dumbass=keegan (Was: Re: coyle=mancini)
Dr. Michael Mancini
james g. keegan jr. <jgke...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-CC017B...@news.individual.net...
> In article <b1744$4b3a19a9$6211a844$26...@ALLTEL.NET>,
> "Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
>
> > The Chief Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
> > news:slrnhjje37....@eris.io.com...
>
> > > You, of all people, should know that you don't have the minimal sense
to
> > > read the headers and address the newsgroup you're abusing.
> >
> > The only one I'm abusing is Keegan. And he deserves it.
>
>
> oh bobby, are you still angry that your mancini impersonation was
> uncovered so many years ago?
You, make me angry? Only in your dweams, Junior. Are you running out of K-Y
jelly? You know that activity will only make hair grow on your palms.
--Dr. Michael Mancini
james g. keegan jr.
"Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> james g. keegan jr. <jgke...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:jgkeegan-CC017B...@news.individual.net...
> > In article <b1744$4b3a19a9$6211a844$26...@ALLTEL.NET>,
> > "Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> >
> > > The Chief Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
> > > news:slrnhjje37....@eris.io.com...
> >
> > > > You, of all people, should know that you don't have the minimal sense
> to
> > > > read the headers and address the newsgroup you're abusing.
> > >
> > > The only one I'm abusing is Keegan. And he deserves it.
> >
> >
> > oh bobby, are you still angry that your mancini impersonation was
> > uncovered so many years ago?
>
> You, make me angry?
does the real mancini know that you're so ashamed of your name that
you're still using his?
james g. keegan jr.
"Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> james g. keegan jr. <jgke...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:op.u5u25...@james-macbook.local...
[...]
> :> that wasn;t always the
> > case, of course. at one point, bobby c was so obsessed with keith cochran
> > that he repeatedly posted that kieth was dead.
>
> Who is Keith Cochran?
one of the many guys you lied about, bobby. interestingly, you
repeatedly claimed keith was dead. you may have been experimenting with
necrophelia at that time.
btw, you might want to chat up the person posting as peter nyikos as you
and the original nyikos seem to share the same fascination.
Dr. Michael Mancini
> In article <f0294$4b3e7a0a$6211a844$4...@ALLTEL.NET>,
> "Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
>
> > james g. keegan jr. <jgke...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:op.u5u25...@james-macbook.local...
> [...]
> > :> that wasn;t always the
> > > case, of course. at one point, bobby c was so obsessed with keith
cochran
> > > that he repeatedly posted that kieth was dead.
> >
> > Who is Keith Cochran?
>
> one of the many guys you lied about, bobby
Anyone you don't agree with is a liar. However, as is typical of you, James,
you never post any evidence. Therefore, as usual, you are full of shit.
> btw, you might want to chat up the person posting as peter nyikos as you
> and the original nyikos seem to share the same fascination.
Who is "the person posting as peter nyikos?" Since you can't name names or
produce evidence, once again you are full of shit, James. But don't worry,
Patrick still loves you.
The Chief Instigator
>
> james g. keegan jr. <jgke...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:jgkeegan-09E5F6...@news.individual.net...
>> In article <f0294$4b3e7a0a$6211a844$4...@ALLTEL.NET>,
>> "Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
>>
>> > james g. keegan jr. <jgke...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:op.u5u25...@james-macbook.local...
>> [...]
>> > :> that wasn;t always the
>> > > case, of course. at one point, bobby c was so obsessed with keith
> cochran
>> > > that he repeatedly posted that kieth was dead.
>> >
>> > Who is Keith Cochran?
>>
>> one of the many guys you lied about, bobby
>
> Anyone you don't agree with is a liar. However, as is typical of you, James,
> you never post any evidence. Therefore, as usual, you are full of shit.
>
>> btw, you might want to chat up the person posting as peter nyikos as you
>> and the original nyikos seem to share the same fascination.
>
> Who is "the person posting as peter nyikos?" Since you can't name names or
> produce evidence, once again you are full of shit, James. But don't worry,
> Patrick still loves you.
Well, Bobby, if you want no one to believe you, you're doing a fair job of
achieving your goal.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 6, Milwaukee 2 (January 1)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, January 3 vs. Abbotsford, 4:05
james g. keegan jr.
"Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> james g. keegan jr. <jgke...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:jgkeegan-09E5F6...@news.individual.net...
> > In article <f0294$4b3e7a0a$6211a844$4...@ALLTEL.NET>,
> > "Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> >
> > > james g. keegan jr. <jgke...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:op.u5u25...@james-macbook.local...
> > [...]
> > > :> that wasn;t always the
> > > > case, of course. at one point, bobby c was so obsessed with keith
> cochran
> > > > that he repeatedly posted that kieth was dead.
> > >
> > > Who is Keith Cochran?
> >
> > one of the many guys you lied about, bobby
>
> Anyone you don't agree with is a liar.
liars, like you, bobby, are liars.
this is too easy.
===begin repost
From: ja...@netcom.com (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran)
Subject: Re: Keith Cochran dead? Since when?
Date: 1996/02/15
Message-ID: <jandaDM...@netcom.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 139437966
sender: ja...@netcom14.netcom.com
references: <jhaartti....@vipunen.hut.fi>
<8239839...@tiktok.demon.co.uk> <wotanDM...@netcom.com>
<4fth72$2...@uuneo.neosoft.com>
x-siged: SigEd V1.3, Add .sig and PGP flexibility to posts.
x-siged-url: http://nyx10.cs.du.edu:8001/~pgregg/siged/
organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
newsgroups: alt.flame,aus.flame,alt.usenet.kooks,talk.abortion
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <4fth72$...@uuneo.neosoft.com>,
Dr. Michael Mancini <manc...@starbase.neosoft.com> wrote:
>Wotan (wo...@netcom.com) wrote:
>: FyRE <F...@tiktok.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>: >Next up, kcockran(deceased) pay
>
>: You mean Keith Cochran?
>
>: Netcom must now be billing the dead. Either that or a zombie is
using
>: Janda's account here.
>
>: finger -m janda
>: Login name: janda In real life: Keith
"Justified
>: And Ancient" Cochran
>: Directory: /u7/janda Shell: /bin/csh
>
>For those who care, here's the story I got on this:
You have to stop listening to those voices in your head.
>Keith Cochran died sometime last fall.
And nobody noticed.
Does this mean I don't have to pay my credit cards off?
[Somebody else (probably Keegan) is posting from my account, and other
such stupidity deleted.]
[ For Public Key: finger ja...@netcom.com ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i
iQBVAgUBMSLIvE+IBrig7UeRAQHhKwH6A83CutvObhWaGJQhJ4tDZPvVhjS3IMBb
94MhvalpZP5APU0GNBWhhyI0QPkU4PhDGF6d/ouPXuNYV27RHUobMw==
=rxQn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
"cocksucker motherfucker tits asshole cunt pussy twat bitch
dick shlong hose cock piece of shit fuckwad."
-- Henry (he...@netcom.com), on the passage of the CDA.
===end repost
Spartakus
> > > > that wasn;t always the case, of course. at one point,
> > > > bobby c was so obsessed with keith cochran that
> > > > he repeatedly posted that kieth was dead.
> > > Who is Keith Cochran?
> > one of the many guys you lied about, bobby
> Anyone you don't agree with is a liar. However, as is typical of you,
> James, you never post any evidence. Therefore, as usual, you are
> full of shit.
Unfortunately for you, Keegan *did* post evidence that you had claimed
that Keith Cochran was dead several years ago. What's more, you
recently claimed to be returning to Usenet after a long absence.
Don't you even remember your own posting history? Or are you lying
about your identity as well? Either way, it didn't take much
sleuthing to catch you lying. I wouldn't say that you are full of
shit, but you certainly stepped in it.
> > btw, you might want to chat up the person posting as peter
> > nyikos as you and the original nyikos seem to share the
> > same fascination.
> Who is "the person posting as peter nyikos?"
That's what we'd like to know! You yourself once impersonated a
Baylor U. professor. What do you have to do to your synapses to go
all in on such a strategy? Head injury? Consumption of wood
alcohol? Electro-convulsive therapy? Huffing spray paint cans?
Maybe you could share some insight.
Dr. Michael Mancini
Thomas Calabro? I'm sure he's aware of your abnormal homosexual tendencies
and psychotic hatred toward women.
james g. keegan jr.
<e0fb9b5f-d048-4d5b...@upsg2000gro.googlegroups.com>,
Spartakus <spar...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> "Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> > james g. keegan jr. <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote...
> > > �"Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> > > > james g. keegan jr. <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote...
>
> > > > > that wasn;t always the case, of course. at one point,
> > > > > bobby c was so obsessed with keith cochran that
> > > > > he repeatedly posted that kieth was dead.
>
> > > > Who is Keith Cochran?
>
> > > one of the many guys you lied about, bobby
>
> > Anyone you don't agree with is a liar. However, as is typical of you,
> > James, you never post any evidence. Therefore, as usual, you are
> > full of shit.
>
> Unfortunately for you, Keegan *did* post evidence that you had claimed
> that Keith Cochran was dead several years ago.
i noticed that bobby posted several times, while ignoring this
particular issue.
> What's more, you recently claimed to be returning to Usenet after a
> long absence. Don't you even remember your own posting history? Or
> are you lying about your identity as well? Either way, it didn't
> take much sleuthing to catch you lying. I wouldn't say that you are
> full of shit, but you certainly stepped in it.
bobby's sociopathic behavior is consistent with his earlier posts.
>
> > > btw, you might want to chat up the person posting as peter
> > > nyikos as you and the original nyikos seem to share the
> > > same fascination.
>
> > Who is "the person posting as peter nyikos?"
>
> That's what we'd like to know! You yourself once impersonated a
> Baylor U. professor. What do you have to do to your synapses to go
> all in on such a strategy? Head injury? Consumption of wood
> alcohol? Electro-convulsive therapy? Huffing spray paint cans?
> Maybe you could share some insight.
bobby is so ashamed of who he is that he is unable to cope with
questions like that one.
Dr. Michael Mancini
> In article
> <e0fb9b5f-d048-4d5b...@upsg2000gro.googlegroups.com>,
> Spartakus <spar...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > "Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> > > james g. keegan jr. <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote...
> > > > "Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> > > > > james g. keegan jr. <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote...
> >
> > > > > > that wasn;t always the case, of course. at one point,
> > > > > > bobby c was so obsessed with keith cochran that
> > > > > > he repeatedly posted that kieth was dead.
> >
> > > > > Who is Keith Cochran?
> >
> > > > one of the many guys you lied about, bobby
> >
> > > Anyone you don't agree with is a liar. However, as is typical of you,
> > > James, you never post any evidence. Therefore, as usual, you are
> > > full of shit.
> >
> > Unfortunately for you, Keegan *did* post evidence that you had claimed
> > that Keith Cochran was dead several years ago.
>
>
> i noticed that bobby posted several times, while ignoring this
> particular issue.
Produce the evidence, liar.
> > What's more, you recently claimed to be returning to Usenet after a
> > long absence. Don't you even remember your own posting history? Or
> > are you lying about your identity as well? Either way, it didn't
> > take much sleuthing to catch you lying. I wouldn't say that you are
> > full of shit, but you certainly stepped in it.
>
>
> bobby's sociopathic behavior is consistent with his earlier posts.
Sorry, James, I can't get into your metrosexual attraction toward me. It
makes me ill, knowing you're reading my posts and hacking off to me.
> >
> > > > btw, you might want to chat up the person posting as peter
> > > > nyikos as you and the original nyikos seem to share the
> > > > same fascination.
> >
> > > Who is "the person posting as peter nyikos?"
> >
> > That's what we'd like to know! You yourself once impersonated a
> > Baylor U. professor. What do you have to do to your synapses to go
> > all in on such a strategy? Head injury? Consumption of wood
> > alcohol? Electro-convulsive therapy? Huffing spray paint cans?
> > Maybe you could share some insight.
>
>
> bobby is so ashamed of who he is that he is unable to cope with
> questions like that one.
You are the one who is unable to cope with Peter Nyikos. You are even too
afraid to state who this alleged person who is posting in his stead. Tell me
something, James. How do you know that I'm not really Peter Nyikos, posting
under the guise of someone who disappeared into spankee's oblivion years and
years ago, when you began harassing Baylor College of Medicine? Can you
prove who is really on the other side of this keyboard? Of course you can't,
you worthless piece of shit.
Spartakus
> james g. keegan jr. <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote...
> > > "Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> > > > james g. keegan jr. <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote...
> > > > > "Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> > > > > > james g. keegan jr. <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote...
> > > > > > > that wasn;t always the case, of course. at one point,
> > > > > > > bobby c was so obsessed with keith cochran that
> > > > > > > he repeatedly posted that kieth was dead.
> > > > > > Who is Keith Cochran?
> > > > > one of the many guys you lied about, bobby
> > > > Anyone you don't agree with is a liar. However, as is typical of you,
> > > > James, you never post any evidence. Therefore, as usual, you are
> > > > full of shit.
> > > Unfortunately for you, Keegan *did* post evidence that you had claimed
> > > that Keith Cochran was dead several years ago.
> > i noticed that bobby posted several times, while ignoring this
> > particular issue.
> Produce the evidence, liar.
Uh-oh, someone's getting cranky.
> > > What's more, you recently claimed to be returning to Usenet after
> > > a long absence. Don't you even remember your own posting history?
> > > Or are you lying about your identity as well? Either way, it didn't
> > > take much sleuthing to catch you lying. I wouldn't say that you
> > > are full of shit, but you certainly stepped in it.
> > bobby's sociopathic behavior is consistent with his earlier posts.
> Sorry, James, I can't get into your metrosexual attraction toward me. It
> makes me ill, knowing you're reading my posts and hacking off to me.
But you're responding to Keegan's posts in threads that ended years
ago. So when are you going to start claiming that he's dead?
> > > > > btw, you might want to chat up the person posting as peter
> > > > > nyikos as you and the original nyikos seem to share the
> > > > > same fascination.
> > > > Who is "the person posting as peter nyikos?"
> > > That's what we'd like to know! You yourself once impersonated a
> > > Baylor U. professor. What do you have to do to your synapses to go
> > > all in on such a strategy? Head injury? Consumption of wood
> > > alcohol? Electro-convulsive therapy? Huffing spray paint cans?
> > > Maybe you could share some insight.
> > bobby is so ashamed of who he is that he is unable to cope with
> > questions like that one.
> You are the one who is unable to cope with Peter Nyikos. You are even too
> afraid to state who this alleged person who is posting in his stead. Tell me
> something, James. How do you know that I'm not really Peter Nyikos, posting
> under the guise of someone who disappeared into spankee's oblivion years and
> years ago, when you began harassing Baylor College of Medicine? Can you
> prove who is really on the other side of this keyboard? Of course you can't,
> you worthless piece of shit.
Ha ha! Robert Coyle totally loses his shit!
Tell us about the time you invited Barbara Turner to your "office" at
Baylor University.
james g. keegan jr.
"Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> james g. keegan jr. <jgke...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:jgkeegan-A51A2A...@news.individual.net...
> > In article
> > <e0fb9b5f-d048-4d5b...@upsg2000gro.googlegroups.com>,
> > Spartakus <spar...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >
> > > "Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> > > > james g. keegan jr. <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote...
> > > > > "Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> > > > > > james g. keegan jr. <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote...
> > >
> > > > > > > that wasn;t always the case, of course. at one point,
> > > > > > > bobby c was so obsessed with keith cochran that
> > > > > > > he repeatedly posted that kieth was dead.
> > >
> > > > > > Who is Keith Cochran?
> > >
> > > > > one of the many guys you lied about, bobby
> > >
> > > > Anyone you don't agree with is a liar. However, as is typical of you,
> > > > James, you never post any evidence. Therefore, as usual, you are
> > > > full of shit.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately for you, Keegan *did* post evidence that you had claimed
> > > that Keith Cochran was dead several years ago.
> >
> >
> > i noticed that bobby posted several times, while ignoring this
> > particular issue.
>
> Produce the evidence, liar.
you already did, bobby.
and your frenzy was such that you never noticed it while others were
laughing at you.
pnyikos
> In article <f0294$4b3e7a0a$6211a844$...@ALLTEL.NET>,> > james g. keegan jr. <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:op.u5u25...@james-macbook.local...
> [...]
> > :> that wasn;t always the
> > > case, of course. at one point, bobby c was so obsessed with keith cochran
> > > that he repeatedly posted that kieth was dead.
>
> > Who is Keith Cochran?
>
> one of the many guys you lied about, bobby. interestingly, you
> repeatedly claimed keith was dead. you may have been experimenting with
> necrophelia at that time.
>
> btw, you might want to chat up the person posting as peter nyikos as you
> and the original nyikos seem to share the same fascination.
Fascination with parallels between reasons for considering homosexual
lifestyles to be perfectly normal and reasons for considering
necrophilia to be normal is what it is all about--and it is no more
and no less now than it was in 1992-1997; which stands to reason,
since I and "the original nyikos" are one and the same.
BTW, Chilton does feel that necrophilia is normal and harmless (even
though he personally would not indulge in it, feeling there is too big
a "yuck" factor for him) so I have some reason for that "fascination."
And how do you account for YOUR fascination with aspects of forced
sodomy of 14-year-olds? You repeatedly libeled me with the false
charge that I defended it, while ducking all questions about YOUR
attitude towards it.
Peter Nyikos
pnyikos
Only sexkitten really wanted to know, and now she knows.
Peter Nyikos