wrote in message
news:gcd782$i1g$2...@registered.motzarella.org...
Which is a reuslt of many factor's other then a fast-food diet, which I
proved many time's already.
Buck
> I never said I DO eat it in excess.
You DO eat it in excess if you're spending $15/visit at Taco Bell. Plus
you weigh over 300 pounds! And you actually BRAG about your weight and
eating habits here on Usenet.
Dude - you're in SERIOUS DENIAL. You sure as hell don't eat fast food
as any sort of HEALTHY diet. What a joke.
Bucky
Buck
70% of the food you eat is fast food.
You eat about twice as much as a normal, healthy person would.
You weigh 320lbs.
You can't stand for more than 10 minutes at a time.
What the hell else is there to prove?
Lucky
blake murphy
personally, i think it is a result of the abuse of apostrophe's.
your pal,
blake
Jerry Sauk
<sigh> HOW many TIME'S must we go thru this. LARGER PEOPLE REQUIRE
LARGER AMOUNT'S OF FOOD.
Get with it.
Robert
unless they still want to be large fatass slobs
Robert
kilikini
>
> <sigh> HOW many TIMES must we go thru this. LARGER PEOPLE
> REQUIRE LARGER AMOUNTS OF FOOD.
>
> Get with it.
Yes, this is true if you're happy and at peace with your weight. You need
the calories and fat to maintain your current weight. More mass would
require more food to *maintain* the mass. That is correct. However, if a
person is unhappy with their weight, then changes need to be made.
You're not unhappy with your weight, Jerry, so why do you keep justifying
yourself to these people? I'm not being mean to you, sweetie, but if you're
happy, you're happy. Everybody has a vice; you like fast food, other folks
smoke, pop pills, drink, participate in extreme sports, whatever floats
their boat. We're all going to die in the end anyway, aren't we? Go by the
vice of your choice and be happy.
kili <----- who's dreaming of a spinach & mushroom lasagna with a white
sauce.
Yes, spinach is one of my vices (not allowed to have) and I'm going to make
this dish and eat it this weekend. Hmm, maybe I'll be bold and get some bay
scallops, too. (Not allowed to have those either.)
Goomba
> <sigh> HOW many TIME'S must we go thru this. LARGER PEOPLE REQUIRE
> LARGER AMOUNT'S OF FOOD.
>
> Get with it.
Uh.. no they don't. They just often hoard those calories better.
Jerry Sauk
Exactly WHERE did you get this 320 LB figure from? I certainly never said
it. Is this another Steve lie?
Jerry Sauk
"kilikini" <kili...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gcksmn$9v7$1...@news.datemas.de...
I'm actually pretty happy with my weight, it hasn't really been an issue for
me. I am extrememy happy with most of my life. There is only one diet that
is compatable with my system, and I can't spend too much time on it because
I get sick of eating the same food over and over, but one month out of the
year is fine with me and my parent's who first forced me to try it several
year's ago.
And the reason I keep justifiying myself here is because I have a right to
pursue whatever it is that makes me happy, and noone has the right to tell
me what to eat. BUT.... Lasanga does sound like a good choice, kili, so
I'll have to beg my mom to make some for supper tomorow!!!!!! (w/o spinach!
:-)) I'm sure she'll say yes since it is a family favorite.
Thanks for the advice kili.
Jeßus
Thats right - he's a JOKE. So enjoy the joke! :)
Jeßus
ROFL...!
> Get with it.
"it" being morbid obesity?
Jerry Sauk
"Jeßus" <nonewha...@all.org> wrote in message
news:gcmqpl$vo3$2...@news.tornevall.net...
IT being science. And common knowledge.
And it's not MORBID obesity because I'm still alive.
Buck
You posted that you weighed 300lbs over two years ago. It's all in the
archives. And at the rate you're going, you must weigh AT LEAST 320 by now.
Bucky
Jerry Sauk
Nope, I never did. Steve probably imagined it and that's what you saw.
Scott
So you're a figment of Steve's imagination then.
Mike
"Scott" <sws...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6qydnb1M2_DsO3LV...@giganews.com...
More Proof . Thanks jerry
Jerry Sauk
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:53:42 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > "Buck" <bcl...@hotmale.com> wrote in message
> >> Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >>
> >> You posted that you weighed 300lbs over two years ago. It's all in the
> >> archives. And at the rate you're going, you must weigh AT LEAST 320 by
> >> now.
> >
>
> unsubstantiated "facts" I read on the Internet.
>
>
<http://groups.google.com/group/alt.startrek/msg/7814cabbba6118fa?hl=en&dmod
e=source>
>
> That was you that posted that, right? Or was it Steve again?
>
> Scientific studies say that people under-report their weight by an
> average of 12%. Heavier people lie more. So by saying you're 295,
> this means that you're probably in the 339-pound range, give or take
> 10-lbs.
>
> And you know you weigh quite a bit more than you did 2 years ago.
> So how much do you weigh now? And don't try and lie again.
>
> Bucky
I don't remember posting that at all. Get a life.
Buck
> "Buck" <bcl...@hotmale.com> wrote in message
> news:vbkwj7uqvwnm$.byuaxsz39ad1$.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:53:42 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>
>>> "Buck" <bcl...@hotmale.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gco0pb$b1k$1...@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You posted that you weighed 300lbs over two years ago. It's all in the
>>>> archives. And at the rate you're going, you must weigh AT LEAST 320 by
>>>> now.
>>>
>>> Nope, I never did. Steve probably imagined it and that's what you saw.
>>
>> Screw Steve. I just know what I'VE read. I don't repeat
>> unsubstantiated "facts" I read on the Internet.
>>
> <http://groups.google.com/group/alt.startrek/msg/7814cabbba6118fa?hl=en&dmod
> e=source>
>> That was you that posted that, right? Or was it Steve again?
>
You seem to have trouble remembering what you posted yesterday, so no
surprise there. Fact is, you posted it, you were proven a liar, and I
DEMAND an APOLOGY and that you ADMIT YOU'RE A LIAR IMMEDIETELY!
In your face, asshole. You're the one that started THIS confrontation,
and you lost. Then you tell ME to get a life? HA!
See Kili, dear? This is why we all think Jerry is a supreme asshole
(even you do, too - you know you do) and deserves to be euthanized.
Bucky