Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
[REVENGE NOMINATIONS INCLUDED] VOTE! March, 2013 Usenet Kook Awards
9 views
Skip to first unread message
Hawkeye-X
Apr 7, 2013, 12:16:24 PM4/7/13
to
On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 13:29:02 +0000 (UTC), Gary Burnore also known as
the Fake"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler", Thrown out by Peter J.
Ross the FNVW-e after 6 days of duty <fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>The Voting will close Monday, April 8 at 23:59:59 UTC.
>
>
>Gary Burnore also known as the Fake Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler, Thrown out by Peter J. Ross <fn...@databasix.com> wrote in
>news:kjnro5$3bf$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> Here follows the one true ballot for the March 2013 Usenet Kook
>> Awards.
>>
Burnore, knock it off.
Also, Gary you also fucked up AGAIN. Your NSP let you post to
alt.flame.alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk?
No-one is (or is willing to) recognizing the kook awards of yours,
because you keep fucking UP.
I'm busy, and don't have time for your lits-o-haet.
You're just using the AUK awards to protect your tiny wanger which
no-one gives a shit about.
You're trying to include me in your kook civil war with the FNVW's,
and I am asking you, no I'm telling YOU to fuck off.
My story is simply this:
The group I hang out in, news.admin.net-abuse.email had a kook and a
spam supporter (ROKSO certified) named Andrew J. Stephens aka Andrew
Stevens aka Pastor Peanut Butter Farts, aka Stophaus that had engaged
in a two year war of hilarity and stupidity, so kooky, it was like we
were watching a TV series. I knew the time was to come to confirm the
legitimate kook that we had, I came to AUK to validate AJS's
kookiness, and the 4 FNVW's accepted it first, recognizing for who AJS
is. I stuck around to make sure it was proprerly seen through. Then
about two weeks later you said you were the FNVW, and I gave you a
chance. You rejected some of it, because you didn't see some of it,
despite Andrew Stephen's 2 year history with nanae, a group you are
supposedly supportive of. Then Bit Rot got started with all that shit
with me, and I wisely decided to ignore him, and you fell for it, hook
line and sinker. I tried to caution you out of it, but you just
decided I was a kook from very few posts that I made. I told you I was
neutral on this matter, but you took it too personally and nominated
me as the kook of the month.
I'm not a chewtoy nor do I have time to pretend I'm one.
Just leave me alone, Gary. You don't have a very good history right
now.
the Fake"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler", Thrown out by Peter J.
Ross the FNVW-e after 6 days of duty <fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>The Voting will close Monday, April 8 at 23:59:59 UTC.
>
>
>Gary Burnore also known as the Fake Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler, Thrown out by Peter J. Ross <fn...@databasix.com> wrote in
>news:kjnro5$3bf$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> Here follows the one true ballot for the March 2013 Usenet Kook
>> Awards.
>>
Burnore, knock it off.
Also, Gary you also fucked up AGAIN. Your NSP let you post to
alt.flame.alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk?
No-one is (or is willing to) recognizing the kook awards of yours,
because you keep fucking UP.
I'm busy, and don't have time for your lits-o-haet.
You're just using the AUK awards to protect your tiny wanger which
no-one gives a shit about.
You're trying to include me in your kook civil war with the FNVW's,
and I am asking you, no I'm telling YOU to fuck off.
My story is simply this:
The group I hang out in, news.admin.net-abuse.email had a kook and a
spam supporter (ROKSO certified) named Andrew J. Stephens aka Andrew
Stevens aka Pastor Peanut Butter Farts, aka Stophaus that had engaged
in a two year war of hilarity and stupidity, so kooky, it was like we
were watching a TV series. I knew the time was to come to confirm the
legitimate kook that we had, I came to AUK to validate AJS's
kookiness, and the 4 FNVW's accepted it first, recognizing for who AJS
is. I stuck around to make sure it was proprerly seen through. Then
about two weeks later you said you were the FNVW, and I gave you a
chance. You rejected some of it, because you didn't see some of it,
despite Andrew Stephen's 2 year history with nanae, a group you are
supposedly supportive of. Then Bit Rot got started with all that shit
with me, and I wisely decided to ignore him, and you fell for it, hook
line and sinker. I tried to caution you out of it, but you just
decided I was a kook from very few posts that I made. I told you I was
neutral on this matter, but you took it too personally and nominated
me as the kook of the month.
I'm not a chewtoy nor do I have time to pretend I'm one.
Just leave me alone, Gary. You don't have a very good history right
now.
happy zombie jebus
Apr 7, 2013, 12:40:12 PM4/7/13
to
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 10:16:24 -0600, Hawkeye-X <tes...@gmail.con>
wrote:
news.admin.net-abuse.email
sounds like a lot of effort to me, i think i'll leave my abuse on
usenet so everyone can share in it.
hand.
--
mhm x v i x i i i
wrote:
sounds like a lot of effort to me, i think i'll leave my abuse on
usenet so everyone can share in it.
hand.
--
mhm x v i x i i i
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Hawkeye-X
Apr 7, 2013, 1:40:43 PM4/7/13
to
On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:49:19 +0000 (UTC), Gary Burnore
<gbur...@panix.com> wrote:
>In news.admin.net-abuse.email Hawkeye-X <tes...@gmail.con> wrote:
>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 13:29:02 +0000 (UTC), Gary Burnore also known as
>> the Fake"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler", Thrown out by Peter J.
>> Ross the FNVW-e after 6 days of duty <fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>The Voting will close Monday, April 8 at 23:59:59 UTC.
>>>
>>>
>>>Gary Burnore also known as the Fake Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler, Thrown out by Peter J. Ross <fn...@databasix.com> wrote in
>>>news:kjnro5$3bf$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> Here follows the one true ballot for the March 2013 Usenet Kook
>>>> Awards.
>>>>
>> Burnore, knock it off.
>>
>> Also, Gary you also fucked up AGAIN.
>
>Acceptance speeches before the awards are announced are rather uncouth.
Look carefully. I fixed it for you, stupid. Your original post
x-posted to that above. You put a period between flame and alt.
>
>> No-one is (or is willing to) recognizing the kook awards of yours,
>> because you keep fucking UP.
>
>So you're saying that the awards for Andrew should not stand?
Your kook awards for Andrew is fine, even your own side recognizes
that Andrew is one big honking kook. But you decided to pick on me for
some apparent reason after Bit Rot outerfilthed me and got you to join
his k00k krusade.
>>
>> I'm busy, and don't have time for your lits-o-haet.
>
>But you did in Spamdrew's case?
>
If you saw my posting pattern for those past two years, I ignored
Andrew for nearly a year in between.
>> You're just using the AUK awards to protect your tiny wanger which
>> no-one gives a shit about.
>
>Seems actually, you're the only one worried about the size of my wanger. Did it hurt?
>
No butthurt here, because it's all about defending yourself and your
"good" name. That's why you're hiding behind those lits-o-haet.
>>
>> You're trying to include me in your kook civil war with the FNVW's,
>> and I am asking you, no I'm telling YOU to fuck off.
>
>There's no kook civil war. There are k00ks and there are k00kologists and
>you chose to side with the k00ks.
That's because you decided to stupidly put the 4 FNVW's on Golden
Killfile that you made up because they were SPNAK'ing you on a daily
basis and you needed a break - so you revenge nominated them to get
the kooks on your side. I took a careful look at the Google files, and
found some early history - and recognized for the real FNVW's. Those
four. Not you.
You haven't still explained _WHY_ Peter J. Ross called you a clown and
kicked you off the FNVW slot after a mere 6 days and ignored you ever
since. If Peter J. Ross would like to confirm that said termination on
this post, it would be nice to have the emetrius confirm that you are
not a valid FNVW.
>>> My story is simply this:
>
>Yawn.
>within the group, but it's not a bar.
Whatever. You hang out and stalk AUK on a daily basis as well as
harassing Emmett Gulley among others. You may have your thoughts about
where to hang out - like people hang out in Facebook, people hang out
in forums, I chose to hang out in Usenet for a short while.
>
>> and a spam supporter (ROKSO certified) named Andrew J. Stephens aka Andrew
>> Stevens aka Pastor Peanut Butter Farts, aka Stophaus that had engaged
>> in a two year war of hilarity and stupidity, so kooky, it was like we
>> were watching a TV series.
>
>... and, of course, you as a k00k couldn't keep from mixing the business of
>fighting spam with the "pleasure" of nominating him.
>
I found time, so I am finding time to deal with your utter kookiness
right now, even though I don't *want* to.
>> I knew the time was to come to confirm the legitimate kook that we had, I came to
>> AUK to validate AJS's kookiness
>
>Which is tacit proof that you believe the awards to be able to validate.
>
>Four dictators? Really? If you're that stupid, how much of what you post
>in nanae can be trusted? You're as fr00ty as Bai^h^h^h you know who.
>that you were dealing with four k00ks (actually only one or two people)
>
MID?: Besides you. And kooks don't count.
>> You rejected some of it, because you didn't see some of it,
>
>No, it was rejected because you did not present the evidence in your nomination.
>You're so busy being a k00k that you couldn't read the rules? You just went down
>the list, right?
You rejected it because you were too lazy to bother to check the
posting history of AJS. THe FNVW's (the real ones) has followed AJS
for quite some time and has been quite aware of him - and accepted the
nominations as such followed with the proper MID's.
>
>> despite Andrew Stephen's 2 year history with nanae, a group you are
>> supposedly supportive of.
>
>Supposedly? Prove otherwise, k00k or again be proven a liar.
>
I've been on nanae since 1996, at least, and have seen you on nanae
from time to time with some rational discussions. Apparently you
turned yourself from such a respected anti-spam fighter to a kook. I
supposed we've got bad apples on the bunch. I told you about Morely.
>> Then Bit Rot got started with all that shit
>> with me, and I wisely decided to ignore him, and you fell for it, hook
>> line and sinker.
>
>Revisionist history, when it is so clearly evident by the posts available on spool,
>is eligible for an award, I believe. Did you check?
>
Because you support k00ks like Bit Rot as an amigo in your little war
against me.
>Tells me you can't be trusted and that anything you put forth in nanae should
>be suspect.
Please provide proof that I supported Pastor Peanut Butter Farts.
Please. I'm waiting. That's where you fucked up, Gary. You ASSume
things, when you shouldn't. That's why I told you to read the nanae's
posting history for the last two years. Even skimming a few would have
showed you that you're on the wrong side.
>> I told you I was neutral on this matter,
>
>I'm not really shocked that you don't get this. You can't say you "came to auk"
>to get validation on something and then be neutral on the issue of you choosing
>k00ks over k00kologists. With all the evidence out there tht they're k00ks.
Look, asshole, The last time I was in auk when nanae was dealing with
Lamie Baillie. If my memory serves me, Sean was the FNVW at that time,
and accepted my nomination of Lamie for a bunch of kook awards that he
later won. My understanding is that Lamie finally bought a clue, and
has been pretty silent ever since.
>> but you took it too personally and nominated me as the kook of the month.
>
>It's nothing personal.
By nominating me as Kook of the Month, you have made it personal. I
think you should drop the nomination, period. You accepted a kook's
nomination for Clueless Newbie of the Month. That's a revenge
nomination, and so is your nomination for me as KotM. I am officially
requesting that you deem both nominations invalid and dropped. Then
we'll go back to ignoring each other. Fair enough?
>> I'm not a chewtoy nor do I have time to pretend I'm one.
>
>You had time to "hang around and see the process through" for spamdrew.
>
Because I was determined to see that he earned those awards. Now my
part's done.
>>
>> Just leave me alone, Gary.
>
>I'm not doing anything to you. In fact, you started the discussion.
And I have nothing more to say to you.
<gbur...@panix.com> wrote:
>In news.admin.net-abuse.email Hawkeye-X <tes...@gmail.con> wrote:
>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 13:29:02 +0000 (UTC), Gary Burnore also known as
>> the Fake"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler", Thrown out by Peter J.
>> Ross the FNVW-e after 6 days of duty <fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>The Voting will close Monday, April 8 at 23:59:59 UTC.
>>>
>>>
>>>Gary Burnore also known as the Fake Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler, Thrown out by Peter J. Ross <fn...@databasix.com> wrote in
>>>news:kjnro5$3bf$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> Here follows the one true ballot for the March 2013 Usenet Kook
>>>> Awards.
>>>>
>> Burnore, knock it off.
>>
>> Also, Gary you also fucked up AGAIN.
>
>
>> Your NSP let you post to alt.flame.alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk?
>
>So does yours. Funny, that.
>> Your NSP let you post to alt.flame.alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk?
>
Look carefully. I fixed it for you, stupid. Your original post
x-posted to that above. You put a period between flame and alt.
>
>> No-one is (or is willing to) recognizing the kook awards of yours,
>> because you keep fucking UP.
>
Your kook awards for Andrew is fine, even your own side recognizes
that Andrew is one big honking kook. But you decided to pick on me for
some apparent reason after Bit Rot outerfilthed me and got you to join
his k00k krusade.
>>
>> I'm busy, and don't have time for your lits-o-haet.
>
>
If you saw my posting pattern for those past two years, I ignored
Andrew for nearly a year in between.
>> You're just using the AUK awards to protect your tiny wanger which
>> no-one gives a shit about.
>
>
No butthurt here, because it's all about defending yourself and your
"good" name. That's why you're hiding behind those lits-o-haet.
>>
>> You're trying to include me in your kook civil war with the FNVW's,
>> and I am asking you, no I'm telling YOU to fuck off.
>
>you chose to side with the k00ks.
That's because you decided to stupidly put the 4 FNVW's on Golden
Killfile that you made up because they were SPNAK'ing you on a daily
basis and you needed a break - so you revenge nominated them to get
the kooks on your side. I took a careful look at the Google files, and
found some early history - and recognized for the real FNVW's. Those
four. Not you.
You haven't still explained _WHY_ Peter J. Ross called you a clown and
kicked you off the FNVW slot after a mere 6 days and ignored you ever
since. If Peter J. Ross would like to confirm that said termination on
this post, it would be nice to have the emetrius confirm that you are
not a valid FNVW.
>>> My story is simply this:
>
>
>> The group I hang out in, news.admin.net-abuse.email had a kook
>
>You don't "hang out" in a USENet group. You might participate in conversations
>> The group I hang out in, news.admin.net-abuse.email had a kook
>
>within the group, but it's not a bar.
Whatever. You hang out and stalk AUK on a daily basis as well as
harassing Emmett Gulley among others. You may have your thoughts about
where to hang out - like people hang out in Facebook, people hang out
in forums, I chose to hang out in Usenet for a short while.
>
>> and a spam supporter (ROKSO certified) named Andrew J. Stephens aka Andrew
>> Stevens aka Pastor Peanut Butter Farts, aka Stophaus that had engaged
>> in a two year war of hilarity and stupidity, so kooky, it was like we
>> were watching a TV series.
>
>fighting spam with the "pleasure" of nominating him.
>
I found time, so I am finding time to deal with your utter kookiness
right now, even though I don't *want* to.
>> I knew the time was to come to confirm the legitimate kook that we had, I came to
>> AUK to validate AJS's kookiness
>
>
>
>
>>, and the 4 FNVW's accepted it first,
>
>Four k00ks claiming, at the same time, to be a dictator called the FNVW.
>
>
>>, and the 4 FNVW's accepted it first,
>
>
>Four dictators? Really? If you're that stupid, how much of what you post
>in nanae can be trusted? You're as fr00ty as Bai^h^h^h you know who.
>
>> recognizing for who AJS is. I stuck around to make sure it was proprerly seen through.
>
>You bought the k00ks line. Noted.
>> recognizing for who AJS is. I stuck around to make sure it was proprerly seen through.
>
>
>> Then about two weeks later you said you were the FNVW, and I gave you a
>> chance.
>
>There was no chance for you to give, k00k. You were informed, by more than one person
>> Then about two weeks later you said you were the FNVW, and I gave you a
>> chance.
>
>that you were dealing with four k00ks (actually only one or two people)
>
MID?: Besides you. And kooks don't count.
>> You rejected some of it, because you didn't see some of it,
>
>You're so busy being a k00k that you couldn't read the rules? You just went down
>the list, right?
You rejected it because you were too lazy to bother to check the
posting history of AJS. THe FNVW's (the real ones) has followed AJS
for quite some time and has been quite aware of him - and accepted the
nominations as such followed with the proper MID's.
>
>> despite Andrew Stephen's 2 year history with nanae, a group you are
>> supposedly supportive of.
>
>
I've been on nanae since 1996, at least, and have seen you on nanae
from time to time with some rational discussions. Apparently you
turned yourself from such a respected anti-spam fighter to a kook. I
supposed we've got bad apples on the bunch. I told you about Morely.
>> Then Bit Rot got started with all that shit
>> with me, and I wisely decided to ignore him, and you fell for it, hook
>> line and sinker.
>
>is eligible for an award, I believe. Did you check?
>
Because you support k00ks like Bit Rot as an amigo in your little war
against me.
>
>> I tried to caution you out of it, but you just
>> decided I was a kook from very few posts that I made.
>
>The main determination was your continued support of OTHER k00ks like Andrew.
>> I tried to caution you out of it, but you just
>> decided I was a kook from very few posts that I made.
>
>Tells me you can't be trusted and that anything you put forth in nanae should
>be suspect.
Please provide proof that I supported Pastor Peanut Butter Farts.
Please. I'm waiting. That's where you fucked up, Gary. You ASSume
things, when you shouldn't. That's why I told you to read the nanae's
posting history for the last two years. Even skimming a few would have
showed you that you're on the wrong side.
>> I told you I was neutral on this matter,
>
>to get validation on something and then be neutral on the issue of you choosing
>k00ks over k00kologists. With all the evidence out there tht they're k00ks.
Look, asshole, The last time I was in auk when nanae was dealing with
Lamie Baillie. If my memory serves me, Sean was the FNVW at that time,
and accepted my nomination of Lamie for a bunch of kook awards that he
later won. My understanding is that Lamie finally bought a clue, and
has been pretty silent ever since.
>> but you took it too personally and nominated me as the kook of the month.
>
By nominating me as Kook of the Month, you have made it personal. I
think you should drop the nomination, period. You accepted a kook's
nomination for Clueless Newbie of the Month. That's a revenge
nomination, and so is your nomination for me as KotM. I am officially
requesting that you deem both nominations invalid and dropped. Then
we'll go back to ignoring each other. Fair enough?
>> I'm not a chewtoy nor do I have time to pretend I'm one.
>
>
Because I was determined to see that he earned those awards. Now my
part's done.
>>
>> Just leave me alone, Gary.
>
>
>> You don't have a very good history right now.
>>
>Ah so you lied to me too.
>> You don't have a very good history right now.
>>
And I have nothing more to say to you.
Message has been deleted
Checkmate
Apr 7, 2013, 3:18:39 PM4/7/13
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 10:16:24 -0600, Hawkeye-X put forth the notion that:
Yeah, Gary... just leave him alone!
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright ￜ 2012
all rights reserved
I'm Checkmate, and I approve this message...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpZhZAr1cQU
Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
_____________________________________________________________________
"I keep forgetting you've been doing this for so long that it's easy
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave."
Uncle Steve
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
"Did... did you just tell someone to attempt to ROT-13 *numbers*, you
Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?"
Paul Derbyshire, socked-up as [tor] Phoenix
Message-ID: <k3ae35$prb$1...@news.mixmin.net>
_____________________________________________________________________
"Nov. 1 can't come quickly enough for me. I really, REALLY want to put
that little + in the box for your Creepy Candy Coating on the ballot,
so badly my hand is twitching. And I'm sorely tempted to rustle up a
couple dozen sockpuppets and stuff the ballot box just to make
absolutely sure you "win" it, you fucking lech!"
Paul Derbyshire, socked up as Andrew Wilson
Message-ID: <9870030e-6c49-4f16-af9e-
070a57...@g18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."
-Ragnar
_____________________________________________________________________
"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"
-Ragnar, socked-up as "Wildhare"
_____________________________________________________________________
Checkmate!
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 10:16:24 -0600, Hawkeye-X put forth the notion that:
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright ￜ 2012
all rights reserved
I'm Checkmate, and I approve this message...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpZhZAr1cQU
Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
_____________________________________________________________________
"I keep forgetting you've been doing this for so long that it's easy
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave."
Uncle Steve
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
"Did... did you just tell someone to attempt to ROT-13 *numbers*, you
Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?"
Paul Derbyshire, socked-up as [tor] Phoenix
Message-ID: <k3ae35$prb$1...@news.mixmin.net>
_____________________________________________________________________
"Nov. 1 can't come quickly enough for me. I really, REALLY want to put
that little + in the box for your Creepy Candy Coating on the ballot,
so badly my hand is twitching. And I'm sorely tempted to rustle up a
couple dozen sockpuppets and stuff the ballot box just to make
absolutely sure you "win" it, you fucking lech!"
Paul Derbyshire, socked up as Andrew Wilson
Message-ID: <9870030e-6c49-4f16-af9e-
070a57...@g18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."
-Ragnar
_____________________________________________________________________
"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"
-Ragnar, socked-up as "Wildhare"
_____________________________________________________________________
Message has been deleted
Ms. Kitty
Apr 7, 2013, 5:16:11 PM4/7/13
to
"Hawkeye-X" <tes...@gmail.con> wrote in message
news:6o63m8l0ca6t05js2...@4ax.com...
wanker, he's really not worth more than a sentence, if at all. I'm
surprised he hasn't been nominated for the GKF by now.
MK
Nadegda
Apr 7, 2013, 8:05:49 PM4/7/13
to
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 16:16:11 -0500, Ms. Kitty wrote:
> "Hawkeye-X" <tes...@gmail.con> wrote in message
> news:6o63m8l0ca6t05js2...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 13:29:02 +0000 (UTC), Gary Burnore...
> "Hawkeye-X" <tes...@gmail.con> wrote in message
> news:6o63m8l0ca6t05js2...@4ax.com...
...
> I think you finally understand Gary pretty well by now. Just ignore the
> wanker, he's really not worth more than a sentence, if at all. I'm
> surprised he hasn't been nominated for the GKF by now.
Oh, the Tetrarchy thinks there's still a great deal of amusement to be
> wanker, he's really not worth more than a sentence, if at all. I'm
> surprised he hasn't been nominated for the GKF by now.
wrung out of trolling that kook, prodding him into frothing, and watching
him flail and fail at pretending to be FNVW. His colossal screwups at
that endeavor are *alone* fueling up to 40% of all popcorn sales in
convenience stores located close to Tetrarchy members' residences.
When he gets sufficiently boring or repetitive, or if he snaps so
thoroughly as to fall under the Formosa rules, then he'll be GKF'd.
<snicker>
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Four}
Apr 7, 2013, 10:31:46 PM4/7/13
to
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt.
<snicker>
Convicted Molester Gary Lee Burnore the ex-fake-FNVW, in
>>>> Gary Lee Burnore the ex-fake-FNVW, Thrown out by Peter J.
No, the point is that you fucked up. Didn't you claim that
when you fucked up, you admitted it? Just another lie, eh?
>>>> No-one is (or is willing to) recognizing the kook awards of yours,
>>>> because you keep fucking UP.
>>> So you're saying that the awards for Andrew should not stand?
>> Your kook awards for Andrew is fine,
> Just not you. Eh? You're as k00ky, if not moreso.
Your saying so doesn't make it so, Gary. And your saying so
proves you know next to nothing about Andrew Jacob Stephens.
How could you? You're not the real FNVW.
>> even your own side recognizes that Andrew is one big honking kook.
> Side?
Yeah, that gang of stalkers who try to do what you're trying
to do to Hawkeye-X... use your fake kook awards as a means
of pummeling any dissent into silence as a means of
maintaining the illusion that you have any power.
>> But you decided to pick on me for some apparent reason after
>> Bit Rot outerfilthed me and got you to join his k00k krusade.
> No, you did it to yourself. You were given advice you chose not to take.
> That is NOT my fault. Now you're stuck, begging.
Again, you're just a kook. Nothing more.
>>>> I'm busy, and don't have time for your lits-o-haet.
>>> But you did in Spamdrew's case?
>> If you saw my posting pattern for those past two years, I ignored
>> Andrew for nearly a year in between.
> So?
So you're a clueless retard who has no clue what he's
talking about.
>>>> You're just using the AUK awards to protect your tiny wanger which
>>>> no-one gives a shit about.
>>> Seems actually, you're the only one worried about the size of my wanger. Did it hurt?
>> No butthurt here, because it's all about defending yourself and your
>> "good" name.
> So all those people voting for you are all really voting for me? Odd stretch.
All "those people" voting for him are members of your
stalking gang of retards who would do anything to support
you in order to further your bringing back your game of
stalking, outer-filthing and trying to destroy innocent
people's lives as a means of you maintaining the illusion
that you have any power.
Hawkeye-X, did I tell you they'd do this? Even after it was
proven Bit Rot made the first nomination of you out of spite
to "even the score" in his support of the ROKSO spammer and
convicted felon Andrew Jacob Stephens, even after Bit Rot
rescinded his nomination, even after Bit Rot kooked out and
started attacking the old guard stalker cabal *including*
*Gary*, he's going to play his game.
The next thing that'll happen is that they'll out your real
name and address, and the names of your family. Anonymously,
of course, along with a lot of insinuations of you being
involved in drugs, kiddie porn, child molestation, whatever
turd first floats to the surface of the toilet Burnore calls
a brain. Then the stalker retards will be free to repeat
that libel again and again and again.
You watch, it'll happen. They're stalkers, they can't help
but stalk innocent people.
>> That's why you're hiding
> How, exactly, am I hiding.
I don't see anyone hiding except you, Gary. You're hiding
behind your kooky little killfile because we've been beating
you to a pulp. Coward.
>> behind those lits-o-haet.
> The same ones you use against Andrew? You can't have this both ways. You could
> with the 4 k00ks, but that should have been a sign to you.
Sure he can. He's not a kook, Stephens is.
> I gave you examples of ways you could know which "side' was which. Others did too.
That's your take on things. Others have a different take,
one that says you're a stalking retard. And you're proving
them right in your harassment of Hawkeye-X.
>>>> You're trying to include me in your kook civil war with the FNVW's,
>>>> and I am asking you, no I'm telling YOU to fuck off.
>>> There's no kook civil war. There are k00ks and there are k00kologists and
>>> you chose to side with the k00ks.
He chose to side with the nonkooks. You're the kook. Your
own actions prove this.
>> That's because you decided to stupidly put the 4 FNVW's on Golden
>> Killfile that you made up because they were SPNAK'ing you on a daily
>> basis and you needed a break
> So much for you not being involved or taking sides.
You're an idiot, Burnore. You're doing exactly what you
stalkers always do. It'll escalate from here when anonymous
posts show up with Hawkeye-X's real life information in
them.
>> - so you revenge nominated them to get
>> the kooks on your side. I took a careful look at the Google files, and
>> found some early history - and recognized for the real FNVW's. Those
>> four. Not you.
>>
>> You haven't still explained _WHY_ Peter J. Ross called you a clown and
>> kicked you off the FNVW slot after a mere 6 days and ignored you ever
>> since. If Peter J. Ross would like to confirm that said termination on
>> this post, it would be nice to have the emetrius confirm that you are
>> not a valid FNVW.
> 1. Same troll on Fred.
MID or you're lying, kook.
> 2. Rule is he can replace, once replaced he nor anyone else can take it back.
Doesn't matter, the FNVW spot was deserted by Fat Fred, we
stepped in and ran the kook awards. You were placed into a
fake-FNVW spot, since there were already sitting FNVWs.
I know, you'll say, "There's never more than one FNVW", to
which I refer you to 1998, when there was more than one, you
clueless fucking retard.
> It's a dictatorship, you fucking dumbass.
That's right. Ours.
>>>>> My story is simply this:
>>> Yawn.
>>>> The group I hang out in, news.admin.net-abuse.email had a kook
>>> You don't "hang out" in a USENet group. You might participate in conversations
>>> within the group, but it's not a bar.
>> Whatever. You hang out and stalk AUK on a daily basis as well as
>> harassing Emmett Gulley among others. You may have your thoughts about
>> where to hang out - like people hang out in Facebook, people hang out
>> in forums, I chose to hang out in Usenet for a short while.
> Gettin ready tojet, eh?
You'd just love that, wouldn't you, Convicted Molester?
You'd love for him to run away... and if he doesn't, you or
one of your slurpers will be sending that anonymous post
soon to out his real-life info. I've seen it almost 100
times from you stalkers, as evidence by the more than 80
names you retards tried to claim was me (all of them your
past victims) in trying to out me.
>>>> and a spam supporter (ROKSO certified) named Andrew J. Stephens aka Andrew
>>>> Stevens aka Pastor Peanut Butter Farts, aka Stophaus that had engaged
>>>> in a two year war of hilarity and stupidity, so kooky, it was like we
>>>> were watching a TV series.
>>>... and, of course, you as a k00k couldn't keep from mixing the business of
>>>fighting spam with the "pleasure" of nominating him.
>> I found time, so I am finding time to deal with your utter kookiness
>> right now, even though I don't *want* to.
> You want to or you can't control yourself. One or the other. Not both.
He doesn't want to have to deal with a stalking retard like
you, but *because* you're a stalking, outer-filthing,
real-lifing retard bent on destroying the lives of anyone
who utters even one word of dissent, he's forced to.
>>>> I knew the time was to come to confirm the legitimate kook that we had, I came to
>>>> AUK to validate AJS's kookiness
>>> Which is tacit proof that you believe the awards to be able to validate.
> You skipped ovee the truth again. Oops.
Which truth is that, Gary, that you're a stalking kook?
>>>>, and the 4 FNVW's accepted it first,
>>> Four k00ks claiming, at the same time, to be a dictator called the FNVW.
>>>
>>> Four dictators? Really? If you're that stupid, how much of what you post
>>> in nanae can be trusted? You're as fr00ty as Bai^h^h^h you know who.
Check back to 1998, stupid. You're Clueless Newbie-ism is
showing again, Convicted Molester.
>>>> recognizing for who AJS is. I stuck around to make sure it was proprerly seen through.
>>> You bought the k00ks line. Noted.
>>>> Then about two weeks later you said you were the FNVW, and I gave you a
>>>> chance.
>>> There was no chance for you to give, k00k. You were informed, by more than one person
>>> that you were dealing with four k00ks (actually only one or two people)
>> MID?: Besides you. And kooks don't count.
> You call anyone who disagrees with you a k00k. That's part of your problem.
And you stalk, harass, outer-filthing, libel, slander and
try to destroy the lives of anyone who disagrees with you,
kook. That's part of your problem. The other part being that
you're retarded.
>>>> You rejected some of it, because you didn't see some of it,
>>> No, it was rejected because you did not present the evidence in your nomination.
>>> You're so busy being a k00k that you couldn't read the rules? You just went down
>>> the list, right?
>> You rejected it because you were too lazy to bother to check the
>> posting history of AJS.
> I know the posting history. I also know the rules. Get the fuck over it.
Sez the guy who's claiming that a well-known and respected
NANAE anti-spammer is on par with a ROKSO spammer and
convicted felon who's run from the law, evaded paying child
support, claimed he's rich and posted pictures of his blue
suede shoes and Bentley (that he posed next to but didn't
own) to "prove" it, all while working in lawn maintenance
and chickenboner spamming, started his own fake church
because he thought he could use it to get around the
anti-spamming laws and evade paying taxes, and started an
anti-Spamhaus crusade that so far has resulted in nothing
more than side-splitting guffaws from the opposing side.
You clueless fucking kook.
>> THe FNVW's (the real ones) has followed AJS
>> for quite some time and has been quite aware of him - and accepted the
>> nominations as such followed with the proper MID's'
> So then _IF_ you claim they rule, why do you so direly want me to let you
> out of the mess you have made for youself.
He doesn't. He wants you to leave him the fuck alone and
stop stalking and harassing him, stalking kook.
>>>> despite Andrew Stephen's 2 year history with nanae, a group you are
>>>> supposedly supportive of.
>>> Supposedly? Prove otherwise, k00k or again be proven a liar.
>> I've been on nanae since 1996,
> Proves nothing.
Sez the kook who continually brings up how long he's been on
usenet as a means of claiming some sort of legitimacy.
>> at least, and have seen you on nanae
>> from time to time with some rational discussions. Apparently you
>> turned yourself from such a respected anti-spam fighter to a kook.
> Says someone about to be awarded K0tM.
Fake-KotM. It's an 'award from a kook', not a kook award.
>> I supposed we've got bad apples on the bunch. I told you about Morely.
> I can't trust anything you say. It's your fault, not that you care.
Non-sequitur. You don't trust anything he says because you
have become invested in proving him a kook, which you'll do
at all costs to prove yourself right... including stalking
him, outer-filthing him, and ruining his real life in order
to chase him off and silence his dissent. It's what you
stalking kooks *do*.
>>>> Then Bit Rot got started with all that shit
>>>> with me, and I wisely decided to ignore him, and you fell for it, hook
>>>> line and sinker.
>>> Revisionist history, when it is so clearly evident by the posts available on spool,
>>> is eligible for an award, I believe. Did you check?
>> Because you support k00ks like Bit Rot as an amigo in your little war
>> against me.
> Bit rot's about to get a bobo. He's near a Formosa. If you all that defending, then you're a .... wait for it ....
And yet you're still going forward with the nomination that
the frothing kook Bit Rot made. After he attacked his own
side, outer-filthed several of you stalking kooks, even
attacked *you*.
Because you can't stand dissent. You *have* to quash it, no
matter what it takes, even if you ruin Hawkeye-X's life in
doing so.
> KOOK.
Yeah, you are a kook.
>>>> I tried to caution you out of it, but you just
>>>> decided I was a kook from very few posts that I made.
>>> The main determination was your continued support of OTHER k00ks like Andrew.
>>> Tells me you can't be trusted and that anything you put forth in nanae should
>>> be suspect.
>> Please provide proof that I supported Pastor Peanut Butter Farts.
> Pleaes provide prove I said you did. I said kooks like him. There's truth to that.
From above, you fucking retard, your own words:
convicted of felonies, run from the law in *two* states,
evaded paying child support, got into a Walgreens fight over
Mountain Dew and got arrested for it, claimed he was rich
while working as a groundskeeper and chickenboner spammer,
started his own fake church so he could claim his spam was
religious speech and therefore protected from anti-spamming
laws, and so he wouldn't have to pay taxes on his earnings,
and started a Quixotic crusade against the mighty Spamhaus
that to date has done nothing but earned him derisive
laughter at his kooky antics.
You clueless fucking retarded kook.
>> Please.
> Get off your knees.
Get on your knees, bitch. Things are about to get really
ugly for you.
>> I'm waiting.
> If you're waiting to suddenly gain reading comprehension, you're going to be waiting a
> very long time.
>> That's where you fucked up, Gary. You ASSume things, when you shouldn't.
> Says the k00k who just assumed I said you supported Andrew directly.
Sez the kook who said he supported kooks like Andrew
directly, as I just proved.
You fucking clueless drooling retard.
>> That's why I told you to read the nanae's posting history for the last two years.
> I'm the FNVW.
Wrong. You're nothing more than a kook.
> Like the supreme court. I don't go out LOOKING for you. You gotta
> present your case. You didn't.
He didn't have to. The *real* FNVWs were already fully
cognizant of Andrew Jacob Stephens and his kooky antics.
We'd been waiting for and expecting someone from NANAE to
make nominations.
You, on the other hand, hadn't even *heard* of Stephens,
didn't know anything that he'd done, and you *still* don't
have much of a clue, as evidence by your drivel above
comparing a well-known and respected anti-spammer to that
uber-kook Stephens.
> Then you whined. All the while sucking the dicks
> of the F(ake)NVW's.
No, he *didn't* suck *your* dick, which is what you demand
of everyone. And because he didn't, you'll go about
destroying his life to run him off. It's what you stalking
kooks do.
>> Even skimming a few would have showed you that you're on the wrong side.
> Dude. You're standing next to k00ks, telling someone they're on the wrong side.
> That you don't GET that is your problem.
That you don't GET that you're nothing more than a retarded
kook is your problem.
That you don't GET that *you're* siding with kooks (remember
Bit Rot, retard?) is your problem.
> This is NOT about andrew. This is about you and the now tinfoiled quad mess.
Fake tinfoil sombreros. 'Awards from a kook', not kook
awards. There's a *big* difference.
> Nominated by the same PJR you now claim can somehow magically un-make me FNVW.
The same PJR who called you an "ignorant clown" and told you
to leave him the fuck alone? <snicker>
> You lose. Tough shit.
Sez the loser.
>>>> I told you I was neutral on this matter,
>>> I'm not really shocked that you don't get this. You can't say you "came to auk"
>>> to get validation on something and then be neutral on the issue of you choosing
>>> k00ks over k00kologists. With all the evidence out there tht they're k00ks.
>> Look, asshole, The last time I was in auk when nanae was dealing with
>> Lamie Baillie. If my memory serves me, Sean was the FNVW at that time,
>> and accepted my nomination of Lamie for a bunch of kook awards that he
>> later won. My understanding is that Lamie finally bought a clue, and
>> has been pretty silent ever since.
> "memory serves" "my understanding". Fool.
>
> Besides, what do you think Sean would have said about the F(ake)NVW's?
He would have welcomed us as an improvement over the lot of
(quoting PJR again) "layabouts, cowards and kook" (including
you) that have been the laughingstock of usenet as they play
at being FNVWs but aren't smart enough to get the job done
right.
>>>> but you took it too personally and nominated me as the kook of the month.
>>> It's nothing personal.
>> By nominating me as Kook of the Month, you have made it personal.
> Too bad.
>> I think you should drop the nomination, period.
> Too late, period.
>> You accepted a kook's nomination for Clueless Newbie of the Month.
> Too bad.
You admit to accepting a kook's (Bit Rot's) nomination of
Hawkeye-X for CNotM. Bit Rot, who kooked out, attacked his
own side (including you), outed several of you idiots, and
is now up for his very own Bobo with the *real* FNVWs.
Good on ya, you fucking tard.
>> That's a revenge nomination, and so is your nomination for me as KotM. I am officially
>> requesting that you deem both nominations invalid and dropped. Then
>> we'll go back to ignoring each other. Fair enough?
> Ignore away. The awards you say don't matter from an FNVW you say you don't follow stand.
No, they don't. You're failing, just as Fat Fred Hall, the
last kook to try to be FNVW, failed.
> Your little BEG FEST is ample proof you know I'm the FNVW. So thanks for that.
No, it's ample proof that he knows you're going to try to
outer-filth him, stalk him, libel and harass him, and
ultimately try to ruin his real life if he doesn't do as you
say. Because you're a vile stalking kook who can't stand
dissent, so you go to any length to quash that dissent.
>>>> I'm not a chewtoy nor do I have time to pretend I'm one.
>>> You had time to "hang around and see the process through" for spamdrew.
>> Because I was determined to see that he earned those awards. Now my
>> part's done.
> You went so far you turned to the k00ks.
No, he turned *away* from the kooks. You and your fake
awards. You, on the other hand, have *embraced* the kooks,
including siding with Bit Rot, who sided with Andrew Jacob
Stephens, to nominate a well-known and respected NANAE
anti-spammer for your fake little 'awards from a kook'.
> Now your part is, indeed done.
>
> You just wait for the awards. That part is easy. Monday!
And he'll promptly ignore them, as they're nothing more than
'awards from a kook', not the legitimate kook awards.
>>>> Just leave me alone, Gary.
>>> I'm not doing anything to you. In fact, you started the discussion.
>>>> You don't have a very good history right now.
>>> Ah so you lied to me too.
>> And I have nothing more to say to you.
> Bet you just lied again.
Sez the lying kook.
<snicker>
--
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.
databasix.com netbasix.net ncfast.net usfast.net:
all branches of the same malignant tree.
March 2013 Kook Awards Voting Ballot:
Message-ID: <kjdlc3$utk$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/browse_thread/thread/7942fbd764054dbf/5a77faf3adbe7ea0
https://groups.google.com/group/news.admin.net-abuse.email/msg/187e7305f391ae78
http://narkive.com/xDyI1xQY#post15
http://alt.usenet.kooks.narkive.com/xDyI1xQY/march-2013-kook-awards-official-voting-ballot#post15
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&A=0&MSGI=%3Ckjdlc3%24utk%244%40newsfeed.x-privat.org%3E
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136487698400
<snicker>
Convicted Molester Gary Lee Burnore the ex-fake-FNVW, in
<news:kjshel$f67$1...@reader1.panix.com> did thusly write:
> In news.admin.net-abuse.email Hawkeye-X <tes...@gmail.con> wrote:
> In news.admin.net-abuse.email Hawkeye-X <tes...@gmail.con> wrote:
>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:49:19 +0000 (UTC), Convicted Molester
>> Gary Lee Burnore the ex-fake-FNVW <gbur...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>In news.admin.net-abuse.email Hawkeye-X <tes...@gmail.con> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 13:29:02 +0000 (UTC), Convicted Molester
>> Gary Lee Burnore the ex-fake-FNVW <gbur...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>In news.admin.net-abuse.email Hawkeye-X <tes...@gmail.con> wrote:
>>>> Gary Lee Burnore the ex-fake-FNVW, Thrown out by Peter J.
>>>> Ross the FNVW-e after 6 days of duty <fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>>The Voting will close Monday, April 8 at 23:59:59 UTC.
>>>>> Convicted Molester Gary Lee Burnore the ex-fake-FNVW,
>>>>>The Voting will close Monday, April 8 at 23:59:59 UTC.
>>>>> Thrown out by Peter J. Ross <fn...@databasix.com> wrote in
>>>>>news:kjnro5$3bf$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>> Here follows the one true ballot for the March 2013 Usenet Kook
>>>>>> Awards.
>>>> Burnore, knock it off.
>>>>
>>>> Also, Gary you also fucked up AGAIN.
>>> Acceptance speeches before the awards are announced are rather uncouth.
>>>> Your NSP let you post to alt.flame.alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk?
>>> So does yours. Funny, that.
>> Look carefully. I fixed it for you, stupid. Your original post
>> x-posted to that above. You put a period between flame and alt.
> Big whoop. The point was to get your attention, which it did.
>>>>>news:kjnro5$3bf$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>> Here follows the one true ballot for the March 2013 Usenet Kook
>>>>>> Awards.
>>>> Burnore, knock it off.
>>>>
>>>> Also, Gary you also fucked up AGAIN.
>>> Acceptance speeches before the awards are announced are rather uncouth.
>>>> Your NSP let you post to alt.flame.alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk?
>>> So does yours. Funny, that.
>> Look carefully. I fixed it for you, stupid. Your original post
>> x-posted to that above. You put a period between flame and alt.
No, the point is that you fucked up. Didn't you claim that
when you fucked up, you admitted it? Just another lie, eh?
>>>> No-one is (or is willing to) recognizing the kook awards of yours,
>>>> because you keep fucking UP.
>>> So you're saying that the awards for Andrew should not stand?
>> Your kook awards for Andrew is fine,
Your saying so doesn't make it so, Gary. And your saying so
proves you know next to nothing about Andrew Jacob Stephens.
How could you? You're not the real FNVW.
>> even your own side recognizes that Andrew is one big honking kook.
Yeah, that gang of stalkers who try to do what you're trying
to do to Hawkeye-X... use your fake kook awards as a means
of pummeling any dissent into silence as a means of
maintaining the illusion that you have any power.
>> But you decided to pick on me for some apparent reason after
>> Bit Rot outerfilthed me and got you to join his k00k krusade.
> That is NOT my fault. Now you're stuck, begging.
Again, you're just a kook. Nothing more.
>>>> I'm busy, and don't have time for your lits-o-haet.
>>> But you did in Spamdrew's case?
>> If you saw my posting pattern for those past two years, I ignored
>> Andrew for nearly a year in between.
So you're a clueless retard who has no clue what he's
talking about.
>>>> You're just using the AUK awards to protect your tiny wanger which
>>>> no-one gives a shit about.
>>> Seems actually, you're the only one worried about the size of my wanger. Did it hurt?
>> No butthurt here, because it's all about defending yourself and your
>> "good" name.
All "those people" voting for him are members of your
stalking gang of retards who would do anything to support
you in order to further your bringing back your game of
stalking, outer-filthing and trying to destroy innocent
people's lives as a means of you maintaining the illusion
that you have any power.
Hawkeye-X, did I tell you they'd do this? Even after it was
proven Bit Rot made the first nomination of you out of spite
to "even the score" in his support of the ROKSO spammer and
convicted felon Andrew Jacob Stephens, even after Bit Rot
rescinded his nomination, even after Bit Rot kooked out and
started attacking the old guard stalker cabal *including*
*Gary*, he's going to play his game.
The next thing that'll happen is that they'll out your real
name and address, and the names of your family. Anonymously,
of course, along with a lot of insinuations of you being
involved in drugs, kiddie porn, child molestation, whatever
turd first floats to the surface of the toilet Burnore calls
a brain. Then the stalker retards will be free to repeat
that libel again and again and again.
You watch, it'll happen. They're stalkers, they can't help
but stalk innocent people.
>> That's why you're hiding
I don't see anyone hiding except you, Gary. You're hiding
behind your kooky little killfile because we've been beating
you to a pulp. Coward.
>> behind those lits-o-haet.
> The same ones you use against Andrew? You can't have this both ways. You could
> with the 4 k00ks, but that should have been a sign to you.
Sure he can. He's not a kook, Stephens is.
> I gave you examples of ways you could know which "side' was which. Others did too.
That's your take on things. Others have a different take,
one that says you're a stalking retard. And you're proving
them right in your harassment of Hawkeye-X.
>>>> You're trying to include me in your kook civil war with the FNVW's,
>>>> and I am asking you, no I'm telling YOU to fuck off.
>>> There's no kook civil war. There are k00ks and there are k00kologists and
>>> you chose to side with the k00ks.
own actions prove this.
>> That's because you decided to stupidly put the 4 FNVW's on Golden
>> Killfile that you made up because they were SPNAK'ing you on a daily
>> basis and you needed a break
You're an idiot, Burnore. You're doing exactly what you
stalkers always do. It'll escalate from here when anonymous
posts show up with Hawkeye-X's real life information in
them.
>> - so you revenge nominated them to get
>> the kooks on your side. I took a careful look at the Google files, and
>> found some early history - and recognized for the real FNVW's. Those
>> four. Not you.
>>
>> You haven't still explained _WHY_ Peter J. Ross called you a clown and
>> kicked you off the FNVW slot after a mere 6 days and ignored you ever
>> since. If Peter J. Ross would like to confirm that said termination on
>> this post, it would be nice to have the emetrius confirm that you are
>> not a valid FNVW.
MID or you're lying, kook.
> 2. Rule is he can replace, once replaced he nor anyone else can take it back.
Doesn't matter, the FNVW spot was deserted by Fat Fred, we
stepped in and ran the kook awards. You were placed into a
fake-FNVW spot, since there were already sitting FNVWs.
I know, you'll say, "There's never more than one FNVW", to
which I refer you to 1998, when there was more than one, you
clueless fucking retard.
> It's a dictatorship, you fucking dumbass.
That's right. Ours.
>>>>> My story is simply this:
>>> Yawn.
>>>> The group I hang out in, news.admin.net-abuse.email had a kook
>>> You don't "hang out" in a USENet group. You might participate in conversations
>>> within the group, but it's not a bar.
>> Whatever. You hang out and stalk AUK on a daily basis as well as
>> harassing Emmett Gulley among others. You may have your thoughts about
>> where to hang out - like people hang out in Facebook, people hang out
>> in forums, I chose to hang out in Usenet for a short while.
You'd just love that, wouldn't you, Convicted Molester?
You'd love for him to run away... and if he doesn't, you or
one of your slurpers will be sending that anonymous post
soon to out his real-life info. I've seen it almost 100
times from you stalkers, as evidence by the more than 80
names you retards tried to claim was me (all of them your
past victims) in trying to out me.
>>>> and a spam supporter (ROKSO certified) named Andrew J. Stephens aka Andrew
>>>> Stevens aka Pastor Peanut Butter Farts, aka Stophaus that had engaged
>>>> in a two year war of hilarity and stupidity, so kooky, it was like we
>>>> were watching a TV series.
>>>... and, of course, you as a k00k couldn't keep from mixing the business of
>>>fighting spam with the "pleasure" of nominating him.
>> I found time, so I am finding time to deal with your utter kookiness
>> right now, even though I don't *want* to.
He doesn't want to have to deal with a stalking retard like
you, but *because* you're a stalking, outer-filthing,
real-lifing retard bent on destroying the lives of anyone
who utters even one word of dissent, he's forced to.
>>>> I knew the time was to come to confirm the legitimate kook that we had, I came to
>>>> AUK to validate AJS's kookiness
>>> Which is tacit proof that you believe the awards to be able to validate.
Which truth is that, Gary, that you're a stalking kook?
>>>>, and the 4 FNVW's accepted it first,
>>> Four k00ks claiming, at the same time, to be a dictator called the FNVW.
>>>
>>> Four dictators? Really? If you're that stupid, how much of what you post
>>> in nanae can be trusted? You're as fr00ty as Bai^h^h^h you know who.
showing again, Convicted Molester.
>>>> recognizing for who AJS is. I stuck around to make sure it was proprerly seen through.
>>> You bought the k00ks line. Noted.
>>>> Then about two weeks later you said you were the FNVW, and I gave you a
>>>> chance.
>>> There was no chance for you to give, k00k. You were informed, by more than one person
>>> that you were dealing with four k00ks (actually only one or two people)
>> MID?: Besides you. And kooks don't count.
And you stalk, harass, outer-filthing, libel, slander and
try to destroy the lives of anyone who disagrees with you,
kook. That's part of your problem. The other part being that
you're retarded.
>>>> You rejected some of it, because you didn't see some of it,
>>> No, it was rejected because you did not present the evidence in your nomination.
>>> You're so busy being a k00k that you couldn't read the rules? You just went down
>>> the list, right?
>> You rejected it because you were too lazy to bother to check the
>> posting history of AJS.
Sez the guy who's claiming that a well-known and respected
NANAE anti-spammer is on par with a ROKSO spammer and
convicted felon who's run from the law, evaded paying child
support, claimed he's rich and posted pictures of his blue
suede shoes and Bentley (that he posed next to but didn't
own) to "prove" it, all while working in lawn maintenance
and chickenboner spamming, started his own fake church
because he thought he could use it to get around the
anti-spamming laws and evade paying taxes, and started an
anti-Spamhaus crusade that so far has resulted in nothing
more than side-splitting guffaws from the opposing side.
You clueless fucking kook.
>> THe FNVW's (the real ones) has followed AJS
>> for quite some time and has been quite aware of him - and accepted the
> So then _IF_ you claim they rule, why do you so direly want me to let you
> out of the mess you have made for youself.
He doesn't. He wants you to leave him the fuck alone and
stop stalking and harassing him, stalking kook.
>>>> despite Andrew Stephen's 2 year history with nanae, a group you are
>>>> supposedly supportive of.
>>> Supposedly? Prove otherwise, k00k or again be proven a liar.
>> I've been on nanae since 1996,
Sez the kook who continually brings up how long he's been on
usenet as a means of claiming some sort of legitimacy.
>> at least, and have seen you on nanae
>> from time to time with some rational discussions. Apparently you
>> turned yourself from such a respected anti-spam fighter to a kook.
Fake-KotM. It's an 'award from a kook', not a kook award.
>> I supposed we've got bad apples on the bunch. I told you about Morely.
Non-sequitur. You don't trust anything he says because you
have become invested in proving him a kook, which you'll do
at all costs to prove yourself right... including stalking
him, outer-filthing him, and ruining his real life in order
to chase him off and silence his dissent. It's what you
stalking kooks *do*.
>>>> Then Bit Rot got started with all that shit
>>>> with me, and I wisely decided to ignore him, and you fell for it, hook
>>>> line and sinker.
>>> Revisionist history, when it is so clearly evident by the posts available on spool,
>>> is eligible for an award, I believe. Did you check?
>> Because you support k00ks like Bit Rot as an amigo in your little war
>> against me.
And yet you're still going forward with the nomination that
the frothing kook Bit Rot made. After he attacked his own
side, outer-filthed several of you stalking kooks, even
attacked *you*.
Because you can't stand dissent. You *have* to quash it, no
matter what it takes, even if you ruin Hawkeye-X's life in
doing so.
> KOOK.
Yeah, you are a kook.
>>>> I tried to caution you out of it, but you just
>>>> decided I was a kook from very few posts that I made.
>>> The main determination was your continued support of OTHER k00ks like Andrew.
>>> Tells me you can't be trusted and that anything you put forth in nanae should
>>> be suspect.
>> Please provide proof that I supported Pastor Peanut Butter Farts.
From above, you fucking retard, your own words:
"The main determination was your continued support of OTHER
k00ks like Andrew."
Please to be pointing out which OTHER kooks have been
k00ks like Andrew."
convicted of felonies, run from the law in *two* states,
evaded paying child support, got into a Walgreens fight over
Mountain Dew and got arrested for it, claimed he was rich
while working as a groundskeeper and chickenboner spammer,
started his own fake church so he could claim his spam was
religious speech and therefore protected from anti-spamming
laws, and so he wouldn't have to pay taxes on his earnings,
and started a Quixotic crusade against the mighty Spamhaus
that to date has done nothing but earned him derisive
laughter at his kooky antics.
You clueless fucking retarded kook.
>> Please.
> Get off your knees.
Get on your knees, bitch. Things are about to get really
ugly for you.
>> I'm waiting.
> If you're waiting to suddenly gain reading comprehension, you're going to be waiting a
> very long time.
>> That's where you fucked up, Gary. You ASSume things, when you shouldn't.
Sez the kook who said he supported kooks like Andrew
directly, as I just proved.
You fucking clueless drooling retard.
>> That's why I told you to read the nanae's posting history for the last two years.
Wrong. You're nothing more than a kook.
> Like the supreme court. I don't go out LOOKING for you. You gotta
> present your case. You didn't.
He didn't have to. The *real* FNVWs were already fully
cognizant of Andrew Jacob Stephens and his kooky antics.
We'd been waiting for and expecting someone from NANAE to
make nominations.
You, on the other hand, hadn't even *heard* of Stephens,
didn't know anything that he'd done, and you *still* don't
have much of a clue, as evidence by your drivel above
comparing a well-known and respected anti-spammer to that
uber-kook Stephens.
> Then you whined. All the while sucking the dicks
> of the F(ake)NVW's.
No, he *didn't* suck *your* dick, which is what you demand
of everyone. And because he didn't, you'll go about
destroying his life to run him off. It's what you stalking
kooks do.
>> Even skimming a few would have showed you that you're on the wrong side.
> That you don't GET that is your problem.
That you don't GET that you're nothing more than a retarded
kook is your problem.
That you don't GET that *you're* siding with kooks (remember
Bit Rot, retard?) is your problem.
> This is NOT about andrew. This is about you and the now tinfoiled quad mess.
Fake tinfoil sombreros. 'Awards from a kook', not kook
awards. There's a *big* difference.
> Nominated by the same PJR you now claim can somehow magically un-make me FNVW.
The same PJR who called you an "ignorant clown" and told you
to leave him the fuck alone? <snicker>
> You lose. Tough shit.
Sez the loser.
>>>> I told you I was neutral on this matter,
>>> I'm not really shocked that you don't get this. You can't say you "came to auk"
>>> to get validation on something and then be neutral on the issue of you choosing
>>> k00ks over k00kologists. With all the evidence out there tht they're k00ks.
>> Look, asshole, The last time I was in auk when nanae was dealing with
>> Lamie Baillie. If my memory serves me, Sean was the FNVW at that time,
>> and accepted my nomination of Lamie for a bunch of kook awards that he
>> later won. My understanding is that Lamie finally bought a clue, and
>> has been pretty silent ever since.
>
> Besides, what do you think Sean would have said about the F(ake)NVW's?
He would have welcomed us as an improvement over the lot of
(quoting PJR again) "layabouts, cowards and kook" (including
you) that have been the laughingstock of usenet as they play
at being FNVWs but aren't smart enough to get the job done
right.
>>>> but you took it too personally and nominated me as the kook of the month.
>>> It's nothing personal.
>> By nominating me as Kook of the Month, you have made it personal.
>> I think you should drop the nomination, period.
>> You accepted a kook's nomination for Clueless Newbie of the Month.
You admit to accepting a kook's (Bit Rot's) nomination of
Hawkeye-X for CNotM. Bit Rot, who kooked out, attacked his
own side (including you), outed several of you idiots, and
is now up for his very own Bobo with the *real* FNVWs.
Good on ya, you fucking tard.
>> That's a revenge nomination, and so is your nomination for me as KotM. I am officially
>> requesting that you deem both nominations invalid and dropped. Then
>> we'll go back to ignoring each other. Fair enough?
No, they don't. You're failing, just as Fat Fred Hall, the
last kook to try to be FNVW, failed.
> Your little BEG FEST is ample proof you know I'm the FNVW. So thanks for that.
No, it's ample proof that he knows you're going to try to
outer-filth him, stalk him, libel and harass him, and
ultimately try to ruin his real life if he doesn't do as you
say. Because you're a vile stalking kook who can't stand
dissent, so you go to any length to quash that dissent.
>>>> I'm not a chewtoy nor do I have time to pretend I'm one.
>>> You had time to "hang around and see the process through" for spamdrew.
>> Because I was determined to see that he earned those awards. Now my
>> part's done.
No, he turned *away* from the kooks. You and your fake
awards. You, on the other hand, have *embraced* the kooks,
including siding with Bit Rot, who sided with Andrew Jacob
Stephens, to nominate a well-known and respected NANAE
anti-spammer for your fake little 'awards from a kook'.
> Now your part is, indeed done.
>
> You just wait for the awards. That part is easy. Monday!
And he'll promptly ignore them, as they're nothing more than
'awards from a kook', not the legitimate kook awards.
>>>> Just leave me alone, Gary.
>>> I'm not doing anything to you. In fact, you started the discussion.
>>>> You don't have a very good history right now.
>>> Ah so you lied to me too.
>> And I have nothing more to say to you.
Sez the lying kook.
<snicker>
--
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.
databasix.com netbasix.net ncfast.net usfast.net:
all branches of the same malignant tree.
March 2013 Kook Awards Voting Ballot:
Message-ID: <kjdlc3$utk$4...@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/browse_thread/thread/7942fbd764054dbf/5a77faf3adbe7ea0
https://groups.google.com/group/news.admin.net-abuse.email/msg/187e7305f391ae78
http://narkive.com/xDyI1xQY#post15
http://alt.usenet.kooks.narkive.com/xDyI1xQY/march-2013-kook-awards-official-voting-ballot#post15
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&A=0&MSGI=%3Ckjdlc3%24utk%244%40newsfeed.x-privat.org%3E
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136487698400
Message has been deleted
Checkmate
Apr 8, 2013, 10:40:02 AM4/8/13
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:01:20 +0000 (UTC), Feste put forth the notion that:
Checkmate!
>
> In article <6r93m81kgrs0cf2n7...@4ax.com> Hawkeye-X wrote:
> >On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:49:19 +0000 (UTC), Gary Burnore
>
>
>
> Hey Hawykeye-X! Here's what you do man. You stop arguing with Gary because
> Gary has mental problems after the severe beatings he's suffered on Usenet
> all the years ..._immediately_. Not ot another word to Burnore, he's got
> antichrist dna in him as well, he's been missing screws on reassembly since
> 1961. Not another minute of you doing anything but dancing in joy about your
> awards. In fact take a cue from me and get every damn ko0k award pissable
> by proving the lot hypocrites in every word written.
>
> Now you take that KotM award or any other revenge noms these assholes give
> you, put em your knapsack and head over to alt.tasteless. You're more than
> welcome in a.t than anyone could be in any other ng. Say hi to the guys.
> Once standard greetings are out of the way, you drop your trousers, squat to
> the floor, do your business a give your arse a wicked long wipe... smear
> those awards around like a roll of Tidy Twat(tm). Toss them in a plastic bag
> and kick back and have a few beers with the boys at a.t. . They're gonna
> laud you for having jazz enough to drop a deuce on their floor anyway.
> Things are slow in there lately and a fresh steaming load will be
> appreciated there.
>
> After you finish your beers and say...oh I dunno, try the corn beef on rye
> with a dill on the side it's delicious. Hop in the car and head back to auk
> and catch Gary just as he's grabbing his keys heading back home to buy Fred
> G.(cough) [tinf-g.] his nightly steak. Just as Gary turns his back to head
> out to his car you holler back "Yo Gary, can I have a word wit'ya for a
> minute". Make ready the hot and steaming smeared awards in the bag and soon
> as Gary turns his shoulders to look and see who it is , you wail the bag of
> turd-smeared awards and fire it directly at his head on top of that pink tie
> of his. He's gonna take the shot directly in the face and that's all that
> needs saying about Gary or anyone else's kook awards. This is one big
> circle-jerk full of nutters and manic depressed fuckheads and the very last
> thing you do, is take any of this shit seriously.
>
> Gary got an award years ago that he's still famous for and not at all happy
> about getting her, and don't you ever forget that. You own as much Usenet
> real estate as you get bragging rights to. Rhondick got awards coming out
> her ass. The Novins defendants they got a pile of awards too, cost them a
> bundle but oh well, dumb and dumber on that one. Who's left ...hmm lemme
> see. sweetness! Yea she's got the ASH ghoul lifetime achievement award for
> running defense for and while her buddy-dog River snuffed more than a few
> kids with his cocktails ... yea, everyone here has awards. Welcome to the
> party dude.... it's all in how you look at ko0ks.
Hey Tommy, when you moved to alt.tasteless and dropped your ceremonial
deuce, did you tell them Checkmate spanked you out of AUK? Just
wondering...
0 new messages