Grupy dyskusyjne Google nie obsługują już nowych postów ani subskrypcji z Usenetu. Treści historyczne nadal będą dostępne.

UL reference?

69 wyświetleń
Przejdź do pierwszej nieodczytanej wiadomości

Mark Shaw

nieprzeczytany,
28 mar 2022, 19:41:5428.03.2022
do
What's the go-to resource for debunking ULs these days? Snopes seems
to have evolved into pure fact-checking, and I've found nothing else
useful.

Thanks-

--
Mark Shaw moc TOD liamg TA wahsnm
========================================================================
"All of my mistakes are giving me ideas." - Natalie Lileks

cbusylol

nieprzeczytany,
4 kwi 2022, 02:31:544.04.2022
do
There probably aren't a lot now that social media is a loudspeaker

And social media networks aren't exactly designed or have instruments
to find or archive much of anything that is posted- it's all now now now.

All you need is one situation / video and 200 people retweeting out of
context and bam, you have yourself a modern urban legend.

This will likely never change since the majority of those that listen don't
bother to do any sort of research, which all ULs tend to have in common
and propagate through.

Word of mouth spread is a lot less though (read: not through the keyboard)
and there's all sorts of factors into that.

Ray Depew

nieprzeczytany,
20 sty 2023, 18:02:1320.01.2023
do
On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 5:41:54 PM UTC-6, Mark Shaw wrote:
Wow, they're all gone.

I just had a look at/for all of the old goto sites.

* snopes.com, as you observed, is nothing like what it used to be.
* Likewise, truthorfiction.com, while it's still there, hasn't been updated lately.
* urbanlegends.about.com no longer exists, and typing in the URL takes you to a fluff page.
* The grand old tafkac.org ("The Archive Formerly Known as Cathouse") is no more. The URL has been taken over by what looks like a business operating under the dot-org rubric instead of dot-com.
* urbanlegends.com is a page selling stuff.
* urbanlegends.org takes you to Arthur Goldstuck's UL blog, and it hasn't been updated since 2012.

All the sparkling edifices of the 1990s and 2000s are crumbling to dust.

--
Regards
Ray
"It does not do to
leave a live dragon out of
your calculations."
-- haiku by J. R. R. Tolkien

danny burstein

nieprzeczytany,
20 sty 2023, 18:28:5520.01.2023
do
In <66dc740d-bc0d-4f2a...@googlegroups.com> Ray Depew <bisho...@gmail.com> writes:

>On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 5:41:54 PM UTC-6, Mark Shaw wrote:
>> What's the go-to resource for debunking ULs these days? Snopes seems
>> to have evolved into pure fact-checking, and I've found nothing else
>> useful.
>> --
>> Mark Shaw moc TOD liamg TA wahsnm
>> ========================================================================

>Wow, they're all gone.

>I just had a look at/for all of the old goto sites.

>* snopes.com, as you observed, is nothing like what it used to be.

[tales of woe snipped]

>All the sparkling edifices of the 1990s and 2000s are crumbling to dust.

Not bad. Mr. Mark's query is March, 2022. I guess we'll hear
from Ed Rice in another year or two...

His doppleganger, an author based in California (I think...)
has a bunch of books that might qualify. Or might be a
good source of laughs, depending on your point of view.

https://markshawbooks.com


--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
dan...@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

Don Freeman

nieprzeczytany,
25 sty 2023, 14:40:3725.01.2023
do
There the subreddit r/UrbanMyths though it does seem to be mainly
recounting ghost stories.

Don Freeman

nieprzeczytany,
25 sty 2023, 14:46:2425.01.2023
do
On 1/25/2023 12:40 PM, Don Freeman wrote:

>
> There the subreddit r/UrbanMyths though it does seem to be mainly
> recounting ghost stories.
>

There is also r/UrbanLegends but it is the same as the one above.

Paul Tomblin

nieprzeczytany,
31 sty 2023, 13:20:5331.01.2023
do
In a previous article, Ray Depew <bisho...@gmail.com> said:
>All the sparkling edifices of the 1990s and 2000s are crumbling to dust.

As are those of us who created them.


--
Paul Tomblin <ptom...@xcski.com> http://blog.xcski.com/
God is real, unless declared as an integer.

Lee Rudolph

nieprzeczytany,
19 lut 2023, 21:16:4819.02.2023
do
On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 1:20:53 PM UTC-5, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> In a previous article, Ray Depew <bisho...@gmail.com> said:
> >All the sparkling edifices of the 1990s and 2000s are crumbling to dust.
> As are those of us who created them.

Speak for yourself. I am crumbling to ashes.

Tim McDaniel

nieprzeczytany,
26 lut 2023, 16:34:3326.02.2023
do
In article <33517428-54e5-49b9...@googlegroups.com>,
Power Off options: please choose one.

[ ] Ashes to ashes
[ ] Funk to funky
[ ] Dust to dust
[ ] All flesh is grass
[ ] A spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire
[ ] Other (please detail in 16 characters or fewer)

--
Tim McDaniel, tm...@panix.com
Nowe wiadomości: 0