Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Taco Bell to bring back the Enchirito

8 views
Skip to first unread message

KWills

unread,
Oct 8, 2022, 5:18:29 AM10/8/22
to
https://www.today.com/food/news/taco-bell-bringing-back-discontinued-item-choose-rcna49860

I've never had the Enchirito, and I don't expect to now. But it's
clear the customer base wanted it, so it's back.

--
Be really good to your family and friends. You never know
when you are going to need them to empty your bedpan.

KlausSchadenfreude

unread,
Oct 8, 2022, 5:53:50 AM10/8/22
to
On Sat, 08 Oct 2022 02:18:27 -0700, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:

>https://www.today.com/food/news/taco-bell-bringing-back-discontinued-item-choose-rcna49860
>
> I've never had the Enchirito, and I don't expect to now. But it's
>clear the customer base wanted it, so it's back.

Only people who use their mobile app were actually consulted about
this made up fake "Mexican" dish. It sounds OK, but I bet the end
product looks pretty nasty.

KWills

unread,
Oct 8, 2022, 10:28:13 AM10/8/22
to
I would expect so.

--
There's no place like 127.0.0.1

Jerry Sauk

unread,
Oct 8, 2023, 3:16:13 AM10/8/23
to

"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
news:d2g2khtss1jpkdpjs...@4ax.com...
The Enchirito was a delicious item, but when they returned it it was ON-LINE
ONLY. You couldn't personally order one in the drivethru which is BULLSHIT
and discriminoitary. The next time they make it available, becouse it was
such a popular item, make it available to EVERBODY.


KlausSchadenfreude

unread,
Oct 8, 2023, 7:06:28 AM10/8/23
to
It's a way for them to get you to download the app. Just download it
on your phone and join us in the future, Jenny.

KWills

unread,
Oct 8, 2023, 7:32:02 AM10/8/23
to
On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 02:00:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>news:d2g2khtss1jpkdpjs...@4ax.com...
>> https://www.today.com/food/news/taco-bell-bringing-back-discontinued-item-choose-rcna49860
>>
>> I've never had the Enchirito, and I don't expect to now. But it's
>> clear the customer base wanted it, so it's back.
>>
>> --
>> Be really good to your family and friends. You never know
>> when you are going to need them to empty your bedpan.
>
>The Enchirito was a delicious item, but when they returned it it was ON-LINE
>ONLY.

Again you PROVE you really do NEED to lie.

>You couldn't personally order one in the drivethru which is BULLSHIT

So you have to go inside. Oh doom!
Of course, that you claim it's was not available via
drive-through is very strong evidence that it was available via the
drive-through.

>and discriminoitary.

Since your claim is a lie, your LYING about discrimination fails.

>The next time they make it available, becouse it was
>such a popular item, make it available to EVERBODY.

It was available to EVERYBODY. The article states to *vote* one
must have used the app. The Enchirito was available for order at the
store, as the article states.
Why did you wait a year to expose your NEED to lie? What did you
hope to gain from your LYING about this? I really want to know. But I
know that if you're able to acknowledge you've been caught in a lie,
you will play an avoidance game.

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/

KWills

unread,
Oct 8, 2023, 7:32:11 AM10/8/23
to
On Sun, 08 Oct 2023 04:06:17 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 02:00:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>>news:d2g2khtss1jpkdpjs...@4ax.com...
>>> https://www.today.com/food/news/taco-bell-bringing-back-discontinued-item-choose-rcna49860
>>>
>>> I've never had the Enchirito, and I don't expect to now. But it's
>>> clear the customer base wanted it, so it's back.
>>
>>The Enchirito was a delicious item, but when they returned it it was ON-LINE
>>ONLY. You couldn't personally order one in the drivethru which is BULLSHIT
>>and discriminoitary. The next time they make it available, becouse it was
>>such a popular item, make it available to EVERBODY.
>
>It's a way for them to get you to download the app. Just download it
>on your phone and join us in the future, Jenny.

But it was available for ordering at the store. To vote one had
to use the app. But that was voting only.

--
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.

Jerry Sauk

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 5:25:22 AM10/23/23
to

"KWills" <f...@home.new> wrote in message
news:vo45iitpc8j5tv0oq...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 02:00:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>>news:d2g2khtss1jpkdpjs...@4ax.com...
>>> https://www.today.com/food/news/taco-bell-bringing-back-discontinued-item-choose-rcna49860
>>>
>>> I've never had the Enchirito, and I don't expect to now. But it's
>>> clear the customer base wanted it, so it's back.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Be really good to your family and friends. You never know
>>> when you are going to need them to empty your bedpan.
>>
>>The Enchirito was a delicious item, but when they returned it it was
>>ON-LINE
>>ONLY.
>
> Again you PROVE you really do NEED to lie.

Yawn.


KWills

unread,
Oct 24, 2023, 4:21:49 AM10/24/23
to
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 04:13:19 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <f...@home.new> wrote in message
>news:vo45iitpc8j5tv0oq...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 02:00:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>>>news:d2g2khtss1jpkdpjs...@4ax.com...
>>>> https://www.today.com/food/news/taco-bell-bringing-back-discontinued-item-choose-rcna49860
>>>>
>>>> I've never had the Enchirito, and I don't expect to now. But it's
>>>> clear the customer base wanted it, so it's back.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Be really good to your family and friends. You never know
>>>> when you are going to need them to empty your bedpan.
>>>
>>>The Enchirito was a delicious item, but when they returned it it was
>>>ON-LINE
>>>ONLY.
>>
>> Again you PROVE you really do NEED to lie.
>
>Yawn.
>

Again, if you find your NEED to lie being so completely proved
boring, try honesty.

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

KlausSchadenfreude

unread,
Oct 24, 2023, 6:38:19 AM10/24/23
to
I believe that would be impossible for Jenny.

KWills

unread,
Oct 25, 2023, 4:18:37 AM10/25/23
to
It is. Jenny proves this with nearly every post.

--
Only one shopping day left until tomorrow!

Jerry Sauk

unread,
Feb 14, 2024, 4:12:06 PMFeb 14
to

"KWills" <f...@home.new> wrote in message
news:0q45iih5qauo18hdp...@4ax.com...
I consider that illicit election processes and should be illegal.


Jerry Sauk

unread,
Feb 14, 2024, 4:12:07 PMFeb 14
to

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1435iilg9vt24ggpc...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
And what are people that don't have a cell-phone supposd to do?


K Wills

unread,
Feb 15, 2024, 4:29:48 AMFeb 15
to
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:09:05 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 11:06:17 +0000


Why do you wait MONTHS to reply, Jenny? What do you gain from it? I
really do want to know.


>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1435iilg9vt24ggpc...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 02:00:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>>>news:d2g2khtss1jpkdpjs...@4ax.com...
>>>> https://www.today.com/food/news/taco-bell-bringing-back-discontinued-item-choose-rcna49860
>>>>
>>>> I've never had the Enchirito, and I don't expect to now. But it's
>>>> clear the customer base wanted it, so it's back.
>>>
>>>The Enchirito was a delicious item, but when they returned it it was
>>>ON-LINE
>>>ONLY. You couldn't personally order one in the drivethru which is
>>>BULLSHIT
>>>and discriminoitary. The next time they make it available, becouse it was
>>>such a popular item, make it available to EVERBODY.
>>
>> It's a way for them to get you to download the app. Just download it
>> on your phone and join us in the future, Jenny.
>
>And what are people that don't have a cell-phone supposd to do?

It's 2024. Who, under the age of 90, doesn't have a cell phone?
Well, five-year-olds probably don't. But they won't be the demographic
Taco Bell is looking for.
So, a better question is, who, within the desired age
demographic, doesn't have a cell phone -- especially since they are
often cheaper than a land line? Mint offers a $15/month plan, though
you do have to prepay for a year at $180.
And customers get "free" (it's claimed to be free, but really,
it's just included in the price) Internet with most plans. The
downside, if you can really call it that, is most plans will slow down
the speed after a certain data point is reached. You may go from 5G to
3G. Noticeable with sites like Youtube, but text heavy sites won't
show much change.
I'm not willing to download Taco Bell's app. But if someone was
thinking about getting it, then the promotion was probably a good
incentive to do so. Which, I suspect, was the reason for it.
And, as you know, ordering was possible without the app. So the
whole" needing the app to order" was another of your countless lies.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

K Wills

unread,
Feb 15, 2024, 4:30:13 AMFeb 15
to
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:09:42 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 04:32:23 -0700


And again you wait MONTHS to offer more evidence of your NEED to lie.
What do you believe you gain from this? I really do want to know.
There is nothing illicit in the election process used. But
present your best evidence proving it was/is. I'll wait. Since
anything illicit is already prohibited, often by being made illegal,
you won't offer any evidence for your claim.
Maybe you will also explain why you LIED and claimed ordering was
only allowed via the app when, as explained in the article, ordering
in person was allowed?

KlausSchadenfreude

unread,
Feb 15, 2024, 7:02:21 AMFeb 15
to
The vast majority of Americans – 97% – now own a cell phone of some
kind. Nine-in-ten own a smartphone
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/

Those who don't cannot have an Enchirito, or they will have a friend
order it for them. Why couldn't you figure this out, Jenny?


KlausSchadenfreude

unread,
Feb 15, 2024, 7:04:48 AMFeb 15
to
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:09:42 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <f...@home.new> wrote in message
>news:0q45iih5qauo18hdp...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 08 Oct 2023 04:06:17 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>> <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 02:00:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>><jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>>>>news:d2g2khtss1jpkdpjs...@4ax.com...
>>>>> https://www.today.com/food/news/taco-bell-bringing-back-discontinued-item-choose-rcna49860
>>>>>
>>>>> I've never had the Enchirito, and I don't expect to now. But it's
>>>>> clear the customer base wanted it, so it's back.
>>>>
>>>>The Enchirito was a delicious item, but when they returned it it was
>>>>ON-LINE
>>>>ONLY. You couldn't personally order one in the drivethru which is
>>>>BULLSHIT
>>>>and discriminoitary. The next time they make it available, becouse it
>>>>was
>>>>such a popular item, make it available to EVERBODY.
>>>
>>>It's a way for them to get you to download the app. Just download it
>>>on your phone and join us in the future, Jenny.
>>
>> But it was available for ordering at the store. To vote one had
>> to use the app. But that was voting only.
>
>I consider that illicit election processes and should be illegal.

You would be wrong, as you are 99.99999999% of the time.

The voting is ONLY open to people who have a smart phone. That's
because they only want the opinions of people with a smart phone.

People that don't have a smart phone are not desirable customers.

Are you saying you DON'T have a smartphone, Jenny?

KlausSchadenfreude

unread,
Feb 15, 2024, 7:05:32 AMFeb 15
to
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 01:30:28 -0800, K Wills <kw...@kw.kw> wrote:

>On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:09:05 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 11:06:17 +0000
>
>
>Why do you wait MONTHS to reply, Jenny? What do you gain from it? I
>really do want to know.

He's hoping it will make it harder to go back and track his lies.

Jerry Sauk

unread,
Feb 15, 2024, 9:11:32 PMFeb 15
to

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8avrsih7lehbtlbqo...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
And what kind of people would that be? Please try to answer without being
racist.


K Wills

unread,
Feb 16, 2024, 5:08:59 AMFeb 16
to
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 04:02:08 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:09:05 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schade...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:1435iilg9vt24ggpc...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 02:00:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>>>>news:d2g2khtss1jpkdpjs...@4ax.com...
>>>>> https://www.today.com/food/news/taco-bell-bringing-back-discontinued-item-choose-rcna49860
>>>>>
>>>>> I've never had the Enchirito, and I don't expect to now. But it's
>>>>> clear the customer base wanted it, so it's back.
>>>>
>>>>The Enchirito was a delicious item, but when they returned it it was
>>>>ON-LINE
>>>>ONLY. You couldn't personally order one in the drivethru which is
>>>>BULLSHIT
>>>>and discriminoitary. The next time they make it available, becouse it was
>>>>such a popular item, make it available to EVERBODY.
>>>
>>> It's a way for them to get you to download the app. Just download it
>>> on your phone and join us in the future, Jenny.
>>
>>And what are people that don't have a cell-phone supposd to do?
>

What they've done in the past. Order in the store.

>The vast majority of Americans – 97% – now own a cell phone of some
>kind. Nine-in-ten own a smartphone
>https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/
>
>Those who don't cannot have an Enchirito, or they will have a friend
>order it for them. Why couldn't you figure this out, Jenny?

They can still have one. The article states, "...by ordering
digitally through Taco Bell’s app, delivery, online or via *in-store
kiosks* at locations nationwide." (Emphasis added)
Jenny was, of course, lying.

--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world:
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

K Wills

unread,
Feb 16, 2024, 5:09:07 AMFeb 16
to
A dumb reason, since clicking on the MIDs will bring up the
posts. Unless someone uses a mail client that can read Usenet. Such a
simpleton won't be able to make use of the MIDs.

--
Dadass
Tuesdays 8PM
Network TV Channel

K Wills

unread,
Feb 16, 2024, 5:09:28 AMFeb 16
to
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:04:17 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
Klaus answered your question before you asked.

"People that don't have a smart phone are not desirable customers."

Your hope to gain an opportunity to express your racism has
failed.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

KlausSchadenfreude

unread,
Feb 16, 2024, 6:10:01 AMFeb 16
to
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:04:17 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
Poor Luddites.

You're the one that's racist, Jenny. Proven fact.
0 new messages