The original computing engine was trinary (0,1,2)

[Cornette B. Meltzer]

Imagine what the world would be like today if we had that much extra
computing power. Instead, we're stuck in a binary-based system.

[D]

On Wed, 21 Feb 2024, Cornette B. Meltzer wrote:

> Imagine what the world would be like today if we had that much extra
> computing power. Instead, we're stuck in a binary-based system.
>
>

Quantum computing to the rescue!

[Blue-Maned_Hawk]

A trinary computer would still be turingcomplete, and therefore exactly as
powerful as a binary one, to the degree that computing power can be
quantified.


--
Blue-Maned_Hawk│shortens to
Hawk│/
blu.mɛin.dʰak/
│he/him/his/himself/Mr.
blue-maned_hawk.srht.site
Works half the time!

[Julieta Shem]

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Removed rec.sport.pro-wrestling. (Can't see any sense in that.)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluema...@invalid.invalid> writes:

> A trinary computer would still be turingcomplete

Technically, we could have a binary or trinary computer that's not
Turing complete. Turing completeness is a function of the instruction
set of the computer. Even more technically, it also requires an
infinite memory. (But when someone says---it's Turing complete---, it's
usually just meant that it's able to loop.)

[Jan van den Broek]

2024-02-22, Julieta Shem <js...@yaxenu.org> schrieb:
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> Removed rec.sport.pro-wrestling. (Can't see any sense in that.)
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

It's possible the someone just wants to fill that group with
off-topic postings.

[Schnipp]

--
Jan van den Broek
balg...@xs4all.nl 0xAFDAD00D
http://huizen.dds.nl/~balglaas/