I don't get you folks
kilikini
openly admits to being heavy?
Yes, being heavy can lead to diabetes, can cause heart problems, digestive
issues, lethargy, breathlessness, etc. So can smoking, or drinking, and/or
drugs. How many of you still smoke or drink or....... whatever, although
you know that it's not good for you and you do it anyway?
Why do we overeat? Why do we drink? Why do we smoke? Why do we do drugs?
It usually starts out as a need to fulfill something in your life you're
lacking. Then the behavior becomes a habit. I'll share a bit of personal
trivia with the world, here. I started drinking heavily, early on, because
I had no self-esteem. I needed liquid courage to even leave my house. The
alcoholism turned into a case of anxiety and agoraphobia, which I now
struggle with and my husband has to deal with.
Do you think razzing Jerry doesn't impact his self-esteem at all? We're not
grade school kids, folks. I'm tired of this bickering. Perhaps I should
just leave the group, but I do find some posts funny, others informative,
and I really do try to add pertinent content to help keep this forum alive.
Killfile me if you want. I've had my say.
kili <------ putting on the flame-retardant suit
Scott
Something tells me Jerry enjoys this kind of attention...he knows it's
all fun and games. I probably eat almost as much fast food as he does. I
can easily put away 2 Wendy's 1/2lb double cheeseburgers (which I do)
but It's a habit that's hard to break. I am starting to worry of the
consequences of eating too much since my weight is getting out of
control. I am trying to learn how to cook though. And I pretty sure I
speak for everyone here when I say don't leave this group.
Scott
Sqwertz
> Everybody here picks on Jerry. Why? Because he likes to eat fast-food and
> openly admits to being heavy?
I don't have anything against fat people, that's just one of his many
shortcomings.
We pick on Jerry because he's a stupid, argumentative, self-centered
prick-bastard. Are you fucking blind and out of your mind? If you act
like an ass, you attract assholes. And that's Jerry's signature
specialty - being an asshole. He's not even human, IMO.
Get real, girl. You need to stop babysitting him and slap him upside
his head. Feeling sorry for him isn't doing him any favors. He needs
to grow up. If he doesn't like it here, then *he* need to do something
about it.
-sw
Robert
"kilikini" <kili...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gcktku$bje$1...@news.datemas.de...
Kili
Think of it as a group intervention, jerry needs help.
Don't you want him to get help?
Robert
DK
Word.
-dk
TFM®
"kilikini" <kili...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gcktku$bje$1...@news.datemas.de...
Fuck Jerry! He's retarded.
TFM®
Jerry Sauk
"Robert" <racemaildro...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:57uHk.3124$c45...@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com...
Jerry does NOT need help. And if I did, it would come from my family, not
you.
Jerry Sauk
"kilikini" <kili...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gcktku$bje$1...@news.datemas.de...
Actually kili I wouldn't worry about it too much, but thatnks for the
concern. Your sweet. (must be the wisconsin left in you! :-))
But people have been picking on me since elementery school, so It's nothing
that I'm not used to. It's doesn't bother me because I have actually one
almost every arguement that has come up, so the name-calling and bullying
just confirms that I beat them... Except the subway drive-thru issue...
which if I remember right... YOU were actually the one that brought up that
they have drive-thru's... weren't you? SO YOU CAN'T LEAVE THE GROUP,
because your the only one that actually proved me wrong about something!!
:-)
Personally I actually foind the troll's funny also, the only issue that I
couldn't stand was the whole jerry-died issue, I couldn't live with that but
I solved the problem right away, and steve and the other's have learned
thier lesson. I'd even un-killfile them if they proved that they think I'm
still alive and not an imposter.
About my self-esteem... their is NOTHING they can do to impact it at
all.... but if by some unfortunate thing they do, you'll be the first
person I'll go to for help.
Mike
dsi1
> Everybody here picks on Jerry. Why? Because he likes to eat fast-food and
> openly admits to being heavy?
>
That's the way it was in grade school and a lot of folks still do it
even after they're all grown up. Well, that's the breaks. BTW, you're
wrong about everybody picking on Jerry.
Robert
"Jerry Sauk" <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:mYqdneMCmZRBenPV...@supernews.com...
>
> "Robert" <racemaildro...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:57uHk.3124$c45...@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com...
>> Think of it as a group intervention, jerry needs help.
>>
>> Don't you want him to get help?
>>
>> Robert
>
>
> Jerry does NOT need help. And if I did, it would come from my family, not
> you.
>
>
You should say I DON'T NEED HELP, not jerry does not need help. Unless your
not Jerry!!
Robert
Jerry Sauk
People reffer to themselves by thier own first name all the time, Robert.
Don't turn this into an imposter issue or you'll be killfiled.
Robert
Your a little touchy, remember you accused me of being an imposter first.
What you can make accusations but I can't. That makes you a hypocrite.
Robert
Jerry Sauk
No, I'm not a damn hypocrite at all because you have 100% rights to
kill-file me for calling you an imposter.
But since you brought it up, there are two difference's in our cases. A.)
when I called you and imposter, it was just a suspicion that you were a
sock-puppet. b:) When you called ME an imposter, you were implying that I
was dead, which is what is unaccaptable.
(by the way I no longer think you ran imposter, I'm pretty sure that IF
steve is impostering somebody, it's buck. Steve's posts and buck's are
pretty much the same thing.
Robert
I was question your wording. It was implied by your statement that you were
impersonating jerry. People do not refer to themselves in the third person
on a regular bases, unless they have a spit or multiple personality which by
it nature disassociates them from themselves. Looking from that point of
view I'm implying your nut's not dead!
Robert
Ji...@forteinc.com
Not everyone here picks on Sauk and a lot of the shit that sticks
to him, he brings upon himself. I couldn't care less if he weighs 800
pounds and eats fast food 16 times per day. What I do find
unacceptable are his pathetic attempts at netKKKopping; demanding that
OPs obey his posting rules, as if this is a moderated NG (which it is
not) and he is the moderator (which he isn't). For a
Johnny-come-lately he sure comes across as an arrogant sonofabitch.
His constant misuse of the English language doesn't help either, nor
does his propensity for hitting the comma key at least 10 times per
post in places where no commas apply. Jerry presents himself as a
fairly stupid, barely articulate man who is unable to learn from his
mistakes, unwilling or unable to take advice from others (though it
may be well-meant), and rises to the bait of his antagonists every
time it is cast.
Jimmy
DK
Word...
-dk
Paco
"kilikini" <kili...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gcktku$bje$1...@news.datemas.de...
Has it occurred to you, Miss "I have the hots for Jerry", that perhaps we
are childish and immature? Hmm, has it? Turn around and take a look at
your husband. Go ahead, take a look. There. Need I say more? ;-)
-sw
Jerry Sauk
<Ji...@forteinc.com> wrote in message
news:jhd2f41opp8msf9fb...@4ax.com...
EXCUSE ME?!?!?! There are MANY basic rule's that apply to ALL
newsgroups. Such as keeping your damn post's ON-TOPIC. I reserve my right
to demand everyone follow it.
Jerry Sauk
True, but sometimes I'm talking to people who are to stupid to know who I'm
reffering to when I just say "me".
Now stop pro-longing this pointless arguement.
BY THE WAY I got your email the other day...... there was NOTHING about it
that was off-topic, since this is a group about fast-food we are concerned
about what politcal people we need to vote. for.
Basically Robert said that Mccain would be less likely to tax fast-food
places. So that settles it. If I vote, it'll be for Mccain. (which
translates into lower fast-food price's, which is a bonus for the economy.
Ji...@forteinc.com
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
><Ji...@forteinc.com> wrote in message
>news:jhd2f41opp8msf9fb...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 08:32:32 -0400, "kilikini"
>>
>>
>>
>> Not everyone here picks on Sauk and a lot of the shit that sticks
>> to him, he brings upon himself. I couldn't care less if he weighs 800
>> pounds and eats fast food 16 times per day. What I do find
>> unacceptable are his pathetic attempts at netKKKopping; demanding that
>> OPs obey his posting rules, as if this is a moderated NG (which it is
>> not) and he is the moderator (which he isn't).
>
> EXCUSE ME?!?!?! There are MANY basic rule's that apply to ALL
>newsgroups. Such as keeping your damn post's ON-TOPIC. I reserve my right
>to demand everyone follow it.
>
>
>
>
>
I rest my case.
Robert
Are you admitting that your nuts or that you lies about people referring to
themselves by name all the time?
> Now stop pro-longing this pointless arguement.
>
Which argument are you referring too.
> BY THE WAY I got your email the other day...... there was NOTHING about
> it
> that was off-topic, since this is a group about fast-food we are concerned
> about what politcal people we need to vote. for.
>
This group is about fast food, and by your own words not about
Cooking fast food
politics
Managing a business
Taxes
So the taxes and cost associated with running taco bell are it's managements
problem and not on-topic here.
> Basically Robert said that Mccain would be less likely to tax fast-food
> places. So that settles it. If I vote, it'll be for Mccain. (which
> translates into lower fast-food price's, which is a bonus for the economy.
>
>
What I said basically is that Obama said he was going to raise taxes on
anyone making more then 250,000. Since jerry alone gives taco bell $15.00 a
day for his meal is 5,475 a year. That means Jerry and 45 others will give
them over 250,000 a year. So their taxes will go up.
Robert
Ji...@forteinc.com
<racemaildro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>"J
>
>> Now stop pro-longing this pointless arguement.
>>
>
>Which argument are you referring too.
>
>
>> BY THE WAY I got your email the other day...... there was NOTHING about
>> it
>> that was off-topic, since this is a group about fast-food we are concerned
>> about what politcal people we need to vote. for.
>>
>
>This group is about fast food, and by your own words not about
>
>Cooking fast food
>politics
>Managing a business
>Taxes
>
>So the taxes and cost associated with running taco bell are it's managements
>problem and not on-topic here.
>
>> Basically Robert said that Mccain would be less likely to tax fast-food
>> places. So that settles it. If I vote, it'll be for Mccain. (which
>> translates into lower fast-food price's, which is a bonus for the economy.
>>
>>
>What I said basically is that Obama said he was going to raise taxes on
>anyone making more then 250,000. Since jerry alone gives taco bell $15.00 a
>day for his meal is 5,475 a year. That means Jerry and 45 others will give
>them over 250,000 a year. So their taxes will go up.
>
>Robert
>
>
Smarten up- anything Sauk says is on topic is thus described.
Anything Sauk is off-topic is therefore off-topic. Jeez, get with the
program, man. Don't you realize that anything the drunkard says is
the
word of law ine "A USENET". Jerry hass' areal, probelemm with hizz,
definnnitioonnn of onn' topppic' and' offf-topic.
The fat shitbag (sorry, pig, but you had it coming), wants
everything his own way, and its just not gonna happen. Alll
the peapl in this USENET probably agre'e.
Jerry Sauk
<Ji...@forteinc.com> wrote in message
news:fciaf41vd2u4ht1kc...@4ax.com...
WHAT THE HELL is so difficult to understand that FAST-FOOD is on-topic
and anything NOT about fast-food is OFF-TOPIC? Are you really so stupid you
cant unsderstand? that?
Jerry Sauk
Fast-food politicol issue's are about FAST-FOOD and therefore they are
ON-TOPIC here.
And I take back what I said before about the industry will never need a
bailout... Becayse steve HIMSELF alone cost Taco Bell an estimated $21
Million Dollar's in about 5 post.
Scott
>
> And I take back what I said before about the industry will never need a
> bailout... Becayse steve HIMSELF alone cost Taco Bell an estimated $21
> Million Dollar's in about 5 post.
>
>
So we have control over the fast food industry, which is a major player
in the US economy?
McD's sucks...Taco Bell sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wow, I just did some major damage to our economy!
Buck
> And I take back what I said before about the industry will never need a
> bailout... Becayse steve HIMSELF alone cost Taco Bell an estimated $21
> Million Dollar's in about 5 post.
And you wonder why everyone picks on you for being a trolling dumbass.
Bucky