wrote:
>On Sun, 19 May 2013 14:38:24 -0400, MarkA <som...@somewhere.invalid>
>wrote in alt.atheism:
>
>>On Sun, 19 May 2013 11:28:58 -0500, Free Lunch wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 19 May 2013 09:08:36 -0700, linuxgal <
linu...@cleanposts.com>
>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>
>>>>Surfer wrote:
>>>>> Yes. Now that Manhatten has been flooded with sea water during a storm
>>>>> surge, what is the risk of that happening again and what is the risk
>>>>> of it being worse next time?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Manhattan used to be a swamp, it's constantly in danger of flooding with
>>>>or without a storm surge. There's a vast infrastructure of pumps under
>>>>the city.
>>>
>>> There is certainly landfill in areas of Manhattan (e.g. Battery Park and
>>> Battery Park City), but most of it is on rocks well above sea level. The
>>> problem is that Wall Street buildings are built down below sea level.
>>
>>When Galveston, TX was destroyed by a hurricane in 1900, they re-built the
>>city - after raising it 10 feet. The few buildings that were still
>>standing were lifted on jacks, and earth was filled in under them.
>>Manhattan is a bit larger, and heavier, but, as sea levels inevitably
>>rise, it might be a solution to consider.
>
>How do you jack up a 40-story tower with five basement levels?