Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Did David Rockefeller really say this?

95 views
Skip to first unread message

Semi-Detached

unread,
Nov 16, 2002, 10:19:47 PM11/16/02
to
This almost sounds like an urban legend does anyone know if its true?


http://www.rense.com/general17/quote.htm
David Rockefeller's 1991 Bilderberg Quote...Ten Years Later

``Quote:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time
Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended
our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost
forty years."

He went on to explain:

"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the
world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during
those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to
march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of
an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to
the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."


-- David Rockefeller, Speaking at the June, 1991 Bilderberger
meeting in Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by
then-Governor Bill Clinton and by Dan Quayle''

Tom Sevart

unread,
Nov 18, 2002, 6:14:08 PM11/18/02
to

"Semi-Detached" <fullmet...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20021116221947...@mb-fa.aol.com...

> This almost sounds like an urban legend does anyone know if its true?

> -- David Rockefeller, Speaking at the June, 1991 Bilderberger


> meeting in Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by
> then-Governor Bill Clinton and by Dan Quayle''

He said that, but the sound of the black helicopters flying overhead drowned
out his voice.

Tom


Simon Slavin

unread,
Nov 18, 2002, 6:34:04 PM11/18/02
to
In article <20021116221947...@mb-fa.aol.com>,
fullmet...@aol.com (Semi-Detached) wrote:

>This almost sounds like an urban legend does anyone know if its true?

If /what/ is true ?


Lon Stowell

unread,
Nov 18, 2002, 10:31:39 PM11/18/02
to

what is always true

Lon "surprised..." Stowell


John Francis

unread,
Nov 18, 2002, 10:39:45 PM11/18/02
to
In article <3DD9B0A0...@attbi.com>,

Lon Stowell <lon.s...@attbi.comedy.forum> wrote:
>
> what is always true
>
> Lon "surprised..." Stowell

TINBOAC

--
John "or BEA, come to that" Francis

Semi-Detached

unread,
Nov 22, 2002, 11:12:43 AM11/22/02
to
>From: "Tom Sevart" n2uhc...@yahoo.com

>
>He said that, but the sound of the black helicopters flying overhead drowned
>out his voice.

You're a stupid fucker

Peter of the Norse

unread,
Nov 24, 2002, 3:55:47 AM11/24/02
to
In article <20021122111243...@mb-cd.aol.com>, "Semi-Detached"
<fullmet...@aol.com> spake:

> You're a stupid fucker

It seems like someone is in the dumps. What can we do about that? I know!

GROUP HUG!

Come on now. Gather 'round. Don't be shy. There now. Don't you feel
better?

--
Peter "We lurrvve you" of the Norse
'"Bordem". I like it. Suggests a whorehouse of ennui.' - Chris Clarke

Tom Sevart

unread,
Nov 26, 2002, 1:39:24 PM11/26/02
to

"Semi-Detached" <fullmet...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20021122111243...@mb-cd.aol.com...

Actually, my wife calls me a smart fucker, and I'm more inclined to listen
to her opinion than some anonymous moron on a newsgroup.

Tom


Dutch Courage of Horror

unread,
Nov 26, 2002, 3:19:45 PM11/26/02
to
"Tom Sevart" n2uhc...@yahoo.com writes:

>Actually, my wife calls me a smart fucker, and I'm more inclined to listen
>to her opinion than some anonymous moron on a newsgroup

Ad Hominem.

--
." A cover in bad taste, for example, might be defined as holding the head a
little higher so that the blood could be seen dripping from it, and moving the
body over a little further so that the neck of the body could be seen to be
bloody."

0 new messages