info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Kloaus... Strawberry frosty
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Jerry Sauk
Feb 15, 2024, 9:11:32 PMFeb 15
to
Quick question, Klous..
Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
yourself.
Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
yourself.
K Wills
Feb 16, 2024, 5:10:12 AMFeb 16
to
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Quick question, Klous..
>
Who is Klous?
As if you're an officer of the court who can place anyone under
oath.
BTW, I'm still waiting for you to answer the question I asked of
you regarding the machines from so long ago.
[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]
--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Quick question, Klous..
>
Who is Klous?
oath.
BTW, I'm still waiting for you to answer the question I asked of
you regarding the machines from so long ago.
[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]
--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com
KlausSchadenfreude
Feb 16, 2024, 6:12:28 AMFeb 16
to
====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
[ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
[ ] You are lying, as usual
[x] This has already been explained to you
[ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
[ ] Yes, it *is* private property
[ ] Yes, McDonald's says salt and pepper *are* ingredients
[ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
[ ] I'm not paying much attention to your lame, months old responses
======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
KlausSchadenfreude
Feb 16, 2024, 6:14:03 AMFeb 16
to
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 02:10:53 -0800, K Wills <kw...@kw.kw> wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Quick question, Klous..
>>
>
> Who is Klous?
Maybe some relation to this "Kloaus" guy he's directing his post to? I
>On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Quick question, Klous..
>>
>
> Who is Klous?
dunno.
>
>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>
>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>
>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>yourself.
>
> As if you're an officer of the court who can place anyone under
>oath.
Jerry Sauk
Feb 16, 2024, 7:16:47 PMFeb 16
to
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hngusit2ih4fhgosk...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Quick question, Klous..
>>
>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>
>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>
>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>yourself.
>
> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Quick question, Klous..
>>
>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>
>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>
>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>yourself.
>
> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
> [x] This has already been explained to you
> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
So would that be a yes or a no?
KlausSchadenfreude
Feb 17, 2024, 7:15:01 AMFeb 17
to
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:17:59 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:hngusit2ih4fhgosk...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>>
>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>
>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>
>>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>>yourself.
>>
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>
>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>
>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
> So would that be a yes or a no?
>
====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:hngusit2ih4fhgosk...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>>
>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>
>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>
>>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>>yourself.
>>
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>
>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>
>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
> So would that be a yes or a no?
>
====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
[ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
[ ] You are lying, as usual
[ ] You are lying, as usual
[x] This has already been explained to you
[ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
[ ] Yes, it *is* private property
[ ] Yes, McDonald's says salt and pepper *are* ingredients
[ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
[ ] I'm not paying much attention to your lame, months old responses
[ ] Yes, it *is* private property
[ ] Yes, McDonald's says salt and pepper *are* ingredients
[ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
[ ] I'm not paying much attention to your lame, months old responses
K Wills
Feb 17, 2024, 8:23:22 AMFeb 17
to
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 03:13:51 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 02:10:53 -0800, K Wills <kw...@kw.kw> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>><jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>
>> Who is Klous?
>
>Maybe some relation to this "Kloaus" guy he's directing his post to? I
>dunno.
>
Maybe they're cousins?
<klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 02:10:53 -0800, K Wills <kw...@kw.kw> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>><jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>
>> Who is Klous?
>
>Maybe some relation to this "Kloaus" guy he's directing his post to? I
>dunno.
>
As good a guess as any at this point.
>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>
>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>
>>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>>yourself.
>>
>> As if you're an officer of the court who can place anyone under
>>oath.
>
>He's funny. He's also looking for a new lie to spew, I can tell.
--
No todos los que ven tus obras ven tus virtudes.
K Wills
Feb 17, 2024, 8:24:24 AMFeb 17
to
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:17:59 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
not the case? I really do want to know. But I know you will either run
away from the question, or attempt to divert from it.
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:hngusit2ih4fhgosk...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>>
>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>
>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>
>>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>>yourself.
>>
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>
>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>
>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
> So would that be a yes or a no?
Asked and answered, as you know. Why LIE and present that this is
>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:hngusit2ih4fhgosk...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>>
>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>
>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>
>>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>>yourself.
>>
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>
>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>
>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
> So would that be a yes or a no?
not the case? I really do want to know. But I know you will either run
away from the question, or attempt to divert from it.
Jerry Sauk
Feb 18, 2024, 9:23:06 PMFeb 18
to
news:ao81tito9vdkbg290...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
strawberry Frosty wasn't ordered, how was it that it came to be in your
possession.
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:17:59 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:hngusit2ih4fhgosk...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>>>
>>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>>
>>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>>
> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:hngusit2ih4fhgosk...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>>>
>>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>>
>>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>>
>>>>Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one yourself.
>>>
>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>
>>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>>
>>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>>
>> So would that be a yes or a no?
> [x] This has already been explained to you
> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
Fine, Whatever. Next question: Who ordered the frosty for you, or, if the
>>>
>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>
>>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>>
>>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>>
>> So would that be a yes or a no?
> [x] This has already been explained to you
> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
strawberry Frosty wasn't ordered, how was it that it came to be in your
possession.
K Wills
Feb 19, 2024, 3:23:56 AMFeb 19
to
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 20:17:51 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
What possible relevance could this have to anything?
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ao81tito9vdkbg290...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:17:59 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:hngusit2ih4fhgosk...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one yourself.
>>>>
>>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>>
>>>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>>>
>>>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>>>
>>> So would that be a yes or a no?
>
>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>
>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
>Fine, Whatever. Next question: Who ordered the frosty for you, or, if the
>strawberry Frosty wasn't ordered, how was it that it came to be in your
>possession.
I'll bite.
>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ao81tito9vdkbg290...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:17:59 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:hngusit2ih4fhgosk...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one yourself.
>>>>
>>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>>
>>>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>>>
>>>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>>>
>>> So would that be a yes or a no?
>
>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>
>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
>Fine, Whatever. Next question: Who ordered the frosty for you, or, if the
>strawberry Frosty wasn't ordered, how was it that it came to be in your
>possession.
What possible relevance could this have to anything?
KlausSchadenfreude
Feb 19, 2024, 6:16:17 AMFeb 19
to
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 20:17:51 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ao81tito9vdkbg290...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:17:59 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:hngusit2ih4fhgosk...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one yourself.
>>>>
>>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>>
>>>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>>>
>>>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>>>
>>> So would that be a yes or a no?
>
>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>
>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
>Fine, Whatever. Next question: Who ordered the frosty for you, or, if the
>strawberry Frosty wasn't ordered, how was it that it came to be in your
>possession.
>
Irrelevant.
>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ao81tito9vdkbg290...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:17:59 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:hngusit2ih4fhgosk...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one yourself.
>>>>
>>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>>
>>>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>>>
>>>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>>>
>>> So would that be a yes or a no?
>
>> [x] This has already been explained to you
>
>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
>Fine, Whatever. Next question: Who ordered the frosty for you, or, if the
>strawberry Frosty wasn't ordered, how was it that it came to be in your
>possession.
>
Jerry Sauk
Feb 20, 2024, 2:26:20 PMFeb 20
to
"K Wills" <kw...@kw.kw> wrote in message
news:85dusidhhlcrl8887...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Quick question, Klous..
>>
>
> Who is Klous?
>
>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>
>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>
>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>yourself.
>
> As if you're an officer of the court who can place anyone under
> oath.
you don't need a court to take an oath, kwills.
> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Quick question, Klous..
>>
>
> Who is Klous?
>
>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>
>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>
>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>yourself.
>
> As if you're an officer of the court who can place anyone under
> oath.
Jerry Sauk
Feb 20, 2024, 2:26:21 PMFeb 20
to
news:m2e6ti1mtis0h5l1e...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
Yes, it is relevant. You made the claim that you tasted a strawberry
frosty, yet never ordered one.
I'm going to ask you one more time, who ordered it for you, OR, how did you
get it if you didnt order it yourself.
frosty, yet never ordered one.
I'm going to ask you one more time, who ordered it for you, OR, how did you
get it if you didnt order it yourself.
Skeeter
Feb 20, 2024, 2:52:14 PMFeb 20
to
KlausSchadenfreude
Feb 20, 2024, 3:16:46 PMFeb 20
to
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:24:51 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
No. When I had it, and who bought it, is irrelevant
>You made the claim that you tasted a strawberry
>frosty, yet never ordered one.
Another JennyLie™
>I'm going to ask you one more time
Probably *another* JennyLie™
>, who ordered it for you, OR, how did you
>get it if you didnt order it yourself.
Irrelevant
>You made the claim that you tasted a strawberry
>frosty, yet never ordered one.
>I'm going to ask you one more time
>, who ordered it for you, OR, how did you
>get it if you didnt order it yourself.
K Wills
Feb 21, 2024, 4:38:15 AMFeb 21
to
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:23:28 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>
>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>
>>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>>yourself.
>>
>> As if you're an officer of the court who can place anyone under
>> oath.
>
>you don't need a court to take an oath, kwills.
Only an officer of the court can place someone under oath. But
you know this. You're merely feeding your NEED to lie. You would have
learned this in fifth grade civics class.
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"K Wills" <kw...@kw.kw> wrote in message
>news:85dusidhhlcrl8887...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>
>> Who is Klous?
>>
Jenny?
>
>"K Wills" <kw...@kw.kw> wrote in message
>news:85dusidhhlcrl8887...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>
>> Who is Klous?
>>
>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>
>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>
>>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>>yourself.
>>
>> As if you're an officer of the court who can place anyone under
>> oath.
>
>you don't need a court to take an oath, kwills.
you know this. You're merely feeding your NEED to lie. You would have
learned this in fifth grade civics class.
K Wills
Feb 21, 2024, 4:38:42 AMFeb 21
to
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:24:51 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
Yes. And?
As has been explained, it's very probable someone else ordered it
for him, or he sampled someone else's. It's not a difficult concept,
really.
>I'm going to ask you one more time, who ordered it for you, OR, how did you
>get it if you didnt order it yourself.
Irrelevant.
As has been explained, it's very probable someone else ordered it
for him, or he sampled someone else's. It's not a difficult concept,
really.
>I'm going to ask you one more time, who ordered it for you, OR, how did you
>get it if you didnt order it yourself.
0 new messages